Timed adoptive T cell transfer during chemotherapy in patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: The presence of T cells and suppressive myeloid cells in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) correlate with good and bad clinical outcome, respectively. This suggests that EOC may be sensitive to adoptive cell therapy with autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), provided that immunosuppression by myeloid-derived suppressor cells and M2 macrophages is reduced. Platinum-based chemotherapy can alleviate such immunosuppression, potentially creating a window of opportunity for T cell-based immunotherapy. METHODS: We initiated a phase I/II trial (NCT04072263) in patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive EOC receiving TIL during platinum-based chemotherapy. TILs were administered 2 weeks after the second, third and fourth chemotherapy course. Patients were treated in two cohorts with or without interferon-α (IFNa), as conditioning and TIL support regimen. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the feasibility and safety according to CTCAE V.4.03 criteria and the clinical response and immune modulatory effects of this treatment were evaluated as secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were enrolled. TIL could be successfully expanded for all patients. TIL treatment during chemotherapy without IFNa (n=13) was safe but the combination with IFNa added to the chemotherapy-induced toxicity with 2 out of 3 patients developing thrombocytopenia as dose-limiting toxicity. Fourteen patients completed treatment with a full TIL cycle and were further evaluated for clinical and immunological response. Platinum-based chemotherapy resulted in reduction of circulating myeloid cell numbers and IL-6 plasma levels, confirming its immunosuppression-alleviating effect. Three complete (CR), nine partial responses and two stable diseases were recorded, resulting in an objective response rate of 86% (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors V.1.1). Interestingly, progression free survival that exceeded the previous platinum-free interval was detected in two patients, including an exceptionally long and ongoing CR in one patient that coincided with sustained alleviation of immune suppression. CONCLUSION: TIL therapy can be safely combined with platinum-based chemotherapy but not in combination with IFNa. The chemotherapy-mediated reduction in immunosuppression and the increase in platinum-free interval for two patients warrants further exploration of properly-timed TIL infusions during platinum-based chemotherapy, possibly further benefiting from IL-2 support, as a novel treatment option for EOC patients.

Intradermal vaccination of HPV-16 E6 synthetic peptides conjugated to an optimized Toll-like receptor 2 ligand shows safety and potent T cell immunogenicity in patients with HPV-16 positive (pre-)malignant lesions.

BACKGROUND: Amplivant is a molecularly optimized Toll-like receptor 2 ligand that can be covalently conjugated to tumor peptide antigens. In preclinical models, amplivant-adjuvanted synthetic long peptides (SLPs) strongly enhanced antigen presentation by dendritic cells, T cell priming and induction of effective antitumor responses. The current study is a first-in-human trial to investigate safety and immunogenicity of amplivant conjugated to human papillomavirus (HPV) 16-SLP. METHODS: A dose escalation phase I vaccination trial was performed in 25 patients treated for HPV16 positive (pre-)malignant lesions. Amplivant was conjugated to two SLPs derived from the two most immunodominant regions of the HPV16 E6 oncoprotein. The vaccine, containing a mix of these two conjugates in watery solution without any other formulation, was injected intradermally three times with a 3-week interval in four dose groups (1, 5, 20 or 50 µg per conjugated peptide). Safety data were collected during the study. Peptide-specific T cell immune responses were determined in blood samples taken before, during and after vaccination using complementary immunological assays. RESULTS: Toxicity after three amplivant-conjugated HPV16-SLP vaccinations was limited to grade 1 or 2, observed as predominantly mild skin inflammation at the vaccination site and sometimes mild flu-like symptoms. Adverse events varied from none in the lowest dose group to mild/moderate vaccine-related inflammation in all patients and flu-like symptoms in three out of seven patients in the highest dose group, after at least one injection. In the lowest dose group, vaccine-induced T cell responses were observed in the blood of three out of six vaccinated persons. In the highest dose group, all patients displayed a strong HPV16-specific T cell response after vaccination. These HPV16-specific T cell responses lasted until the end of the trial. CONCLUSIONS: Amplivant-conjugated SLPs can safely be used as an intradermal therapeutic vaccine to induce robust HPV16-specific T cell immunity in patients previously treated for HPV16 positive (pre-) malignancies. Increased vaccine dose was associated with a higher number of mild adverse events and with stronger systemic T cell immunity. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT02821494 and 2014-000658-12.

Low-dose interferon-alpha preconditioning and adoptive cell therapy in patients with metastatic melanoma refractory to standard (immune) therapies: a phase I/II study.

