Hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy in ABO-incompatible kidney transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVE: We perform living-related ABO-incompatible kidney transplantations to alleviate the organ shortage in our country. Splenectomy has been performed routinely in these recipients, although its clinical significance remains controversial. In this study, we have reported our experience with a hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy (HALS) technique. METHODS: Between April 2000 and December 2006, 50 patients (23 males) underwent ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation with HALS. The mean age and weight of the recipients were 44 +/- 13 years and 56 +/- 12 kg, respectively. All patients underwent preoperative plasmapheresis to reduce isoagglutinin (A and/or B antibody). In 6/50 patients, a hand-assisted device was placed through a peritoneal window in the right lower abdominal skin incision for kidney engraftment. In the remaining 44 patients, a 6-cm upper midline or periumbilical midline incision was made for the hand-assisted device in the lateral position. RESULTS: An ABO-incompatible procedure was completed successfully in all cases. The average HALS time was 118 +/- 42 minutes, with an average pneumoperitoneum time of 79 +/- 40 minutes and average blood loss of 48 +/- 81 g. There were two conversions to open splenectomy because of intraoperative bleeding and suspected pneumothorax. Two other cases required relaparotomy because of hematoma and perforation of the ileum. Successfully operations were achieved through the previous periumbilical incision. CONCLUSIONS: Although meticulous, rigorous surgical technique is essential, HALS is safe and feasible for recipients of ABO-incompatible grafts with tissue weakness and a bleeding tendency because of renal failure and preoperative plasmapheresis.

Clinical utility of monitoring sialyl Lewis(X) (CD15S) antigen on peripheral lymphocytes for the diagnosis and treatment of rejection after renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: In organ transplantation, the grafts must be carefully monitored, but it is often difficult to make a quick and accurate diagnosis of unusual changes. Extensive research has failed to identify a useful marker for rejection. We investigated the clinical utility of sialyl Lewis(X) (CD15s) monitoring in 17 renal transplant patients with acute rejection. METHODS: The expression of CD15s on peripheral lymphocytes was examined using flow cytometry in renal transplant recipients with rejection (n=17), without rejection (n=23), recipients infected with cytomegalovirus (n=7), recipients with other diseases (n=7), and healthy volunteers (n=18). CD15s expression was compared with histological findings, and was also examined before and after steroid pulse therapy to investigate the effects of steroids on CD15s antigen expression on the surface of the peripheral lymphocytes. RESULTS: CD15s was strongly expressed in all patients with rejection, but was not expressed in any of the patients without rejection or in any healthy volunteers. Histologically, cell infiltration into the rejected graft was moderate or severe in all patients with strong expression of CD15s. In contrast, no or only mild infiltration was observed in patients with weak expression of CD15s. In addition, 14 of 17 patients (14/17, 82%) with strong CD15s expression improved upon administration of steroid pulse therapy, although there was no benefit from steroids in any of the patients with weak expression of CD15s. CONCLUSIONS: The CD15s antigen is expressed strongly on the peripheral lymphocytes at the time of rejection. It is interesting that the efficacy of steroid therapy in the patients with elevated creatinine could be predicted by CD15s expression on the peripheral lymphocytes before graft biopsy. There have been only few reports showing the relationship between CD markers and the efficacy of the treatment in patients with elevated creatinine. We report that the detection of CD15s on the peripheral lymphocytes by flow cytometry was an easy, helpful, and noninvasive means for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with elevated creatinine after renal transplantation.

Anti-AB titer changes in patients with ABO incompatibility after living related kidney transplantations: survey of 101 cases to determine whether splenectomies are necessary for successful transplantation.

BACKGROUND: A shortage of organ donors for transplantation has become a serious problem throughout the world. To overcome this problem, transplantations across ABO blood barriers have been performed with some success. In general, however, the graft survival rate for transplantation with ABO incompatibility is lower than that of transplantation with ABO compatibility. Unfortunately, the mechanism by which isohemagglutinins might injure an ABO-incompatible graft remains uncertain. Here, the pre- and posttransplantation anti-AB titers in patients who received transplants from ABO-incompatible living donors are reviewed and the pathological findings are compared. METHODS: One hundred and one patients underwent ABO-incompatible living related kidney transplantation (i-LKT) between January 1989 and October 1999 at our hospital. Plasmapheresis and immunoadsorption were performed in all of the i-LKT patients before the transplantation to remove anti-AB antibodies. A splenectomy was also performed during the operation, followed by the local irradiation of the graft with a dose of 150 rad. The anti-AB titers and pathological findings for 93 i-LKT patients, excluding 8 patients who died, were then examined. RESULTS: Immediately after the i-LKT, the anti-AB titer dropped rapidly to below 1:4 in all 93 cases. Seventy of patients (70/93, 75%) showed no elevation in their anti-AB titer during their follow-up. However, the remaining 23 patients (23/93, 25%) showed a significant elevation of their anti-AB titer to over 1:16. Sixteen of these patients (16/93, 17%) exhibited an anti-AB titer of over 1:32. Out of these 16 patients, 11 patients (11/16, 69%) lost their grafts. The anti-AB titer in the remaining five patients (5/16, 31%) spontaneously decreased without any special treatment. Seven patients (7/93, 8%) exhibited an elevated titer of 1:16. Out of these patients, only one patient (1/7, 14%) lost his graft. The elevated titers in the remaining six patients (6/7, 86%) eventually decreased. The graft function improved in patients whose elevated anti-AB titers eventually decreased. Control patients (ABO-compatible kidney transplant patients) showed a normal elevation of their titer values compared with preoperative titers. Pathological findings showed severe humoral rejections in all cases with high anti-AB titers that lost grafts. Humoral rejection was also detected in most of the patients whose anti-AB titer was elevated to over 1:16 after the transplantation, but excellent renal function was resumed once the titers decreased to below 1:4. CONCLUSIONS: In 23 out of 93 i-LKT patients (25%), the anti-AB titers were significantly elevated after the splenectomy. In view of other reports of i-LKT without splenectomy, we feel that a splenectomy in i-LKT patients might be unnecessary. Pathological evidence suggests that the decrease in the anti-AB titer after transplantation might be the net result of plasmapheresis before the operation and the adsorption of antibodies to the endothelium of the transplanted organ after the operation, neither of which is influenced by a splenectomy.

Renal transplantation in patients with human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1.

BACKGROUND: Renal transplantation (RTx) in carriers of human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) has a risk of developing overt leukemia upon immunosuppression. Although there have been a few reports of such cases, it is unclear HTLV-1 carrier if patients on the modern immunosuppressants would develop HTLV-1-associated myelopathy or adult T-cell leukemia lymphoma. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical outcomes of RTx in nine HTLV-1 carriers to assess a risk of developing leukemia from 2002 to 2011 using immunosuppression with a calcineurin inhibitor, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and steroid. The anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody basiliximab was used for induction. In two cases of ABO-incompatible RTx, the rituximab was also administered before RTx. RESULTS: The ratio of male to female subjects was 2 to 7 with an overall mean recipient age of 54.3 ± 8.1 years. We prescribed cyclosporine (n = 5) or tacrolimus (n = 4). There was only one graft loss due to the death caused by aspiration pneumonia with a functioning graft. No one developed overt leukemia with combined treatment with MMF, basiliximab and rituximab. CONCLUSION: We concluded that RTx in HTLV-1 carriers could be performed using a modern immunosuppressive regimen, without the risk of developing leukemia.

Long-term impact of hypertension on renal allografts.

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the impact of hypertension on renal transplant function and survival in the past decade after introduction of mycophenolate mofetil and rituximab. METHODS: We examined the 184 patients who underwent renal transplantation from March 1982 to September 1999 and presented at our outpatient clinic from 2001 to 2011. They were divided into group 1 with mean systolic blood pressure (mSBP) >130 mm Hg and Group 2 with mSBP <130 mm Hg. We compared mean serum creatinine (sCr) levels for 9 years and 12-year actuarial graft survival rates. Risk factors for graft survival were assessed by Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: There were 75 group 1 and 109 group 2 recipients. The mean sCr level of group 1 was 1.59 ± 0.12 mg/dL and that of group 2 1.54 ± 0.10 mg/dL (P < .0001). Of note was that mean sCr levels of group 1 started to increase about 3 years after transplantation. Although 5-year graft survival rates of both groups were 100%, 9- and 12-year rates among group 1 were 97.3% and 90.5%, respectively, whereas among group 2 they were 99.1% and 98.1%, respectively (P = .0195). Cox univariate and multivariate analyses showed mean SBP to be the only significant risk factor for graft survival (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that the hypertensive group showed deteriorating renal function from around 3 years after transplantation that lowered graft survival afterward, resulting in a clear distinction from the nonhypertensive group at around 10 years after transplantation. Mean SBP was a significant risk factor for graft survival. Hypertension may be a surrogate for a poor renal graft prognosis in the long run.

Improved outcomes of renal transplantation from cardiac death donors: a 30-year single center experience.

Outcomes of renal transplantation from donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors over 30 years were analyzed. Between 1975 and 2004, 256 renal transplantations from DCD donors were performed. The recipients were divided into four groups according to a time period as follows: 1975-1979 (Group 1; n = 18), 1980-1989 (Group 2; n = 81), 1990-1999 (Group 3; n = 84) and 2000-2004 (Group 4; n = 73). Of the 256 transplanted kidneys from DCD donors, 38 (15%) functioned immediately after transplantation. The incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) was 72%. Warm ischemic time and total ischemic time were 7.4 +/- 9.4 min and 11.9 +/- 5.6 h, respectively. The overall graft survival rates at 1, 5 and 10 years were 80%, 72% and 53%, respectively. Graft survival rates in each group have continually improved over time (5-year graft survival; 23% vs. 64% vs. 74% vs. 91%, respectively). However, there was no significant difference in graft survival rates between the groups of patients who survived with a functioning graft for more than 1 year. A multivariate Cox regression analysis showed acute rejection and donor age to be independently associated with graft outcome. DCD donors are a valuable source of kidneys for transplantation with promising long-term outcomes.

Factors affecting survival after living-related liver transplantation.

The purpose of this study was to determine the perioperative factors that influence patient and graft outcome in living-related liver transplantation (LRLT). Between April 1995 and October 1998, we performed a series of 46 LRLT procedures, including 11 adult cased, at our institute. Mean age and weight of the recipients were 12.0 +/- 2.3 years and 23.7 +/- 2.6 kg, respectively. Seven out of the 46 patients had renal failure and received hemodialysis therapy before and after LRLT or kidney transplantation. The recipients were divided into two groups: those who survived for 7-48 months after LRLT (group 1, n = 36), and those who died within 4 months after surgery (group 2, n = 10). Factors analyzed included recipient age and weight, graft/recipient body weight ratio (G/R ratio), emergent vs elective surgery, United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) status, presence of preoperative plasmapheresis (PEX) and renal failure, and so on. Recipients in group 1 compared with group 2 had less advanced liver disease (i. e., a lower rate of emergent surgery, 14% vs 50%, and fewer patients with UNOS status 1, 14% versus 70%; P < 0.05 and P < 0.001, respectively). Group 1 recipients also had a lower percentage of preoperative treatment with plasmapheresis (22% vs 70%, P < 0.01). However, neither the G/R ratio nor the presence of renal failure affected the patient survival rate. In conclusion, factors independently associated with reduced patient survival after LRLT include emergent surgery, Child-Pugh class, UNOS status 1, and preoperative plasmapheresis.