Juvenile hallux valgus: Comparison of three types of osteotomy and medium-term postoperative results.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the treatment of juvenile hallux valgus (JHV). Numerous surgical techniques have been described, none of which has been proven to be superior and the mid-term results of these methods are not well known. Our objective was to compare the mid-term clinical, radiographic, and functional results of three metatarsal osteotomy techniques. METHODS: Patients under 18 years of age operated on for JHV between January 2010 and December 2019 were included in this multicenter retrospective study. Patients were excluded if they had non-idiopathic hallux valgus or if their postoperative follow-up was less than 3 years. The surgical techniques used were metatarsal osteotomies: basimetatarsal, scarf, or distal. During follow-up visits, we collected HMIS-AOFAS (Hallux Metatarsophalangeal Interphalangeal Scale-American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, acquired radiographs, and recorded complications and recurrences. Secondarily, the study population was stratified according to physis status (open vs. closed). RESULTS: During the study period, 18 patients (26 feet) met the inclusion criteria. The median postoperative follow-up was 6.5 (4.1) years. At the end of follow-up, the median HMIS score was 79.0 (20.0), the mean hallux valgus angle (HVA) improvement was 13.2° (16.8), and the complication and recurrence rates were 31 % and 23 %, respectively. There was no significant difference in the outcome measures between the three techniques or any difference according to physis status at the time of surgery. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The functional and radiographic results of metatarsal osteotomies are good in the medium term, regardless of the osteotomy site. Our results are comparable to those published in the literature. As our sample size was limited, it did not lead to the identification of statistically significant differences.

Can the TrueLok Hexapod System™ be used to accurately correct lower limb deformity in children?

INTRODUCTION: Progressive bone lengthening in children can be done using an external fixator, a lengthening nail, or plate with screws. The TrueLok Hexapod System™ (TL-HEX™) is the newest hexapod external fixator on the market. We hypothesized that the TL-HEX™ can accurately correct lower limb deformities in children. The goal of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes after correcting lower limb deformities in children using the TL-HEX™ system. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data from 58 limbs that underwent bone lengthening with the TL-HEX™ were analyzed for this retrospective, single-center study. The average patient age was 11.4 years. The femur was lengthened in 23 limbs and the tibia in 35. The outcomes were evaluated using long leg standing radiographs preoperatively and at the final assessment. The variables of interest were the mechanical axis deviation (MAD), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), mechanical lateral proximal tibia angle (mMPTA), healing index (HI) and accuracy of the correction. The complications were graded on a 4-point scale summarizing three broad goals: planned correction, duration of treatment and sequelae. The accuracy of the correction was defined as the difference between the planned correction and the actual correction achieved. RESULTS: The mean HI was 37 days/cm. Significant correction was achieved for leg length discrepancy (LLD) (60 mm vs. 20 mm; p<0.01) and mLDFA (88.6° vs. 89.9°; p=0.04) but not the MAD (17.7 vs. 14.7; p= 0.17) or mMPTA (87.3 vs. 88.1; p=0.08). In the entire cohort, the difference from planned was 12.5 mm (p<0.01) for lengthening, 1.3° for the mLDFA (p=0.5) and 3° for the mMPTA (p=0.02). Relative to the initial goal, the mean lengthening achieved was 118%. In the sub-group where the plan did not need to be modified, the accuracy of the correction was better. There were 40 complications (69%). CONCLUSION: The TL-HEX™ is an effective and accurate system. The complication rate associated with its use is the same as other hexapod external fixators. Surgeons and patients must be aware of the high complication rate, which may require the plan to be modified and could potentially compromise the outcome.