Unlicensed medical practitioners in tribal dominated rural areas of central India: bottleneck in malaria elimination.

BACKGROUND: In India, Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs) deliver services for diagnosis and treatment of malaria, although unlicensed medical practitioners (UMPs) (informal health providers) are most preferred in communities. A cross sectional survey was conducted to: (i) assess knowledge and treatment-seeking practices in the community, and (ii) explore the diagnosis and treatment practices related to malaria of UMPs working in rural and tribal-dominated high malaria endemic areas of central India, and whether they adhere to the national guidelines. METHODS: A multi-stage sampling method and survey technique was adopted. Heads of the households and UMPs were interviewed using a structured interview schedule to assess knowledge and malaria treatment practices. RESULTS: Knowledge regarding malaria symptoms was generally accurate, but misconceptions emerged related to malaria transmission and mosquito breeding places. Modern preventive measures were poorly accessed by the households. UMPs were the most preferred health providers (49%) and the first choice in households for seeking treatment. UMPs typically lacked knowledge of the names of malaria parasite species and species-specific diagnosis and treatment. Further, irrational use of anti-malarial drugs was common. CONCLUSIONS: UMPs were the most preferred type of health care providers in rural communities where health infrastructure is poor. The study suggests enhancing training of UMPs on national guidelines for malaria diagnosis and treatment to strengthen their ability to contribute to achievement of India's malaria elimination goals.

Socioeconomic determinants of community knowledge and practice in relation to malaria in high- and low-transmission areas of central India.

This study was undertaken with an aim of exploring community knowledge and treatment practices related to malaria and their determinants in high- and low-transmission areas of central India. A community-based cross-sectional study was carried out between August 2015 and January 2016 in two high- and two low-malaria-endemic districts of central India. A total of 1470 respondents were interviewed using a pre-tested structured interview schedule. Respondents residing in high-transmission areas with higher literacy levels, and of higher socioeconomic status, were found to practise more modern preventive measures than those living in low-transmission areas with low literacy levels and who were economically poor. Level of literacy, socioeconomic status and area (district) of residence were found to be the main factors affecting people's knowledge of malaria aetiology and clinical features, and prevention and treatment practices, in this community in central India.

The economic cost of malaria at the household level in high and low transmission areas of central India.

The cost burden of malaria at the household level, resulting from complex social, economic, and epidemiological factors, is enormous. This study was carried out to estimate the economic burden of malaria at the household level in low and high malaria transmission areas of central India. We conducted surveys with households in which at least one member had suffered from malaria in the three months preceding the survey. The human capital method was used to estimate the cost of malaria at the household level. We found that the total cost per episode of malaria was higher in high transmission areas than low transmission areas; direct costs were generally higher for adults than for children. Males spent more on diagnosis and treatment than females, and the mean work absenteeism due to malaria was higher among male adult patients than among females, though work time lost due to child illness was lower for male caregivers. Households belonging to high and middle socioeconomic status (SES) spent significantly more on malaria illness than those of low SES. However, the economic burden of malaria relative to annual incomes was highest among low SES households. Populations belonging to high transmission areas were more vulnerable to malarial infection due to geo-climatic, demographic, socioeconomic, and cultural factors, as well as the relatively poor access to health facilities that characterize these regions. Additionally, poor health-seeking practices not only increase the cost burden but also adversely affect patients' health and productivity, which lead to opportunity losses while imposing a greater economic burden on households.