Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Rehabil ; 31(6): 753-760, 2017 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27260764

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of a Pilates exercise program on disability, pain, lumbar mobility, flexibility and balance in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: University laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 54 patients with chronic non-specific low back pain. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly allocated to an experimental group ( n=27) included in a Pilates exercise program or to a control group ( n=27) receiving information in a form of a leaflet. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Disability (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and Oswestry Disability Index), current, average and pain at it least and at its worst (Visual Analogue Scales), lumbar mobility (modified Shober test), flexibility (finger-to-floor test) and balance (single limb stance test) were measured at baseline and after the intervention. RESULTS: A between-group analysis showed significant differences in the intervention group compared to the control group for both disability scores, the Rolland-Morris questionnaire (mean change±standard deviation of 5.31±3.37 and 2.40±6.78 respectively and between-groups mean difference of 3.2 ± 4.12, p=0.003) and the Oswestry Disability Index ( p<0.001), current pain ( p=0.002) and pain at it least ( p=0.033), flexibility (0.032) and balance (0.043). CONCLUSIONS: An 8-week Pilates exercise program is effective in improving disability, pain, flexibility and balance in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica/reabilitação , Técnicas de Exercício e de Movimento/métodos , Dor Lombar/reabilitação , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto , Dor Crônica/diagnóstico , Dor Crônica/psicologia , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Dor Lombar/diagnóstico , Dor Lombar/psicologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Seleção de Pacientes , Valores de Referência , Medição de Risco , Análise e Desempenho de Tarefas , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Patient Educ Couns ; 104(6): 1438-1444, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33246873

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a self-management treatment added to a physical therapy program compared to a physical therapy program in patients with chronic neck pain. METHODS: Fifty-three patients with chronic neck pain were randomly allocated to a physical therapy intervention (control group) or an individualized self-management combined with physical therapy intervention (experimental group). Both interventions were developed over a four-week period. Outcome measures included were Disability, Fear-Avoidance Beliefs, Health-Related Quality of Life, Pain, and Anxiety and Depression. All outcomes were measured before and after the treatment and at three-month follow-up. RESULTS: There were not significant differences between groups at baseline. After the intervention both groups obtained better results in the Neck Disability Index but there were not significant differences between them (p > 0.05). At follow-up, the self-management group obtained significant better results compared to the control group (95 % CI: -5.20(-6.8 to -1.5), p = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: An individualized self-management program added to a physical therapy program led to a greater improvement in disability at 3 months follow up compared to a physical therapy program alone. Catastrophizing, pain, and health-related quality of life improved significantly after the intervention and at follow-up compared to the standard care alone. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: This study indicates that physical therapy for patients with chronic neck pain preferably should include self-management education.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica , Autogestão , Dor Crônica/terapia , Terapia por Exercício , Humanos , Cervicalgia/terapia , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Qualidade de Vida , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Ann N Y Acad Sci ; 916: 194-8, 2000.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11193621

RESUMO

Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) was introduced into the Americas in 1870. At that time the disease was described simultaneously in the North coast of the United States of North America, the Province of Buenos Aires in Argentina, the central region of Chile, Uruguay, and South Brazil. At the beginning of the twentieth century the disease spread to the rest of Brazil, Bolivia, Paraguay, and Perú. In 1950 the disease was introduced into Venezuela, and in the same year to Colombia, and from there to Ecuador. The United States of America eradicated an outbreak of FMD in 1929. Outbreaks of FMD were also eradicated from Mexico in 1947 and from Canada in 1952. The last outbreak that occurred in Mexico in 1954 was also eradicated. In 1951 the Americas Animal Health Authorities decided to establish a Pan-American Foot-and-Mouth Disease Center (PANAFTOSA), initially as a special program within the American States Organization (OAS). The center was later transferred to the Pan-American Health Organization (PAHO). In the early 1970s PANAFTOSA developed a proposal for a continental surveillance system for vesicular diseases, which was approved by Agriculture Ministers at an International Meeting for FMD and Zoonoses (RICAZ). Since then, PANAFTOSA dedicated all efforts to collaborate with each country in the implementation of the system and to receive, analyze, and distribute a weekly report of vesicular diseases. The model was elaborated using coordinate grid maps, one for the South American Continent, others for each country in the region. The reports from each country consist of the grid location for any suspicious outbreak of vesicular disease. Using the information gathered during visits to the countries, as well as weekly reports, and by studying the most frequent animal movements within the region, PANAFTOSA developed a proposal for FMD eradication. This plan was approved by the Government of South America and implemented in cooperation with PANAFTOSA. The hemispheric plan for FMD eradication (PHEFA), has been implemented and today Chile and Uruguay are FMD free without vaccination; Argentina, Paraguay, and the states of Rio Grande do Sul and Santa Catarina in Brazil are also recognized by the OIE to be FMD Free, with vaccination. The use of the continental surveillance system is the main strategy for achieving the eradication of FMD in South America. At this time PANAFTOSA is working to improve the system, and to add other diseases indicated by the governments of the Americas.


Assuntos
Febre Aftosa/epidemiologia , Febre Aftosa/prevenção & controle , Cooperação Internacional , Animais , Bovinos , Humanos , América do Norte , Vigilância da População , América do Sul , Zoonoses/epidemiologia
12.
Bol. Oficina Sanit. Panam ; 95(4): 327-32, oct. 1983.
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: lil-18832

RESUMO

La incidencia de rabia humana en Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua, llevo a efectuar un estudio del costo del tratamiento de las personas que acudieron al Centro Antirrabico de esa ciudad por haber tenido contacto o haber sido mordidas por un animal que se sospechaba rabioso


Assuntos
Pré-Escolar , Criança , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Mordeduras e Picadas , Custos e Análise de Custo , Raiva , Vacina Antirrábica , México
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA