Chest CT at X-Ray Dose Using a Noise-Mitigating Weighted Projection: The Thoracic Tomogram. Diagnostic Performance for Pneumonia Detection in Hemato-Oncology Patients.

PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic performance of a thick-slab reconstruction obtained from an ultra-low-dose CT (termed thoracic tomogram) with standard-of-care low-dose CT (SOC-CT) for rapid interpretation and detection of pneumonia in hemato-oncology patients. METHODS: Hemato-oncology patients with a working diagnosis of pneumonia underwent an SOC-CT followed by an ultra-low-dose CT, from which the thoracic tomogram (TT) was reconstructed. Three radiologists evaluated the TT and SOC-CT in the following categories: (I) infectious/inflammatory opacities, (II) small airways infectious/inflammatory changes, (III) atelectasis, (IV) pleural effusions, and (V) interstitial abnormalities. The TT interpretation time and radiation dose were recorded. Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, ROC, and AUC were calculated with the corresponding power analyses. The agreement between TT and SOC-CT was calculated by Correlation Coefficient for Repeated Measures (CCRM), and the Shrout-Fleiss intra-class correlations test was used to calculate interrater agreement. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients (mean age 58.7 ± 14.9 years; 29 male) were prospectively enrolled. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, AUC, and Power for categories I/II/III/IV/V were: 94.9/99/97.9/0.971/100, 78/91.2/86.5/0.906/100, 88.6/100/97.2/0.941/100, 100/99.2/99.3/0.995/100, and 47.6/100/92.2/0.746/87.3. CCRM between TT and SOC-CT for the same categories were .97/.81/.92/.96/.62 with an interobserver agreement of .93/.88/.82/.96/.61. Mean interpretation time was 18.6 ± 5.4 seconds. The average effective radiation dose of TT was similar to a frontal and lateral chest X-ray (0.27 ± 0.08 vs 1.46 ± 0.64 mSv for SOC-CT; P < .01). CONCLUSION: Thoracic tomograms provide comparable diagnostic information to SOC-CT for the detection of pneumonia in immunocompromised patients at one-fifth of the radiation dose with high interobserver agreement.

Imaging Acute and Chronic Cardiac Complications of COVID-19 and after COVID-19 Vaccination.

COVID-19 is associated with acute and longer-term cardiovascular manifestations including myocardial injury, myopericarditis, stress-induced cardiomyopathy, myocardial infarction, and thromboembolic disease. Although the morbidity and mortality related to acute COVID-19 have decreased substantially, there is growing concern about the longer-term cardiovascular effects of the disease and postacute sequelae. Myocarditis has also been reported after messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA)-based COVID-19 vaccination, with the highest risk among adolescent boys and young adult men. Noninvasive imaging including cardiac MRI has a key role in identifying the presence of cardiovascular disease, evaluating for potential mechanisms of injury, stratifying risk of future adverse cardiovascular events, and potentially guiding treatment in patients with suspected cardiovascular injury after COVID-19 and vaccination. Patterns of injury identified at cardiac MRI after COVID-19 include myocarditis and pericarditis, myocardial ischemia, and infarction. Myocardial edema and late gadolinium enhancement have been described months after the initial infection in a minority of patients with persistent cardiac symptoms after COVID-19. In patients with myocarditis after receiving a COVID-19 vaccination, the most common pattern of late gadolinium enhancement is subepicardial at the basal inferolateral wall, and patients tend to have milder imaging abnormalities compared with those from other causes of myocarditis. This article describes the role of multimodality cardiac imaging and imaging findings in patients with acute and longer-term cardiovascular manifestations of COVID-19 and in patients with myocarditis after receiving an mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination. ©RSNA, 2023 Online supplemental material is available for this article. Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center.

Cardiac Imaging in Myocarditis: Current Evidence and Future Directions.

Myocarditis is defined as a non-ischemic inflammatory disease of the myocardium. It remains a challenge to diagnose given non-specific symptoms and lack of specific blood biomarkers. Cardiac imaging plays an important role in the evaluation of myocarditis with unique strengths and limitations of different imaging modalities, including cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography, and positron emission tomography. The purpose of this review is to discuss the strengths and limitations of various cardiac imaging techniques in the evaluation of myocarditis, review imaging findings in specific causes of myocarditis including COVID-19 and after vaccination, evaluate the role of imaging in differentiating myocarditis from potential mimics and differential considerations, identify current gaps in knowledge, and propose future directions.

Diagnostic performance of chest radiography measurements for the assessment of cardiac chamber enlargement.

