Reduced Ejection Fraction in Elite Endurance Athletes: Clinical and Genetic Overlap With Dilated Cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Exercise-induced cardiac remodeling can be profound, resulting in clinical overlap with dilated cardiomyopathy, yet the significance of reduced ejection fraction (EF) in athletes is unclear. The aim is to assess the prevalence, clinical consequences, and genetic predisposition of reduced EF in athletes. METHODS: Young endurance athletes were recruited from elite training programs and underwent comprehensive cardiac phenotyping and genetic testing. Those with reduced EF using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (defined as left ventricular EF <50%, or right ventricular EF <45%, or both) were compared with athletes with normal EF. A validated polygenic risk score for indexed left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESVi-PRS), previously associated with dilated cardiomyopathy, was assessed. Clinical events were recorded over a mean of 4.4 years. RESULTS: Of the 281 elite endurance athletes (22±8 years, 79.7% male) undergoing comprehensive assessment, 44 of 281 (15.7%) had reduced left ventricular EF (N=12; 4.3%), right ventricular EF (N=14; 5.0%), or both (N=18; 6.4%). Reduced EF was associated with a higher burden of ventricular premature beats (13.6% versus 3.8% with >100 ventricular premature beats/24 h; P=0.008) and lower left ventricular global longitudinal strain (-17%±2% versus -19%±2%; P<0.001). Athletes with reduced EF had a higher mean LVESVi-PRS (0.57±0.13 versus 0.51±0.14; P=0.009) with athletes in the top decile of LVESVi-PRS having an 11-fold increase in the likelihood of reduced EF compared with those in the bottom decile (P=0.034). Male sex and higher LVESVi-PRS were the only significant predictors of reduced EF in a multivariate analysis that included age and fitness. During follow-up, no athletes developed symptomatic heart failure or arrhythmias. Two athletes died, 1 from trauma and 1 from sudden cardiac death, the latter having a reduced right ventricular EF and a LVESVi-PRS >95%. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced EF occurs in approximately 1 in 6 elite endurance athletes and is related to genetic predisposition in addition to exercise training. Genetic and imaging markers may help identify endurance athletes in whom scrutiny about long-term clinical outcomes may be appropriate. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=374976&isReview=true; Unique identifier: ACTRN12618000716268.

Left ventricular hypertrophy: do not forget Fabry disease. Diagnostic work-up and differential diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy is a common clinical finding. Differential diagnosis includes Fabry disease, a rare and progressive, but treatable storage disease caused by deficiency of α-galactosidase A. However, diagnosis of Fabry is often hampered by its clinical heterogeneity, LV hypertrophy phenocopies and unawareness of the clinician. METHODS: This review summarises clinical data, family history, electrocardiogram (ECG) and imaging (echocardiogram and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)) characteristics to differentiate aetiologies of LV hypertrophy including clues for the diagnosis of Fabry. RESULTS: LV hypertrophy is a consequence of pressure overload mostly, but differential diagnosis includes hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and infiltrative diseases. Clinical data, ECG, type and degree of LV hypertrophy, functional and tissue characteristics differ among aetiologies. LV hypertrophy in Fabry is progressive and mostly concentric but may copy any hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Dependent on residual alfa-galactosidase A enzyme activity, degree of LV hypertrophy in Fabry may vary. Initially, low myocardial CMR T1-map values are calculated. At a later stage, midwall late gadolinium enhancement of the inferolateral LV wall may occur. Global longitudinal strain may be depressed in the inferolateral wall. Voltage criteria for LV hypertrophy and short PQ interval are common. Right ventricular (RV) hypertrophy is frequent. In addition, multisystemic symptoms including neuropathic pain, hypohidrosis, proteinuria, renal insufficiency and familial young stroke are pointing to Fabry. CONCLUSIONS: LV hypertrophy should raise suspicion of Fabry disease, especially if LV hypertrophy is unexplained and/or associated with RV hypertrophy. In Fabry, LV hypertrophy may be heterogeneous and mimic any hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. ECG, multisystemic symptoms and imaging may provide clues for Fabry.

Serial Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Mitral Valve Prolapse-A Single-Center Retrospective Registry.

Background: Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) and mitral annular disjunction (MAD) are common valvular abnormalities that have been associated with ventricular arrhythmias (VA). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has a key role in risk stratification of VA, including assessment of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Methods: Single-center retrospective analysis of patients with MVP or MAD who had >1 CMR and >1 24 h Holter registration available. Data are presented in detail, including evolution of VA and presence of LGE over time. Results: A total of twelve patients had repeated CMR and Holter registrations available, of which in four (33%) patients, it was conducted before and after minimal invasive mitral valve repair (MVR). After a median of 4.7 years, four out of eight (50%) patients without surgical intervention had new areas of LGE. New LGE was observed in the papillary muscles and the mid to basal inferolateral wall. In four patients, presenting with syncope or high-risk non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), programmed ventricular stimulation was performed and in two (50%), sustained monomorphic VT was easily inducible. In two patients who underwent MVR, new LGE was observed in the basal inferolateral wall of which one presented with an increased burden of VA. Conclusions: In patients with MVP and MAD, repeat CMR may show new LGE in a small subset of patients, even shortly after MVR. A subgroup of patients who presented with an increase in VA burden showed new LGE upon repeat CMR. VA in patients with MVP and MAD are part of a heterogeneous spectrum that requires further investigation to establish risk stratification strategies.

An international multicenter cohort study on implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for the treatment of symptomatic children with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) may cause sudden cardiac death (SCD) despite medical therapy. Therefore, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are commonly advised. However, there is limited data on the outcomes of ICD use in children. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the risk of arrhythmic events in pediatric patients with CPVT with and without an ICD. METHODS: We compared the risk of SCD in patients with RYR2 (ryanodine receptor 2) variants and phenotype-positive symptomatic CPVT patients with and without an ICD who were younger than 19 years and had no history of sudden cardiac arrest at phenotype diagnosis. The primary outcome was SCD; secondary outcomes were composite end points of SCD, sudden cardiac arrest, or appropriate ICD shocks with or without arrhythmic syncope. RESULTS: The study included 235 patients, 73 with an ICD (31.1%) and 162 without an ICD (68.9%). Over a median follow-up of 8.0 years (interquartile range 4.3-13.4 years), SCD occurred in 7 patients (3.0%), of whom 4 (57.1%) were noncompliant with medications and none had an ICD. Patients with ICD had a higher risk of both secondary composite outcomes (without syncope: hazard ratio 5.85; 95% confidence interval 3.40-10.09; P < .0001; with syncope: hazard ratio 2.55; 95% confidence interval 1.50-4.34; P = .0005). Thirty-one patients with ICD (42.5%) experienced appropriate shocks, 18 (24.7%) inappropriate shocks, and 21 (28.8%) device-related complications. CONCLUSION: SCD events occurred only in patients without an ICD and mostly in those not on optimal medical therapy. Patients with an ICD had a high risk of appropriate and inappropriate shocks, which may be reduced with appropriate device programming. Severe ICD complications were common, and risks vs benefits of ICDs need to be considered.