Complementary pneumatic dilations are an effective and safe treatment when laparoscopic myotomy fails: A 30-year experience at a single tertiary center.

BACKGROUND: In the last 3 decades, laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) has represented the treatment of choice for esophageal achalasia, solving symptoms in most patients. Little is known about the fate of patients relapsing after LHM or their treatment. In this study, we aimed at evaluating the results of complementary pneumatic dilations (CPDs) after ineffective LHM. METHODS: We evaluated the patients who underwent LHM with Dor fundoplication (LHD) from 1992 to 2022 and were submitted to CPD for persistent or recurrent symptoms. The patients were followed clinically and with manometry, barium swallow, and endoscopy when necessary. An Eckardt score (ES) of > 3 was used as threshold for failure. RESULTS: Of 1420 patients undergoing LHD, 120 (8.4%) were considered failures and were offered CPD. Ten patients refused further treatment; in 5 CPD was not indicated for severe esophagitis; 1 patient had surgery for a misshaped fundoplication and 1 patient developed cancer 2 years after LHD; that leaves 103 patients who underwent a median 2 CPDs (IQR, 1-3), at a median of 15 (IQR, 8-36) months after surgery, with 3.0- to 4.0-cm Rigiflex dilator (Boston Scientific, Massachusetts, USA). No perforations were recorded. Only 6 patients were lost to follow-up. Thus, 97 were followed for a median of 37 months (IQR, 6-112) after the last CPD: 70 (72%) were asymptomatic, whereas 27 (28%) had significant persistent dysphagia (ES > 3). The only differences between the 2 groups were the ES after surgery (P < .01) and the number of required CPD. Overall, the combination of LHD + CPD provided a satisfactory outcome in 96.5% of the patients. CONCLUSION: CPDs represent an effective and safe option to treat patients after a failed LHD: when the postsurgery ES consistently remains high and the number of CPDs required to control symptoms exceeds 2, this may suggest the need for further invasive treatments.

Manometric identikit of a functioning and effective fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease in the high-resolution manometry ERA.

BACKGROUND: The pathophysiological and clinical value of performing High-Resolution Manometry (HRM) after laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is still unclear and debated. OBJECTIVE: We sought to establish the HRM parameters indicative of functioning fundoplications, and whether HRM could distinguish them from tight or defective ones. METHODS: The study involved patients with GERD who underwent laparoscopic Nissen (LN) or Toupet (LT) fundoplication between 2010 and 2022. HRM and 24-h pH monitoring were performed before and 6 months after surgery. The study population was divided into 5 groups: LN and LT patients with normal 24h-pH findings (LNpH- and LTpH-, respectively); LN and LT patients with pathological 24h-pH findings (LNpH+ and LTpH + groups, respectively); and patients with a postoperative dysphagia intensity score >2 (Dysphagia group). The novel Hiatal Morphology (HM) classification was applied, envisaging 3 different subtypes: HM1 (normal), HM2 (intrathoracic fundoplication), and HM3 (slipped fundoplication). RESULTS: Among the 132 patients recruited during the study period, 46 were in the LNpH- group, 51 in the LTpH- group, 15 in the LNpH + group, 7 in the LTpH + group, and 5 in the Dysphagia group. In multivariate analysis, postoperative abdominal lower esophageal sphincter length (p = 0.001) and HM2 (p < 0.001) were both independently associated with surgical failure. Integrated relaxation pressure was significantly higher in the Dysphagia group than in the LNpH- group. CONCLUSION: This study generated reference HRM values for an effective LF, and confirms that using HRM to assess the neo-sphincter and HM improves the clinical assessment in cases of symptom recurrence.