The impact of a routine late third trimester growth scan on the incidence, diagnosis, and management of breech presentation in Oxfordshire, UK: A cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Breech presentation at term contributes significantly to cesarean section (CS) rates worldwide. External cephalic version (ECV) is a safe procedure that reduces term breech presentation and associated CS. A principal barrier to ECV is failure to diagnose breech presentation. Failure to diagnose breech presentation also leads to emergency CS or unplanned vaginal breech birth. Recent evidence suggests that undiagnosed breech might be eliminated using a third trimester scan. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of introducing a routine 36-week scan on the incidence of breech presentation and of undiagnosed breech presentation. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We carried out a population-based cohort study of pregnant women in a single unit covering Oxfordshire, United Kingdom. All women delivering between 37+0 and 42+6 weeks gestational age, with a singleton, nonanomalous fetus over a 4-year period (01 October 2014 to 30 September 2018) were included. The mean maternal age was 31 years, mean BMI 26, 44% were nulliparous, and 21% were of non-white ethnicity. Comparisons between the 2 years before and after introduction of routine 36-week scan were made for 2 primary outcomes of (1) the incidence of breech presentation and (2) undiagnosed breech presentation. Secondary outcomes related to ECV, mode of birth, and perinatal outcomes. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are reported. A total of 27,825 pregnancies were analysed (14,444 before and 13,381 after). A scan after 35+0 weeks was performed in 5,578 (38.6%) before, and 13,251 (99.0%) after (p < 0.001). The incidence of breech presentation at birth did not change significantly (2.6% and 2.7%) (RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.89, 1.18; p = 0.76). The rate of undiagnosed breech before labour reduced, from 22.3% to 4.7% (RR 0.21; 95% CI 0.12, 0.36; p < 0.001). Vaginal breech birth rates fell from 10.3% to 5.3% (RR 0.51; 95% CI 0.30, 0.87; p = 0.01); nonsignificant increases in elective CS rates and decreases in emergency CS rates for breech babies were seen. Neonatal outcomes were not significantly altered. Study limitations include insufficient numbers to detect serious adverse outcomes, that we cannot exclude secular changes over time which may have influenced our results, and that these findings are most applicable where a comprehensive ECV service exists. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a universal 36-week scan policy was associated with a reduction in the incidence but not elimination of undiagnosed term breech presentation. There was no reduction in the incidence of breech presentation at birth, despite a comprehensive ECV service.

Correction: The impact of a routine late third trimester growth scan on the incidence, diagnosis, and management of breech presentation in Oxfordshire, UK: A cohort study.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003503.].

The impact of individual sonographer variation on the detection of small for gestational age fetuses using a third trimester growth scan.

OBJECTIVES: Detection of small for gestational age (SGA) fetuses in a third trimester ultrasound could be affected by variation in sonographer performance. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all singleton, non-anomalous ultrasound examinations between 35+0 -36+6 weeks gestation, in a single institution where a universal 36-week scan is offered. Screen positive was defined as estimated fetal weight (EFW) <10th centile; SGA was birthweight <10th centile. Individual sonographers' distributions of head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL) were used to assess sonographers' screen positive rate (SPR), detection rate (DR) and true positive rate (TPR). Univariate and multivariate regression analysis was performed to assess the association between the sonographers' mean and SD (SD) for HC, AC, FL and their SPR, DR and TPR. RESULTS: There were 27 sonographers performing more than 50 examinations per year, a total of 5691 scans. The mean incidence of SGA was 10.0%. For an overall SPR of 9.4%, the overall DR was 43.8% (95% CI: 39.6% - 48.1%) and the overall TPR was 46.5% (95% CI: 42.9% - 50.2%). Higher AC scatter (SD difference up to 11.6 mm) was associated with higher SPR (P = 0.001). Lower mean FL (difference up to 3.6 mm) was associated with higher SPR (P = 0.003) and higher DR (P = 0.002). As a result, DR varied amongst different sonographers between 14.3% and 85.7% and TPR varied between 8.3% and 100.0%. CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring of individual AC and FL distributions is a simple and effective tool for institutional quality assurance.

How often do we incidentally find a fetal abnormality at the routine third-trimester growth scan? A population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Third-trimester scans are increasingly used to try to prevent adverse outcomes associated with abnormalities of fetal growth. Unexpected fetal malformations detected at third-trimester growth scans are rarely reported. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and type of fetal malformations detected in women attending a routine third-trimester growth scan. STUDY DESIGN: This was a population-based study of all women with singleton pregnancy attending antenatal care over a 2-year period in Oxfordshire, UK. Women who had a viable singleton pregnancy at dating scan were included. Women had standard obstetrical care including the offer of a routine dating scan and combined screening for trisomies; a routine anomaly scan at 18 to 22 weeks; and a routine third-trimester growth scan at 36 weeks. The third-trimester scan comprises assessment of fetal presentation, amniotic fluid, biometry, umbilical and middle cerebral artery Dopplers, but no formal anatomic assessment is undertaken. Scans are performed by certified sonographers or clinical fellows (n=54), and any suspected abnormalities are evaluated by a team of fetal medicine specialists. We assessed the frequency and type of incidental congenital malformations identified for the first time at this third-trimester scan. All babies were followed-up after birth for a minimum of 6 months. RESULTS: There were 15,244 women attending routine antenatal care. Anomalies were detected in 474 (3.1%) fetuses as follows: 103 (21.7%) were detected before the anomaly scan, 174 (36.7%) at the anomaly scan, 11 (2.3%) after the anomaly scan and before the third-trimester scan, 43 (9.1%) at the third-trimester scan and 143 (30.2%) after birth. The 43 abnormalities were found in a total of 13,023 women who had a 36 weeks scan, suggesting that in 1 out of 303 (95% confidence interval, 233-432) women attending such a scan, a new malformation was detected. Anomalies detected at the routine third-trimester scan were of the urinary tract (n=30), central nervous system (5), simple ovarian cysts (4), chromosomal (1), splenic cyst (1), skeletal dysplasia (1), and cutaneous lymphangioma (1). Most urinary tract anomalies were renal pelvic dilatation, which showed spontaneous resolution in 57% of the cases. CONCLUSION: When undertaking a program of routine third-trimester growth scans in women who have had previous screening scans, an unexpected congenital malformation is detected in approximately 1 in 300 women.