Correction to: Skating on thin ice: pragmatic prescribing for medication refractory schizophrenia.

After publication of the original article [1], the authors have notified us that there was an oversight on acknowledging funding received for the study. They would like to mention that Professor Sukhi Shergill was funded by an ERC Consolidator Award.

Skating on thin ice: pragmatic prescribing for medication refractory schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Clozapine is the treatment of choice for medication refractory psychosis, but it does not benefit half of those put on it. There are numerous studies of potential post-clozapine strategies, but little data to guide the order of such treatment in this common clinical challenge. We describe a naturalistic observational study in 153 patients treated by a specialist psychosis service to identify optimal pharmacotherapy practice, based on outcomes. METHODS: Medication and clinical data, based on the OPCRIT tool, were examined on admission and discharge from the national psychosis service. The primary outcome measure was the percentage change in mental state examination symptoms between admission and discharge and the association with medication on discharge. Exploratory analyses evaluated the specificity of individual medication effects on symptom clusters. RESULTS: There were fewer drugs prescribed at discharge relative to admission, suggesting an optimisation of medication, and a doubling of the number of patients treated with clozapine. Treatment with clozapine on discharge was associated with maximal decrease in symptoms from admission. In the group of patients that did not respond to clozapine monotherapy, the most effective drug combinations were clozapine augmentation with 1) sodium valproate, 2) lithium, 3) amisulpride, and 4) quetiapine. There was no support for a dose-response relationship for any drug combination. CONCLUSIONS: Clozapine monotherapy is clearly the optimal medication in medication refractory schizophrenia and it is possible to maximise its use. In patients unresponsive to clozapine monotherapy, augmentation with sodium valproate, lithium, amisulpride and quetiapine, in that order, is a reasonable treatment algorithm. Reducing the number of ineffective drugs is possible without a detrimental effect on symptoms. Exploratory data indicated that clozapine was beneficial across a range of symptoms domains, whereas olanzapine was beneficial specifically for hallucinations and lamotrigine for comorbid affective symptoms.

Real-World Outcomes in the Management of Refractory Psychosis.

BACKGROUND: Clozapine is the only medication approved for those patients with schizophrenia who do not achieve a clinical response to standard antipsychotic treatment, yet it is still underused. Furthermore, in the case of a partial or minimal response to clozapine treatment, there is no clarity on the next pharmacologic intervention. METHODS: The National Psychosis Service is a tertiary referral inpatient unit for individuals with refractory psychosis. Data from 2 pooled data sets (for a total of 325 medical records) were analyzed for treatment trajectories between admission and discharge (2001-2016). Effectiveness of pharmacologic treatment was determined using change in symptoms, assessed using the Operational Criteria (OPCRIT) system applied retrospectively to the medical records. Analysis was focused on identifying the optimal medication regimens impacting clinical status during the admission. RESULTS: Less than a quarter of the patients were on clozapine treatment at the time of admission; this rate increased to 63.4% at the time of discharge. Initiating clozapine during admission (n = 136) was associated with a 47.9% reduction of symptoms as reflected by their OPCRIT score. In cases in which clozapine monotherapy did not achieve sufficient improvement in symptoms, the most effective clozapine augmentation strategy was adding amisulpride (n = 22, 60.8% reduction of symptoms), followed by adding a mood stabilizer (n = 36, 53.7% reduction). A less favorable option was addition of quetiapine (n = 15, 26.7% reduction). CONCLUSIONS: Many people with longer-term and complex refractory illness do respond to clozapine treatment with suitable augmentation strategies when necessary. Furthermore, it is possible to advance clozapine prescribing in these complex patients when they are supported by a skilled and dedicated multidisciplinary team. The optimal therapeutic approach relies on confirmation of diagnosis and compliance and optimization of clozapine dose using therapeutic drug monitoring, followed by augmentation of clozapine with amisulpride or mood stabilizers. There is some preliminary evidence suggesting that augmentation strategies may impact differentially depending on the symptom profile.

Unheard voices: outcomes of tertiary care for treatment-refractory psychosis.

Aims and method In up to a quarter of patients, schizophrenia is resistant to standard treatments. We undertook a naturalistic study of 153 patients treated in the tertiary referral in-patient unit of the National Psychosis Service based at the Maudsley Hospital in London. A retrospective analysis of symptoms on admission and discharge was undertaken using the OPCRIT tool, along with preliminary economic modelling of potential costs related to changes in accommodation. Results In-patient treatment demonstrated statistically significant improvements in all symptom categories in patients already identified as having schizophrenia refractory to standard secondary care. The preliminary cost analysis showed net savings to referring authorities due to changes from pre- to post-discharge accommodation. Clinical implications Despite the enormous clinical, personal and societal burden of refractory psychotic illnesses, there is insufficient information on the outcomes of specialised tertiary-level care. Our pilot data support its utility in all domains measured.