Systematic review and meta-analysis regarding maternal apelin in pregnant women with and without preeclampsia.

Aims: To investigate maternal circulating apelin levels in pregnancies with and without preeclampsia.Design and Method: Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies reporting circulating apelin in women who develop preeclampsia. We searched databases for appropriate studies published through December 2021, without language restriction. The quality of studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa-Scale. Data were pooled as mean difference (MDs) or standardized MDs (SMDs) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). A random-effects model enabled reporting of differences between groups, minimizing the effects of uncertainty associated with inter-study variability on the effects of different endpoints.Results: We identified a total of 122 studies, and ten of them reported circulating apelin in women with and without preeclampsia. Maternal apelin did not show a difference in preeclamptic compared to normotensive women (SMD: -0.38, 95%CI -0.91 to 0.15), although there was high heterogeneity between the included studies (I2 = 95%). Participants with preeclampsia had higher body mass index, lower gestational age at delivery, and birth weight. Preeclamptic pregnant women with higher BMI showed significantly lower apelin levels in the subgroup analysis. There was no significant apelin difference in the preeclampsia severity sub-analysis.Conclusion: There was no significant difference in apelin levels in pregnant women with and without preeclampsia.

Preeclampsia and gestational hypertension are associated to low maternal circulating kisspeptin levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: There are contradictory data concerning kisspeptin in gravids with preeclampsia and gestational hypertension (GH). OBJECTIVE: To conduct a meta-analysis of studies comparing maternal kisspeptin levels in gravids with and without preeclampsia or GH. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We searched PubMed, LILACS, and CNKI list of articles up to 20 August 2021, without language limitations, comparing circulating maternal kisspeptin levels, and maternal and neonatal outcomes in gravids with and without preeclampsia or GH. Meta-analyzed results are reported as standardized mean differences (SMD), and their 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Seven studies with a low-to-moderate risk of bias were eligible for meta-analysis. Gravids with preeclampsia or GH displayed significantly lower circulating kisspeptin levels (SMD, -0.68, 95% CI, -1.04 to -0.32), lower gestational ages at delivery (SMD, -2.22, 95% CI, -3.25 to -1.18), and birth weight (SMD, -2.16, 95% CI, -3.15 to -1.17), and significantly higher body mass indices (MD, 0.56, 95% CI, 0.24-0.88), systolic (SMD, 2.87, 95% CI, 2.22-3.53), and diastolic blood pressures (SMD, 2.57, 95% CI, 2.19-2.95). CONCLUSION: Gravids with preeclampsia or GH had lower kisspeptin levels as compared to normotensive controls.

COVID-19 and Pregnancy: Citation Network Analysis and Evidence Synthesis.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 spread quickly around the world shortly after the first outbreaks of the new coronavirus disease at the end of December 2019, affecting all populations, including pregnant women. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between different publications on COVID-19 in pregnancy and their authors through citation networks, as well as to identify the research areas and to determine the publication that has been the most highly cited. METHODS: The search for publications was carried out through the Web of Science database using terms such as "pregnancy," "SARS-CoV-2," "pregnant," and "COVID-19" for the period between January and December 2020. Citation Network Explorer software was used for publication analysis and VOSviewer software was used to construct the figures. This approach enabled an in-depth network analysis to visualize the connections between the related elements and explain their network structure. RESULTS: A total of 1330 publications and 5531 citation networks were identified in the search, with July being the month with the largest number of publications, and the United States, China, and England as the countries with the greatest number of publications. The most cited publication was "Clinical characteristics and intrauterine vertical transmission potential of COVID-19 infection in nine pregnant women: a retrospective review of medical records" by Chen and colleagues, which was published in March 2020. Six groups identified as being close in the citation network reflect multidisciplinary research, including clinical characteristics and outcomes in pregnancy, vertical transmission, delivery mode, and psychological impacts of the pandemic on pregnant women. CONCLUSIONS: Thousands of articles on COVID-19 have been published in several journals since the disease first emerged. Identifying relevant publications and obtaining a global view of the main papers published on COVID-19 and pregnancy can lead to a better understanding of the topic. With the accumulation of scientific knowledge, we now know that the clinical features of COVID-19 during pregnancy are generally similar to those of infected nonpregnant women. There is a small increase in frequency of preterm birth and cesarean birth, related to severe maternal illness. Vaccination for all pregnant women is recommended. Several agents are being evaluated for the treatment of COVID-19, but with minimal or no information on safety in pregnancy. These results could form the basis for further research. Future bibliometric and scientometric studies on COVID-19 should provide updated information to analyze other relevant indicators in this field.