RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Developmental dysplasia of the hip represents a spectrum of deformity. Residual dysplasia at 2 years of age is associated with an increased risk for osteoarthritis and functional limitations. We compared the prognostic value of 6-month imaging modalities and aimed to identify optimal diagnostic metrics for the prediction of residual dysplasia. METHODS: After IRB approval, patients who underwent Pavlik treatment between 2009 and 2018 with 2-year follow-up were identified. Sonographs [ultrasound (US)] and radiographs (x-ray) were obtained at 6-month and 2-year-old visits. Dysplasia at 2 years was defined as an acetabular index (AI) >24 degrees. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to quantitatively compare the prognostic ability of US and x-ray-based measures at 6 months. Youden's index [(YI) (values range from 0 (poor test) to 1 (perfect test)] was used to evaluate existing cutoffs at 6 months of age (normal measurements: alpha angle (AA) ≥60 degrees, femoral head coverage (FHC) ≥50%, and AI <30 degrees) relative to newly proposed limits. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were included, of which 28.8% of patients (95% CI: 17.3 to 40.4%) had acetabular dysplasia at 2 years. After adjusting for sex, AA [Area under the Curve (AUC): 80] and AI (AUC: 79) at 6 months of age were better tests than FHC (AUC: 0.77). Current diagnostic cutoffs for AA (YI: 0.08), AI (YI: 0.0), and FHC (YI: 0.06) at 6 months had poor ability to predict dysplasia at 2 years. A composite test of all measures based on proposed cutoffs (AA ≥73 degrees, FHC > 62% and AI ≤24 degrees) was a better predictor of dysplasia at 2 years (Youden's index (YI): 0.63) than any single metric. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of residual dysplasia remains concerning. The 6-month x-ray and US both play a role in the ongoing management of the developmental dysplasia of the hip. The prediction of dysplasia is maximized when all metrics are considered collectively. Existing parameters were not accurate; We recommend the following cutoffs: AA ≥73 degrees, FHC > 62%, and AI ≤24 degrees. These cutoffs must be validated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II.
Assuntos
Displasia do Desenvolvimento do Quadril , Luxação Congênita de Quadril , Humanos , Articulação do Quadril , Raios X , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acetábulo/diagnóstico por imagem , Luxação Congênita de Quadril/diagnóstico por imagem , Luxação Congênita de Quadril/terapia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This analysis examined how the application of the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons appropriate use criteria (AUC) for developmental dysplasia of the hip in infants would change treatment patterns and outcomes for Graf IIA hips at a single quaternary pediatric hospital. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval, patient medical records were reviewed and data were collected. Graf IIa hips were defined as alpha angle (AA) 50 to 59 degrees. AA and femoral head coverage (FHC) were measured from initial and 6-month ultrasounds and acetabular index (AI) was measured from radiographs at 6 months of age. Instability (positive Ortolani and Barlow tests) was noted. On the basis of the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons AUC for managing developmental dysplasia of the hip, hips were further categorized as normal (FHC ≥45%), borderline (FHC 35% to 44%), or dysplastic (FHC <35%). RESULTS: Overall, 13% (49/371) of Graf IIa hips (AA 50 to 59 degrees) were dysplastic (FHC <35%). Total 24% (89/371) were clinically unstable. Total 42% (37/89) of unstable Graf IIa hips were dysplastic. Only 4% of stable Graf IIa hips were dysplastic (12/282). Out of 371 Graf IIa hips, 256 were treated with Pavlik harness (n=250) or Rhino brace (n=6). Among stable, nondysplastic (SND) hips (those with normal and borderline FHC≥35%), 33% (52/158) were treated because of a more severe contralateral side. If the AUC had been applied, 67% (106/158) of SND Graf IIa hips would not have been treated. Among the n=162 hips that returned for a 6-month radiograph, there was no difference in AI in the 115 treated and 47 untreated SND hips (mean difference treatment vs. no treatment: -1.5, 95% CI, -3.1 to 0.2, P =0.0808). CONCLUSIONS: Using AUC recommendations, our center could reduce the number of SND Graf IIa hips we treat by 67%. Although 24% of Graf IIa hips were clinically unstable and 13% were dysplastic based on FHC, most Graf IIa hips had normal or borderline FHC per the AUC and may do well with observation and follow-up ultrasound at 12 weeks old. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-diagnostic study.
