[Implementation of the Choosing Wisely Program in the General Surgery Residency]. / Implementação do Programa Choosing Wisely no Internato de Cirurgia Geral.

INTRODUCTION: The practice of unnecessary conduct and waste in Health is an important topic, not often addressed during undergraduate training. Medical education has a fundamental role in student and doctors' training concerning cost-conscious attitudes for good health care. The aim of this study was to describe and assess the implementation of the Choosing Wisely campaign within a General Surgery residency program. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was an interventional study involving residency advisors and specialty residents. Recommendations based on three procedures frequently used in clinical practice, with no benefits and involving unnecessary risks for patients were identified by residency advisors with the use of the Delphi method and were grouped by frequency and by nature according to the Choosing Wisely layout. Educational actions such as workshops and banner advertising in addition to training activities regarding cost-conscious healthcare were carried out. This subject was also included in the theoretical evaluation of the residency program. RESULTS: The leading five recommendations were related to (i) computed tomography overuse (versus ultrasound imaging) in patients with suspected acute appendicitis, (ii) multithreaded computed tomography overuse in patients with low-risk trauma, (iii) longer than recommended antibiotic prophylaxis in surgical patients, (iv) longer than recommended preoperative fasting period and (v) upper gastrointestinal endoscopy overuse in surgical patients without an adequate clinical evidence or without the presence of warning signs. Awareness and reflection among participants were improved, leading to high grades in final evaluation. DISCUSSION: Changes in training regarding quality of care and cost awareness should start throughout undergraduate training, within a learning environment focused on a reflective and evidence-based practice. All the benefits and harms to patients were taken into account in the recommendations that emerged from this study. CONCLUSION: The inclusion of this initiative in the General Surgery residency, involving reflective discussions on campaign recommendations regarding procedures frequently used in clinical practice, with no benefits and involving unnecessary risks for patients may lead to more cost-conscious procedures.

Introdução: A prática de condutas desnecessárias e os desperdícios na saúde são temas importantes e ainda pouco abordados no curso de Medicina. A educação médica tem um papel fundamental na formação de estudantes e médicos com atitudes custo-conscientes para uma boa atenção à saúde. O objectivo deste estudo foi descrever e avaliar a implementação do programa Choosing Wisely - Escolhas Criteriosas em Saúde, no internato de Cirurgia Geral.Material e Métodos: Estudo de intervenção envolvendo orientadores de formação e internos. Utilizando a técnica Delphi, os orientadores de formação identificaram três intervenções frequentemente observadas na prática clínica sem benefício e com potenciais riscos desnecessários para o doente, que geraram recomendações, agrupadas e adaptadas ao formato do programa Choosing Wisely. O tema foi incluido na avaliação do internato, tendo sido desenvolvidas ações de formação e de divulgação em banners personalizados, a par de atividades de aprendizagem reflexiva sobre o programa e da integração da temática na avaliação teórica do internato.Resultados: As cinco principais recomendações referem-se (i) à utilização excessiva de tomografia axial computorizada na abordagem da suspeita de apendicite aguda e (ii) de tomografia axial computorizada de vários segmentos do corpo em traumatismos de baixo grau de gravidade, (iii) profilaxia antibiótica mais prolongada do que o recomendado no doente cirúrgico, (iv) jejum mais prolongado do que o recomendado no pré-operatório de todas as cirurgias e (v) utilização excessiva da endoscopia digestiva alta em doentes cirúrgicos sem sinais clínicos de alarme. As ações de formação geraram um incremento da sensibilização e reflexão, traduzido globalmente por um elevado aproveitamento na avaliação final.Discussão: A formação em escolhas criteriosas em saúde, promovendo uma utilização de cuidados de saúde consciente e de qualidade, sugere que as mudanças devem ocorrer ao longo do curso de Medicina, num ambiente de aprendizagem centrado numa prática reflexiva e baseada na evidência. As recomendações produzidas no estudo tiveram em consideração a totalidade dos benefícios e riscos para o doente.Conclusão: A integração da iniciativa Choosing Wisely no programa de formação em Cirurgia Geral deu origem a um conhecimento e discussão mais reflexivos sobre as recomendações relativas à utilização racional e criteriosa de cuidados de saúde, podendo resultar numa prática médica mais sustentável e sensível aos custos que gera.

Choosing Wisely in Pediatric Internship.

Background. The Choosing Wisely (CW) campaign informs physicians and the public about safety and quality in medical practice. Objective. To evaluate a CW campaign in a medical internship in pediatrics. Methods. An interventionist study with teachers of medicine and pediatric internship students in which the Delphi technique was applied using online questionnaires. Specialists identified 3 unnecessary situations that commonly occur in clinical practice. Following the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) model evaluation, a group of students who participated in the educational interventions was compared with another group that was not exposed to the campaign. Results. Most students evaluated the CW campaign content as excellent (64%) or very good (31.6%). The level of successes in the OSCE evaluation was higher in the exposed group when compared with the nonexposed group (P = .001). Conclusions. The CW campaign improved the clinical skills of pediatric internship students.

Acute Poisoning in Children in Bahia, Brazil.

Acute poisoning is a frequent accident in childhood, particularly in children under 4 years of age. This was a descriptive study with data collected from standardized forms of the Poison Control Center and patient record charts. All the cases of acute poisoning in children aged 0 to 14 years during the period 2008 to 2012 were selected. The variables studied comprised characteristics of the events and toxic agents, clinical development, and outcome. A total of 657 cases of acute poisoning, with higher frequency in the age-group from 1 to 4 years (48.7%) and male sex (53.4%), were recorded. The occurrences were accidental in 92% of the cases, and 5.8% were due to suicide attempts. Among the toxic agents, medications (28.5%), venomous animals (19.3%), nonvenomous animals (10%), household cleaning products (9.0%), and raticide agents (8.7%) predominated. The majority of cases were characterized as light (73.5%) and around 18% required hospitalization, and there was low lethality (0.5%).