RESUMO
Cognitive functioning in older age profoundly impacts quality of life and health. While most research on cognition in older age has focused on mean levels, intraindividual variability (IIV) around this may have risk factors and outcomes independent of the mean value. Investigating risk factors associated with IIV has typically involved deriving a summary statistic for each person from residual error around a fitted mean. However, this ignores uncertainty in the estimates, prohibits exploring associations with time-varying factors, and is biased by floor/ceiling effects. To address this, we propose a mixed-effects location scale beta-binomial model for estimating average probability and IIV in a word recall test in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. After adjusting for mean performance, an analysis of 9,873 individuals across 7 (mean = 3.4) waves (2002-2015) found IIV to be greater at older ages, with lower education, in females, with more difficulties in activities of daily living, in later birth cohorts, and when interviewers recorded issues potentially affecting test performance. Our study introduces a novel method for identifying groups with greater IIV in bounded discrete outcomes. Our findings have implications for daily functioning and care, and further work is needed to identify the impact for future health outcomes.
Assuntos
Atividades Cotidianas , Qualidade de Vida , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Envelhecimento/psicologia , Cognição , Estudos Longitudinais , Modelos Estatísticos , Fatores de Risco , MasculinoRESUMO
Alopecia areata is an autoimmune form of non-scarring hair loss. It is usually characterized by limited areas of hair loss. However, the disease may progress to complete scalp and body hair loss (alopecia totalis, alopecia universalis). In patients with alopecia areata hair loss significantly impacts the quality of life. Children and adolescents with alopecia areata often experience bullying, including physical aggression. The disease severity evaluation tools used in clinical practice are: the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score and the Alopecia Areata Scale (AAS). A SALT score equal to or greater than 20 constitutes a commonly accepted indication for systemic therapy in alopecia areata. When using the AAS, moderate to severe alopecia areata should be considered a medical indication for systemic treatment. Currently, the only two EMA-approved medications for alopecia areata are baricitinib (JAK 1/2 inhibitor) for adults and ritlecitinib (JAK 3/TEC inhibitor) for individuals aged 12 and older. Both are EMA-approved for patients with severe alopecia areata. Other systemic medications used off-label in alopecia areata include glucocorticosteroids, cyclosporine, methotrexate and azathioprine. Oral minoxidil is considered an adjuvant therapy with limited data confirming its possible efficacy. This consensus statement is to outline a systemic treatment algorithm for alopecia areata, indications for systemic treatment, available therapeutic options, their efficacy and safety, as well as the duration of the therapy.
Assuntos
Alopecia em Áreas , Inibidores de Janus Quinases , Adulto , Adolescente , Criança , Humanos , Alopecia em Áreas/tratamento farmacológico , Qualidade de Vida , Alopecia/tratamento farmacológico , Minoxidil/uso terapêutico , Azatioprina/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Janus Quinases/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: French guidelines recommend stopping biologic treatment of psoriasis between 3 and 24â¯weeks before conception in accordance with the relevant Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the real-life practice of dermatologists in the management of pregnant women with psoriasis previously treated with biologic agents. We wished to assess the level of practitioner adherence to the relevant SmPCs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a study in collaboration with GRPso and Resopso. A computerized questionnaire was completed by the practitioners. We performed descriptive statistics and studied the profile of the practitioners, their level of confidence with continuation of biological agents during pregnancy, and their reported practices on the use of biological agents in pregnancy. Statistical analyses were performed using XLSTAT. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 63 dermatologists (women: 71%; mean age 43.8â¯years) participated in this study, the majority of whom were hospital-based (87%). Recommendations were followed by 36.5% of practitioners, while 44% reported discontinuing biologic agents on diagnosis of pregnancy, and 20.5% reported using these agents during pregnancy. Among dermatologists with more than ten years of experience, 19% reported following the SmPC. Among dermatologists with a patient base >200 (patients treated with biologic agents for psoriasis), 19% reported following the SmPC compared to 54% of practitioners with less than 50 patients. The mean age of dermatologists following the SmPC was 41â¯years vs. 47â¯years for those not following the SmPC. DISCUSSION: The majority of practitioners do not follow recommendations on discontinuation of biologic agents before the planning of pregnancy by patients.
Assuntos
Complicações na Gravidez , Psoríase , Humanos , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Gravidez , Adulto , Complicações na Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Dermatologistas , França , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: While numerous surveys over the last decade have evaluated the burden of skin diseases, none have focused on the specific impact of disease-location on the hands and face. AIM: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the burden of 8 skin diseases on the multidimensional aspects of subjects' daily lives in respect to their location on visible body areas (face or hands) versus non-visible areas. METHODS: This was a population-based study in a representative sample of the Canadian, Chinese, Italian, Spanish, German and French populations, aged over 18â¯years using the proportional quota sampling method. All participants were asked (i) to complete a specific questionnaire including socio-demographic characteristics, (ii) to declare if they had a skin disease. All respondents with a skin disease were asked (iii) to specify the respective disease locations (hands, face, body) and (iv) to complete the DLQI questionnaire. Respondents with 8 selected skin diseases were asked (v) to complete a questionnaire evaluating the impact of the skin disease on their daily life, including their professional activity, social relations, emotional and intimate life, leisure, sports activities and perceived stigma. RESULTS: A total of 13,138 adult participants responded to the questionnaire, of whom 26.2â¯% (nâ¯=â¯3,450) had skin diseases, and 23.4â¯% (nâ¯=â¯3,072) reported having one of the 8 selected skin diseases. Fifty-three percent were women and the mean age was 39.6⯱â¯15.5â¯years. The QoL was mostly impaired when the visible localization was solely on the hands as compared with the face (38â¯% had a DLQIâ¯>â¯10 versus 22â¯% respectively). More subjects with a visible localization on the hands reported felt-stigma, having difficulty falling asleep and felt that their sex life had been affected. CONCLUSION: Special attention should be given to patients with skin disease on the hands and face as they are at higher risk of social exclusion and lower quality of life.
Assuntos
Qualidade de Vida , Dermatopatias , Adulto , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Masculino , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Canadá , Dermatopatias/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estigma SocialRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The nature of the COVID-19 pandemic led to concerns among patients and physicians about the potential impact of immunosuppressive treatments for chronic diseases such as psoriasis on the risk of severe COVID-19. OBJECTIVES: To describe treatment modifications and determine the incidence of COVID-19 infection among psoriasis patients during the first wave of the pandemic, and identify the factors associated with these events. METHODS: Data from PSOBIOTEQ cohort relating to the first COVID-19 wave in France (March to June, 2020), as well as a patient-centred COVID-19 questionnaire, were used to evaluate the impact of lockdown on changes (discontinuations, delays or reductions) in systemic therapies, and to determine the incidence of COVID-19 cases among these patients. Logistic regression models were used to assess associated factors. RESULTS: Among the 1751 respondents (89.3%), 282 patients (16.9%) changed their systemic treatment for psoriasis, with 46.0% of these changes being initiated by the patients themselves. Patients were more likely to experience psoriasis flare-ups during the first wave if they changed their treatment during this period (58.7% vs 14.4%; Pâ¯<â¯0.0001). Changes to systemic therapies were less frequent among patients with cardiovascular diseases (Pâ¯<â¯0.001), and those agedâ¯≥â¯65â¯years (Pâ¯=â¯0.02). Overall, 45 patients (2.9%) reported having COVID-19, and eight (17.8%) required hospitalization. Risk factors for COVID-19 infection were close contact with a positive case (Pâ¯<â¯0.001) and living in a region with a high incidence of COVID-19 (Pâ¯<â¯0.001). Factors associated with a lower risk of COVID-19 were avoiding seeing a physician (Pâ¯=â¯0.002), systematically wearing a mask during outings (Pâ¯=â¯0.011) and being a current smoker (Pâ¯=â¯0.046). CONCLUSIONS: Discontinuation of systemic psoriasis treatments during the first COVID-19 wave (16.9%) - mainly decided by patients themselves (46.0%) - was associated with a higher incidence of disease flares (58.7% vs 14.4%). This observation and factors associated with a higher risk of COVID-19 highlight the need to maintain and adapt patient-physician communication during health crises according to patient profiles, with the aim of avoiding unnecessary treatment discontinuations and ensuring that patients are informed about the risk of infection and the importance of complying with hygiene rules.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Psoríase , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Psoríase/epidemiologia , Imunossupressores/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The assessment of the prevalence of diseases is of primary importance in planning health policies. No complete data on the prevalence of skin diseases across European countries are available. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of the most frequent skin conditions or diseases in 27 European countries (24 EU countries, plus Norway, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom). METHODS: We conducted a population-based study on representative and extrapolable samples of the general population aged 18 years or more in each of the 27 countries surveyed. Participants were selected using stratified, proportional sampling with a replacement design. Data were collected using a web-based online survey. All participants were asked to fill in a questionnaire with sociodemographic data and to declare if they have had one or more skin conditions or diseases during the previous 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 44 689 participants from 27 countries responded to the questionnaire, 21 887 (48.98%) men and 22 802 (51.02%) women. The proportion of participants who reported having suffered from at least one dermatological condition or disease during the previous 12 months was 43.35% (95% CI: 42.89%, 43.81%). The projection in the total population of the 27 countries included in the study resulted in 185 103 774 individuals affected by at least one dermatological condition or disease. Accordingly, we can estimate that more than 94 million Europeans complain of uncomfortable skin sensations like itch, burning, or dryness. The most frequent conditions were fungal skin infections (8.9%), acne (5.4%), and atopic dermatitis or eczema (5.5%). Alopecia, acne, eczema, and rosacea were more common in women, whereas men were more likely to suffer from psoriasis and sexually transmitted infections. CONCLUSION: Skin diseases are an important public health concern. Their high prevalence has to be taken into account in planning access to dermatological care to address patient needs.
Assuntos
Acne Vulgar , Eczema , Dermatopatias , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalência , Dermatopatias/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Acral pustular disease within the pustular psoriasis/psoriasis-like spectrum mainly includes palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) and acrodermatitis continua of Hallopeau (ACH). Scarce data argue for a distinction between these two entities, but no study has compared the clinical and epidemiologic characteristics of ACH and PPP. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to perform a comparative description of the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of PPP and ACH in a multicentre retrospective cohort. METHODS: In this multicentre national retrospective cohort study, we compared the epidemiological characteristics, comorbidities and psoriasis characteristics of patients with PPP and ACH. RESULTS: A total of 234 patients were included: 203 (87%) with PPP, 18 (8%) with ACH and 13 (6%) with both, according to 2017 ERASPEN criteria. As compared with ACH, PPP was associated with female sex, smoking activity and higher median BMI (P = 0.01, P = 0.02 and P = 0.05 respectively). A family background of psoriasis was more frequent in PPP than ACH. Age of onset of palmoplantar disease was similar between PPP and ACH patients, median age 44 and 48 years respectively. Peripheral joint inflammatory involvement was the only rheumatic disease associated with ACH. The association with another psoriasis type was similar in PPP and ACH (57.6% and 61.1% respectively). CONCLUSION: Our study confirms in a large PPP cohort the predominance of females and a high prevalence of smoking and elevated body mass index but also shows an association of these features in PPP as compared with ACH. In addition, it highlights peripheral arthritis as the only arthritis endotype associated with ACH. Increased knowledge of the immunogenetic backgrounds underlying these two entities is warranted to better stratify pustular psoriasis or psoriasis-like entities for precision medicine.
Assuntos
Acrodermatite , Artrite , Doenças da Imunodeficiência Primária , Psoríase , Dermatopatias Vesiculobolhosas , Acrodermatite/epidemiologia , Adulto , Demografia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Psoríase/epidemiologia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Biologics are the cornerstone of treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and switches between biologics are frequently needed to maintain clinical improvement over time. OBJECTIVES: The main purpose of this study was to describe precisely switches between biologics and how their pattern changed over time with the recent availability of new biologic agents. METHODS: We included patients receiving a first biologic agent in the Psobioteq multicenter cohort of adults with moderate-to-severe psoriasis receiving systemic treatment. We described switches between biologics with chronograms, Sankey and Sunburst diagrams, assessed cumulative incidence of first switch by competing risks survival analysis and reasons for switching. We assessed the factors associated with the type of switch (intra-class - i.e. within the same therapeutic class - vs. inter-class) in patients switching from a TNF-alpha inhibitor using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 2153 patients was included. The cumulative incidence of switches from first biologic was 34% at 3 years. Adalimumab and ustekinumab were the most prescribed biologic agents as first and second lines of treatment. The main reason for switching was loss of efficacy (72%), followed by adverse events (11%). Patients receiving a TNF-alpha inhibitor before 2016 mostly switched to ustekinumab, whereas those switching in 2016 or after mostly switched to an IL-17 inhibitor. Patients switching from a first-line TNF-alpha inhibitor before 2016 were more likely to switch to another TNF-alpha inhibitor compared with patients switching since 2018. Patients switching from etanercept were more likely to receive another TNF-alpha inhibitor rather than another therapeutic class of bDMARD compared with patients switching from adalimumab. CONCLUSION: This study described the switching patterns of biologic treatments and showed how they changed over time, due to the availability of the new biologic agents primarily IL-17 inhibitors.
Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos , Psoríase , Adalimumab/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Etanercepte/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Interleucina-17 , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa , Ustekinumab/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Within-individual variability of repeatedly measured exposures might predict later outcomes (e.g., blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV) is an independent cardiovascular risk factor above and beyond mean BP). Because 2-stage methods, known to introduce bias, are typically used to investigate such associations, we introduce a joint modeling approach, examining associations of mean BP and BPV across childhood with left ventricular mass (indexed to height; LVMI) in early adulthood with data (collected 1990-2011) from the UK Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children cohort. Using multilevel models, we allowed BPV to vary between individuals (a "random effect") as well as to depend on covariates (allowing for heteroskedasticity). We further distinguished within-clinic variability ("measurement error") from visit-to-visit BPV. BPV was predicted to be greater at older ages, at higher body weights, and in female participants and was positively correlated with mean BP. BPV had a weak positive association with LVMI (10% increase in within-individual BP variance was predicted to increase LVMI by 0.21%, 95% credible interval: -0.23, 0.69), but this association became negative (-0.78%, 95% credible interval: -2.54, 0.22) once the effect of mean BP on LVMI was adjusted for. This joint modeling approach offers a flexible method of relating repeatedly measured exposures to later outcomes.
Assuntos
Pressão Sanguínea/fisiologia , Ventrículos do Coração/fisiopatologia , Hipertensão/fisiopatologia , Função Ventricular Esquerda/fisiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Monitorização Ambulatorial da Pressão Arterial , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Seguimentos , Ventrículos do Coração/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Sístole , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: European guidelines propose a 0·5 mg kg-1 per day dose of oral prednisone as initial treatment for bullous pemphigoid (BP). We assessed the safety and efficacy of this regimen depending on BP extent and general condition of the patients. METHODS: In a prospective international study, we consecutively included all patients diagnosed with BP. Patients received a 0·5 mg kg-1 per day dose of prednisone, which was then gradually tapered 15 days after disease control, with the aim of stopping prednisone or maintaining minimal treatment (0·1 mg kg-1 per day) within 6 months after the start of treatment. The two coprimary endpoints were control of disease activity at day 21 and 1-year overall survival. Disease severity was assessed according to the Bullous Pemphigoid Disease Area Index (BPDAI) score. RESULTS: In total, 198 patients were included between 2015 and 2017. The final analysis comprised 190 patients with a mean age of 80·9 (SD 9·1) years. Control of disease activity was achieved at day 21 in 119 patients [62·6%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 55·3-69.5]; 18 of 24 patients (75%, 95% CI 53·3-90·2), 75 of 110 patients (68·8%, 95% CI 59·2-77·3) and 26 of 56 patients (46.4%, 95% CI 33·0-60·3) had mild, moderate and severe BP, respectively (P = 0·0218). A total of 30 patients died during the study. The overall Kaplan-Meier 1-year survival was 82·6% (95% CI 76·3-87·4) corresponding to 90·9%, 83·0% and 80·0% rates in patients with mild, moderate and severe BP, respectively (P = 0·5). Thresholds of 49 points for BPDAI score and 70 points for Karnofsky score yielded maximal Youden index values with respect to disease control at day 21 and 1-year survival, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A 0·5 mg kg-1 per day dose of prednisone is a valuable therapeutic option in patients with mild or moderate BP whose general condition allows them to be autonomous.
Assuntos
Penfigoide Bolhoso , Administração Oral , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Humanos , Penfigoide Bolhoso/diagnóstico , Prednisona/uso terapêutico , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In 2018 in France, overall mean health-related out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditures were 214.00/year/patient. AIM: To evaluate OOP expenditures for psoriasis patients in France. METHODOLOGY: Observational, cross-sectional, non-comparative, multicentre study in 3000 patients with clinically confirmed psoriasis who responded to a specific digital questionnaire collecting demographic and socio-economic characteristics, assessing the 3 domains (severity, psychosocial impact and past history and interventions) of the patient's Simplified Psoriasis Index (sa-SPI) and expenditures to manage psoriasis, including OOP. Multivariate linear regression was conducted to search for factors associated with higher OOP. RESULTS: In total, 2681 patients completed the questionnaire and, of those, 2562 provided clinically validated data. Overall, 60% were women; the mean age was 49.4 ± 14.8 years. 30% of the patients declared that they suffered from psoriatic arthritis. The final mean sa-SPI core was 10.86 ± 9.70. Of these 2562 patients, 243 (9.5%) had severe, 442 (17.3%) moderate and 1877 (73.3%) mild psoriasis. In addition, 932 (36.4%) patients reported facial involvement, 724 (28.25%) genital impairment and 1124 (43.8%) lesions on the limbs. Mean OOP expenditures to manage psoriasis per patient were 531.00, 439.74 ± 939.85 for patients with mild, 791.06 ± 1367.67 with moderate and 1077.64 ± 1680.14 for patients with severe psoriasis. For patients with psoriasis in the genital area, the median amount of expenditures (251.17; CI95% [138.35;363.99]) was significantly higher than that for the face (183.85; CI95% [78.76;288.94]) or limbs (199.96; CI95% [93.77;306.15); (P < 0.001). More than 90% of the patients had OOP expenditures for over-the-counter products (97.5%) and alternative care (92.0%), especially for emollients and/or hydrating products. CONCLUSION: In France, in 2019, OOP expenditures to manage psoriasis were on average more than twice as high as the overall mean health-related OOP expenditures estimated by the French Health Agency in 2018. These results should lead health authorities to review certain standards of healthcare reimbursement.
Assuntos
Gastos em Saúde , Psoríase , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Atenção à Saúde , Feminino , França , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The utility of the Simplified Psoriasis Index (SPI), a recently developed multidomain tool for assessing psoriasis, was investigated in a study assessing response to secukinumab. METHODS: In an open-label, multicentre study involving 17 French centres, patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis received secukinumab 300 mg subcutaneously once weekly from baseline to W4, then every 4 weeks until W48. Dermatologist-scored SPI psoriasis severity (proSPI-s) was compared with Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI). Patient self-assessed severity (saSPI-s) and psychosocial impact (SPI-p) were compared with PASI and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), respectively. RESULTS: We included 120 patients (69.2% male; mean age 45.9 years; mean duration of psoriasis 21.6 years). Mean baseline scores were as follows: proSPI-s 24.9, saSPI-s 23.5, PASI 23.1, SPI-p 8.2 and DLQI 13.6. Severity scores achieved by 16 weeks (proSPI-s 2.3, saSPI-s 2.2 and PASI 2.2) were maintained to W52. Reductions in mean psychosocial impact scores were maintained to W52 (SPI-p and DLQI, respectively, 2.1 and 1.5 at W16; 1.5 and 1.9 at W52). CONCLUSIONS: Decrease of PASI scores in response to secukinumab was closely correlated with proSPI-s, supporting the latter's suitability for assessing response to therapy. Although the correlation between PASI and saSPI-s was slightly weaker, patients were able to complete a valid assessment of their psoriasis independently, and thus potentially remotely. With the added benefit of psychosocial impact assessment (SPI-p), SPI provides a valid tool enabling patients to assess their own psoriasis, remotely if necessary.
Assuntos
Psoríase , Qualidade de Vida , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) and psoriasis (Pso) are highly prevalent chronic inflammatory skin diseases. They share similarities regarding severity and impact on quality of life but display differences regarding risk factors, comorbidities, and pathogenesis. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to assess the prevalence of AD and Pso among the French population, along with associated comorbidities, and to compare these data with those of the age- and gender-adjusted French population with neither AD nor Pso. METHODS: The survey was conducted by a polling institute between September 1 and November 30, 2016, with proportional quota sampling being applied to render the study population representative of the French population. In all, 20 012 individuals were selected from among 900,000 internet users aged≥15years. RESULTS: Overall, 20,012 adults (48.8% men; 51.2% women) completed a digital questionnaire. The prevalence of AD was 4.65% [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.36%-4.94%] and that of Pso was 4.42% [95% CI: 4.14%-4.71%]. More AD patients presented≥1 comorbidity compared to subjects without AD (57.04% vs. 49.2%, P<0.0001) and more Pso patients presented≥1 comorbidity compared to subjects without Pso (60.68% vs. 49.05%, P<0.0001). After adjustment for gender and age, hypertension and dyslipidemia, a greater prevalence of osteoarticular, respiratory and psychiatric diseases was noted in both AD and Pso patients, whereas increased prevalence of obesity was seen only in Pso patients. The prevalence of components of metabolic syndrome was higher among Pso than AD patients. CONCLUSION: Further studies are required to consolidate these findings, to better characterize the entire spectrum of AD and Pso comorbidities, and to better identify determinants and risk factors, along with targeted therapies.
Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica , Psoríase , Adulto , Comorbidade , Dermatite Atópica/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalência , Psoríase/epidemiologia , Qualidade de VidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Corticosteroids (CS) with or without adjuvant immunosuppressant agents are standard treatment for pemphigus vulgaris (PV). The efficacy of adjuvant therapies in minimizing steroid-related adverse events (AEs) is unproven. OBJECTIVES: To utilize data collected in a French investigator-initiated, phase III, open-label, randomized controlled trial to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of rituximab and seek approval for its use in PV. METHODS: This was an independently conducted post hoc analysis of the moderate-to-severe PV subset enrolled in the Ritux 3 study. Patients were randomized to rituximab plus 0·5 or 1·0 mg kg-1 per day prednisone tapered over 3 or 6 months, or 1·0 or 1·5 mg kg-1 per day prednisone alone tapered over 12 or 18 months, respectively (according to disease severity). The primary end point was complete remission at month 24 without CS (CRoff) for ≥ 2 months, and 24-month efficacy and safety results were also reported. RESULTS: At month 24, 34 of 38 patients (90%) on rituximab plus prednisone achieved CRoff ≥ 2 months vs. 10 of 36 patients (28%) on prednisone alone. Median total cumulative prednisone dose was 5800 mg in the rituximab plus prednisone arm vs. 20 520 mg for prednisone alone. Eight of 36 patients (22%) who received prednisone alone withdrew from treatment owing to AEs; one rituximab-plus-prednisone patient withdrew due to pregnancy. Overall, 24 of 36 patients (67%) on prednisone alone experienced a grade 3/4 CS-related AE vs. 13 of 38 patients (34%) on rituximab plus prednisone. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with moderate-to-severe PV, rituximab plus short-term prednisone was more effective than prednisone alone. Patients treated with rituximab had less CS exposure and were less likely to experience severe or life-threatening CS-related AEs. What's already known about this topic? Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is the most common type of pemphigus. Corticosteroids, a standard first-line treatment for PV, have significant side-effects. Although their effects are unproven, adjuvant corticosteroid-sparing agents are routinely used to minimize steroid exposure and corticosteroid-related side-effects. There is evidence that the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab is effective in the treatment of patients with severe recalcitrant pemphigus and in patients with newly diagnosed pemphigus. What does this study add? This study provides a more detailed analysis of patients with PV enrolled in an investigator-initiated trial. Rituximab plus prednisone had a steroid-sparing effect and more patients achieved complete remission off prednisone. Fewer patients experienced grade 3 or grade 4 steroid-related adverse events than those on prednisone alone. This collaboration between academia and industry, utilizing independent post hoc analyses, led to regulatory authority approvals of rituximab in moderate-to-severe PV.
Assuntos
Pênfigo , Humanos , Fatores Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Pênfigo/tratamento farmacológico , Prednisona , Rituximab/efeitos adversos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Numerous inclusion and exclusion criteria are involved in phase III moderate to severe psoriasis trials investigating the safety and efficacy of biologics. This questions the generalization of results. METHODS: In this cohort study, we applied inclusion/exclusion criteria for phase III trials from original protocols (adalimumab - REVEAL, ustekinumab - PHOENIX, brodalumab - AMAGINE, secukinumab FIXTURE) to all patients enrolled in the PsoBioTeq prospective registry who received a biological agent for the first time between July 2012 and November 2017. We then compared the efficacy, drug survival and occurrence of adverse events between patients who satisfied/did not satisfy the eligibility criteria for these phase III trials. RESULTS: A total of 1267 patients were enrolled, of whom 993 (78.4%) were not eligible for at least one RCT (randomized controlled trial) and 251 (19.1%) did not meet the PASI/PGA severity requirements. Apart from disease severity, the most frequent criteria resulting in exclusion were as follows: non-plaque psoriasis (12.6%), significant cardiac disease (8.4%), significant liver disease (7.3%), elevated liver enzymes (4.9-9.6%) and personal history of diabetes (9.2%). There was no difference in drug survival between the two groups. The incidence ratio of adverse events was significantly lower in eligible versus non-eligible patients [0.78 (95% CI 0.62-0.97) (P = 0.03)]. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients treated with biologics in the PsoBioTeq real-life registry would not have been eligible for phase III moderate to severe psoriasis trials. Patients not eligible for psoriasis phase III clinical trials have a higher incidence of adverse events.
Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapêutico , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Sistema de Registros , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Psoríase/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) and acrodermatitis continua of Hallopeau (ACH) are rare variants of psoriasis. Knowledge of the efficacy of biologics is scarce. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the real-life efficacy of tumour necrosis factor blockers and ustekinumab in PPP and in ACH. METHODS: A multicentre retrospective descriptive study was conducted in 19 dermatology departments, including all patients with PPP or ACH seen from 2014 to 2016 who received one of the studied biologics. The data were collected by a standardized document. Factors associated with complete clearance (CC) were analysed by multivariate analysis, estimating odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Among 92 patients included, 50 received adalimumab, 44 ustekinumab, 36 etanercept and 31 infliximab. Improvement and CC were observed in 83.9% and 20.0% patients receiving infliximab, 75.0% and 38.6% ustekinumab, 57.1% and 20.0% etanercept and 60.4% and 29.2% adalimumab. We found no significant difference in CC rates or duration of treatment among the biological treatments (P = 0.18 and P = 0.10, respectively). On multivariate analysis, CC with etanercept was associated with the ACH form and not smoking [OR = 9.5 (95% CI 1.1-82.7), P = 0.04 and 0.1 (0.01-0.9), P = 0.04]; with ustekinumab, male sex and absence of obesity [6.0 (1.3-28.6), P = 0.02 and 4.7 (1.0-22.7), P = 0.05]; with adalimumab, the ACH form [11.9 (2.7-52.3), P = 0.001]; and with infliximab, obesity [5.6 (1.1-29.4), P = 0.04]. CONCLUSIONS: We found no difference in efficacy between TNF blockers and ustekinumab and among the three different TNF blockers in real life for PPP or ACH, which reveals the heterogeneity of clinical response to biologics in pustular psoriasis as compared with plaque psoriasis.
Assuntos
Acrodermatite , Psoríase , Acrodermatite/tratamento farmacológico , Adalimumab , Etanercepte , Humanos , Infliximab , Masculino , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inibidores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral , UstekinumabRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The incidence of skin cancers has been increasing steadily over the last decades. Although there have been significant breakthroughs in the management of skin cancers with the introduction of novel diagnostic tools and innovative therapies, skin cancer mortality, morbidity and costs heavily burden the society. OBJECTIVE: Members of the European Association of Dermato-Oncology, European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, International Dermoscopy Society, European Dermatology Forum, European Board of Dermatovenereology of the European Union of Medical Specialists and EORTC Cutaneous Lymphoma Task Force have joined this effort to emphasize the fundamental role that the specialist in Dermatology-Venereology has in the diagnosis and management of different types of skin cancer. We review the role of dermatologists in the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with melanoma, non-melanoma skin cancers and cutaneous lymphomas, and discuss approaches to optimize their involvement in effectively addressing the current needs and priorities of dermato-oncology. DISCUSSION: Dermatologists play a crucial role in virtually all aspects of skin cancer management including the implementation of primary and secondary prevention, the formation of standardized pathways of care for patients, the establishment of specialized skin cancer treatment centres, the coordination of an efficient multidisciplinary team and the setting up of specific follow-up plans for patients. CONCLUSION: Skin cancers represent an important health issue for modern societies. The role of dermatologists is central to improving patient care and outcomes. In view of the emerging diagnostic methods and treatments for early and advanced skin cancer, and considering the increasingly diverse skills, knowledge and expertise needed for managing this heterogeneous group of diseases, dermato-oncology should be considered as a specific subspecialty of Dermatology-Venereology.
Assuntos
Dermatologia , Melanoma , Dermatopatias , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Venereologia , Dermatologistas , Humanos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/terapiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Living with disfiguring disorders can impair the emotional well-being and relationships of patients as well as their social and professional life. Since 2010, courses in medical cosmetic correction for disfiguring diseases have been conducted at the dermatology department of the Timone University Hospital in Marseille and they form part of an educational program. The aim of this study was to assess the satisfaction of patients taking part in this program. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 55 patients taking part in make-up sessions from January 2010 to December 2014 and subsequently completing a questionnaire. RESULTS: The median patient age was 46 years with most being women (n=49, 89 %). They presented pigmentary disorders (54.5 %), inflammatory diseases (27.3 %) and scars (18.2 %). 75 % of patients stated that they had improved their knowledge and 82 % remarked that the technique was personalized to their needs. The technique was considered as easy by 62 % and reproducible by 87 % of patients. 55 % of patients considered that cosmetic camouflage improved their quality of life and 56 % stated that it helped them accept the gaze of others. CONCLUSION: In our study skin camouflage appears easy to use and meets patient expectations.
Assuntos
Cosmecêuticos/uso terapêutico , Satisfação do Paciente , Dermatopatias/reabilitação , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos da Pigmentação/reabilitação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Genital psoriasis is often under-recognized. OBJECTIVES: To assess the instantaneous prevalence of genital psoriasis and describe its clinical features, association with a particular subtype of psoriasis and its impact on general and sexual quality of life (QoL). METHODS: GENIPSO is a prospective study conducted by private and hospital-based dermatologists. This study featured the consecutive inclusion of patients consulting for extragenital psoriasis. The clinical features of psoriasis and genital psoriasis were recorded and QoL and sexual health questionnaires were distributed to patients. RESULTS: Overall, 335 of 776 patients (43·2%) included in the study had genital involvement. All were aware that they had genital lesions but only 135 patients (40%) declared that they had been previously examined. Genital lesions were associated with male sex, severity of psoriasis, age of onset > 20 years, inverse psoriasis and involvement of scalp, nail and external auditory canal, but were not associated with obesity, psoriatic arthritis and active sex life. Itching was the main symptom. Genital psoriasis was associated with impairment of QoL and sexual health according to the Dermatology Life Quality Index and the Female Sexual Function Index. CONCLUSIONS: Genital psoriasis has a high prevalence in patients consulting for extragenital psoriasis, which affects QoL, and should be taken into account by dermatologists in order to optimize global care.
Assuntos
Doenças dos Genitais Femininos/epidemiologia , Doenças dos Genitais Masculinos/epidemiologia , Psoríase/epidemiologia , Qualidade de Vida , Saúde Sexual , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Doenças dos Genitais Femininos/complicações , Doenças dos Genitais Femininos/diagnóstico , Doenças dos Genitais Femininos/psicologia , Doenças dos Genitais Masculinos/complicações , Doenças dos Genitais Masculinos/diagnóstico , Doenças dos Genitais Masculinos/psicologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Psoríase/complicações , Psoríase/diagnóstico , Psoríase/psicologia , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Inquéritos e Questionários/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The public perception of dermatologists, highly relevant for implementing strategies to improve dermatological care, has been scarcely investigated in France, in regard to the background where the number of active dermatologists is continuously decreasing. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to investigate the French public's perception of dermatologists, as well as the physician-patient relationship in dermatology area. METHODS: A sample of 5000 inhabitants (aged ≥15-80 years) of Metropolitan France, seeking medical advice for a skin condition, were invited in July 2018 to fill in a digital structured questionnaire. RESULTS: The sample's gender ratio and geographical distribution proved representative of the French general population. Compared to 33.2% of respondents having consulted a general practitioner (GP), 20.6% had consulted a dermatologist over the past 12 months, the main reasons being a chronic skin condition (37%), surgical intervention (18%) and naevi check-up (15%). When confronted with acute skin problems, survey participants stated their GP was the first healthcare reference (54% of cases). This may be explained by two distinct phenomena: the declining demography of dermatologists and specific peculiarities of the French healthcare system. Contrarily, the dermatologist was the first care provider for chronic skin problems (47% of cases). On answering the question whether they were satisfied with their last dermatological consultation, 76% declared to be very satisfied/satisfied, vs. 24% dissatisfied/very dissatisfied. Some 78% were given a prescription at consultation end, considered efficacious by 91% and well tolerated by 98%. CONCLUSION: Our study findings underline the central role of dermatologists in skin care as valued and trusted care providers in France. Further educational and political strategies appear warranted to improve patient referral to dermatologists and decrease waiting times, thereby improving patients' well-being and satisfaction, as well as care quality provided.