Identification of the contact region responsible for the formation of the homomeric CYP1A2•CYP1A2 complex.

Previous studies showed that cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) forms a homomeric complex that influences its metabolic characteristics. Specifically, CYP1A2 activity exhibits a sigmoidal response as a function of NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase (POR) concentration and is consistent with an inhibitory CYP1A2•CYP1A2 complex that is disrupted by increasing [POR] (Reed et al. (2012) Biochem. J. 446, 489-497). The goal of this study was to identify the CYP1A2 contact regions involved in homomeric complex formation. Examination of X-ray structure of CYP1A2 implicated the proximal face in homomeric complex formation. Consequently, the involvement of residues L91-K106 (P1 region) located on the proximal face of CYP1A2 was investigated. This region was replaced with the homologous region of CYP2B4 (T81-S96) and the protein was expressed in HEK293T/17 cells. Complex formation and its disruption was observed using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET). The P1-CYP1A2 (CYP1A2 with the modified P1 region) exhibited a decreased BRET signal as compared with wild-type CYP1A2 (WT-CYP1A2). On further examination, P1-CYP1A2 was much less effective at disrupting the CYP1A2•CYP1A2 homomeric complex, when compared with WT-CYP1A2, thereby demonstrating impaired binding of P1-CYP1A2 to WT-CYP1A2 protein. In contrast, the P1 substitution did not affect its ability to form a heteromeric complex with CYP2B4. P1-CYP1A2 also showed decreased activity as compared with WT-CYP1A2, which was consistent with a decrease in the ability of P1-CYP1A2 to associate with WT-POR, again implicating the P1 region in POR binding. These results indicate that the contact region responsible for the CYP1A2•CYP1A2 homomeric complex resides in the proximal region of the protein.

Functional characterization of CYP1 enzymes: Complex formation, membrane localization and function.

CYP1A1, CYP1A2, and CYP1B1 have a high degree of sequence similarity, similar substrate selectivities and induction characteristics. However, experiments suggest that there are significant differences in their quaternary structures and function. The goal of this study was to characterize the CYP1 proteins regarding their ability to form protein-protein complexes, lipid microdomain localization, and ultimately function. This was accomplished by examining (1) substrate metabolism of the CYP1s as a function of NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase (POR) concentration, and (2) quaternary structure, using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET). Both CYP1As were able to form BRET-detectable homomeric complexes, which was not observed with CYP1B1. When activities were measured as a function of [POR], CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 showed a hyperbolic response, consistent with mass-action binding; however, CYP1A2 produced a sigmoidal response, suggesting that the homomeric complex affected its function. Differences were observed in their ability to form heteromeric complexes. Whereas CYP1B1 and CYP1A1 formed a complex, neither the CYP1A1/CYP1A2 nor the CYP1B1/CYP1A2 pair formed BRET-detectable complexes. These proteins also differed in their lipid microdomain localization, with CYP1A2 and CYP1B1 residing in ordered membranes, and CYP1A1 in the disordered lipid regions. Taken together, despite their sequence similarities, there are substantial differences in quaternary structures and microdomain localization that can influence enzymatic activities. As these proteins exist in the endoplasmic reticulum with other ER-resident proteins, the P450s need to be considered as part of multi-enzyme systems rather than simply monomeric proteins interacting with their redox partners.