Examining the service-related experiences and outcomes of caregivers involved in a system of care who experienced everyday discrimination.

Individuals who report everyday experiences of discrimination are at heightened risk for adverse health outcomes and tend to report underutilization of health services. Systems of care (SOCs) have the potential to engage members of minority groups and to reduce health disparities. We examined the service-related experiences of predominantly Latinx caregivers enrolled in a SOC for their children with severe psychological health needs. We used independent samples t-tests and regression analyses to compare relations among service access, perceived service characteristics, and caregiver stress according to whether caregivers reported frequent or infrequent discrimination. The frequent discrimination group scored significantly higher on dimensions of stress and had greater dosage than the infrequent group. There were no differences in relations between service characteristics and outcomes by group. Findings indicated important differences in the service-related experiences and outcomes of caregivers who reported frequent and infrequent discrimination. We discuss limitations and implications.

The concept of race in research: using composite variables.

Researchers who study differential outcomes based on racial classifications should acknowledge the sociopolitical forces that influence the concept of race. In this article, logistic regression findings based on a traditional methodological approach to race are compared to an approach that used a composite variable incorporating race/ethnicity and immigration status. Participants were 258 ethnically diverse low-income women drawn via convenience sampling from the Women, Infants, and Children's Program (WIC) in or near a northeastern city. The PrimeMD Patient Health Questionnaire was used to identify whether the women had subthreshold or major depressive syndrome. The analyses using the composite variable better account for the findings than the analyses using race as a separate variable. Researchers should strive to identify and utilize various dimensions of participants' social positions (e.g., immigration status, social economic status and language) that help explicate differential outcomes.

The value and purpose of the traditional qualitative literature review.

Both meta-analysis and traditional literature or narrative reviews strive to compile a great deal of information in an accessible and succinct manner. In recent years, social work researchers have been turning toward meta-analysis to identify issues in large areas of research. In order for meta-analysis to be a rigorous and objective source of information there are a certain set of assumptions that must be met about how to carry out the process of including and excluding various studies. However, when these assumptions are not met, the information provided can be misleading. Traditional literature reviews continue to offer a valid and important way to identify existing patterns and gaps in social work research. In fact, because they draw not only on quantitative (as does meta-analysis) but also qualitative studies their reach may often be broader. This paper examines the strengths, weaknesses and utility of both practices in social work research today.

Are curriculum decisions based on the evidence? How social work faculty members make choices in curriculum decisions.

An important step in translating evidence-based practice and empirically supported interventions into large-scale service improvements is to develop an understanding of practitioners' education and training in these practices. This understanding begins with discovering the factors that influence the decision-making process by social work faculty regarding curriculum content for master's level social work programs. This exploratory study uses quantitative and qualitative survey data to examine the decision-making process used by 42 master's level social work programs to select the models of direct practice taught in their master's level social work programs, and whether evidence-based practice and research evidence influences those decisions. We investigate faculty perceptions of curriculum effectiveness and discuss implications of our findings for social work educators making content and organization decisions regarding master's level social work curriculum.