Significance of anti-HBc only in blood donors: a serological and virological study after hepatitis B vaccination.

BACKGROUND: Blood donors positive only for anti-HBc may have a resolved hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, low grade chronic infection or infection with variant strains of HBV. We aimed to assess the significance of this serological pattern after hepatitis B vaccination in such cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four anti-HBc only blood donors were vaccinated with the Engerix HBV vaccine and a serological and virological evaluation was performed before HBV vaccination and 7-10 days after each dose. Subjects were classified as non-responders if their anti-HBs levels stayed below 10 IU/L after full vaccination, while the response was considered secondary (anamnestic) if anti-HBs levels rose over 10 IU/L after the first vaccine dose, and primary if anti-HBs levels rose over 10 IU/L only after the second or third vaccine dose. RESULTS: Of the 21 fully evaluable donors, six had no response, eight showed a primary response and seven had an anamnestic response. One non-responder had transient positivity for HBV-DNA at low levels (12 IU/mL) with persistent negativity for HBsAg. DISCUSSION: Anti-HBc-only positive blood donors are a heterogeneous population including HBV naïve subjects with a likely false-positive anti-HBc reactivity, subjects with a resolved HBV infection, and subjects with persistent low-level HBV replication. The analysis of the anti-HBs response after a dose of HBV vaccine may help to distinguish among the different causes of the isolated anti-HBc positivity, thereby enabling proper counselling and potential readmission to blood donation.

From the donor's arm to blood product: a study on bacterial contamination of apheresis platelet concentrates.

BACKGROUND: Transfusion-associated bacterial infections are a quite frequent collateral effect of administration of platelet concentrates (PC). We carried out a microbiological surveillance of bacterial contamination of apheresis platelet concentrates by studying microbial flora on donors' arms before and after skin disinfection, through blood cultures with the diversion volume and with the PC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Platelet aphereses were carried out using two Haemonetics MCS+ instruments. Cutaneous swabs were examined by the direct plate technique and blood cultures were performed using Bact/ALERT aerobic bottles. In the 5 years from January 2001 to December 2005 we tested 481 PC. RESULTS: Cutaneous swabs showed significant bacterial growth in 89% of cases before skin disinfection and in 44% after. None of the blood cultures performed on diversion blood was positive, one (0.2%) PC was positive on the fifth day after collection and the presence of a Staphylococcus epidermidis strain was demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the skin disinfection protocol adopted in our structure is not fully satisfactory. The cultures performed on the PC showed a low prevalence of contamination, and the only positive sample was contaminated by a common skin contaminant (S. epidermidis). The culture became positive on the fifth day after collection, but on the second day the PC had been transfused to a patient, without any adverse reaction. In our experience a culture method using Bact/ALERT aerobic bottles was not able to prevent transfusion of the only contaminated PC identified in this study.