Efficacy of epetraborole against Mycobacteroides abscessus in a mouse model of lung infection.

Mycobacteroides abscessus (Mab or Mycobacterium abscessus) is a fast-growing mycobacterium that is ubiquitous in the environment and can cause opportunistic disease in people with lung comorbidity and immunodeficiency. There are no Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs for this disease, and repurposed antibiotics have a poor microbiological response. To address the need for effective new antibiotics, we determined the efficacy of epetraborole (EBO) against three Mab clinical isolates in a mouse model of lung Mab infection. Reduction in lung Mab burden over 4 weeks of treatment was the study end point. EBO was administered orally once daily at doses of 25 and 50 mg/kg, which achieved exposures approximating the once-daily dosing of 250 mg and 500 mg, respectively, in humans. EBO administration led to a gradual reduction in the lung Mab burden. After 4 weeks of treatment, the efficacies of 25 and 50 mg/kg EBO against isolates ATCC 19977 and M9501 were comparable. However, against isolate M9530, 50 mg/kg EBO was more efficacious than 25 mg/kg and comparable with parenteral imipenem, one of the most efficacious antibiotics against Mab. We also undertook a dose-ranging study by evaluating the efficacies of once-daily oral administration of 0.5, 5, 10, 25, and 100 mg/kg EBO against M9501 over 4 weeks. Once-daily oral 100 mg/kg EBO was as effective as twice-daily 100 mg/kg imipenem injection. Our study suggests that EBO could address the unmet need for effective oral treatment options for Mab lung disease, given the high rates of Mab drug resistance and limited tolerable intravenous options.

Efficacies of three drug regimens containing omadacycline to treat Mycobacteroides abscessus disease.

Mycobacteroides abscessus (Mab, also known as Mycobacterium abscessus) causes opportunistic pulmonary and soft tissue infections that are difficult to cure with existing treatments. Omadacycline, a new tetracycline antibiotic, exhibits potent in vitro and in vivo activity against Mab. As regimens containing multiple antibiotics are required to produce a durable cure for Mab disease, we assessed efficacies of three three-drug combinations in a pre-clinical mouse model of pulmonary Mab disease to identify companion drugs with which omadacycline exhibits the highest efficacy. Additionally, we assessed the susceptibility of Mab recovered from mouse lungs after four weeks of exposure to the three triple-drug regimens. Among the three-drug regimens, omadacycline + imipenem + amikacin produced the largest reduction in Mab burden, whereas omadacycline + imipenem + linezolid exhibited the most effective early bactericidal activity. Omadacycline + linezolid + clofazimine, a regimen that can be administered orally, lacked early bactericidal activity but produced a gradual reduction in the lung Mab burden over time. The robust efficacy exhibited by these three regimens in the mouse model supports their further evaluation in patients with Mab lung disease. As we were unable to isolate drug-resistant Mab mutants at the completion of four weeks of treatment, these triple-drug combinations show promise of producing durable cure and minimizing selection of resistant mutants.

Efficacies of omadacycline + amikacin + imipenem and an all-oral regimen omadacycline + clofazimine + linezolid in a mouse model of M. abscessus lung disease.

Treatment outcomes for Mycobacteroides abscessus (Mab, also known as Mycobacterium abscessus) disease are still unsatisfactory, mainly due to issues with drug toxicity, tolerability, and efficacy. Treating Mab disease is challenging due to its high baseline antibiotic resistance, initial requirement for intravenous therapy, and poor medication tolerance. Omadacycline, a new tetracycline, is active against Mab. Since any new antibiotic effective against Mab is expected to be used in combination with other antibiotics, we evaluated the efficacy of two triple-drug combinations comprising omadacycline, omadacycline + amikacin + imipenem, and omadacycline + clofazimine + linezolid against two contemporary Mab clinical isolates in a mouse model of Mab lung disease. Antibiotic administration was initiated 1-week post-infection and was given daily, with Mab burden in the lungs at treatment completion serving as the endpoint. Omadacycline alone moderately reduced Mab levels and maintained better health in mice compared to untreated ones, which typically suffered from the infection. The omadacycline + clofazimine + linezolid combination showed immediate bactericidal activity and enhanced efficacy over 6 weeks, particularly against the more resistant strain (M9507). However, the clofazimine + linezolid combination lacked early bactericidal activity. When combined with amikacin and imipenem, omadacycline did not improve the regimen's effectiveness over 4 weeks of treatment. Our study showed that omadacycline + clofazimine + linezolid exhibited significant bactericidal activity over an extended treatment duration. However, adding omadacycline to amikacin and imipenem did not improve regimen effectiveness against the evaluated clinical isolates within 4 weeks. Further research in Mab disease patients is needed to determine the most effective omadacycline-containing regimen.IMPORTANCEMycobacteroides abscessus is a common environmental bacterium that causes infections in people with compromised lung function, including those with bronchiectasis, cystic fibrosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and weakened immune systems, especially among older individuals. Treating M. abscessus disease is challenging due to the limited effectiveness and toxicity of current antibiotics, which often require prolonged use. Omadacycline, a new antibiotic, shows promise against M. abscessus. Using a mouse model that mimics M. abscessus disease in humans, we studied the effectiveness of including omadacycline with recommended antibiotics. Adding omadacycline to clofazimine and linezolid significantly improved treatment outcomes, rapidly clearing the bacteria from the lungs and maintaining effectiveness throughout. This oral combination is convenient for patients. However, adding omadacycline to amikacin and imipenem did not improve treatment effectiveness within 4 weeks. Further study with M. abscessus patients is necessary to optimize omadacycline-based treatment strategies for this disease.