Effect of combination therapy of ezetimibe and rosuvastatin on regression of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with coronary artery disease.

Ezetimibe has been reported to provide significant incremental reduction in low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) when added to a statin; however, its effect on coronary atherosclerosis has not yet been evaluated in detail. The aim of this study was to investigate the add-on effect of ezetimibe to a statin on coronary atherosclerosis evaluated by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).In this prospective randomized open-label study, a total of 51 patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were enrolled, and assigned to a combination group (n = 26, rosuvastatin 5 mg/day + ezetimibe 10 mg/day) or a monotherapy group (n = 25, rosuvastatin 5 mg/day). Volumetric IVUS analyses were performed at baseline and 6 months after the treatment for a non-PCI site. LDL-C level was significantly reduced in the combination group (-55.8%) versus that in the monotherapy group (-36.8%; P = 0.004). The percent change in plaque volume (PV), the primary endpoint, appeared to decrease more effectively in the combination group compared with the monotherapy group (-13.2% versus -3.1%, respectively, P = 0.050). Moreover, there was a significant group × time interaction in the effects of the two treatments on PV (P = 0.021), indicating the regressive effect of the combination therapy on PV was greater than that of monotherapy for subtly different values of baseline PV in the two treatment groups. Moreover, percent change in PV showed positive correlations with percent change of LDL-C (r = 0.384, P = 0.015).Intensive lipid-lowering therapy with ezetimibe added to usual-dose statin may provide significant incremental reduction in coronary plaques compared with usual-dose statin monotherapy.

Effects of Irradiation During Computed Tomography Scanning on the Function of Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillators.

The effect of irradiation during computed tomography (CT) imaging on implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) has not been fully evaluated in various settings. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the occurrence of electromagnetic interference (EMI) during CT irradiation in various clinically available ICDs with phantom experiments and to determine the potential risks related to irradiation during CT imaging. Five types of clinically available ICDs from five manufacturers were tested. An ICD was combined with an electrocardiogram (ECG) simulator, mounted in a chest phantom, and subjected to CT imaging. Each ICD was irradiated at the maximal power level (tube voltage, 135 kVp; tube current, 510 mA; rotation time, 1.5 s). EMI was defined as oversensing, ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) detection, noise, or shock delivery during CT imaging. For ICDs in which EMI was observed, EMI was then evaluated under 144 different irradiation conditions (tube voltage [four patterns from 80-135 kVp], tube current [six patterns from 50-550 mA], and rotation time [six patterns from 0.35-1.5 s]). Testing was also performed during irradiation at the typical doses in three clinical settings and in two settings with inappropriate irradiation of ICDs due to incorrect setup. Among the five ICDs, a shock was delivered by one ICD manufactured by Medtronic (Minneapolis, MN, USA) due to oversensing during irradiation, which occurred at the maximal power level. No oversensing was observed in other ICDs. In the malfunctioned ICD, oversensing was observed in 134 of 144 irradiation patterns, even at a low power in the ICD. The VF-detection criterion was fulfilled in 20 of 134 tests and was significantly associated with tube voltage, tube current, ration time, and tube voltage × rotation time interaction. Although oversensing was observed in three clinical settings (typical chest CT, CT coronary angiography after coronary artery bypass graft, and dynamic assessment for pleural tumors) and one situation during an incorrect scan range on the chest for head perfusion CT, they were not recognized as tachycardia beats. Oversensing was observed when scans were incorrectly set over the ICD during bolus tracking of contrast-enhanced CT. Maximal power CT imaging induced VT/VF detection and shock delivery in one model of ICD placed in a chest phantom. VT/VF detection was observed when tube voltages were high and irradiation times were longer. Oversensing can occur during inappropriate CT imaging, particularly when slices are positioned over the ICD.

[Partial electrical reset of CT irradiation on implantable cardiac devices: relationship between reset and tube voltage, tube current, and rotation time].

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between partial electrical reset (PER) and CT scan parameters (tube voltage, tube current, rotation time, and product of tube current and rotation time in mAs). A cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker (Insync 8040, Medtronic Inc., Tokyo) and 320 area detector CT scanner (Aquilion ONE, Toshiba medical systems, Otawara, Japan) with volume scan were used. The pacemaker was put in DDD mode. The PERs were interpreted using both the programmer's wave forms and error messages. The exposure was repeated 5 times per CT setting. The pacemaker was placed on the anterior wall and upper side of a chest phantom. Each CT scan was performed using the following parameters: tube voltage of 80, 100, 120, and 135 kV; tube current of 50-550 mA; and rotation time of 0.35-1.5 s. PERs were observed at 100, 120, and 135 kV, and more PERs were observed as the tube voltage increased. The PER tube current decreased as the rotation time was increased. In contrast, the PER tube current and rotation time product (mAs) increased as the rotation time was increased. More specifically, the radiation dose rate was the affected factor of the PERs. To avoid PER of pacemakers, CT scan parameters with lower radiation dose rates (low rather than high tube current and rotational time) is recommended. In conclusion, our results will help with CT scans of patients who have implantable cardiac devices (included pacemakers and cardioverter defibrillators).