RESUMO
OPINION STATEMENT: Multiple treatment options are now approved for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). An immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-containing regimen should be highly considered as the first-line treatment when there is no contraindication, especially in those with hepatitis virus-related HCC, due to proven superior overall survival (OS) compared to sorafenib. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and durvalumab plus tremelimumab remain the treatment of choice among all ICI-containing regimens, unless contraindications to either of the medications exist. Although sorafenib is still the only medication currently approved for select patients with Child-Pugh B (CP) HCC in the first-line setting, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab is being studied in this patient population. Moreover, patients with post-liver transplantation recurrence may benefit from tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), while more studies are still needed to determine the safety of ICIs in this setting. Interestingly, multiple potential biomarkers, including tumor mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI) status, and PD-L1 expression level, have inconsistently predicted response to ICIs in patients with HCC. Limited evidence is available to guide treatment choice in later-line settings after progressing on ICIs, and decisions should be based on the safety profile of the treatment regimen and patient preference. Multiple trials are ongoing to elucidate the optimal treatment sequence. Of note, we believe that TKIs (e.g., cabozantinib, regorafenib, lenvatinib, and sorafenib) could be more beneficial in later-line settings to broaden inhibition of other pathways apart from vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). When conventional treatment options are exhausted, tissue biopsy may be helpful to reveal rare targetable mutations, such as RET gene fusions.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/etiologia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/genética , Sorafenibe , Bevacizumab , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular , Neoplasias Hepáticas/etiologia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/genéticaRESUMO
LESSONS LEARNED: This trial evaluating a novel plant extract, PBI-05204, did not meet its primary endpoint of overall survival but did show signals of efficacy in heavily pretreated mPDA. PBI-05204 was generally well tolerated, with the most common side effects related to treatment being vomiting (23.7%), nausea (18.4%), decreased appetite (18.4%), and diarrhea (15.8%). Additional trials are needed to explore the role of PBI-05204 in cancer treatment. BACKGROUND: Survival for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDA) is dismal, and novel agents are needed. PBI-05204 is a modified supercritical carbon dioxide extract of Nerium oleander leaves. Oleandrin, the extract's major cytotoxic component, is a cardiac glycoside that has demonstrated antitumor activity in various tumor cell lines with a mechanism involving inhibition of Akt phosphorylation and through downregulation of mTOR. METHODS: A phase II, single-arm, open-label study to determine the efficacy of PBI-05204 in patients with refractory mPDA therapy was conducted. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), with the hypothesis that 50% of patients would be alive at 4.5 months. Secondary objectives included safety, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall response rate. Patients received oral PBI-05204 daily until progressive disease (PD), unacceptable toxicity, or patient withdrawal. Radiographic response was assessed every two cycles. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were enrolled, and 38 were analyzed. Ten patients were alive at 4.5 months (26.3%) with a median PFS of 56 days. One objective response (2.6%) was observed for 162 days. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 63.2% of patients with the most common being fatigue, vomiting, nausea, decreased appetite, and diarrhea. CONCLUSION: PBI-05204 did not meet its primary endpoint for OS in this study. Recent preclinical data indicate a role for PBI-05204 against glioblastoma multiforme when combined with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. A randomized phase II trial is currently being designed.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Teorema de Bayes , Compostos Heterocíclicos de 4 ou mais Anéis/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The diagnosis of pancreatic cancer carries with it a high mortality rate. Despite advances in the field, this has remained relatively unchanged over the last few decades. Current options for the treatment of resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma will be reviewed here in conjunction with the historical data that support them. We will focus on updates in treatment guidelines and ongoing clinical trials of interest. RECENT FINDINGS: For localized disease, standard of care includes resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy ± chemoradiation. Recently, a report was published supporting the use of doublet therapy with gemcitabine and capecitabine (as opposed to gemcitabine monotherapy), which prompted a practice-changing update to major treatment guidelines. Multiple trials using neoadjuvant treatment, novel therapies, and different forms of radiation are ongoing. Although pancreatic cancer is an active area of research, outcomes remain dismal. Clinical trials will need to be more robust and innovative to drastically improve survival statistics.
Assuntos
Terapia Neoadjuvante , Pancreatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Terapia Combinada , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , PrognósticoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) colorectal cancer (CRC) represents a unique subset of CRC characterized by elevated neoantigen expression and a high degree of intraepithelial T-cell infiltrate. These characteristics make MSI-H tumors particularly susceptible to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as pembrolizumab which inhibit the negative regulation of cytotoxic T-cells and promote T-cell mediated anti-tumor activity. AREAS COVERED: We discuss the drug development of pembrolizumab including the seminal studies which enabled the drug to garner FDA approvals in the refractory and first-line settings for patients with MSI-H CRC, the pharmacokinetic & pharmacodynamic profile of the agent, and the adverse event profile of the ICI. We also discuss unmet needs in the arena of ICIs including strategies to overcome tumor resistance and to increase the applicability of the agents to a broader population of CRC patients. EXPERT OPINION: Despite the anti-tumor activity of pembrolizumab in patients with MSI-H CRC, 30-35% of patients fail to derive any benefit. Ongoing research efforts are seeking to identify ICI combinations, which can overcome CRC resistance to pembrolizumab, move ICIs into the treatment paradigm for patients with localized MSI-H CRC and enable ICIs to become meaningful treatment options for patients with microsatellite stable CRC.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/farmacologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/farmacologia , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/farmacocinética , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Desenvolvimento de Medicamentos , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos , Humanos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/farmacocinética , Instabilidade de Microssatélites , Linfócitos T/imunologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The incidence of colorectal cancer in adults younger than age 50 has increased with rates expected to continue to increase over the next decade. The objective of this study is to examine the survival benefit of surgical resection (primary and/or metastatic) versus palliative therapy in this patient population. METHODS: We identified 6708 young adults aged 18-45 years diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) from 2004 to 2015 from the SEER database. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimation, log rank test, and multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Sixty-three percent of patients in our study underwent primary tumor resection (PTR), with 40% undergoing PTR alone and 23% undergoing both resection of primary disease and metastasectomy. The median OS for patients who underwent both PTR and metastasectomy was 36 months, compared to 13 months for those who did not receive any surgical intervention. The multivariate analysis showed significant OS benefit of receiving both PTR and metastasectomy (HR 0.34, 95% CI: 0.31-0.37, p < 0.001) compared to palliative therapy. Undergoing PTR only and metastasectomy only were also associated with improved OS (HR 0.46, 95% CI: 0.43-0.49, p < 0.001 and HR 0.64, 95% CI: 0.55-0.76, p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: This is the largest observational study to evaluate survival outcomes in young-onset mCRC patients and the role of surgical intervention of the primary and/or metastatic site. Our study provides evidence of statistically significant increase in OS for young mCRC patients who undergo surgical intervention of the primary and/or metastatic site.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/mortalidade , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Metastasectomia/mortalidade , Adulto , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Metastasectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidados Paliativos , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Programa de SEER , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Simple Summary Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is commonly used in several solid tumor malignancies, but remains understudied in the setting of locally advanced colon cancer. Advantages of this strategy extrapolated from other disease sites include early treatment of micro-metastatic disease, the ability to decrease local disease burden potentially leading to more effective resections and improved treatment tolerability. Approaches for accurate staging and safe administration of systemic treatment are being investigated in large, randomized clinical trials, but available data are either not mature enough or have not demonstrated a convincing argument for adoption into standard practice warranting further investigation. Abstract Early stage colon cancer is typically managed with surgical resection, although not all patients experience a durable remission. Adjuvant chemotherapy with a fluoropyrimidine, with or without oxaliplatin, is commonly utilized to increase the chance of cure, but its efficacy in the neoadjuvant setting is not well established. Preoperative chemotherapy has demonstrated safety and efficacy in other gastrointestinal malignancies, but there is a paucity of data from large, prospective randomized trials, although multiple are ongoing. In this review, we will discuss the theoretical risks and benefits, logistical difficulties, and available safety and efficacy data pertaining to the use of chemotherapy in locally advanced colon cancer.
RESUMO
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is one of the deadliest solid tumor malignancies and is projected to become a leading cause of cancer-related death in coming years. Improving quality of life and survival amongst these patients will require new ideas and novel therapies in a multidisciplinary approach. This review will cover the most recent advances in the comprehensive treatment of pancreatic cancer and place them within a historical context when necessary. Treatment of all disease stages will be discussed, but the focus is on systemic therapy as novel drugs and new treatment combinations enter the clinic. This will include more aggressive chemotherapy in earlier disease stages, approved uses for immunotherapy, and targetable mutations. In addition, negative trials of importance and controversial topics will be noted.