A Comprehensive Review of the Current State of Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Salvage Prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Salvage robot assisted radical prostatectomy (sRARP) is performed for patients with biochemical or biopsy proven, localized prostate cancer recurrences after radiation or ablative therapies. Traditionally, sRARP has been avoided by lower volume surgeons due to technical demand and high complication rates. Post-radiation sRARP outcomes studies exist but remain few in number. With increasing use of whole gland and focal ablative therapies, updates on sRARP in this setting are needed. The aim of this narrative review is to provide an overview of recently reviewed studies on the oncologic outcomes, functional outcomes, and complications after post-radiation and post-ablative sRARP. Tips and tricks are provided to guide surgeons who may perform sRARP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a non-systematic literature search of PubMed and MEDLINE for the most relevant articles pertaining to the outlined topics from 2010-2022 without limitation on study design. Only case reports, editorial comments, letters, and manuscripts in non-English languages were excluded. Key Content and Findings: Salvage robotic radical prostatectomy is performed in cases of biochemical recurrence after radiation or ablative therapies. Oncologic outcomes after sRARP are worse compared to primary surgery (pRARP) though improvements have been made with the robotic approach when compared to open salvage prostatectomy. Higher pre-sRARP PSA levels and more advanced pathologic stage portend worse oncologic outcomes. Patients meeting low-risk, EAU-biochemical recurrence criteria have improved oncologic outcomes compared to those with high-risk BCR. While complication rates in sRARP are higher compared to pRARP, Retzius sparing approaches may reduce complication rates, particularly rectal injuries. In comparison to the traditional open approach, sRARP is associated with a lower rate of bladder neck contracture. In terms of functional outcomes, potency rates after sRARP are poor and continence rates are low, though Retzius sparing approaches demonstrate acceptable recovery of urinary continence by 1 year, post-operatively. CONCLUSIONS: Advances in the robotic platform and improvement in robotic experience have resulted in acceptable complication rates after sRARP. However, oncologic and functional outcomes after sRARP in both the post-radiation and post-ablation settings are worse compared to pRARP. Thus, when engaging in shared decision making with patients regarding the initial management of localized prostate cancer, patients should be educated regarding oncologic and functional outcomes and complications in the case of biochemically recurrent prostate cancer that may require sRARP.

Laparoscopic and Robotic Urology Surgery during Global Pandemic COVID19.

Known laparoscopic and robotic assisted approaches and techniques for the surgical management of urological malignant and benign diseases are commonly used around the World. During the global pandemic COVID19, urology surgeons had to reorganize their daily surgical practice. A concern with the use of minimally invasive techniques arose due to a proposed risk of viral transmission of the coronavirus disease with the creation of pneumoperitoneum. Due to this, we reviewed the literature to evaluate the use of laparoscopy and robotics during the pandemic COVID19. A literature review of viral transmission in surgery and of the available literature regarding the transmission of the COVID19 virus was performed up to April 30, 2020. We additionally reviewed surgical society guidelines and recommendations regarding surgery during this pandemic. Few studies have been performed on viral transmission during surgery. No study has been made regarding this area during minimally invasive urology cases. To date there is no study that demonstrates or can suggest the ability for a virus to be transmitted during surgical treatment whether open, laparoscopic or robotic. There is no society consensus on restricting laparoscopic or robotic surgery. However, there is expert consensus on modification of standard practices to minimize any risk of transmission. During the pandemic COVID19 we recommend the use of specific personal protective equipment for the surgeon, anesthesiologist and nursing staff in the operating room. Modifications of standard practices during minimally invasive surgery such as using lowest intra-abdominal pressures possible, controlled smoke evacuation systems, and minimizing energy device usage are recommended.

Surgeon-administered regional nerve blocks during radical cystectomy: a feasibility study.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the technique for surgeon-administered, ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (SU-TAP) blocks performed during radical cystectomy as a component of multimodal, perioperative pain management. METHODS: Retrospective, case series of patients receiving SU-TAP blocks just prior to incision for RC. TAP blocks were performed by the surgeon with a standard technique using US guidance to instill an anesthetic solution. The primary outcome was opioid consumption at the intervals of 0-12, 12-24, 24-36, and 36-48 h postoperatively. Opioid consumption was reported as oral morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Secondary outcomes included time to perform SU-TAP blocks, and safety of block procedure. RESULTS: 34 patients were included. During the median length of stay of 4 days (interquartile range [IQR] 3-7), only 30/34 (88%) of patients required opioids within the first 12 h post-op, decreasing to 38% by 48 h post-op. The median consumption decreased in the first 48 h from 21 MMEs (IQR 9-38) to 10 MMEs (IQR 8-15) at the 0-12 and 36-48 h intervals, respectively. The median time to perform block procedure was 6 min (IQR 4-8 min) and there were no safety events related to the SU-TAP blocks. Limitations include no comparative arm for opioid consumption. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that urologists may feasibly perform US-guided TAP blocks as a practical, efficient, and safe method of regional anesthesia. SU-TAP blocks should be considered in ERAS protocols for RC. Future comparative studies on opioid consumption compared to local infiltration and alternative block techniques are warranted.

Risk factors for infection and acute urinary retention following transperineal prostate biopsy.

PURPOSE: To calculate the frequency of infection and acute urinary retention (AUR) following transperineal (TP) prostate biopsy at a single high-volume academic institution and determine risk factors for developing these post-biopsy conditions. METHODS: Men undergoing TP prostate biopsy from 2012 to 2022 at our institution were retrospectively identified and chart reviewed. TP biopsies were performed with TR ultrasound (TRUS) guidance with anesthesia using a brachytherapy grid template. TRUS volumes were recorded during the procedure, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) volumes were calculated using the ellipsoid formula. When available, MRI volume was used for all analysis, and when absent, TRUS volume was used. AUR was defined as requiring urinary catheter placement within 72 h post-biopsy for inability to urinate. Univariable analysis was performed and variables with p < 0.1 and/or established clinical relevance were included in a backward binary logistic regression to produce an optimized model that fit the data without collinearity between variables. RESULTS: A total of 767 TP biopsies were completed in the study window. The frequency of infection was 1.83% (N = 14/767). The total frequency of AUR was 5.48% (N = 42/767). On multivariable regression, patients who went into AUR were five times as likely to develop infection (p = 0.020). Patients with infection post-TP biopsy were four times as likely to develop AUR (p = 0.047) and with prostates > 61.21 cc were three times as likely (p = 0.019). CONCLUSION: According to our model, AUR is the greatest risk factor for infection post-TP biopsy. With regard to AUR risks, infection post-biopsy and prostate size > 61.21 cc are the greatest risk factors.

Ileal Conduit versus Cutaneous Ureterostomy after Open Radical Cystectomy: Comparison of 90-Day Morbidity and Tube Dependence at Intermediate Term Follow-Up.

Background: This study aims to compare perioperative morbidity and drainage tube dependence following open radical cystectomy (ORC) with ileal conduit (IC) or cutaneous ureterostomy (CU) for bladder cancer. Methods: A single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing ORC with IC or CU urinary diversion between 2020 and 2023 was carried out. The 90-day perioperative morbidity, as per Clavien-Dindo (C.D.) complication rates (Minor C.D. I-II, Major C.D. III-V), and urinary drainage tube dependence (ureteral stent or nephrostomy tube) after tube-free trial were assessed. Results: The study included 56 patients (IC: 26, CU: 30) with a 14-month median follow-up. At 90 days after IC or CU, the frequencies of any, minor, and major C.D. complications were similar (any-69% vs. 77%; minor-61% vs. 73%; major-46% vs. 30%, respectively, p > 0.2). Tube-free trial was performed in 86% of patients with similar rates of tube replacement (19% IC vs. 32% CU, p = 0.34) and tube-free survival at 12 months was assessed (76% IC vs. 70% CU, p = 0.31). Conclusions: Compared to the ORC+IC, ORC+CU has similar rates of both 90-day perioperative complications and 12-month tube-free dependence. CU should be offered to select patients as an alternative to IC urinary diversion after RC.

Surgical management of a locally advanced symptomatic recurrence of penile sarcoma secondary to prostate brachytherapy.

UNLABELLED: The surgical management of patients with symptomatic metastatic or locally advanced recurrences involving the penis remains poorly characterized. The aim of the present abstract and video is to detail our experience in the surgical management of a specific patient with a locally advanced symptomatic recurrence of penile sarcoma secondary to prostate cancer treated with primary brachytherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 70 year old male patient initially treated for localized prostate cancer with interstitial brachytherapy at an outside facility developed an unfortunate secondary malignancy consisting of a locally advanced penile sarcoma involving as well the prostate and base of the bladder. Despite our best efforts to control his pain, he developed a very symptomatic local recurrence with a secondary penile abscess and purulent periurethral drainage. At this time, it was felt a surgical resection consisting of a total penectomy, urethrectomy, cystoprostatectomy, and ileal conduit urinary diversion would be the best option for local cancer control in this particular patient. RESULTS: The patient underwent the surgical resection without any complications as illustrated in this surgical video, with a jejunal intestinal mass identified at the time of surgery which was resected with a primary bowel anastomosis performed. The patient was discharged from hospital uneventfully with his symptomatic local recurrence being successfully managed and the patient no longer requiring oral narcotics for pain control. The pathological report confirmed a locally advanced sarcoma involving the penile, prostate, and bladder which was resected with negative surgical margins and the jejunal mass was confirmed to represent a small bowel sarcoma metastatic site. CONCLUSION: As highlighted in the present video, the treatment of a symptomatic sarcoma local recurrence contiguously involving the penis can be successfully managed provided the patient is informed of the potential morbidity and psychosocial implications imparted by performing a total penectomy and adjacent organ resection.

Urothelial Carcinoma Recurrence With an Ileal Conduit: Multimodal Management With Extirpative Surgery, Chemotherapy, and Immunotherapy.

Ileal conduit (IC) is the most performed urinary diversion after radical cystectomy (RC) for urothelial carcinoma (UC) of the bladder. While UC recurrence after RC is well-described, recurrence of UC within a urinary diversion is much less prevalent, and thus, management of these lesions is not well understood. Here, we report the case of a 59-year-old male with a history of invasive UC with glandular differentiation of the urinary bladder who had carcinoma in situ recurrence after induction, intravesical Bacille Calmette-Guerin therapy. He underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy (RALC) with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection and intracorporal ileal conduit (IC) urinary diversion. Two years later, he presented to the emergency department with hematuria. Computed tomography demonstrated a mass within the IC. He subsequently underwent IC resection and ligation of bilateral ureters and had permanent nephrostomy tubes placed, with the final pathology confirming high-grade UC. Positron emission tomography revealed hypermetabolic soft tissue implants within the greater omentum and retroperitoneum for which he underwent fine-needle aspiration, demonstrating recurrence of poorly differentiated UC. Ultimately, the patient started treatment with systemic gemcitabine and carboplatin and completed 4 cycles before transitioning to maintenance avelumab therapy. No disease progression was noted at 16 months post-treatment. Herein, we present a review of the literature and our management of the present patient.

Is the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scoring system predictive of the functional efficacy of nephron sparing surgery in the solitary kidney?

PURPOSE: We evaluated the ability of renal tumor complexity, as assessed by the R.E.N.A.L. (radius, exophytic, nearness to collecting system, anterior/posterior and location) nephrometry scoring system, to predict the functional efficacy of nephron sparing surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 42 patients who presented with an anatomically (32) or a functionally (10) solitary kidney and underwent partial nephrectomy. Each renal unit was assigned a R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score using preoperative imaging. The CKD-EPI equation was applied to calculate the estimated glomerular filtration rate. The difference between the estimated glomerular filtration rate at baseline and at postoperative time points served as a measurement of the renal functional loss attributable to partial nephrectomy. RESULTS: In the 42 patients who underwent partial nephrectomy the mean preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate was 61.5 ml/minute/1.73 m(2). The median total nephrometry score was 8 (range 4 to 10). In the immediate postoperative period the cohort mean estimated glomerular filtration rate of 48.6 ml/minute/1.73 m(2) was significantly less than the preoperative value (p <0.0001). At 6-month followup the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate had recovered at 54.1 ml/minute/1.73 m(2) but it remained significantly less than the preoperative value (p = 0.0002). We noted no relationship between the postoperative decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate and the assigned total nephrometry score or in any individual component of the R.E.N.A.L. scoring system related to the targeted lesion. CONCLUSIONS: Neither the individual components of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scoring system nor the total nephrometry score predicted the realized functional loss, as assessed by the estimated glomerular filtration rate in patients with a solitary kidney treated with nephron sparing surgery. However, nephron sparing surgery was quite efficacious for preserving renal function since only a durable 11.6% decrease was noted in the estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection with concomitant IVC thrombectomy, caval wall resection, and grafting for metastatic NSGCT.