BACKGROUND: Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) with tumor-reactive T cells has shown consistent clinical efficacy. We evaluated the response to ACT in combination with interferon alpha (IFNa) preconditioning in patients with stage IV metastatic melanoma, most of which were progressive on cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 and/or programmed cell death protein 1 checkpoint blockade therapy. METHODS: Thirty-four patients were treated with ex vivo expanded tumor reactive T cells, derived from mixed lymphocyte autologous tumor cultures, or with autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and evaluated for clinical response. Clinical and immunological parameters associated with response were also evaluated. RESULTS: Best overall response defined as clinical benefit, comprising either complete response, partial response or stable disease >6 months, was observed in 29% of the patients. Forty-three per cent of the 14 immunotherapy-naïve patients and 20% of the 20 patients progressive on prior immunotherapy benefited from ACT. The overall survival (OS) was 90% versus 28.6% at 1 year and 46.7% versus 0% at 3 years follow-up, of responder and non-responder patients, respectively. Median OS was 36 versus 7 months, respectively. IFNa pretreatment resulted in leukopenia, neutropenia and lymphopenia, which was sustained during the treatment in clinical responders and associated with response. Differences in antigen specificity, but not in phenotype, cytokine profile or CD8+ T cell number of the ACT products correlated with clinical response. Cross-reactivity of the ACT products to one or more allogeneic human leukocyte antigen-matched melanoma cell lines was associated with short OS after treatment while the ACT products of very long-term survivors showed no cross-reactivity but recognized patient-specific neoantigens. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that ACT in combination with a mild IFNa preconditioning regimen can induce clinical benefit even in immunotherapy pretreated patients, although with lower success than in immunotherapy-naïve patients. ACT products comprising neoantigen reactivity may be more effective.

Phase I/II study protocol to assess safety and efficacy of adoptive cell therapy with anti-PD-1 plus low-dose pegylated-interferon-alpha in patients with metastatic melanoma refractory to standard of care treatments: the ACTME trial.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy does not lead to long-lasting clinical responses in approximately 60% of patients with metastatic melanoma. These refractory patients, however, can still respond to treatment with tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) and interferon-alpha (IFNa). A combination of TIL, pegylated-interferon-alpha (PEG-IFNa) and anti-PD-1 is expected to provide a safe, feasible and effective therapy for patients with metastatic melanoma, who are refractory to standard of care treatment options. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Patients are treated in two phases. In phase I, the safety of the combination TIL and anti-PD-1 is assessed (cohort 1) according to CTCAE 4.03 criteria. Subsequently, the safety of cotreatment with PEG-IFNa is tested in cohort 2. The efficacy will be evaluated in the second phase of the trial. Efficacy is evaluated according to RECIST 1.1 and immune-related response criteria. Clinical and immunological parameters will be evaluated for their relation with clinical responsiveness. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval of the trial was obtained from the Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects in the Netherlands. The trial results will be shared with the scientific community at (inter)national conferences and by publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03638375; Pre-results.

Everolimus in Patients With Advanced Follicular-Derived Thyroid Cancer: Results of a Phase II Clinical Trial.

Background: Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) upregulation has been reported to be involved in the pathogenesis of thyroid tumors, and treatment with the mTOR inhibitor everolimus has shown promising results in endocrine tumors. We conducted a prospective phase II clinical trial to determine the efficacy and safety of everolimus in patients with advanced follicular-derived thyroid cancer. Patients and Methods: Twenty-eight patients with progressive metastatic or locally advanced radioactive refractory differentiated thyroid cancer and 7 patients with anaplastic thyroid cancer were included and received everolimus 10 mg orally once daily. The primary endpoint was disease control rate [complete (CR) + partial response (PR) + stable disease (SD) > 24 weeks]. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), toxicity, and mutational and pharmacokinetic-related outcomes. Results: Median follow-up duration was 38 months (2-64). Seventeen patients (65%) showed SD, of which 15 (58%) showed SD >24 weeks. No CR or PR was observed. Median PFS and OS were 9 [95% confidence interval (CI): 4 to 14] and 18 (95% CI: 7 to 29) months, respectively. Survival was negatively influenced by the presence of bone metastases. Toxicity was predominantly grade 1/2 and included anemia (64%), cough (64%), stomatitis (61%), and hyperglycemia (61%). Duration of SD was related to everolimus exposure. The presence of somatic gene variants related to mTOR signaling did not clearly stratify for responses. Conclusion: Everolimus has clinically relevant antitumor activity in patients with advanced differentiated thyroid cancer. Given the observed disease control rate and the relatively low toxicity profile, further investigation of everolimus in sequential or combination therapy in these patients is warranted.