Errors in Calculating Anterior-Posterior Tibial Contact Locations in Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Three-Dimensional Model to Two-Dimensional Image Registration in Radiographs: An In Vitro Study of Two Methods.

Knowledge of anterior-posterior (A-P) tibial contact locations provides an objective assessment of the relative motion of the tibia on the femur following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), which can be used to compare the effects of different components, surgical techniques, and alignment goals on knee function in vivo. Both the lowest point method and the penetration method have been used to calculate A-P tibial contact locations using three-dimensional (3D) model to two-dimensional (2D) image registration. The primary objective of this study was to quantify errors in calculating the A-P tibial contact location using the lowest point and penetration methods because the errors in calculating the A-P tibial contact locations using these two methods are unknown. The A-P tibial contact locations were calculated with the two methods and simultaneously measured with a tibial force sensor in ten fresh-frozen cadaveric knee specimens with a TKA. Single-plane radiographs of the knee specimens were acquired at 0 deg, 30 deg, 60 deg, and 90 deg of flexion in neutrally, internally, and externally rotated orientations. While the radiographs were exposed, reference A-P tibial contact locations were simultaneously collected using the tibial force sensor to be compared to the calculated A-P tibial contact locations. The overall root-mean-squared-errors (RMSEs) in the A-P tibial contact location calculated with the lowest point method, the penetration method with penetration, and penetration method without penetration were 5.5 mm, 3.6 mm, and 8.9 mm, respectively. The overall RMSE was lowest for the penetration method with penetration, making it the superior method for calculating A-P tibial contact locations.

Does the condylar lift-off method or the separation method better detect loss of contact between tibial and femoral implants based on analysis of single-plane radiographs following total knee arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: Loss of contact between the femoral and tibial implants following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been related to accelerated polyethylene wear and other complications. Two methods have been used to detect loss of contact in single-plane fluoroscopy, the condylar lift-off method and the separation method. The objectives were to assess the ability of each method to detect loss of contact. METHODS: TKA was performed on ten cadaveric knee specimens. Tibial force was measured in each compartment as specimens were flexed from 0° to 90° while internal-external and varus-valgus moments were applied. Single-plane radiographs taken simultaneously with tibial force were analyzed for loss of contact using the two methods. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and optimum threshold distances were determined. RESULTS: For the lift-off method and the separation method, the areas under the ROC curves were 0.89 vs 0.60 for the lateral compartment only and 0.81 vs 0.70 for the medial compartment only, respectively. For the lift-off method, the optimum threshold distances were 0.7 mm in the lateral compartment only and 0.1 mm in the medial compartment only but the false positive rate for the medial compartment only almost doubled. For both compartments jointly, the areas under the ROC curves decreased to 0.70 and 0.59 for the lift-off and separation methods, respectively. CONCLUSION: When detecting loss of contact using single-plane fluoroscopy, the lift-off method is useful for the lateral compartment only but not for the medial compartment only and not for both compartments jointly. The separation method is not useful.