Retrospective multicenter observational study of the interventional management of coronary disease in the very elderly: the NINETY.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this observational, multicenter study was to describe the outcome of very elderly patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data among nonagenarians undergoing PCI. METHODS: All consecutive patients 90 years of age or older undergoing PCI with stent implantation between April 2002 and June 2009 were included in the study. The primary endpoint was the long-term rate of net adverse cardiac events (NACE), that is, death, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization, and life-threatening or major bleedings. RESULTS: One hundred forty-six nonagenarians were divided in three groups according to clinical setting: 27 (group A) stable angina or silent ischemia, 85 (group B) unstable angina or non-ST elevation MI, and 34 (group C) with ST elevation MI (STEMI). At 30 days, the incidence of NACE was significantly lower in patients in Group A vs. B or C (0% vs. 17.3% vs. 31.2%, P = 0.006), and the frequency of definite stent thrombosis was higher in Group C vs. A or B (9.4% vs. 0% vs. 0%, P = 0.007), respectively. Up to a median follow-up of 24 months, NACE rate was 33.3% in group A, 49.3% in group B, and 50% in group C (P = 0.32). There were no significant differences between groups in the individual components of the primary endpoint. CONCLUSIONS: PCI in nonagenarians is safe and feasible with acceptable major bleeding rates. However, long-term results show high mortality rates particularly in the STEMI group.

Early angio-guided complete revascularization versus culprit vessel PCI followed by ischemia-guided staged PCI in STEMI patients with multivessel disease.

BACKGROUND: Optimal management of multivessel disease (MVD) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is still unclear. OBJECTIVES: To compare short- and long-term clinical outcomes of early-staged, angio-guided approach and delayed, ischemia-guided treatment of non-infarct-related arteries (IRAs). METHODS: Consecutive patients with STEMI and MVD treated with primary PCI in 6 tertiary care centers were retrospectively selected and analyzed. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were defined as the composite end-point of death, MI, and repeat revascularization. All the events were adjudicated according to the Academic Research Consortium (ARC) definitions. RESULTS: In the time period 2004-2008, 800 primary PCIs in STEMI patients with MVD were performed. Four hundred and seventeen were addressed to early-staged, angio-guided PCI of non-IRAs (CR group) and 383 to an incomplete revascularization (IncR group). During the hospital stay, no difference in terms of death and repeat revascularization was found between groups but the incidence of periprocedural MI/reinfarction and MACE was significantly higher in the CR group (13.9% vs. 3.1%, P = 0.01 and 14.1% vs. 9.1%, P = 0.017, respectively). At a mean follow-up of 642 ± 545 days, no difference in terms of death and MI was found between the CR and IncR group. The MACE-free survival was significantly higher in the IncR group (73.8% vs. 57%, log rank 0.05), mainly driven by the lower incidence of re-PCI. CONCLUSIONS: Early complete revascularization based only on angiographic findings in patients with STEMI and MVD is associated with an excess of periprocedural/re-MI and with a significantly higher incidence of MACE at follow-up.

Percutaneous coronary intervention in nonagenarian: a meta-analysis of observational studies.

BACKGROUND: Developed countries are facing a sustained increase in life expectancy. Along with all social and cultural implications of increase lifespan, very elderly patients are undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with increasing frequency. However, there is limited evidence to guide clinicians in evaluating pros and cons of PCI in this very frail patient population. We, thus, aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies reporting on PCI with stenting in nonagenarians. METHODS: Studies reporting on five or more nonagenarians undergoing PCI were systematically searched in PubMed (last updated on November 2011). Baseline and clinical characteristics, in-hospital and long-term outcomes were systematically appraised. End points of interest were in-hospital and long-term follow-up incidence of death and Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE; i.e. the composite of death from all causes, myocardial infarction or repeat revascularization). Events were pooled with a random-effect model, generating summary estimates of incidence rates [95% confidence intervals (CI)]. RESULTS: A total of 10 studies were included, reporting on a total of 575 nonagenarians undergoing PCI with stenting who represented 1.99% (1.34-2.5) of those undergoing revascularization in the cath lab in a mean period of 5 (3-7) years. Twenty-three percent (13-45) of patients presented with STEMI (ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction), 10% (7-12) with cardiogenic shock and in 78% (64-88) of cases a multivessel disease was diagnosed. Meta-analytic pooling of event rates showed an in-hospital death risk of 12.61% (9.71-15.50) with MACE in 16.41% (13.36-19.47). After a follow-up ranging from 6 to 29 months (median 12), the risk of long-term death was 31.00% (17.10-45.52), with MACE in 37.00% (19.56-55.95; all CI 95%). CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis, pooling the largest cohort ever of nonagenarians undergoing PCI with stents, confirms the feasibility of percutaneous coronary stenting even in this very frail patient subset, despite the expected severe event attrition during follow-up. Thus, nonagenarians with an acceptable risk profile, recent clinical instability and/or disabling symptoms should not be denied the possibility of percutaneous coronary revascularization.