Chip-based capillary electrophoresis profiling of olive pollen extracts used for allergy diagnosis and immunotherapy.

Standardization of protein extracts for clinical purposes represents an important task in order to maintain adequate reactivity, presence of the relevant allergens, and safety among other factors. The main objective of this work was to explore the potential use of a chip-based automated CE system commercially available to analyze several of the most common forms of allergenic extracts from olive pollen used in allergy clinics. These include experimental extracts prepared from olive pollens, in-house reference extracts, extracts designed for skin prick test assays, and a panel of vaccine variants aimed to specific immunotherapy. As a major conclusion of the study, chip-based CE allowed in all cases to determine accurate protein profiles with different degrees of sensitivity, where several allergens (particularly the major olive pollen allergen Ole e 1) were easily recognized. Moreover, several purified allergens were also analyzed by this method, and proposed as specific standards for different purposes. In the present condition, the method can only provide the protein profile of the extracts with respect to a preestablished standard extract, but not allergen identification. However, these and other future developments and applications are discussed.

Pollen from different olive tree cultivars contains varying amounts of the major allergen Ole e 1.

BACKGROUND: Commercial olive pollen from uncertain cultivar origin is the common material used for clinical and biological studies. We aimed to assess the putative heterogeneity of olive cultivars with regard to the presence of the major pollen allergen Ole e 1 and to determine whether these differences have clinical relevance. METHODS: The Ole e 1 content of several cultivars was determined by immunoblotting and ultrastructural immunocytochemistry and compared to that of a commercially available olive pollen extract designed for diagnosis. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analysis of Ole e 1 transcripts was also performed. Crude protein extracts were used to carry out skin prick tests (SPTs) on 30 allergic patients in order to evaluate the clinical importance of such differences. RESULTS: Ole e 1 was present in all cultivars, although significant quantitative differences were detected. Ole e 1 transcripts positively correlated with the amount of the allergen. Significant variations in the average reactivity of allergic patients to SPTs were observed depending on the cultivar considered. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of the Ole e 1 allergen in all the cultivars suggests that this allergen may play an essential biological role. The expression of the allergen is controlled at the transcriptional level. The significant differences in the Ole e 1 content are likely responsible for the different average reactivity exhibited by patients to the cultivars studied, although the role of other allergens cannot be excluded. Our results suggest that the use of the commercial pollen mixtures currently available may lead to mistakes in allergy diagnosis and to limited success in immunotherapy. Therefore, further standardization is strongly recommended.