INTRODUCTION: The management of a post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal mass secondary to testicular cancer can present a surgical challenge when involving adjacent organs or major vascular structures. We present the first video of a retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) with IVC (inferior vena cava) thrombectomy, caval wall resection resulting from metastatic non-seminomatous germ cell testis (NSGCT) cancer. METHODS: In this surgical video, we highlight important surgical considerations in the management of a postchemotherapy retroperitoneal mass with direct IVC wall invasion and level 2 thrombus in such a patient. RESULTS: A 34 year old man underwent a right inguinal orchiectomy for a mixed NSGCT (embryonal, yolk sac, and teratoma components) and elevated serum tumor markers. He underwent systemic chemotherapy (BEP regimen x 4 cycles) with subsequent near normalization of tumor markers. His post-chemotherapy imaging revealed a 6 cm residual retroperitoneal mass with a level 2 IVC tumor thrombus and suspected direct infrarenal IVC wall invasion from the mass. The patient underwent an open post-chemotherapy RPLND, IVC thrombectomy, IVC resection and grafting. The final pathology report of the retroperitoneal mass revealed teratoma with no viable germ cell tumor elements and negative surgical margins. His intra-operative and post-operative stages were unremarkable with his IVC graft remaining patent and no evidence of disease recurrence at last follow-up. CONCLUSION: We present the first surgical video of a post-chemotherapy RPLND with IVC thrombectomy, caval wall resection and grafting for metastatic NSGCT. The final pathology report of teratoma with no viable tumor highlights the local vascular invasive potential of such pathology.

Ventral phalloplasty.

PURPOSE: To present the surgical technique of ventral phalloplasty as an adjunct procedure to the classic prosthetic surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this video we demonstrate how to perform a ventral phalloplasty in a patient that has undergone a penile prosthesis implantation. Our technique consists of: delineation of the penile scrotal web, excision of this redundant skin, and re-approximation of the wound to mimic the natural median raphe. RESULTS: The ventral phalloplasty improves the perception of phallic length, as well as patients' satisfaction after prosthetic surgery. CONCLUSION: Penile length perception is the main concern of patients that have undergone penile prosthesis implantation. In this video we demonstrate that the ventral phalloplasty can improve perception of phallic length, and can be an important adjunct to the classic prosthetic surgery.

Cutaneous ureterostomy technique for adults and effects of ureteral stenting: an alternative to the ileal conduit.

PURPOSE: We present surgical modifications that improved the outcome of cutaneous ureterostomies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 310 patients with a median age of 71 years (range 38 to 88) underwent cutaneous ureterostomy as urinary diversion. Median followup was 25 months (range 1 to 172). The technique included 1) transposition of the left ureter above the inferior mesenteric artery, 2) mobilization of the ileocecal segment with repositioning above each terminal ureter, 3) abdominal wall hiatus fixation with 4 angle sutures and 4) YV plasty of the ureters with edge-to-edge anastomosis for stomal creation. In the 161 group 1 patients (59.1%) the Double-J® stents were removed in less than 3 months. Stents remained longer than 3 months in the 111 group 2 patients (40.8%). RESULTS: Of the 272 patients ureteral obstruction developed in 36 (13.2%). Ureteral obstruction was on the right side in 6 patients (2.2%), on the left side in 27 (9.9%) and bilateral in 3 (1.1%). Ureteral obstruction was treated with restenting in 20 cases (55.4%), stomal revision in 12 (33.3%) and conversion to a conduit in 4 (11%). Ureteral obstruction developed on the right side, on the left side and bilaterally in 3.7%, 13.7% and 1.82% of the patients in group 1, and in 0%, 4.5% and 0%, respectively, of those in group 2. Stenting time impacted only the left ureter with less obstruction in the group with longer stent placement (greater than 3 months) (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: As with other types of urinary diversion, left ureteral obstruction is a common complication of bilateral cutaneous ureterostomies. Long-term stenting for greater than 3 months and the applied surgical modifications improved the clinical outcome of this type of urinary diversion.

