Melasma and reflectance confocal microscopy: from baseline to treatment monitoring.

Melasma is a frequent condition worldwide, and it represents one of the most challenging disorders to treat in cosmetic dermatology. One of the critical factors for treatment prognosis is the assessment of the depth and distribution of pigment within the hyperpigmented area. Nowadays, non-invasive skin imaging techniques, such as reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM), have been used to estimate pigment distribution and depth within different skin layers. This article aims to provide a systematic review of RCM applications in melasma, providing terminology and investigating characteristics of melasma at baseline and after medical and laser treatment. Our results support the recognition of two main types of melasma, epidermal and mixed type, thanks to the role of RCM in highlighting the precise pigment depth location in the skin non-invasively. RCM treatment monitoring enables the objectification of pigment variations after treatment and the identification of prognostic factors for different treatment modalities. After the era of the application of RCM as a technique applied strictly to skin cancers, additional cosmetic applications are emerging, such as the application of melasma treatment monitoring.

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Is a Major Prognostic Factor in Non-small Cell Lung Carcinoma Patients Undergoing First Line Immunotherapy With Pembrolizumab.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Lung cancer is one of the most common malignant neoplastic diseases and by far the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have received increasing attention for playing a crucial role in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Biomarkers, such as programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and tumor mutational burden (TMB), seemed to be helpful in selecting patients who are more likely to benefit from ICI treatment: however, their role has not yet been fully clarified. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, we evaluated the relationship between pre-treatment peripheral blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and survival in 252 patients suffering from advanced NSCLC who had received pembrolizumab as their first-line immunotherapy. RESULTS: Compared to their NLR low counterparts who had a median overall survival (OS) of 34.8 months, patients with NLRs above 4.8 had a median OS of 7.6 months (HR=3.26, 95%Cl=2.3-4.6, p-value<0.0000001). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, alongside other variables, such as metastatic sites, age, and sex, NLR and PD-L1 predicted progression-free survival and OS; furthermore, a very high NLR - over 10 - seemed to forecast a very dismal prognosis in patients undergoing immunotherapy, with sudden deaths in the days immediately following therapy (median OS=3.8 months). CONCLUSION: NLR acts as a valuable and reliable prognostic factor in non-small cell lung carcinoma patients undergoing first line immunotherapy with pembrolizumab. Additional investigation is necessary to fully elucidate the underlying biological rationale, which can be found in myeloid derived suppressor cells, a heterogeneous population of cells with neutrophil-like immunophenotypic features.

Consolidative thoracic radiation therapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer in the era of first-line chemoimmunotherapy: preclinical data and a retrospective study in Southern Italy.

Background: Consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) has been commonly used in the management of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Nevertheless, phase III trials exploring first-line chemoimmunotherapy have excluded this treatment approach. However, there is a strong biological rationale to support the use of radiotherapy (RT) as a boost to sustain anti-tumor immune responses. Currently, the benefit of TRT after chemoimmunotherapy remains unclear. The present report describes the real-world experiences of 120 patients with ES-SCLC treated with different chemoimmunotherapy combinations. Preclinical data supporting the hypothesis of anti-tumor immune responses induced by RT are also presented. Methods: A total of 120 ES-SCLC patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy since 2019 in the South of Italy were retrospectively analyzed. None of the patients included in the analysis experienced disease progression after undergoing first-line chemoimmunotherapy. Of these, 59 patients underwent TRT after a multidisciplinary decision by the treatment team. Patient characteristics, chemoimmunotherapy schedule, and timing of TRT onset were assessed. Safety served as the primary endpoint, while efficacy measured in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was used as the secondary endpoint. Immune pathway activation induced by RT in SCLC cells was explored to investigate the biological rationale for combining RT and immunotherapy. Results: Preclinical data supported the activation of innate immune pathways, including the STimulator of INterferon pathway (STING), gamma-interferon-inducible protein (IFI-16), and mitochondrial antiviral-signaling protein (MAVS) related to DNA and RNA release. Clinical data showed that TRT was associated with a good safety profile. Of the 59 patients treated with TRT, only 10% experienced radiation toxicity, while no ≥ G3 radiation-induced adverse events occurred. The median time for TRT onset after cycles of chemoimmunotherapy was 62 days. Total radiation dose and fraction dose of TRT include from 30 Gy in 10 fractions, up to definitive dose in selected patients. Consolidative TRT was associated with a significantly longer PFS than systemic therapy alone (one-year PFS of 61% vs. 31%, p<0.001), with a trend toward improved OS (one-year OS of 80% vs. 61%, p=0.027). Conclusion: Multi-center data from establishments in the South of Italy provide a general confidence in using TRT as a consolidative strategy after chemoimmunotherapy. Considering the limits of a restrospective analysis, these preliminary results support the feasibility of the approach and encourage a prospective evaluation.

Survival analyses of the ZeOxaNMulti trial: Follow-up randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of oral PMA-zeolite to prevent chemotherapy-induced side effects, especially peripheral neuropathy.

Following the previously published results of the clinical randomized ZeOxaNMulti trial, we evaluated the potential of the tested product PMA-ZEO (Multizeo Med) in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced side effects (especially peripheral neuropathy) within a 30-month follow-up analysis. The aim was to determine the disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in a study-population suffering from colorectal cancer that was previously enrolled in the ZeOxaNMulti trial from April 2015 to October 2018. The participants of the study were randomized to receive either PMA-ZEO or placebo while undergoing oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. A total of 104 patients (pts) (51% of participants randomized to the PMA-ZEO group and 49% to the placebo group), out of a total of 120 pts included in the ZeOxaNMulti trial in 2015, were followed up until March 2021 and were included in the follow-up analysis. According to the chemotherapy line, 44.2% of patients received chemotherapy in an adjuvant setting, and 55.8% of patients received chemotherapy as first-line treatment. The statistical analysis for DFS, PFS, and OS was performed by comparison of the end results with data from the PMA-ZEO/placebo-intervention start point. The analysis of OS did not show statistically significant differences in the first-line chemotherapy patients randomized to PMA-ZEO than among the placebo group (p = 0.1) over the whole period of follow-up (30 months). However, focusing on the PMA-ZEO supplementation time point (7 months), a positive and statistically significant trend (p = 0.004) was documented in the OS analysis for the first-line chemotherapy patients with increasing months of PMA-ZEO treatment compared to the placebo group. Furthermore, borderline statistical significance was reached for PFS at the PMA-ZEO supplementation time point (7 months) in the first-line chemotherapy patients (p = 0.05) for cancer progression events. After stratification of the first-line chemotherapy patients, statistically relevant trends for OS for age, comorbidities, and oxaliplatin dosage (cycles) were also determined. The overall results for DFS (adjuvant patients), PFS (first-line chemotherapy patients), and OS (adjuvant and first-line chemotherapy patients) were generally slightly better in the PMA-ZEO group than in the placebo group, even though no statistically significant results were obtained between the groups within the follow-up period until 2021 (30 months). Based on this follow-up analysis, protective effects of PMA-zeolite supplementation can be deduced. A positive trend and more importantly, significant results in PFS and OS for specific patient groups during and/or after PMA-ZEO treatment were determined, which supports the use of PMA-ZEO as an oncological supportive therapy.