Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Gynecol Oncol ; 130(1): 69-74, 2013 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23474343

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study is to evaluate the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACHT) of patients with recurrent cervical cancer who were poor candidates for pelvic exenteration (PE), and the impact on DFS and OS. METHODS: A retrospective data collection extracted from medical records of 61 patients submitted to pelvic exenteration was performed: 30 underwent up-front exenterative procedure whereas 31 received NACHT. RESULTS: The median tumor size was significantly (P=0.0006) larger in the NACHT group compared to the up-front PE one (43.9 mm vs 28 mm), and a significant (P=0.04) higher percentage of patients (45 vs 20%) had lateral pelvic wall invasion in the NACHT group. No statistically significant difference in early and late complications was observed in the two groups. Median overall survival in study population was 42.9 months (95% CI: 22.2, 180.8). Median overall survival times as well as recurrence free survival times were not significantly different between NACHT (42.9 months and 36.1 months for OS and DFS respectively) vs. No NACHT (111.9 months and 48.1 months for OS and DFS respectively). There was an overall significant difference in DFS between negative and positive margins but the curves were similar for NACHT and up-front PE groups stratified by resection margin status. CONCLUSIONS: In our series, though small and retrospective, NACHT prior to PE represents a feasible therapeutic option without intra-operative and early post-operative mortality or worsening of early and late complication rate and with acceptable long-term survival and DFS for recurrent cervical cancer patients who are poor candidates for up-front pelvic exenteration.


Assuntos
Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Exenteração Pélvica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia
2.
Obstet Gynecol Int ; 2013: 931318, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23983700

RESUMO

Introduction. This study was designed to confirm the feasibility and safety of robotic-assisted transperitoneal aortic lymphadenectomy as part of staging procedure for gynecologic malignancies. Methods. Chart review of 51 patients who had undergone robotic staging with aortic lymphadenectomy for different gynaecologic malignancies was performed. Results. The primary diagnosis was as follows: 6 cases of endometrial cancer, 31 epithelial ovarian cancer, 9 nonepithelial ovarian cancer, 4 tubal cancer, and 1 cervical cancer. Median BMI was 23 kg/m(2). Except for a single case of aortic lymphadenectomy only, both aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomies were performed at the time of the staging procedure. All the para-aortic lymphadenectomies were carried out to the level of the renal veinl but 6 cases were carried out to the level of the inferior mesenteric artery. Hysterectomy was performed in 24 patiens (47%). There was no conversion to LPT. The median console time was 285 (range 195-402) with a significant difference between patients who underwent hysterectomy and those who did not. The median estimated blood loss was 50 mL (range 20-200). The mean number of removed nodes was 29 ± 9.6. The mean number of pelvic nodes was 15 ± 7.6, whereas the mean number of para-aortic nodes was 14 ± 6.6. Conclusions. Robotic transperitoneal infrarenal aortic lymphadenectomy as part of staging procedure is feasible and can be safely performed. Additional trocars are needed when pelvic surgery is also performed.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA