Antibiotic prophylaxis in invasive urodynamics, a Delphi consensus of the Italian Society of Urodynamics (SIUD).

INTRODUCTION: Although antibiotic prophylaxis (AB) demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in bacteriuria after invasive urodynamics (UDS), no significant decrease in the incidence of urinary tract infections (UTI) has been confirmed. No absolute recommendations on the use of AB in case of relevant potential risk of UTI have been reported, though some categories of patients at increased infective probability after UDS have been recognized. The aim of this study is to report the experts' consensus on the best practice for the use of AB before UDS in the main categories of patients at potential risk of developing UTI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed on AB before UDS in males and females. A panel of experts from the Italian Society of Urodynamics, Continence, Neuro-Urology, and Pelvic Floor (SIUD) assessed the review data and decided by a modified Delphi method on 16 statements proposed and discussed by the panel. The cut-off percentage for the consensus was a ≥70% of positive responses to the survey. The study was a Delphi consensus with experts' opinions, not a clinical trial involving directly patients. RESULTS: The panel group was composed of 57 experts in functional urology and UDS, mainly urologists, likewise gynaecologists, physiatrists, infectivologists, pediatric urologists, and nurses. A positive consensus was achieved on 9/16 (56.25%) of the statements, especially on the need for performing AB before UD in patients with neurogenic bladder and immunosuppression. Urine analysis and urine culture before UDS are mandatory, and in the event of their positivity, UDS should be postponed. A consensus was reached on avoiding AB in menopausal status, diabetes, age, gender, bladder outlet obstruction, high postvoid residual, chronic catheterization, previous urological surgery, lack of urological abnormalities, pelvic organ prolapse, and negative urine analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic prophylaxis is not recommended for patients without notable risk factors and with a negative urine test due to the potential morbidities that may result from antibiotic administration. However, AB can be used for risk categories such as neurogenic bladder and immunosuppression. The evaluation of urine analysis and urine culture and postponing UDS in cases of positive tests were considered good practices, as well as performing AB in the neurogenic bladder and immunosuppression.

Detrusor underactivity and complicated stress urinary incontinence: a cross-data study.

Introduction: It is still uncertain whether detrusor underactivity (DUA) influences the outcomes of women undergoing surgery for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Even less evidence is available about women with complicated stress urinary incontinence (C-SUI). The aim of the study was to assess outcomes of middle urethral sling (MUS) placement according to the type of SUI, and the impact of DUA on uncomplicated SUI (U-SUI) and C-SUI functional and surgical results. Material and methods: The study was conducted among patients undergoing MUS. The population was divided into 4 groups: 1: C-SUI with DUA; 2: C-SUI without DUA; 3: U-SUI with DUA; and 4: U-SUI without DUA. Women were qualified for the DUA group if they met one of the Jeong, Abarbanel and Marcus, BVE, and PIP1 Griffiths criteria. Post-operative functional outcomes and differences in POUR rate, de novo overactive bladder syndrome (OAB), and SUI recurrence were examined. Results: 142 women took part in the study, of whom 97 completed the 2-year follow-up. DUA was found in 54.6% (53/97) of patients. C-SUI was prevalent also in the no-DUA group (59.1%). Post-operative ICIQ-FLUTS improved more in the no-DUA patients compared to the DUA women. Post-operative Qmax was statistically significant higher the in no-DUA than in the DUA population. After surgery, neither the PVR nor the PVR ratio differed in the DUA and the no-DUA patients. C-SUI and U-SUI patients showed a POUR rate of 15.6%-12.1%, de novo OAB 12.5%-3%, tape incision 3.1%-3%, and SUI recurrence 4.6%-3%, respectively. Conclusions: The impact of pre-operative DUA on the outcomes of patients undergoing MUS was negligible, even in C-SUI cases. DUA women with SUI, even if complicated, should not be excluded from this kind of surgery.

Detrusor underactivity in symptomatic anterior pelvic organ prolapse.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to assess the detrusor underactivity (DUA) prevalence of females with symptomatic anterior pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and to evaluate the relationship between DUA and POP stage. Material and methods: This was a prospective study recruiting women with symptomatic anterior POP. Patients with symptomatic stage 2-4 POP quantification system (POP-Q) who underwent urodynamics (UD) between January 2018 and April 2021 were included. Results: Data on 330 women (mean age 63.7 ±18.4 years old) with anterior vaginal wall defect were enrolled. Concomitant apical defect (uterine/vaginal vault) requiring surgical correction was diagnosed in 38 women (11.5%). DUA was found in 166 females (50.3%). In DUA women, POP-Q stage 2 was found in 45.2%, stage 3 in 50.9% and stage 4 in 76.5%. Only stage POP-Q stage 4 showed a statistically significant difference between DUA and non-DUA females (p 0.006). Conclusions: In women with symptomatic POP, regardless of the POP-Q stage, the chance of DUA occurrence was high. DUA was diagnosed in approximately half of the women undergoing UD for symptomatic POP, and it was three-fold higher in cases of POP-Q stage 4. Due to the high incidence of DUA in POP-Q 4 stage, it may be advantageous to identify and treat prolapse before they progress to stage 4.

Linguistic translation and validation of the Arabic version of International Female Coital Incontinence Questionnaire (IFCI-Q).

Objectives: Aim of the study was to translate the International Female Coital Incontinence Questionnaire (IFCI-Q) into Arabic (Egyptian) and validate it into among Egyptian population complaining of coital urinary incontinence (CI). Methods: Original questionnaire has been translated and back-translated by an expert panel, to produce the Arabic version. A pilot study was performed to make sure the questionnaire was understandable. Sixty patients included in the study were divided into two groups: Group A comprised patients with CI, and Group B comprised females who attended the urology clinic for other complaints, without CI. Reliability of the Arabic IFCI-Q was evaluated for internal consistency using Cronbach alpha coefficient. Test-retest reliability was determined using the Weighted Cohen's k-test. Discrimination validity was evaluated by comparing scores of patients with those of healthy females not complaining of CI using Mann-Whitney test. Results: 83.3% of women of both groups (mean age: 43.1 ± 10.6 yrs [Group A], 38.9 ± 8 [Group B] yrs) reported OAB symptoms, 73.3% had stress urinary incontinence and 46.7% reported mixed urinary incontinence. Regarding Group A, 10 patients had CI during penetration, 12 during orgasm and 8 had both forms of CI. The comparison of the responses between Group A and Group B demonstrated a statistically difference (p < 0.00). The content validity was assessed by a panel of expert functional urologists. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the total score were high (0.9-1), indicating high internal consistency. The difference between the two groups revealed an internal consistency of IFCI-Q of 0.563-0.851. The test-retest procedure revealed that the k-values of each item are very good. Conclusions: The Arabic version will allow utilizing this tool in a large population of Arabic-speaking countries, with different ethnic and demographic backgrounds.

National Survey on bladder and bowel dysfunctions in Autism Spectrum Disorder population.

Introduction: To evaluate lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and bowel disorders in a population of young subjects with autism spectrum disorder (ADS) by a national survey and to assess the relationship between the occurrence, frequency, and type of LUTS and the severity of behavioral and neuropsychiatric characteristics. Materials and methods: A survey on LUTS and bowel disorders in the ASD population was sent by mail and social media through the main Italian Associations of ASD between February and September 2022. The correlation between LUTS and ASD severity was also assessed. Results: The survey was completed by 502 subjects with a mean age of 16.6 years ± 10 years: male participants were 413 (mean age: 16.5 years ± 9.8 years), while female participants 89 (mean age: 17.2 years ± 10.9 years). ADS severity was found low in 29.9%, moderate in 27.1%, and severe in 43%. LUTS were reported by 77.1%, storage symptoms in 51.4%, and voiding symptoms in 60.6%. Urinary incontinence was reported by 12.5%. Enuresis was reported by 14.3% (72/502) of the respondents: primary enuresis in 70.8% (51/72), secondary in the remaining. Pads were used by 40 subjects with a median of 2.9 pads/day (range, 0-8). A toilet training program was performed by 61 of the respondents, with satisfactory results in 40/61 (65.6%). A significant correlation was found between greater ASD severity and higher LUTS rates. The mean VAS score on the impact of LUTS on family relationships was 2 ± 2.9. Regular bowel function was reported by 57.4% (288/502) of the respondents, while increased daily defecations were present in 11.2% (56/502), constipation in 31.5% (158/502), and fecal incontinence in 7.9% (40/502). Conclusion: This survey demonstrated that LUTS are very common in the young ASD population and that the prevalence of urinary symptoms is related to higher severity of the ASD condition. Bowel disorders are often associated with urinary symptoms and dysfunctions. Urologists should be aware of the frequent occurrence of urological disorders and symptoms in individuals with ASD and should be involved in their clinical management in a multidisciplinary team that cares for these people.

The learning curve for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a single center analysis of surgical and functional outcomes.

BACKGROUND: To report the surgical and functional outcomes of the HoLEP surgical program implemented at a high-volume tertiary referral center and to estimate the learning curve (LC) duration for this surgical procedure. METHODS: Data of all consecutive patients undergoing HoLEP at the University of Verona between June 2022 and April 2024 were retrieved from a prospectively maintained institutional database of patients undergoing BPH surgical treatment. The primary endpoint was functional outcomes evaluation during the surgeons' LC. The secondary endpoint was to define the surgical LC for HoLEP. A multivariable test of means was carried out to compare functional outcomes at different time points. After adjusting for potential confounders (age, preoperative pharmacotherapy, and prostate volume), multivariable linear regression models were fitted to evaluate the effect of experience on operative time (OT) and enucleation efficiency. To assess LCs for HoLEP surgery, the non-risk-adjusted CUSUM method was used. RESULTS: A statistically significant improvement in IPSS score, delta% IPSS score, IPSS-QoL score and delta% IPSS-QoL score was observed over the study period. Furthermore, the incidence of irritative symptoms (p<0.001) and stress incontinence (p=0.01) significantly decreased over time, with a 12-month incidence of 8.4% and 9.5%, respectively. A statistically significant association between experience and both OT and enucleation efficiency was observed at multivariable linear regression analysis. The CUSUM chart for OT and enucleation efficiency showed a steep initial upward/downward trend of ˜50 cases each, and a plateau until ˜100 procedures are reached, where the breakpoint is recognized for both variables, and where the CUSUM curve goes below the LOWESS curve in the corresponding O-E CUSUM plot. CONCLUSIONS: HoLEP represents an effective treatment for BPH, demonstrating significant improvement in BPH-related symptoms over the study period, despite the considerable LC of ˜50 cases associated with the procedure.

A comparative study in learning curves of laparoscopic lateral suspension vs. laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: preliminary results.

Background: Determination of the learning curve of new techniques is essential to improve safety and efficiency. Limited information is available regarding learning curves of different techniques in laparoscopic pelvic floor surgery. Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the learning curve of two operative techniques, laparoscopic lateral suspension (LLS) and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC). Material and methods: We conducted a prospective study to assess the learning curve of LLS and LSC by implementing a structured urogynecologic surgical training program with the use of pelvic trainers for our urogynecology fellow. The fellow was an experienced urogynecologic surgeon, but was laparoscopic suturing and dissection naive at the beginning of the study. She was required to assist in 20 laparoscopic urogynecologic surgeries and undertake laparoscopic suturing and knot tying training with mesh positioning on a laparoscopic trainer for 4 h/week during the trial period. After the completion of this structured training program, the fellow performed LLS and LSC under the supervision of an experienced subspecialist as the primary surgeon. Linear regression analysis was used to compare the data of LLS and LSC learning curves. Subjective pre- and post-operative evaluation of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and pelvic floor disorders was undertaken preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively using the PFDI-20-Quality of Life validated questionnaire. Follow-up was scheduled 12 months after the surgery and performed by a skilled urogynecologist. Objective cure was defined as Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Qualification (POP-Q) stage

Nephrostomy tube versus double J ureteral stent in patients with malignant ureteric obstruction. A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

ABSTRACT Purpose: We aimed to perform a systematic review to assess perioperative outcomes, complications, and survival in studies comparing ureteral stent and percutaneous nephrostomy in malignant ureteral obstruction. Materials and Methods: This review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework. Meta-analyses were performed on procedural data; outcomes; complications (device-related, accidental dislodgement, febrile episodes, unplanned device replacement), dislodgment, and overall survival. Continuous variables were pooled using the inverse variance of the mean difference (MD) with a fixed effect, and 95% confidence interval (CI). The incidences of complications were pooled using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method with the random effect model and reported as Odds Ratio (OR), and 95% CI. Statistical significance was set two-tail p-value <0.05 Results: Ten studies were included. Procedure time (MD −10.26 minutes 95%CI −12.40-8.02, p<0.00001), hospital stay (MD −1.30 days 95%CI −1.69 − −0.92, p<0.0001), number of accidental tube dislodgments (OR 0.25 95% CI 0.13 - 0.48, p<0.0001) were significantly lower in the stent group. No difference was found in mean fluoroscopy time, decrease in creatinine level post procedure, overall number of complications, interval time between the change of tubes, number of febrile episodes after diversion, unplanned device substitution, and overall survival. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis favors stents as the preferred choice as these are easier to maintain and ureteral stent placement should be recommended whenever feasible. If the malignant obstruction precludes a stent placement, then PCN is a safe alternative.