Laparo-endoscopic single site retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy: a novel concept.

PURPOSE: Various treatment options are available for small incidentally detected kidney masses, including surveillance, partial nephrectomy and probe ablative therapies. When partial nephrectomy is considered, the procedure can be safely approached laparoscopically, either pure or robot assisted, in experienced hands. Laparo-endoscopic single site (LESS) surgery is a novel approach for partial nephrectomies in well selected cases. In this video, we present our experience with the LESS retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy using the Gelpoint device. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A 63 year old male patient with a BMI of 31, and a history of a T1c prostate cancer, had a 1.5 cm right posterior lower pole renal enhancing mass discovered incidentally on a three phase CT scan. With the patient under general anesthesia, and in a full flank position, a LESS retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy was performed using a 3 cm transverse incision below the tip of the 12th rib. The following instruments and devices were used: A gelpoint device for single incision port of entry, one 10 mm and two 5 mm trocars used through the gelpoint, one 5 mm Olympus HD endoeye flexible tip camera, one roticulator scissors, and one articulating graspers. RESULTS: Operative time, EBL, and hospital stay were 1 hour, 5 ml, and 23 hours, respectively. The pathology result confirmed a benign hemorrhagic cystic mass. The visual analog scale (0-10) for pain at recovery, 6 hours post op, and 23 hours post op was 5, 3, and 1 point, respectively. The patient tolerated clear liquids and regular diet at 6 and 16 hours, after the procedure. At one month of follow-up, the patient is asymptomatic and practically scarless. CONCLUSIONS: LESS retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy is safe and feasible in selected cases such as small exophytic posterior renal masses. The retroperitoneal approach avoids mobilization of the colon and kidney to access the posterior surface. Instrument clashing, limited range of motion, and CO2 leakage, can be some difficulties encountered during single port retroperitoneal surgery. However, the Gelpoint device gives a great seal in the flank position and allows the relocation of trocars, without loss of CO2 pressure, to prevent instrument clashing during different parts of the procedure.

Robotic assisted laparoscopic treatment of gonadal vein syndrome in a boy.

PURPOSE: Gonadal vein syndrome, with ureteral obstruction and compression by an overlying testicular vein is a controversial and rare diagnosis. Open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted laparoscopic repairs have been described. We report the first case of robot-assisted gonadal vein ligation for treatment of gonadal vein syndrome in a nine year-old boy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 9 years-old boy presented with a four to six month history of worsening intermittent flank pain, nausea and vomiting. Ultrasound revealed moderate hydronephrosis. Diuretic renography and intravenous pyelography reproduced his pain and demonstrated left-sided hydronephrosis and obstruction. The patient underwent left robot-assisted surgery via a four port approach. The colon was reflected medially. The gonadal vein was dissected off the underlying ureter and ligated using laparoscopic clips. Segmental vein excision and ureterolysis was performed. Inspection of the renal hilum did not reveal any other crossing vessels. RESULTS: Operative time was 94 minutes. The patient was discharged 36 hours after surgery. His hydronephrosis has resolved completely. He remains pain-free nine months after surgery. CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted laparoscopic vein excision and ureterolysis is a safe option for the management of ureteral obstruction caused by the gonadal vein.

Salvage spiral sling techniques: alternatives to manage disabling recurrent urinary incontinence in females.

PURPOSE: Females with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after anti-incontinence surgery represent a therapeutic challenge. In our experience and that of others standard sling procedures have occasionally failed to correct these problems. We determined the effectiveness of various spiral sling techniques used in these cases to manage pipe stem urethras in which conventional slings had failed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2007 and July 2008 we evaluated 30 female patients with persistent stress urinary incontinence after multiple failed anti-incontinence procedures. Preoperative and postoperative evaluation consisted of history, physical examination, number of pads, Stamey score and quality of life questionnaires. RESULTS: We followed 28 patients a minimum of 15 months (range 15 to 18). Mean patient age was 60 years (range 36 to 84). At presentation patients had undergone a mean of 3.5 prior vaginal procedures (range 1 to 6) and used a mean of 7 pads daily (range 3 to 12). Of the patients 21 received a synthetic spiral sling, 5 received an autologous spiral sling (rectus fascia in 3 and fascia lata in 2) and 3 received a lateral spiral sling. Mean pad use decreased to 0.9 daily (range 0 to 2, p<0.05). Postoperative mean Stamey score decreased from 2.6 to 0.3 (p<0.05). Complications included unilateral vesical perforation in 3 patients with a contralateral lateral spiral sling. The overall success rate was 72%. CONCLUSIONS: Salvage spiral sling techniques are a satisfactory alternative treatment for refractory stress urinary incontinence. When synthetic material cannot be used, autologous tissue can provide similar results. When the bladder is perforated unilaterally, a lateral spiral sling can be used on the contralateral side.

Laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: impact of the learning curve on perioperative outcomes and margin status.

OBJECTIVE: After improved technical modifications that followed the original reports by pioneering laparoscopic surgeons, the impact of the learning curve has not been objectively assessed for laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (LERP). In this study, we assessed the impact of the learning curve on operative and oncologic outcomes at a high surgical volume institution. METHODS AND MATERIAL: We prospectively analyzed 400 consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer treated with LERP between January 2004 and July 2006. Patients were divided into 4 equal groups (1-100, 101-200, 201-300, and 301- 400). Kruskal-Wallis test was performed to determine whether all the preoperative variables were comparable among groups. Fisher's exact test was performed to determine the association of margin status with pathological stage. Chi-square test was performed to determine whether margin status was associated with groups (1 vs. 2, 3, & 4). Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to determine whether operative time was statistically different in group 1 (1-100) compared with groups 2, 3, and 4. RESULTS: All groups were comparable with respect to preoperative data. Positive margin rate significantly decreased after the first 200 cases for patients with pT2a-c disease (28.4% to 31.9% vs. 11.6% to 11.5%). Margin status was significantly associated with groups (Group 1 & 3: P=0.0044 and group 1 & 4: P=0.0021). Operative time significantly decreased after the first 100 cases (350 min vs. 218 min, 192 min, and 223 min) (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In a tertiary care academic institution, the operative and pathologic outcomes improved significantly with increased surgical experience. At our institution, the operative and pathologic outcomes improved after 100 and 200 cases, respectively.

Update in the management of penile cancer.

PURPOSE: The management of penile cancer has evolved as less invasive techniques are applied in the treatment of the primary tumor and inguinal lymph nodes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Herein we review the literature focusing on advances in the preservation of the phallus as well as less morbid procedures to evaluate and treat the groins. RESULTS: Promising imaging modalities for staging are discussed. New techniques are described and tables provided for penile preservation. We also review the contemporary morbidity of modified surgical forms for evaluation of the inguinal nodes. CONCLUSIONS: Advances in surgical technique have made phallic preservation possible in a greater number of primary penile cancers. The groins can be evaluated for metastasis with greater accuracy through new radiologic means as well as with less morbid modified surgical techniques.

Disabling complications with slings for managing female stress urinary incontinence.

OBJECTIVE: To report an increase in the referral of patients with disabling complications after the failure of conservative therapy, their presentation, final surgical management and clinical outcome, following the use of non-autologous slings (NAS), currently the primary surgical procedure for managing stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women. PATIENT AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients (mean age 64 years) required surgical management for disabling complications after placing a NAS for SUI. Sling types were synthetic (25), xenografts (six) and allografts (four). Twenty (53%) patients presented with bladder outlet obstruction, 13 (34%) with sling erosion, three (8%) with worsened SUI, and two (5%) with unobstructive severe urgency and frequency. RESULTS: The sling was dissected and incised with no complication in 19 of 20 patients. One had a posterior urethral defect during sling dissection. Twelve patients (60%) acquired normal voiding and were continent. Among the 13 patients who had the sling dismantled and urethrolysis, two had recurrent or persistent SUI, two de-novo urgency/frequency and one developed osteitis pubis. Three patients with disabling SUI received a pubovaginal sling placed proximal to the bladder neck, and had an overall improvement in their urinary control with no retention. Two unobstructed patients with urgency and frequency did not improve with anticholinergic medication and pelvic floor therapy, and are now candidates for botulinum toxin injection or neurostimulation. CONCLUSIONS: The complication rate with periurethral NAS for managing SUI in females is substantial. Patients with refractory urgency/frequency after the sling need a complete evaluation with cystoscopy and video-urodynamics. Obstruction and erosion are the commonest problems and require surgical correction.