Energy devices versus electrocoagulation in video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: a propensity-match cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to compare the effect on perioperative outcome of intraoperative use of different devices for tissue dissection (electrocoagulation [EC] or energy devices [ED]) in patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy for lung cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 191 consecutive patients who underwent VATS lobectomy, divided into two cohorts: ED (117 patients), and EC (74 patients); after propensity score matching, 148 patients were extracted, 74 for each cohort. The primary endpoints considered were complication rate and 30-day mortality rate. The secondary endpoints considered were length of stay (LOS) and the number of lymph nodes harvested. RESULTS: The complication rate did not differ between the two cohorts (16.22% EC group, 19.66% ED group, P=0.549), before and after propensity matching (16.22% for both EC and ED group, P=1.000). The 30-day mortality rate was 1 in the overall population. Median LOS was 5 days for both groups, before and after propensity match, with the same interquartile range, (IQR: 4-8). ED group had a significantly higher median number of lymph nodes harvested (ED median: 18, IQR: 12-24; EC median: 10, IQR: 5-19; P=0.0002). The difference was confirmed after the propensity score matching (ED median: 17, IQR: 13-23; EC median: 10, IQR: 5-19; P=0.0008). CONCLUSIONS: ED dissection during VATS lobectomy did not lead to different complication rates, mortality rates, and LOS compared to EC tissue dissection. ED use led to a significantly higher number of intraoperative lymph nodes harvested compared to EC use.

Decurarization After Thoracic Anesthesia using sugammadex compared to neostigmine (DATA trial): a multicenter randomized double-blinded controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic surgery is a high-risk surgery especially for the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. Postoperative residual paralysis has been shown to be a risk factor for pulmonary complications. Nevertheless, there are few data in the literature concerning the use of neuromuscular blocking agent antagonists in patients undergoing lung surgery. METHODS: Seventy patients were randomized in three Italian centers to receive sugammadex or neostigmine at the end of thoracic surgery according to the depth of the residual neuromuscular block. The primary outcome was the time from reversal administration to a train-of-four ratio (TOFR) of 0.9. Secondary outcomes were the time to TOFR of 1.0, to extubation, to postanesthesia unit (PACU) discharge, postoperative complications until 30 days after surgery, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Median time to recovery to a TOFR of 0.9 was significantly shorter in the sugammadex group compared to the neostigmine one (88 vs. 278 s - P < 0.001). The percentage of patients who recovered to a TOFR of 0.9 within 5 min from reversal administration was 94.4% and 58.8% in the sugammadex and neostigmine groups, respectively (P < 0.001). The time to extubation, but not the PACU stay time, was significantly shorter in the sugammadex group. No differences were found between the study groups as regards postoperative complications and length of hospital stay. The superiority of sugammadex in shortening the recovery time was confirmed for both deep/moderate and shallow/minimal neuromuscular block. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing thoracic surgery, sugammadex ensures a faster recovery from the neuromuscular block and earlier extubation compared to neostigmine.

The safety of thoracic paravertebral block and erector spinae plane block in patients treated with anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy. A narrative review of the evidence.

INTRODUCTION: The management of thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) and erector spine plane block (ESPB) in patients treated with anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy is based on limited clinical data, mostly from single case reports. Scientific societies and organizations do not provide strong detailed indications about the limitations of these regional anesthesia techniques in patients receiving antithrombotic therapy. This review summarizes evidence regarding TPVB and ESPB in patients under antithrombotic therapy. EVIDENCE ACQUSITION: A literature review from PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, Google Scholar and Web of Science databases was conducted from 1999 to 2022 to identify articles concerning TPVB and ESPB for cardio-thoracic surgery or thoracic procedures in patients under anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 1704 articles were identified from the initial search. After removing duplicates and not-pertinent articles, 15 articles were analyzed. The results demonstrated a low risk of bleeding for TPVB and minimal or absent risk for ESPB. Ultrasound guidance was extensively used to perform ESPB, but not for TPVB. CONCLUSIONS: Although the low level of evidence available, TPVB and ESPB are reasonably safe options in patients ineligible for epidural anesthesia due to antithrombotic therapy. The few published studies suggest that ESPB offers a risk profile safer than TPVB and the use of ultrasound guidance minimizes any complication. Since the literature available does not allow us to draw definitive conclusions, future adequately-powered trials are warranted to determine the indications and the safety of TPVB and ESPB in patients receiving anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy.

All-in-one diagnostic and therapeutic precision thoracic surgery using a hybrid operating theatre: the triple-marking technique.

BACKGROUND: The minimally invasive management of sub-centimetric and often sub-solid lung lesions is quite challenging for thoracic surgeons. As a matter of fact, thoracoscopic wedge resection can often require conversion to thoracotomy when pulmonary lesions cannot be visually identified. Hybrid operating rooms (ORs) can serve as a helpful tool in a multidisciplinary setting, providing real-time lesion imaging and targeting, allowing preoperative or intraoperative percutaneous placement of different lesions targeting techniques to help locate non-palpable lung nodules during video-assisted thoracic surgery. The aim of the study is to assess whether the lung nodule marking using methylene blue, indocyanine green, and gold seeds - the "triple-marking technique" - in the hybrid OR is effective in helping locate non-visible or palpable nodules. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study on 19 patients with non-palpable lung lesions requiring VATS wedge resection and underwent lesional targeting in the hybrid operating room with different marking systems, including gold seeds placement, methylene blue, or indocyanine green. Lesions were considered non-palpable due to sizing, radiological subsolid aspect, or location and then identified using intraoperative CT scans, also allowing to elaborate needle trajectory. The intraoperative diagnosis was obtained in all of the patients guiding the type of surgery performed. RESULTS: The radio-opaque gold seed marker was used in all of the patients except for two cases that developed intraprocedural pneumothoraces with no major consequences. In these patients, the nodule marking using dyes was still performed and successful in allowing to locate the lesion. Methylene blue and indocyanine green were always used in combination during the dye-targeting phase. Methylene blue appeared to be non-visible in two patients. The indocyanine green was correctly visualized in every patient. We observed the gold seed dislocation in two patients. We were able to identify the lung lesion in all the patients correctly. No conversion was needed. No allergic reactions were observed due to dye administration, and no prophylaxis was performed prior to lesional marking. The lung lesions were visually identified in 100% of the patients thanks to at least one marking technique. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience confirms that the hybrid operating room can represent a suitable tool in helping locate hard-to-find lung lesions in planned VATS resections. Using different techniques, a multiple marking approach seems advisable to maximize the lung lesions detecting rate by direct vision, therefore reducing the VATS conversion rate.

Awake or intubated surgery in diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases? A prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Risks associated with video-assisted surgical lung biopsy (VASLB) for interstitial lung disease (ILD) with endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation are not nil. Awake video-assisted surgical lung biopsy (Awake-VASLB) has been proposed as a method to obtain a precise diagnosis in several different thoracic diseases. OBJECTIVES: To compare clinical outcomes of Awake-VASLB and Intubated-VASLB in patients with suspected ILDs. METHODS: From June 2016 to February 2020, all patients submitted to elective VASLB for suspected ILD were included. Differences in outcomes between Awake-VASLB and Intubated-VASLB were assessed through univariable, multivariable-adjusted, and a propensity score-matched analysis. RESULTS: Awake-VASLB was performed in 66 out of 100 patients, while 34 underwent Intubated-VASLB. The Awake-VASLB resulted in a lower post-operative morbidity (OR 0.025; 95% CI 0.001-0.35; p=0.006), less unexpected intensive care unit admission, less need for rescue therapy for pain, a reduced surgical and anaesthesiologic time, a reduced chest drain duration, and a lower post-operative length of stay. CONCLUSION: Awake-VASLB in patients affected by ILD is feasible and seems safer than Intubated-VASLB.

Independent high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in the management of asymmetric acute lung injury.

We present a case of independent lung ventilation in an adult with asymmetric acute lung injury. We applied a conventional protective ventilatory strategy to the more homogeneously infiltrated lung and high-frequency oscillatory ventilation to the almost totally collapsed lung, because a conventional protective strategy exposed this lung to plateau pressure more than 30 cm H2O, whereas high-frequency oscillatory ventilation provided sufficient gas exchange at safer pressure levels. Analysis of a lung computed tomography scan was used to evaluate the efficacy of the ventilatory strategy.