Ultrasound-Guided Needle Biopsy as an Alternative to Chamberlain's Mediastinotomy and Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) in the Diagnosis of Anterior Mediastinal Neoformations: A Retrospective Analysis.

(1) Background: The prompt diagnosis of anterior mediastinal lesions is a challenge due to their often being categorized as malignant tumours. Ultrasound-guided Transthoracic Core Needle Biopsy (US-TCNB) is an innovative technique that is arousing increasing interest in clinical practice. However, studies in this area are still scarce. This study aims to compare the diagnostic accuracy and complication rate of US-TCNB with those of traditional surgical methods-Anterior Mediastinotomy and Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS)-in patients with anterior mediastinal lesions. (2) Methods: This retrospective study involved patients evaluated between January 2011 and December 2021 who had undergone US-TCNB at the Interdepartmental Unit of Internal and Interventional Ultrasound, Molinette Hospital, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy. Personal data, diagnostic questions, and technical information concerning the bioptic procedure, periprocedural complications and histological reports were collected. (3) Results: Eighty-three patients were included in the analysis. Histological examination was performed in 78 cases, with an overall diagnostic accuracy of 94.0% (sensitivity 94%; specificity 100%). Only in 5 patients was a diagnosis not achieved. Complications occurred in 2 patients who were quickly identified and properly treated without need of hospitalization. The accuracy of US-TCNB was comparable to the performance of the main traditional diagnostic alternatives (95.3% for anterior mediastinotomy, and 98.4% for VATS), with a much lower complication rate (2.4% vs. 3-16%). The outpatient setting offered the additional advantage of saving resources. (4) Conclusions: a US-guided needle biopsy can be considered effective and safe, and in the near future it may become the procedure of choice for diagnosing anterior mediastinal lesions in selected patients.

The type of LDLR gene mutation predicts cardiovascular risk in children with familial hypercholesterolemia.

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain whether the molecular characterization of a defect in the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor gene (LDLR) in children with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (heFH) identifies subjects at greater risk of developing premature coronary artery disease (pCAD) later in life. STUDY DESIGN: We investigated 264 children with heFH from 201 families, along with 148 affected parents and 100 unaffected siblings. The lipid profile was assessed before any treatment was provided, and genotype analysis was performed to characterize LDLR defects. In a subgroup of children with heFH and controls, we measured aorta and carotid intima-media thickness (aIMT and cIMT). The prevalence of pCAD in parents and/or grandparents with heFH was recorded. RESULTS: The children with heFH with a family history of pCAD had higher LDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein B levels and greater aIMT and cIMT than those with negative family history. Compared with carriers of LDLR-defective mutations, carriers of LDLR-negative mutations had a more severe phenotype, in terms of plasma lipid levels and IMT, and a higher prevalence of pCAD in first-degree relatives (36% vs 6.7%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The study of heFH in children, in which other risk factors for CAD play a minor role, allows early identification of those at increased risk for developing pCAD, who merit more stringent clinical control and early pharmacologic treatment.

Endothelial activation, inflammation and premature atherosclerosis in children with familial dyslipidemia.

OBJECTIVES: Prospective studies demonstrated an increased cardiovascular risk in subjects with high levels of either the endothelial-platelet activation marker P-selectin or high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP). Both children with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and those with familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCHL) are prone to premature atherosclerosis. Our objective was to investigate in children with either FH or FCHL whether P-selectin and hs-CRP contribute to carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), along with increased plasma lipid levels. METHODS: Carotid IMT, serum lipids and soluble P-selectin and hs-CRP levels were measured in 88 children (mean age 10.5+/-4.3 years) including 44 dyslipidemic children (25 with FH and 19 with FCHL) and 44 non-dyslipidemic controls. RESULTS: Carotid IMT was significantly higher among dyslipidemic than in control children (0.46+/-0.06mm vs 0.43+/-0.06mm, p=0.003) and serum P-selectin levels as well [129(50-254)ng/mL vs 50(24.5-130)ng/mL, p<0.001]. FH but not FCHL children had higher hs-CRP levels than controls [0.7(0.01-6.9)mg/L vs 0.3(0.1-1.2)mg/L, p=0.006]. In the entire sample of dyslipidemic children, carotid IMT was positively associated with soluble P-selectin levels (rho=0.30, p=0.049), but not with hs-CRP. The association between P-selectin and carotid IMT was independent from confounders, including plasma lipid levels. CONCLUSION: Endothelial-platelet activation, more than low-grade systemic inflammation, correlates with premature atherosclerosis among children with familial dyslipidemia, this association being independent from plasma lipid levels.

Effects of long-term Irbesartan in reducing portal pressure in cirrhotic patients: comparison with propranolol in a randomised controlled study.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The role of angiotensin II (AT-II) type I receptor antagonists in the treatment of portal hypertension remains controversial. We tested the efficacy of Irbesartan (Irb) vs. Propranolol (Pro) in reducing portal pressure and evaluated its systemic haemodynamic effects. METHODS: Thirty-four patients were randomly assigned to receive either Irb 300 mg/day (19 patients) or Pro 40-120 mg/day (15 patients) for 2 months. RESULTS: Irb was discontinued in five patients (26%). No major side effect occurred in the Pro group. On an average, the portal pressure gradient decreased significantly more in the Pro than in the Irb group (median -19.5%, range -11/-31% vs. -4.8%, +2.5/-10%, P<0.001). A clinically significant decrease was seen in one (7%) of the patients given Irb vs. five (33%) given Pro (P<0.02). The fall in mean arterial pressure was significantly higher with Irb than with Pro (median -29%, range -15/-45% vs. -4.9%, +8/-19%, P<0.02). Irb significantly modified the blood creatinine clearance (median -29 ml/m, range +9/-61 ml/m, -30, -24/-35% P<0.0001 vs. basal). CONCLUSIONS: Irb offers no advantage over Pro in the control of portal hypertension. Moreover, its therapeutic profile is limited by important side effects.