Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Pediatr Radiol ; 54(5): 693-701, 2024 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38289399

RESUMO

This review describes our institution's standardized technique as well as potential pitfalls for therapeutic steroid injections in children with symptomatic neuromuscular hip dysplasia. Symptomatic, painful neuromuscular hip dysplasia can dramatically affect quality of life. Steroid injections are used to identify the source of perceived pain, temporarily treat pain while awaiting surgical intervention, or for therapeutic management for nonoperative hip joints.


Assuntos
Cuidados Paliativos , Humanos , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Criança , Injeções Intramusculares/métodos , Doenças Neuromusculares/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças Neuromusculares/complicações , Doenças Neuromusculares/terapia , Injeções Intra-Articulares , Masculino , Feminino , Pré-Escolar , Luxação do Quadril/diagnóstico por imagem , Luxação do Quadril/terapia
2.
J Pediatr Orthop ; 44(7): e592-e597, 2024 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38686934

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Chat generative pre-trained transformer (ChatGPT) has garnered attention in health care for its potential to reshape patient interactions. As patients increasingly rely on artificial intelligence platforms, concerns about information accuracy arise. In-toeing, a common lower extremity variation, often leads to pediatric orthopaedic referrals despite observation being the primary treatment. Our study aims to assess ChatGPT's responses to pediatric in-toeing questions, contributing to discussions on health care innovation and technology in patient education. METHODS: We compiled a list of 34 common in-toeing questions from the "Frequently Asked Questions" sections of 9 health care-affiliated websites, identifying 25 as the most encountered. On January 17, 2024, we queried ChatGPT 3.5 in separate sessions and recorded the responses. These 25 questions were posed again on January 21, 2024, to assess its reproducibility. Two pediatric orthopaedic surgeons evaluated responses using a scale of "excellent (no clarification)" to "unsatisfactory (substantial clarification)." Average ratings were used when evaluators' grades were within one level of each other. In discordant cases, the senior author provided a decisive rating. RESULTS: We found 46% of ChatGPT responses were "excellent" and 44% "satisfactory (minimal clarification)." In addition, 8% of cases were "satisfactory (moderate clarification)" and 2% were "unsatisfactory." Questions had appropriate readability, with an average Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level of 4.9 (±2.1). However, ChatGPT's responses were at a collegiate level, averaging 12.7 (±1.4). No significant differences in ratings were observed between question topics. Furthermore, ChatGPT exhibited moderate consistency after repeated queries, evidenced by a Spearman rho coefficient of 0.55 ( P = 0.005). The chatbot appropriately described in-toeing as normal or spontaneously resolving in 62% of responses and consistently recommended evaluation by a health care provider in 100%. CONCLUSION: The chatbot presented a serviceable, though not perfect, representation of the diagnosis and management of pediatric in-toeing while demonstrating a moderate level of reproducibility in its responses. ChatGPT's utility could be enhanced by improving readability and consistency and incorporating evidence-based guidelines. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-diagnostic.


Assuntos
Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Humanos , Criança , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Inteligência Artificial , Pediatria/métodos
3.
J Pediatr Orthop ; 44(6): e485-e489, 2024 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38545876

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Hip dysplasia reportedly occurs in up to 12% of the general population and may be higher in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). When using lateral center edge angle (LCEA) measurements to help identify hip dysplasia, it is uncertain if this measurement can be performed reliably on scoliosis radiographs due to parallax. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the reliability of measuring LCEA on scoliosis radiographs compared with standard pelvis radiographs. METHODS: This study evaluated 40 hips on 20 patients (mean age 12.5 years ± 3.1; 50% Female) who received PA scoliosis radiographs and AP pelvis radiographs within 1 year of each other. Review was performed by 4 pediatric radiologists (2 general, 2 MSK), 2 pediatric orthopaedic surgeons, and 1 research fellow. Radiographic measurement of the LCEA for each hip was first performed on the scoliosis radiograph. After a minimum of 3 days, the LCEA was measured on a pelvis radiograph of the same individual obtained within 1 year of the scoliosis radiograph. Pearson coefficient was used to measure agreement between scoliosis and pelvis radiograph measurements. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate intraobserver and interobserver agreement. ICC values <0.5 were classified as poor reliability, 0.5 to 0.75 were classified moderate, 0.75 to 0.90 were classified good, and >0.9 indicated excellent reliability. RESULTS: The mean difference between scoliosis and pelvis radiographs was 54 ± 79 days. There was good-to-excellent interobserver agreement on LCEA measurements made between readers on scoliosis radiographs (ICC: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.90-0.96, P <0.001) and pelvis radiographs (ICC: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.83-0.95, P <0.001), and moderate-to-excellent intraobserver agreement for scoliosis radiographs (ICC range: 0.68 to 0.98; P <0.001) and pelvis radiographs (ICC range: 0.62 to 0.96; P <0.001). There was a strong correlation between LCEA measurements made on scoliosis and pelvis radiographs ( r2 =0.66, P <0.001), and the intermodality agreement between scoliosis and pelvis radiograph LCEA measurements were moderate to good (ICC range: 0.68 to 0.89, P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there was good-to-excellent agreement between readers on scoliosis and pelvis radiographs, respectively, and moderate-to-excellent intraobserver agreement between LCEA measurements made on scoliosis radiographs and pelvis radiographs, respectively. LCEA measurements made on scoliosis radiographs strongly correlated to the measurements made on pelvis radiographs, and the intermodality ICC was also considered moderate to good. Dedicated pelvis radiographs may not be necessary during scoliosis workup and follow-up surveillance, thereby decreasing radiation exposure, cost, and improving patient care workflow. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-diagnostic study.


Assuntos
Variações Dependentes do Observador , Radiografia , Escoliose , Humanos , Escoliose/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Adolescente , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Masculino , Criança , Radiografia/métodos , Acetábulo/diagnóstico por imagem , Luxação do Quadril/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA