Modulatory effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the prognosis of patients with breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the changes in biological markers ER, PR, HER2 and Ki67 in residual tumor after surgery for locally advanced breast cancer (LABC), and also to evaluate the outcome of breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). METHODS: 144 breast cancer patients treated with NAC at the Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, Serbia from 2011 to 2015 were included in this study. Changes in biologic markers ER,PR, HER2/neu and Ki-67 were evaluated at diagnostic core biopsy and at the final surgery tissue specimens. RESULTS: Of 144 patients pathological complete response was achieved in 17 (12%) and these were excluded from the study. Evaluated were 127 patients with residual tumor after the final surgery. A change in hormone receptor status (ER,PR) occurred in 9.4% of the patients (ER in 5%, PR in 14.5%) and HER2 status in 4.7% of the patients. ER and PR status change from negative to positive was associated with better overall survival (OS), but without statistical significance (p=0.16). Patients with conversion of HER2 status from negative to positive lived longer (65 vs 42 months). Furthermore, it was determined that HER2 change from negative to positive was associated with better OS (p=0.03). Ki-67 changed in 17 (11.8%) patients. The decrease of Ki-67 expression after NAC was associated with better outcome. Median follow up was 37.5 months (range 16.2-76.8). CONCLUSION: Changes in hormone receptor status, HER2 status and Ki-67 occurred after NAC in patients with LABC. A change from negative to positive hormone receptor status and HER2 status offers new treatment options, like endocrine therapy, and/or trastuzumab therapy for breast cancer patients. The decrease of Ki-67 expression after NAC was associated with better outcome.

Benefit and outcome of using temozolomide-based chemoradiotherapy followed by temozolomide alone for glioblastoma in clinical practice.

PURPOSE: Temozolomide (TEM), an oral alkylating agent, has shown promising activity in the last 10 years in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Our goal was to show the benefit of concomitant therapy involving 3D conformal radiotherapy and temozolomide in clinical practice. METHODS: This was a retrospective/prospective study and included a total of 113 patients with GBM diagnosis. Forty- seven patients received postoperative radiotherapy and 66 received concomitant temozolomide plus 3D conformal radiotherapy. RESULTS: The mean overall survival of patients who received postoperative radiotherapy alone was 9.93±6.475 months, compared to statistically longer overall survival in the group of patients who received radiotherapy plus temozolomide (13.89±8.049 months) (p=0.006). The latter group was divided into two subgroups, one consisting of patients who received 6 complete cycles of temozolomide, and a second with patients who received incomplete treatment. Statistically significant longer overall survival was registered in the first subgroup compared to the second (p=0.006). CONCLUSION: The concomitant usage of temozolomide and radiotherapy was beneficial, and statistically significant difference among groups and subgroups was observed regarding overall survival.

Rituximab in the therapy of stage III and IV follicular lymphoma: Results of the REFLECT 1 study of the Serbian Lymphoma Group.

PURPOSE: Follicular lymphoma (FL) is an indolent lymphoma that responds well to rituximab+chemotherapy. We evaluated the prognosis and efficacy of immunochemotherapy in patients with previously untreated, advanced FL. METHODS: REFLECT 1 is a multicentre, prospective study of 99 patients with previously untreated FL stage III-IV. All patients were treated with rituximab+chemotherapy x 6 cycles, plus 2 cycles of rituximab monotherapy. Clinical assessment was performed at baseline, after completion of the first 6 cycles of therapy and every 3 months from the end of immunochemotherapy to the end of the study period. RESULTS: Eighty-nine out of 99 patients with complete documentation were included. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 61.6%, partial remission (PR) in 11.6% and progressive disease (PD) in 24.4% of the patients. Time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) after the 1st, 2nd and 3rd year were 89.9, 72.7, 57.8%, and 94.2, 92,6 and 92.6%, respectively. The probability of achieving CR was significantly lower in the high risk group according to Follicular Lymphoma Prognostic Index (FLIPI) score. Expression of CD43 antigen had a significant impact on the probability of 2-year TTP and OS, and ECOG performance status had a significant impact on OS. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with rituximab plus chemotherapy is effective in advanced stages of FL. Significant prognostic factors are FLIPI score for induction therapy outcome, CD43 antigen expression for OS and TTP and ECOG performance status for OS.

Real World Overall Survival of Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Only Available Sunitinib and Pazopanib in First-Line Setting.

Background: The emerging new standard of care for metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma (mRCC) becomes a challenge when access to new drugs is limited. In Serbia, sunitinib and pazopanib are the only available first-line therapies. The second-line treatment for mRCC has never been and is still not available. We aimed to assess overall survival (OS) in patients with mRCC who received first-line sunitinib or pazopanib when access to second-line treatment was not available. Methods: This retrospective observational study analyzed data from a nationally representative cohort of 759 patients who started on first-line sunitinib or pazopanib between 1 January 2012 and 30 June 2019, in 4 centers in Serbia. The data cut-off date was 31 December 2019. Key eligibility criteria were clear cell RCC histology, measurable metastatic disease, performance status 0 or 1, and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center favorable or intermediate prognosis. The primary outcome was OS from the start of first-line treatment to death or data cut-off date. Results: The study population included 759 patients with mRCC who started with first-line sunitinib (n = 673; [88.7%]) or pazopanib (n = 86; [11.3%]). Overall, the mean age was 61.0 ± 9.7 years at treatment baseline, and 547 (72%) were men. mRCC was primarily diagnosed in 230 (30%) patients, and most of them underwent cytoreductive nephrectomy prior to systemic therapy (n = 181 [79%]). Additional treatment of metastases prior to and/or during treatment was used in 169 patients (22.3%). Grade 3 and 4 adverse events occurred in 168 (22.1%) and 47 patients (6.2%), respectively, and treatment was permanently stopped because of toxicity in 41 (6.9%). The OS was calculated from the start of first-line treatment, and the median follow-up was 14 months (range, 0-97). The median OS in the entire cohort was 17 months (95% CI, 14.6-19.4). Conclusions: With only available sunitinib and pazopanib in first-line treatment, modest improvements are seen in the overall survival of patients with mRCC in real world clinical practice. In circumstances of limited availability of cancer medicines, our results can contribute to accelerating patient access to novel cancer therapies that have been shown to prolong survival in mRCC.

COVID-19 vaccines and cancer patients: acceptance, attitudes and safety.

PURPOSE: Recommendations and guidelines consider cancer patients a high-priority population for COVID-19 immunization. Vaccination process in Serbia began in January 2021 with four available vaccines. We have conducted a cross-sectional study investigating cancer patients' acceptability of anti SARS-COV2 vaccines. METHODS: The study included 767 patients with solid and hematologic malignancies treated at the Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, Serbia. During July and August 2021 patients filled in an individual paper questionnaire on anti SARS-COV2 vaccination acceptance, preferences, side effects and information origin. Data on treatment phase, diagnosis and treatment was collected from electronic health records. RESULTS: During the first six months of vaccination campaign in Serbia 41% (320/767) of the investigated oncology patients received COVID-19 vaccines. The median age of vaccinated patients was 65 years (28-84). Most of them (75%) were in active treatment of cancer. Half of the unvaccinated patients (52%) wish to get vaccinated after the end of their cancer treatment. Around 10% of the patients definitely refused vaccination. The majority of information on COVID-19 vaccines cancer patients got from their oncologist, television and newspapers. Side effects were reported by 10.93% of the patients after the first dose and 13,31% after the second dose. No serious side effects were reported. CONCLUSION: We have confirmed that patients are reluctant of receiving vaccine due to fear of side effects, especially during the active cancer treatment. However, real-world evidence and clinical trials data have gathered enough evidence to reassure any doubts of the patients and their oncologists on safety and efficacy of anti SARS-COV2 vaccines.