Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 21(4): 578-84, 2015 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25811176

RESUMO

Over the span of a few weeks during July and August 2014, events in West Africa changed perceptions of Ebola virus disease (EVD) from an exotic tropical disease to a priority for global health security. We describe observations during that time of a field team from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and personnel of the Liberian Ministry of Health and Social Welfare. We outline the early epidemiology of EVD within Liberia, including the practical limitations on surveillance and the effect on the country's health care system, such as infections among health care workers. During this time, priorities included strengthening EVD surveillance; establishing safe settings for EVD patient care (and considering alternative isolation and care models when Ebola Treatment Units were overwhelmed); improving infection control practices; establishing an incident management system; and working with Liberian airport authorities to implement EVD screening of departing passengers.


Assuntos
Ebolavirus , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/epidemiologia , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/virologia , Gerenciamento Clínico , Ebolavirus/genética , Geografia Médica , Saúde Global , Pessoal de Saúde , Prioridades em Saúde , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/história , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Incidência , Libéria/epidemiologia , Vigilância da População
2.
Health Promot Pract ; 16(6): 792-5, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26386256

RESUMO

The first Ebola cases in West Africa were reported by the Guinea Ministry of Health on March 23, 2014, and by June it became the largest recorded Ebola outbreak. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention field teams were deployed to West Africa, including in-country logistics staff who were critical for ensuring the movement of staff, equipment, and supplies to locations where public health knowledge and experience were applied to meet mission-related requirements. The logistics role was critical to creating the support for epidemiologists, medical doctors, laboratory staff, and health communicators involved in health promotion activities to successfully respond to the epidemic, both in the capital cities and in remote villages. Logistics personnel worked to procure equipment, such as portable video projectors, and have health promotion materials printed. Logistics staff also coordinated delivery of communication and health promotion materials to the embassy and provided assistance with distribution to various partners.


Assuntos
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S./organização & administração , Planejamento em Desastres/organização & administração , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/epidemiologia , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/terapia , Administração em Saúde Pública , Comunicação , Epidemias , Guiné , Promoção da Saúde/organização & administração , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Cooperação Internacional , Libéria , Serra Leoa , Estados Unidos
3.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 63(41): 930-3, 2014 Oct 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25321071

RESUMO

The ongoing Ebola virus disease (Ebola) outbreak in West Africa is the largest and most sustained Ebola epidemic recorded, with 6,574 cases. Among the five affected countries of West Africa (Liberia, Sierra Leone, Guinea, Nigeria, and Senegal), Liberia has had the highest number cases (3,458). This epidemic has severely strained the public health and health care infrastructure of Liberia, has resulted in restrictions in civil liberties, and has disrupted international travel. As part of the initial response, the Liberian Ministry of Health and Social Welfare (MOHSW) developed a national task force and technical expert committee to oversee the management of the Ebola-related activities. During the third week of July 2014, CDC deployed a team of epidemiologists, data management specialists, emergency management specialists, and health communicators to assist MOHSW in its response to the growing Ebola epidemic. One aspect of CDC's response was to work with MOHSW in instituting incident management system (IMS) principles to enhance the organization of the response. This report describes MOHSW's Ebola response structure as of mid-July, the plans made during the initial assessment of the response structure, the implementation of interventions aimed at improving the system, and plans for further development of the response structure for the Ebola epidemic in Liberia.


Assuntos
Planejamento em Desastres/organização & administração , Epidemias/prevenção & controle , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/prevenção & controle , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/epidemiologia , Humanos , Libéria/epidemiologia
4.
MMWR Suppl ; 65(3): 90-7, 2016 Jul 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27387289

RESUMO

From the initial task of getting "50 deployers within 30 days" into the field to support the 2014-2016 Ebola virus disease (Ebola) epidemic response in West Africa to maintaining well over 200 staff per day in the most affected countries (Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone) during the peak of the response, ensuring the safe and effective deployment of international responders was an unprecedented accomplishment by CDC. Response experiences shared by CDC deployed staff returning from West Africa were quickly incorporated into lessons learned and resulted in new activities to better protect the health, safety, security, and resiliency of responding personnel. Enhanced screening of personnel to better match skill sets and experience with deployment needs was developed as a staffing strategy. The mandatory predeployment briefings were periodically updated with these lessons to ensure that staff were aware of what to expect before, during, and after their deployments. Medical clearance, security awareness, and resiliency programs became a standard part of both predeployment and postdeployment activities. Response experience also led to the identification and provision of more appropriate equipment for the environment. Supporting the social and emotional needs of deployed staff and their families also became an agency focus for care and communication. These enhancements set a precedent as a new standard for future CDC responses, regardless of size or complexity.The activities summarized in this report would not have been possible without collaboration with many U.S and international partners (http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/outbreaks/2014-west-africa/partners.html).


Assuntos
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S./organização & administração , Epidemias/prevenção & controle , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/prevenção & controle , Segurança , África Ocidental/epidemiologia , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/epidemiologia , Humanos , Cooperação Internacional , Gestão de Riscos/organização & administração , Viagem , Estados Unidos
5.
Am J Disaster Med ; 10(4): 347-53, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27149316

RESUMO

Hosting an international outbreak response team can pose a challenge to jurisdictions not familiar with incident management frameworks. Basic principles of team forming, organizing, and executing mission critical activities require simple and flexible communication that can be easily understood by the host country's public health leadership and international support agencies. Familiarity with incident command system principles before a public health emergency could save time and effort during the initial phases of the response and aid in operationalizing and sustaining complex field activities throughout the response. The 2009 initial outbreak of H1N1 in Mexico highlighted the importance of adequately organizing and managing limited resources and expertise using incident management principles. This case study describes logistical and operational aspects of the response and highlights challenges faced during this response that may be relevant to the organization of public health responses and incidents requiring international assistance and cooperation.


Assuntos
Surtos de Doenças , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1 , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Administração em Saúde Pública , Humanos , México/epidemiologia , Saúde Pública
6.
J Emerg Manag ; 13(1): 71-7, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25779901

RESUMO

Hosting an international outbreak response team can pose a challenge to jurisdictions not familiar with incident management frameworks. Basic principles of team forming, organizing, and executing mission critical activities require simple and flexible communication that can be easily understood by the host country's public health leadership and international support agencies. Familiarity with incident command system principles before a public health emergency could save time and effort during the initial phases of the response and aid in operationalizing and sustaining complex field activities throughout the response. The 2009 initial outbreak of H1N1 in Mexico highlighted the importance of adequately organizing and managing limited resources and expertise using incident management principles. This case study describes logistical and operational aspects of the response and highlights challenges faced during this response that may be relevant to the organization of public health responses and incidents requiring international assistance and cooperation.


Assuntos
Barreiras de Comunicação , Planejamento em Desastres/organização & administração , Surtos de Doenças , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1 , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Humanos , Agências Internacionais , Missões Médicas/organização & administração , México , Administração em Saúde Pública
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA