Does Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Yield Better Outcomes Over Closed Reduction of Mandibular Condylar Fractures?

PURPOSE: Despite decades of study, a consensus on therapeutic approaches to condylar fractures remains elusive, and the vexing question of invasive or noninvasive therapy remains to be definitively answered. This randomized clinical study aimed to compare the outcomes of mandibular condylar fractures (MCFs) treated by closed reduction (CR) with those treated by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). METHODS: The investigators designed and implemented a randomized controlled trial composed of patients with unilateral or bilateral MCFs. Patients were randomly allocated into the ORIF and CR groups. The primary predictor variable was treatment, either CR or ORIF. The primary outcome variable was temporomandibular joint function (pain and range of motion) assessed at 1 and 6 weeks and at 3, 6, and 12 months. The secondary outcomes included occlusion and complications (deviation, facial nerve injury, and scarring). Perioperative covariates included fracture displacement, ramus height loss, and associated mandibular fractures. The effect of treatment group on each of the 12-month outcomes was assessed using the χ2 test or the independent samples t test. A 5% significance level was used. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients with MCFs were included in the study. Sixty-eight (59%) and 48 (41%) patients were treated by CR and ORIF, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed between the 2 groups for mouth opening (P = .073, protrusion (P = .71), laterotrusive movements toward fractured side (0.080), and nonfractured side (P = .28). The median pain scores decreased from 4 (interquartile range [IQR] 3 to 4) at 6 weeks to 0 (IQR 0 to 0) at 52 weeks and 6 (IQR 5 to 6) at 6 weeks to 0 (IQR 0 to 0) at 52 weeks in the CR and ORIF groups, respectively. Statistically significant differences between the groups were observed for the outcome of malocclusion (P = .040) and deviation (P < .0001). Ramal height loss (P = .013) and angle of displacement (P = .0084) were significantly associated with the presence of complications in the CR group. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study have shown that both treatment options for MCFs yield acceptable results. However, CR yielded more complications, especially in patients with bilateral MCFs, ramus height loss greater than 5 mm, and angle of displacement greater than 15°.

Management of Refractory Mandibular Kaposiform Hemangioendothelioma with Sirolimus: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Kaposiform hemangioendothelioma (KHE) is a rare vascular neoplasm of intermediate malignancy that generally occurs in infancy and early childhood. Typically, the lesion arises from superficial or deep soft tissues of the extremities, trunk and retroperitoneum. The paucity of reported cases of head and neck KHEs is evidence of the rarity of the disease in this region. We report on the presentation and treatment of KHE in an 11-month-old boy who presented with a mandibular lesion. We include a brief discussion about the differential diagnosis of KHE. Management involved preoperative interventional radiology, surgical excision and chemotherapeutic treatment with Sirolimus. The lesion resolved without evidence of relapse 12 months later.

Conservative Treatment of Ameloblastoma in a Pediatric Patient: A Case Report.

Ameloblastomas typically occur in adults and are considered a rarity in the pediatric patient population. We report on the treatment outcome of a pediatric patient who presented with a unicystic ameloblastoma in the mandible. A 15-year-old boy presented with a large, expansile lesion in the ramus-angle region of the mandible. Incisional biopsy findings confirmed the lesion was a type II unicystic ameloblastoma. Treatment consisted of unroofing of the bone overlying the lesion followed by enucleation with peripheral ostectomy. A 10-mL disposable Luer-lock syringe was cut and modified to fit into the window of the lesion to facilitate irrigation with saline solution. The disposable syringe was held in position with 0.18-mm stainless steel wire for 3 months. Modification of the conservative treatment using the syringe allowed for complete regeneration of bone in the large cavity without the need for bone graft or resection of the lesion. At the 3-year follow-up, there was no sign of recurrence.

Antibiotic prescribing pattern of oral health practitioners before and during the COVID-19 pandemic at Wits Oral Health Centre.

The purpose of the study was to determine the antibiotic prescribing pattern of oral health practitioners before and during the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic at Wits Oral Health Centre, South Africa. A retrospective, descriptive study was conducted using a systematic random sample of 698 records of patients who were prescribed antibiotics. The records were categorised into two groups: pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 pandemic periods. For each group, data collected and analysed included variables such as patient demographics, prescriber discipline, medical history, dental condition, dental procedure, type of antibiotic, dose, frequency, and duration. Most patients in both the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 groups (70.3% and 73%, respectively) were healthy. The most common indication for prescribing antibiotics was a painful tooth (58.7%). Amoxycillin and metronidazole remain the antibiotics of choice for most dental conditions. More patients were treated with antibiotics only in the COVID-19 group than the pre-COVID-19 group (46.8% vs 33.7%). A significant proportion of the prescribed antibiotics were not indicated in both the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 groups (53.1% and 54.3%, respectively). The increased antibiotic usage during the COVID-19 period, in spite of the decrease in the number of patients consulted, underscores the need for more strategies to be implemented to strengthen antimicrobial resistance surveillance and stewardship initiatives.

Lytic brown tumour of the mandible as the initial presentation of hyperparathyroidism in a 7-year old girl: A case report.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Maxillomandibular involvement with brown tumours is rare, especially in the paediatric population. We present a rare case of a young girl with brown tumour (BT) occurring in the mandible as the first manifestation of hyperparathyroidism. CASE PRESENTATION: A 7-year-old black female, presented with a 6-month history of a swelling on the left mandible. Patient had a history of intractable gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea, vomiting and abdominal cramps. Biopsy confirmed the lesion as a giant cell lesion. Elevated parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels confirmed the diagnosis of a BT of hyperparathyroidism. The patient underwent surgical intervention involving parathyroidectomy. This was followed by segmental resection of the mandibular tumour two years later. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Brown Tumour is a rare, non-neoplastic lesion resulting from abnormal bone metabolism secondary to hyperparathyroidism. BT predominantly arise in long bones and the axial skeleton. Maxillomandibular involvement is very rare. In the present case, after parathyroidectomy, normal PTH and calcium levels were restored, and there was relief of gastrointestinal tract hypercalcaemic symptoms. However, there was no spontaneous regression of the mandibular tumour over a 2-year observation period. Hemimandibulectomy followed by reconstruction with a plate and costochondral graft was then performed. CONCLUSION: It is difficult to differentiate BT from other giant cell lesions without blood chemistry revealing hyperparathyroidism. The distinction is imperative to avoid mutilating and aggressive treatment for BTs. Although BTs are amenable for conservative treatment, the present case illustrates that for bigger tumours, in the absence of spontaneous regression, aggressive surgical treatment may be required.