BACKGROUND: The cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) is commonly assessed on chest radiography for detection of cardiac chamber enlargement, but the traditional cutpoint of 0.5 has low specificity. We sought to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of new measurement techniques for the detection of cardiac enlargement on chest radiographs. METHODS: We obtained retrospective cross-sectional data on consecutive patients who underwent both chest radiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within a 14-day interval between 2006 and 2016 at a large academic hospital network. We established the presence of cardiac chamber enlargement using cardiac MRI as the reference standard. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of different techniques for measuring heart size and CTR on frontal chest radiographs. RESULTS: Of 152 patients included, 81 (53%) were men and the mean age was 52 years. Maximum heart diameter had the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for detection of cardiac enlargement (0.827, 95% confidence interval 0.760-0.894). In the subgroup of posteroanterior chest radiography studies (n = 101), a CTR cutpoint of 0.50 had only moderate sensitivity (72%) and specificity (72%). In men, a maximum heart diameter cutpoint of 15 cm had a sensitivity of 86% and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.24, and a cutpoint of 19 cm had a specificity of 100% and a positive likelihood ratio of infinity. In women, a maximum heart diameter cutpoint of 13 cm had a sensitivity of 91% and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.15, and a cutpoint of 17 cm had a specificity of 91% and a positive likelihood ratio of 3.5. INTERPRETATION: A traditional CTR cutpoint of 0.5 has limited diagnostic value. Simple heart diameter measurements have higher diagnostic performance measures than CTR.

Mitral annular disjunction on cardiac MRI: Prevalence and association with disease severity in Loeys-Dietz syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate mitral annular disjunction (MAD) on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in Loeys-Dietz Syndrome (LDS) and to explore its association with adverse outcomes. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, adult patients with LDS who underwent cardiac MRI were evaluated for MAD, aortic dimensions, and ventricular volumetry. Aortic events were defined as aortic surgery and/or dissection and severe arrhythmic events as cardiac arrest or sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT). RESULTS: Among 46 LDS patients (52% female, 37.2 ± 14.3 years), 17 had MAD (37%). MAD and no MAD groups were similar in age, sex, aortic dimensions and left ventricular parameters. After a clinical follow-up of 4.3 years (IQR 1.5-8.4), 3 in MAD and 4 in no MAD groups required aortic valve sparing root replacement (VSRR) and 1 in MAD developed type A dissection. Over a similar imaging follow-up period [4.1 years (IQR 2.7-9.1) vs. 3.2 years (IQR 1.0-9.0), p = 0.65], compared to baseline, increase in native aortic root size was significant only in MAD (39.4 ± 4.6 mm vs. 38.1 ± 5.3 mm, p = 0.02, 19.3 ± 2.4 mm/m2 vs. 18.7 ± 2.4 mm/m2, p = 0.01) compared to those without MAD. Patients with MAD were younger at first aortic event compared to those without (26.7 ± 11.5 years vs. 45.0 ± 14.9 years, p = 0.03). MAD distance correlated with need for VSRR, r = 0.57, p = 0.02. Two patients in the MAD group developed sustained VT. No cardiac arrest or death was observed. CONCLUSION: MAD is highly prevalent in LDS, associated with progressive aortic dilatation, and aortic events at younger age. MAD may be a marker of disease severity necessitating close surveillance.

Imaging of Myocarditis Following mRNA COVID-19 Booster Vaccination.

Keywords: Echocardiography, MR-Functional Imaging, MRI, Cardiac Supplemental material is available for this article.

Cardiac MRI Assessment of Nonischemic Myocardial Inflammation: State of the Art Review and Update on Myocarditis Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination.

Myocarditis is a nonischemic inflammatory disease of the myocardium that can be triggered by a multitude of events, including viral infection and toxins. Recently, there has been heightened interest in myocarditis given its association with COVID-19 vaccination. Timely identification of myocarditis can affect patient management and prognosis. Therefore, it is crucial for radiologists and cardiac imagers to understand the role of cardiac imaging to establish a diagnosis and inform treatment decisions. Cardiac MRI is the most important noninvasive imaging modality for evaluation of myocarditis, with typical findings of focal or diffuse myocardial edema and myocardial damage, including presence of late gadolinium enhancement. There are currently limited data available to indicate that the pattern of myocardial injury following COVID-19 vaccination is similar to other causes of myocarditis, although the severity of disease may be relatively mild. A description of the role of imaging and typical imaging features will be reviewed here, with a focus on emerging data in the setting of myocarditis after COVID-19 vaccination. Keywords: MRI, Heart, Inflammation © RSNA, 2021.