Comparison of the analytic sensitivities of a recombinant immunoblot assay and the radioimmune precipitation assay for the detection of antibodies to Trypanosoma cruzi in patients with Chagas disease.

The diagnosis of chronic Chagas disease usually is made by detecting antibodies to Trypanosoma cruzi, the protozoan parasite that causes this illness. A highly sensitive and specific immunoblot assay developed by us showed a higher analytic sensitivity than the radioimmune precipitation assay, which is used widely as a confirmatory test.

Immunoblot assay using recombinant antigens as a supplemental test to confirm the presence of antibodies to Trypanosoma cruzi.

The diagnosis of chronic Chagas' disease is generally made by detecting antibodies to Trypanosoma cruzi. Most conventional serological tests are based on lysates of whole parasites or semipurified antigen fractions from T. cruzi epimastigotes grown in culture. The occurrence of inconclusive and false-positive results has been a persistent problem with the conventional assays, and there is no universally accepted gold standard for confirmation of positive test results. We describe here an immunoblot assay for detecting antibodies to T. cruzi in which four chimeric recombinant antigens (rAgs), designated FP3, FP6, FP10, and TcF, are used as target antigens. Each of these rAgs is composed of several antigenically distinct regions and includes repetitive as well as nonrepetitive sequences. Each rAg is coated as a discrete line on a nitrocellulose strip. Assay sensitivity was assessed by testing 345 specimens known to be positive for antibodies to T. cruzi. All 345 of these samples showed two to four reactive test bands in addition to the three on-board control bands that are on each strip. Assay specificity was determined by testing 500 specimens from random U.S. blood donors, all of which gave negative results. Based on the results obtained in this study, we propose the following scheme for interpretation of test results: (i) no bands or a single test band = a negative result; (ii) two or more test bands with at least one band showing intensity of 1+ or higher = a positive result; and (iii) multiple faint test bands (+/-) = indeterminate result. Based on this scheme, the prototype immunoblot assay showed sensitivity of 100% (n = 345) and specificity of 100% (n = 500). Additionally, all 269 potentially cross-reacting and T. cruzi antibody-negative specimens tested negative in our immunoblot assay. The rAg-based immunoblot assay has potential as a supplemental test for confirming the presence of antibodies to T. cruzi in blood specimens and for identifying false-positive results obtained with other assays.

Evaluation of a prototype Trypanosoma cruzi antibody assay with recombinant antigens on a fully automated chemiluminescence analyzer for blood donor screening.

BACKGROUND: Chagas disease is caused by Trypanosoma cruzi, a protozoan parasite that can be transmitted by transfusion. The diagnosis of chronic T. cruzi infection is generally made by detecting specific antibodies that bind to parasite antigens. The aim of this study was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of a new serologic assay for antibodies to T. cruzi on a fully automated analyzer (PRISM, Abbott Laboratories). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A prototype chemiluminescent immunoassay based on chimeric recombinant antigens and run on the automated PRISM system was developed for detecting antibodies to T. cruzi in human serum and plasma. Assay specificity was evaluated by testing samples from random blood donors and from a diverse group of specimens from persons with diseases or conditions often associated with false-positive reactions in T. cruzi assays. Sensitivity was determined by testing 377 geographically diverse T. cruzi antibody-positive specimens. RESULTS: Six of 7911 samples (0.08%) from random donors were repeatedly reactive in the prototype PRISM Chagas assay. One of these was reactive in three other tests, including the radioimmune precipitation assay and was presumed to be a true positive. Hence, the specificity was 99.94 percent (7905/7910) in the negative donor group studied. All 377 T. cruzi antibody-positive specimens were positive in the prototype assay and thus the sensitivity was 100 percent. CONCLUSION: The results obtained to date, in terms of sensitivity as well as specificity, strongly suggest that the PRISM Chagas assay should function well as a tool for screening blood for serologic evidence of T. cruzi infection.

Combination HCV core antigen and antibody assay on a fully automated chemiluminescence analyzer.

BACKGROUND: HCV exposure among blood donors is serologically determined by detection of antibodies to HCV (anti-HCV); however, the recent development of an assay for the detection of HCV core antigen identifies infection before anti-HCV development. Simultaneous detection of HCV core antigen and anti-HCV would shorten the window period before seroconversion over conventional HCV antibody screening assays. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A prototype chemiluminescent immunoassay was developed for simultaneous detection of HCV core antigen and anti-HCV in human sera and plasma. The assay was performed on a single-channel instrument representing an automated serologic analyzer (PRISM, Abbott Laboratories) system. Sensitivity and specificity were evaluated by testing 23 HCV seroconversion panels and plasma or sera from volunteer blood donors. RESULTS: The prototype HCV core antigen and antibody combination assay detected 80 of 89 (89.9% ) HCV RNA-positive and antibody-negative specimens from 23 panels, thereby reducing the seroconversion window period by an average of 34.3 days compared to PRISM HCV antibody detection. All PRISM HCV antibody-positive specimens were detected by the combination assay for a relative sensitivity of 100 percent. The repeatedly reactive rate was 0.20 percent based on testing of 3017 screened anti-HCV-negative sera and plasma. CONCLUSIONS: The prototype combination assay was shown to detect HCV core antigen and anti-HCV simultaneously and significantly closed the time gap between the initial detection of HCV RNA and the first appearance of detectable antibodies to HCV.