Contribution of vision and tactile sensation on body sway during quiet stance.

[Purpose] This study examines the contribution of vision and tactile sensation on body sway during quiet stance. [Participants and Methods] Sixteen healthy participants maintained quiet stance. The mean distance between the neutral center of pressure (COP) and that at the peak deviated position, indicating how quickly humans initiate the swaying of the body back to the neutral position, was calculated (COPpeak). [Results] The displacement of the COP in both the anterior-posterior and medial-lateral axes was greater when vision was occluded. The anterior or posterior COPpeak was also greater when vision was occluded. The leftward COPpeak was greater when the tactile sensation of the sole was masked. Visual occlusion decreased the tactile perception threshold of the sole. There was no significant interaction between the effect of vision and that of tactile sensation on body sway during quiet stance. [Conclusion] Vision plays a role in returning the body to the neutral position, particularly in the anterior-posterior axis. Tactile sensation contributes particularly to recovery from the leftward body sway during quiet stance. Tactile sensitivity is enhanced by visual occlusion through inter-modal reweighting. However, inter-modal reweighting between vision and tactile sensation is not specifically for postural control during quiet stance.

Cortical contribution to motor process before and after movement onset.

PURPOSE: This study determined the cortical areas contributing to the process of the reaction time (RT), movement time, onset-peak time, peak velocity and amplitude of the movement. METHODS: Eighteen healthy right-handed humans abducted the left index finger in response to a start cue with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). RESULTS: There was a significant and positive correlation coefficient between the peak velocity and amplitude, indicating that movement velocity increases with the size of the movement to maintain the consistent time taken for the movement. There was no significant correlation between the RT and movement time, and thus, hypothesis that those are under common motor process was not supported. The RT in the trials with TMS over the dorsal premotor cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, or posterior parietal cortex was significantly shorter than the RT in the trials with sham TMS, indicating that those areas contribute to the motor process in the RT. The onset-peak time in the trials with TMS over the posterior parietal cortex was significantly shorter than that in the trials with sham TMS, indicating that the posterior parietal cortex contributes to the motor process that determines the time taken for the acceleration phase of the movement. CONCLUSION: The findings support a view that the cortical areas both in front of and behind the primary motor cortex contribute to the motor process before the movement onset, but the areas behind the primary motor cortex particularly contributes to the motor process during the acceleration phase of the movement.

Rhythmic movement and rhythmic auditory cues enhance anticipatory postural adjustment of gait initiation.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the rhythmic movements or cues enhance the anticipatory postural adjustment (APA) of gait initiation. Healthy humans initiated gait in response to an auditory start cue (third cue). A first auditory cue was given 8 s before the start cue, and a second auditory cue was given 3 s before the start cue. The participants performed the rhythmic medio-lateral weight shift (ML-WS session), rhythmic anterior-posterior weight shift (AP-WS session), or rhythmic arm swing (arm swing session) in the time between the first and second cues. In the rhythmic cues session, rhythmic auditory cues with a frequency of 1 Hz were given in this time. In the stationary session, the participants maintained stationary stance in this time. The APA and initial step movement preceded by those rhythmic movements or cues were compared with those in the stationary session. The temporal characteristics of the initial step movement of the gait initiation were not changed by the rhythmic movements or cues. The medio-lateral displacement of the APA in the ML-WS and arm swing sessions was significantly greater than that in the stationary session. The anterior-posterior displacement of the APA in the rhythmic cues and arm swing sessions was significantly greater than that in the stationary session. Taken together, the rhythmic movements and cues enhance the APA of gait initiation. The present finding may be a clue or motive for the future investigation for using rhythmic movements or cues as the preparatory activity to enlarge the small APA of gait initiation in the patients with Parkinson's disease.

Effect of Moving Tactile Stimuli to Mimic Altered Weight Distribution During Gait on Quiet Stance Body Sway.

