Targeting FFA1 and FFA4 receptors in cancer-induced cachexia.

Free fatty acid (FFA) receptors FFA1 and FFA4 are omega-3 molecular targets in metabolic diseases; however, their function in cancer cachexia remains unraveled. We assessed the role of FFA1 and FFA4 receptors in the mouse model of cachexia induced by Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) cell implantation. Naturally occurring ligands such as α-linolenic acid (ALA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), the synthetic FFA1/FFA4 agonists GW9508 and TUG891, or the selective FFA1 GW1100 or FFA4 AH7614 antagonists were tested. FFA1 and FFA4 expression and other cachexia-related parameters were evaluated. GW9508 and TUG891 decreased tumor weight in LLC-bearing mice. Regarding cachexia-related end points, ALA, DHA, and the preferential FFA1 agonist GW9508 rescued body weight loss. Skeletal muscle mass was reestablished by ALA treatment, but this was not reflected in the fiber cross-sectional areas (CSA) measurement. Otherwise, TUG891, GW1100, or AH7614 reduced the muscle fiber CSA. Treatments with ALA, GW9508, GW1100, or AH7614 restored white adipose tissue (WAT) depletion. As for inflammatory outcomes, ALA improved anemia, whereas GW9508 reduced splenomegaly. Concerning behavioral impairments, ALA and GW9508 rescued locomotor activity, whereas ALA improved motor coordination. Additionally, DHA improved grip strength. Notably, GW9508 restored abnormal brain glucose metabolism in different brain regions. The GW9508 treatment increased leptin levels, without altering uncoupling protein-1 downregulation in visceral fat. LLC-cachectic mice displayed FFA1 upregulation in subcutaneous fat, but not in visceral fat or gastrocnemius muscle, whereas FFA4 was unaltered. Overall, the present study shed new light on FFA1 and FFA4 receptors' role in metabolic disorders, indicating FFA1 receptor agonism as a promising strategy in mitigating cancer cachexia.

Cross Talk between Apical Periodontitis and Metabolic Disorders: Experimental Evidence on the Role of Intestinal Adipokines and Akkermansia muciniphila.

INTRODUCTION: Infection and dysbiosis present a close relationship with metabolic diseases although the influence of apical periodontitis (AP) in this context needs further investigation. This study evaluated the influence of AP in a rat model of metabolic syndrome induced by 10% fructose supplementation. METHODS: Male Wistar rats were used. Animals that received a high-fructose diet (HFD, n = 30) or filtered water (control, n = 30) were subdivided into the following groups: (1) without induction of AP (no AP, n = 10 each), (2) with AP induction 2 weeks before euthanasia (AP 14 days, n = 10 each), and (3) with AP induction 4 weeks before euthanasia (AP 28 days, n = 10 each). RESULTS: HFD triggered metabolic syndrome, as indicated by the induction of overweight and hyperglycemia, besides polydipsia, regardless of the AP induction. Serum or intestinal tumor necrosis factor, interleukin 1 beta, and interleukin 6 levels were undetectable, regardless of the experimental group. Serum leptin and adiponectin levels were significantly elevated in the HFD group without AP induction. The intestinal levels of leptin were significantly increased in the groups with 28 days of AP induction despite HFD. A significant elevation of liver glutathione levels was observed in animals submitted to HFD and AP for 14 days. AP induction (14 or 28 days) led to pulp and periapical tissue inflammation without any influence of HFD. Either HFD or AP induction led to dysbiosis, as indicated by a significant reduction of fecal A. muciniphila expression. CONCLUSIONS: We provide novel evidence that AP can have systemic impacts on metabolic disorders, likely by modulating intestinal metabolism and microbiota.