Acute Kidney Injury Guidelines Are Associated With Improved Recognition and Follow-up for Neonatal Patients.

BACKGROUND: Studies demonstrate that neonatal acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Acute kidney injury survivors are at risk for renal dysfunction and chronic kidney disease and require long-term follow-up. PURPOSE: To maximize identification of AKI and ensure referral, we created guidelines for diagnosis, evaluation, and management of AKI. METHODS/SEARCH STRATEGY: Retrospective cohort study of neonatal intensive care unit patients treated before guideline implementation (cohort 1; n = 175) and after (cohort 2; n = 52). Outcome measures included AKI incidence, documented diagnosis, and pediatric nephrology consultation. Statistical methods included t tests, Fisher exact tests, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. FINDINGS/RESULTS: We found 68 AKI episodes in 52 patients in cohort 1 and 15 episodes in 12 patients in cohort 2. Diagnosis and documentation of AKI improved after guideline implementation (C1:24/68 [35%], C2: 12/15 [80%]; P = .003) as did pediatric nephrology consultation (C1:12/68 [18%]; C2: 12/15 [80%]; P < .001) and outpatient referral (C1: 3/47 [6%], C2:5/8 [63%]; P < .01). IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Neonatal AKI guideline implementation was associated with improvements in recognition, diagnosis, and inpatient and outpatient nephrology consultation. Early recognition and diagnosis along with specialist referral may improve outcomes among neonatal AKI survivors, ensuring appropriate future monitoring and long-term follow-up. IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH: Future research should continue to determine the long-term implications of early diagnosis of AKI and appropriate subspecialty care with follow-up.

Implementation of a Standardized Premedication Bundle to Improve Procedure Success for Nonemergent Neonatal Intubations.

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends premedication for all nonemergent neonatal intubations, yet there remains significant variation in this practice nationally. We aimed to standardize our unit's premedication practices for improved intubation success and reduced adverse events. Methods: The study workgroup developed educational material and protocol content. Process measures included premedication use, education, and audit form completion. Primary (success on first intubation attempt and adverse event rates) and secondary (trainee success) study outcomes are displayed using statistical process control charts and pre-post cohort comparisons. Results: Forty-seven percent (97/206) of nurses completed educational intervention before protocol release, with an additional 20% (42/206) following a staff reminder. Two hundred sixteen (216) patients were intubated per protocol with 81% (174/216) audit completion. Compared with baseline (n = 158), intubation attempts decreased from 2 (IQR, 1-2) to 1 (IQR, 1-2) (P = 0.03), and success on the first attempt increased from 40% (63/158) to 57% (124/216) (P < 0.01), with a notable improvement in trainee success from less than 1% (1/40) to 43% (31/72) (P < 0.01). The rate of severe and rare adverse events remained stable; however, there was a rise in nonsevere events from 30% (48/158) to 45% (98/216). The tachycardia rate increased with atropine use. There was no change in chest wall rigidity, number of infants unable to extubate following surfactant, or decompensation awaiting medications. Conclusions: Standardizing procedural care delivery reduced intubation attempts and increased the attempt success rate. However, this was accompanied by an increase in the rate of nonsevere adverse events.

Human-centered design strategies in family and staff preparation for neonatal care.

OBJECTIVE: This paper describes human-centered design strategies used to develop solutions for neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) patients, families, and staff in preparation for transition from an open bay (OB) NICU to a single-family room (SFR) NICU. HUMAN-CENTERED DESIGN: Through a series of user group meetings, an interdisciplinary team of NICU families, administrators, providers, nurses, and other care team members (CTMs) collaborated with design professionals to create and carry out their vision for the new NICU. This process, which spanned the design, construction, and transition planning phases of the project, enabled stakeholders at the Medical University of South Carolina in Charleston, South Carolina (USA) to seek solutions for integrating patient and family-centered care into the fabric of its new facility and to redesign the care experience. RESULT: From this work, new opportunities for family and staff engagement emerged. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous end-user involvement led to targeted preparation for neonatal care.