The Effects of Momordica charantia on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Alzheimer's Disease.

T2DM is a complex metabolic disorder characterized by hyperglycemia and glucose intolerance. It is recognized as one of the most common metabolic disorders and its prevalence continues to raise major concerns in healthcare globally. Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a gradual neurodegenerative brain disorder characterized by the chronic loss of cognitive and behavioral function. Recent research suggests a link between the two diseases. Considering the shared characteristics of both diseases, common therapeutic and preventive agents are effective. Certain bioactive compounds such as polyphenols, vitamins, and minerals found in vegetables and fruits can have antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects that allow for preventative or potential treatment options for T2DM and AD. Recently, it has been estimated that up to one-third of patients with diabetes use some form of complementary and alternative medicine. Increasing evidence from cell or animal models suggests that bioactive compounds may have a direct effect on reducing hyperglycemia, amplifying insulin secretion, and blocking the formation of amyloid plaques. One plant that has received substantial recognition for its numerous bioactive properties is Momordica charantia (M. charantia), otherwise known as bitter melon, bitter gourd, karela, and balsam pear. M. charantia is utilized for its glucose-lowering effects and is often used as a treatment for diabetes and related metabolic conditions amongst the indigenous populations of Asia, South America, India, and East Africa. Several pre-clinical studies have documented the beneficial effects of M. charantia through various postulated mechanisms. Throughout this review, the underlying molecular mechanisms of the bioactive components of M. charantia will be highlighted. More studies will be necessary to establish the clinical efficacy of the bioactive compounds within M. charantia to effectively determine its pertinence in the treatment of metabolic disorders and neurodegenerative diseases, such as T2DM and AD.

The Importance of Sleep in Overcoming Childhood Obesity and Reshaping Epigenetics.

The development of childhood obesity is a complex process influenced by a combination of genetic predisposition and environmental factors, such as sleep, diet, physical activity, and socioeconomic status. Long-term solutions for decreasing the risk of childhood obesity remain elusive, despite significant advancements in promoting health and well-being in school and at home. Challenges persist in areas such as adherence to interventions, addressing underlying social determinants, and individual differences in response to treatment. Over the last decade, there has been significant progress in epigenetics, along with increased curiosity in gaining insights into how sleep and lifestyle decisions impact an individual's health. Epigenetic modifications affect the expression of genes without causing changes to the fundamental DNA sequence. In recent years, numerous research studies have explored the correlation between sleep and the epigenome, giving a better understanding of DNA methylation, histone modification, and non-coding RNAs. Although significant findings have been made about the influence of sleep on epigenetics, a notable gap exists in the literature concerning sleep-related genes specifically associated with childhood obesity. Consequently, it is crucial to delve deeper into this area to enhance our understanding. Therefore, this review primarily focuses on the connection between sleep patterns and epigenetic modifications in genes related to childhood obesity. Exploring the interplay between sleep, epigenetics, and childhood obesity can potentially contribute to improved overall health outcomes. This comprehensive review encompasses studies focusing on sleep-related genes linked to obesity.

Oral bisacodyl is effective and well-tolerated in patients with chronic constipation.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Although stimulant laxatives have been used for many years to treat patients with constipation, their clinical value has been questioned, and there have been few high-quality trials to assess their efficacy. We tested the efficacy and safety of 4 weeks of treatment with oral bisacodyl tablets in patients with chronic constipation, defined by Rome III criteria. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was conducted in 27 centers in the United Kingdom. After a 2-week baseline period without study medication, patients were randomly assigned, in a 2:1 ratio, to groups that were given 10 mg bisacodyl (n = 247) or placebo (n = 121), once daily, for 4 weeks. Patients used an electronic diary each day to record information relating to their constipation. RESULTS: The mean (± standard error of the mean [SEM]) number of complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBMs) per week during the treatment period increased from 1.1 ± 0.1 in both groups to 5.2 ± 0.3 in the bisacodyl group and 1.9 ± 0.3 in the placebo group (P < .0001). All secondary end points (number of complete spontaneous bowel movements for each single week, number of spontaneous bowel movement (SBMs), and constipation-associated symptoms) differed significantly between groups, demonstrating efficacy for bisacodyl (P < .0001). Compared with baseline, there was a statistically significant improvement in the overall Patient Assessment of Constipation quality of life (PAC-QOL) score and all subscales (satisfaction, physical discomfort, psychosocial discomfort, worries and concerns) in the bisacodyl-treated patients, compared with those that received placebo (P ≤ .0070). Treatment with bisacodyl was well-tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Oral bisacodyl is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for patients with chronic constipation. It improves bowel function, constipation-related symptoms, and disease-related QOL.

Multicenter, 4-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of sodium picosulfate in patients with chronic constipation.

OBJECTIVES: Although it has been used as a laxative for many years, high-quality trials assessing the efficacy of the laxative sodium picosulfate (SPS) are lacking. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of 4-week treatment with SPS in patients with functional constipation as defined by the Rome III diagnostic criteria. METHODS: This study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in 45 general practices in Germany. A total of 468 patients with chronic constipation presenting to their general practitioner and fulfilling the Rome III diagnostic criteria were screened. After a 2-week baseline period, 367 patients were randomized to either SPS drops or matching placebo in a 2:1 ratio for 4 weeks. Dose titration was permitted throughout treatment. Patients without a bowel movement for more than 72 h were allowed to use a "rescue" bisacodyl suppository. The primary end point was the mean number of complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBMs) per week. A spontaneous bowel movement (SBM) was defined as a stool not induced by rescue medication, whereas a CSBM was defined as an SBM associated with a sensation of complete evacuation. RESULTS: The mean number (+/-s.e.) of CSBMs per week increased from 0.9+/-0.1 to 3.4+/-0.2 in the SPS group and from 1.1+/-0.1 to 1.7+/-0.1 in the placebo group (P<0.0001). The percentage of patients reaching an increase of > or =1 in the mean number of CSBMs per week compared to baseline was 65.5% vs. 32.3%, respectively (P<0.0001). The percentage of patients reaching a mean number of at least three CSBMs per week was 51.1% in the SPS group and 18.0% in the placebo group (P<0.0001). After 24 h, approximately 69% of patients in the SPS group and 53% in the placebo group had their first SBM. The SPS dose was titrated down during the study by nearly 50% of patients. Assessment of quality of life (QoL) by the constipation-related Patient Assessment of Constipation (PAC)-QoL questionnaire showed significant improvement in SPS-treated patients compared to the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of chronic constipation with SPS improves bowel function, symptoms, and QoL and is well tolerated. The dose can be adjusted individually while maintaining benefit.

Nicoboxil/nonivamide cream effectively and safely reduces acute nonspecific low back pain - a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Low back pain affects many patients and has a high socioeconomic impact. Topical capsaicinoids have been used for decades to treat musculoskeletal pain. This study investigated the effects of the fixed dose combination (FDC) of nonivamide (a capsaicinoid) and nicoboxil (a nicotinic acid ester) cream in the treatment of acute nonspecific low back pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This phase III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational, multi-center trial investigated efficacy, safety, and tolerability of topical nicoboxil 1.08%/nonivamide 0.17% (Finalgon® cream) in treatment of acute nonspecific low back pain with the endpoints: pain intensity (PI) difference between pre-dose baseline and 8 hours after first application and the end of treatment, mobility score, and efficacy score. RESULTS: Patients (n=138), 21-65 years of age, were treated for up to 4 days with FDC or placebo cream. Mean baseline PI was 6.8 on a 0-10 point numerical rating scale. After 8 hours, pain was more reduced with the FDC than with placebo (adjusted means: 2.824 vs. 0.975 points; p<0.0001). On the last treatment day, mean pain reduction by the FDC was stronger than with placebo (adjusted means: 5.132 vs. 2.174 points; p<0.0001). Mobility on Day 1 was in favor of the FDC when compared to placebo (odds ratio [95% confidence interval {CI}]: 7.200 [3.609, 14.363], p<0.0001). At the end of treatment, patients treated with the FDC rated efficacy significantly higher than placebo (odds ratio [95% CI]: 11.370 [5.342, 24.199], p<0.0001). Both treatments were tolerated well. No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Nicoboxil/nonivamide cream is an effective and safe treatment for acute nonspecific low back pain, adding a promising treatment option.

Absence of excretion of the active moiety of bisacodyl and sodium picosulfate into human breast milk: an open-label, parallel-group, multiple-dose study in healthy lactating women.

The aim of this study was to determine whether administration of the prodrugs bisacodyl (Bisa) and sodium picosulfate (SPS) leads to excretion of their common active metabolite, bis-(p-hydroxyphenyl)-pyridyl-2-methane (BHPM), in breast milk. Two groups of 8 healthy lactating women who had stopped breast feeding received multiple doses of Bisa or SPS. Plasma, urine, and breast milk were collected and concentrations of free and total BHPM were determined using validated liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry methods. BHPM remained below the limits of detection in breast milk following single- and multiple-dose administration of Bisa and SPS. First, BHPM plasma concentrations were observed after a lag time of about 3 to 4 h and 4 to 5 h following Bisa and SPS administration, respectively. C(max) was attained approximately 5 h after dosing of Bisa and 9 h after dosing of SPS. BHPM did not accumulate after multiple administrations of Bisa and only slightly accumulated following multiple doses of SPS. About 12% and 13% of Bisa and SPS was excreted as BHPM into urine at steady state. BHPM, the active moiety of Bisa and SPS, was not excreted into human breast milk. Hence, use of Bisa or SPS to treat constipation of breast-feeding women is considered well tolerated with regard to exposing infants to BHPM via breast milk.