Assuntos
Displasia do Desenvolvimento do Quadril , Luxação Congênita de Quadril , Lactente , Humanos , Criança , Luxação Congênita de Quadril/diagnóstico por imagem , Luxação Congênita de Quadril/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acetábulo/diagnóstico por imagem , Articulação do Quadril/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Large-scale studies examining fracture trends and epidemiological data are lacking. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of fractures presenting to US emergency departments using the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System. A total of 7,109,078 pediatric and 13,592,548 adult patients presenting to US emergency departments with a fracture between 2008 and 2017 were analyzed for patterns. Fractures accounted for 13.9% of pediatric injuries and 15% of adult injuries. Among children, fracture incidence was highest in the group 10 to 14 years old and most frequently involved the forearm (19.0%). Fracture incidence was highest in adults 80 years and older and most frequently involved the lower trunk (16.2%). On average, the rate of pediatric fractures decreased by 2.34% per year (95% CI, 0.25% increase to 4.88% decrease; P=.0757). Among adults, fracture incidence increased 0.33% per year (95% CI, 2.34% decrease to 2.85% increase; P=.7892). This change was significantly different between the pediatric and adult populations (P=.0152). There was an increase in the annual proportion of adults with fractures who were admitted (odds ratio per 1-year increase, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.03-1.07; P<.0001). There was no change in the proportion of pediatric patients with fractures who were admitted (odds ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.99-1.05; P=.0606). The incidence of fractures decreased in pediatric patients yet was relatively stable in adult patients. Conversely, the proportion of patients with fractures who were admitted increased, particularly among adults. These findings may suggest that less severe fractures are presenting elsewhere, falsely inflating the observed rise in admissions. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(6):e369-e375.].
Assuntos
Fraturas Ósseas , Humanos , Criança , Adulto , Adolescente , Fraturas Ósseas/epidemiologia , Hospitalização , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Extremidade Superior , Incidência , HospitaisRESUMO
This study aims to establish how pediatric fracture patterns were altered at a level 1 trauma center in a state that implemented a shutdown during the initial height of COVID-19. After IRB approval, we identified 2017 patients treated at a pediatric institution for definitive management of a fracture between 26 March and 31 May 2018, 2019, or 2020. Dates were chosen based on statewide stay-at-home orders for Colorado. Patients were excluded for treatment at another institution (n = 148), no fracture noted in clinic (n = 18), or other (n = 13). Data were retrospectively collected from the remaining 1838 patients regarding demographics, fracture injury, mechanism, and treatment. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for each variable during COVID-19 relative to prior years. The number of fractures during 2020 decreased by 26% relative to 2019 and 23% to 2018. A larger proportion of patients experienced at least a 5-day delay to definitive treatment [OR: 1.55, confidence interval (CI): 1.23-1.96, P = 0.0002]. Rates of non-accidental trauma (NAT) increased non-significantly (OR: 2.67, CI: 0.86-8.32, P = 0.0900) during 2020 (1.2%) relative to 2018 (0.6%) and 2019 (0.3%). Fractures occurring at home increased to 79.9% (OR: 6.44, CI: 5.04-8.22, P < 0.0001). Despite less overall trauma during shelter-in-place orders, greater fracture numbers were seen among younger children and severe fractures were likely among older children. Patients may hesitate to seek care during 2020. Rates of NAT doubled during 2020. As communities prepare for future waves, treatment centers should warn against common fracture mechanisms and raise awareness of NAT.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Fraturas Ósseas , Adolescente , Criança , Fraturas Ósseas/epidemiologia , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Centros de TraumatologiaRESUMO
Best treatment protocols for infants with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) are poorly defined. This study estimates the time to normalization among Graf IIc hips undergoing Pavlik harness treatment. Following institutional review board approval, patients referred for DDH evaluation at a pediatric institution between 2009 and 2018 (n = 1424 hips/712 patients) were identified. We isolated all Graf IIc hips that underwent Pavlik harness treatment (n = 132 hips/n = 106 patients). Demographic and outcome measures were collected. Normalization was defined as alpha angle greater than or equal to 60° and femoral head coverage greater than or equal to 50%. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses modeled time to normalization and identified factors associated with earlier normalization. Median time to normalization was 7.0 weeks. At 12 weeks standard treatment, 85.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 80.2-91.9%] had normalized. Greater femoral head coverage [hazard ratio (HR) per 1% increase: 1.03; 95% CI: 1.01-1.05; P = 0.0068] and hip stability at treatment initiation (HR unstable vs. stable: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.44-0.93; P = 0.0192) were associated with longer time to normalization. Some patients may not need 12 weeks of Pavlik bracing, particularly those with stable presentation who normalize before week 12. Shorter treatment lengths offer benefit without sacrificing long-term outcomes. Findings reinforce growing evidence that femoral head coverage should be a more significant consideration during diagnosis and instability is a concerning finding on examination.