Our purpose in the present study was to examine whether moving tactile stimuli to the sole to mimic moving weight distribution over the feet during gait would influence body sway in quiet stance. Fifteen healthy males maintained the quiet stance, and we delivered moving tactile stimuli to mimic the change in their weight distribution during gait. Moving tactile stimuli did not change the length of the center of pressure (COP) displacement and COP position. Vision decreased the length of the COP, but it did not interact with moving tactile stimuli for the COP length and position. The COP position rhythmically moved in the medial-lateral axis along with the cycle of moving tactile stimuli. The COP was at the lateral peak position at the period at which moving tactile stimuli mimicked the weight distribution in the transition between the swing and stance phases of the gait cycle. This finding may indicate that the body is positioned at the lateral peak position in quiet stance when people perceive the sensation of weight distribution over the feet at the most unstable phase of the gait cycle. We suggest that moving tactile stimuli to the sole may induce medial-lateral body sway before gait initiation for patients with Parkinson's disease to improve their freezing of gait initiation.

Tactile Perception of Right Middle Fingertip Suppresses Excitability of Motor Cortex Supplying Right First Dorsal Interosseous Muscle.

The present study examined whether tactile perception of the fingertip modulates excitability of the motor cortex supplying the intrinsic hand muscle and whether this modulation is specific to the fingertip stimulated and the muscle and hand tested. Tactile stimulation was given to one of the five fingertips in the left or right hand, and transcranial magnetic stimulation eliciting motor evoked potential in the first dorsal interosseous muscle (FDI) or abductor digiti minimi was given 200 ms after the onset of tactile stimulation. The corticospinal excitability of the FDI at rest was suppressed by the tactile stimulation of the right middle fingertip, but such suppression was absent for the other fingers stimulated and for the other muscle or hand tested. The persistence and amplitude of the F-wave was not significantly influenced by tactile stimulation of the fingertip in the right hand. These findings indicate that tactile perception of the right middle fingertip suppresses excitability of the motor cortex supplying the right FDI at rest. The suppression of corticospinal excitability was absent during tonic contraction of the right FDI, indicating that the motor execution process interrupts the tactile perception-induced suppression of motor cortical excitability supplying the right FDI. These findings are in line with a view that the tactile perception of the right middle finger induces surround inhibition of the motor cortex supplying the prime mover of the finger neighboring the stimulated finger.

Responses of stance leg muscles induced by support surface translation during gait.

This study determined the presence of the muscle responses to the support surface translation in the stance leg during gait and examined the effect of the direction and time point of the translation and that of the cognitive process on the responses. The rectus femoris (RF), biceps femoris (BF), soleus (SOL), and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles in the stance leg were tested. There was no significant effect of cognitive process on the electromyographic (EMG) activity induced by the translation of the support surface. In all muscles except the SOL, the EMG amplitude increased 0-300 â€‹ms after the support surface translation at the initial stance (IS) or middle stance (MS) of the tested leg. This means that the EMG activity in the leg muscles other than the SOL occurs after the support surface translation at the IS or MS no matter the direction of the translation. The EMG amplitude was not changed after the translation at the late stance, indicating that the translation does not influence the EMG amplitude at the double limb support phase with the tested leg behind the other. In the SOL, the EMG amplitude increased after the backward translation at the IS and after the forward translation at the MS, but decreased after the forward translation at the IS, indicating that the support surface translation-induced change in the EMG amplitude of the SOL is dependent on its direction. The change in the EMG amplitude of the TA and RF induced by the forward translation was greatest when the translation was given at the IS. In the SOL, the decrease in the EMG amplitude after the forward translation and the increase in the amplitude after the backward translation were greatest at the IS. Taken together, the change in the EMG amplitude induced by the support surface translation is greatest when the translation is given at the IS. The increase in the EMG amplitude in the TA and RF after the forward translation was greater than that after the backward translation at the IS, indicating that the EMG activity of the frontal leg muscles after the forward translation is greater when the translation is given at the IS.

Influence of the Inter-Trial Interval, Movement Observation, and Hand Dominance on the Previous Trial Effect.

Previous studies have shown that current movement is influenced by the previous movement, which is known as the previous trial effect. In this study, we investigated the influence of the inter-trial interval, movement observation, and hand dominance on the previous trial effect of the non-target discrete movement. Right-handed healthy humans abducted the index finger in response to a start cue, and this task was repeated with constant inter-trial intervals. The absolute difference in the reaction time (RT) between the previous and current trials increased as the inter-trial interval increased. The absolute difference in RT reflects the reproducibility of the time taken for the motor execution between two consecutive trials. Thus, the finding supported the view that there is a carryover of movement information from one trial to the next, and that the underlying reproducibility of the RT between the two consecutive trials decays over time. This carryover of movement information is presumably conveyed by implicit short-term memory, which also decays within a short period of time. The correlation coefficient of the RT between the previous and current trials decreased with an increase in the inter-trial interval, indicating that the common responsiveness of two consecutive trials weakens over time. The absolute difference was smaller when the response was performed while observing finger movement, indicating that a carryover of the visual information to the next trial enhances the reproducibility of the motor execution process between consecutive trials. Hand dominance did not influence the absolute difference or correlation coefficient, indicating that the central process mediating previous trial effect of hand movement is not greatly lateralized.

Sympathetic Response to Postural Perturbation in Stance.

The purpose of the present study was to elucidate whether the sympathetic response to perturbation in stance represents multiple mental responses, whether perturbation-induced fear of fall is one of the mental responses, and whether the sympathetic response is task specific. While healthy humans maintained stance, the support surface of the feet translated in the forward or backward direction. The phasic electrodermal response (EDR), representing the sympathetic response, appeared 1-1.5 s after the support surface translation. Mostly, perturbation-induced EDRs comprised one peak, but some EDRs were comprised of two peaks. The onset latency of the two-peak EDR was much shorter than that of the one-peak EDR. The second peak latency of the two-peak EDR was similar to the peak latency of the one-peak EDR, indicating that the first peak of the two-peak EDR was an additional component preceding the one-peak EDR. This finding supports a view that perturbation-induced EDR in stance sometimes represents multiple mental responses. The amplitude of the EDR had a positive and significant correlation with fear, indicating that perturbation-induced EDR in stance partially represents perturbation-induced fear of fall. The EDR amplitude was dependent on the translation amplitude and direction, indicating that perturbation-induced EDR in stance is a task specific response. The EDR appeared earlier when the participants prepared to answer a question or when the perturbation was self-triggered, indicating that adding cognitive load induces earlier perturbation-induced mental responses.

Current Movement Follows Previous Nontarget Movement With Somatosensory Stimulation.

This study examined whether the current movement follows the previous movement and whether this process is enhanced by somatosensory stimulation or is gated while retrieving and using the memory of the previously practiced target end point. Healthy humans abducted the index finger to a previously practiced target (target movement) or abducted it freely without aiming at the target (nontarget movement). The end point of the nontarget movement had a positive correlation with the previous nontarget movement only when somatosensory stimulation was given during the previous movement, indicating that the current nontarget movement follows the previous nontarget movement with somatosensory stimulation. No conclusive evidence of whether this process is gated by retrieving and using the memory of the previously practiced target was found.

Supplementary motor area contributes to carrying previous movement information over to current movement.

The purpose of the present study was to determine the cortical areas contributing to the influence of the previous movement on the current movement. Right-handed healthy human participants abducted and then adducted the left index finger in response to a start cue. Twenty consecutive trials with 10 s intertrial intervals were performed in each trial block. An odd-numbered trial was considered to be the previous trial, and a trial immediately after the previous trial (even-numbered trial) was the current trial. In each trial block, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was given over one of the seven TMS sites with the start cue in the previous trial. The TMS site was over the supplementary motor area (SMA), right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, right dorsal premotor cortex, right or left posterior parietal cortex or right primary sensory cortex. Sham TMS, producing magnetic stimulation with the coil tilting 90 degrees off the scalp, was delivered over the Cz. In the current trial, TMS was not delivered. The correlation coefficient of the reaction time between the previous and current trials was positive and significant in the sham TMS trial block. This indicates that the current movement is partially dependent on the previous movement. The correlation coefficient of the reaction time between the previous and current movements in the SMA trial block was significantly different from that in the sham TMS trial block, indicating that the SMA contributes to the influence of the previous movement on the current movement. The SMA contributes to carrying the responsiveness level in the previous movement over to the current movement.