Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 408(1): 372, 2023 Sep 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37737866

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Having performed anti-reflux surgery for thirty years, it was important to reexamine our patients in the long term to enlarge the body of evidence concerning classical and extraesophageal symptoms that are differently controlled by Nissen or Toupet fundoplication. OBJECTIVES: We report a cohort of 155 GERD patients who underwent fundoplication within a tailored approach between 1994 and 2000. Changes in the perioperative functional outcome, GERD symptoms, and quality of life are being analyzed 10 and 20 years after the operation. RESULTS: The operation resulted in a superior quality of life compared to a patient cohort treated with PPI therapy. We found that both surgical methods (laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication) cure classical symptoms equally (heartburn, regurgitation, and dysphagia). GERD patients receiving a Toupet fundoplication seem more likely to suffer from extraesophageal GERD symptoms 10 and 20 years after surgery than patients with a Nissen fundoplication. On the other hand, some patients with Nissen fundoplication report dysphagia even 10 and 20 years after surgery. CONCLUSION: Both the laparoscopic Nissen and Toupet fundoplications provide excellent symptom control in the long term. Moreover, the Nissen fundoplication seems to be superior in controlling extraesophageal reflux symptoms, but at the expense of dysphagia. In summary, tailoring the operation based on symptoms seems advantageous.


Assuntos
Transtornos de Deglutição , Refluxo Gastroesofágico , Laparoscopia , Humanos , Fundoplicatura , Transtornos de Deglutição/etiologia , Transtornos de Deglutição/cirurgia , Qualidade de Vida , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/cirurgia
2.
Surg Endosc ; 36(5): 3011-3018, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34152456

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: After laparoscopic Gastric Bypass Procedure (GBP), anastomotic ulcers (AU) at the gastrojejunostomy (GJ) occur in up to 16% of the patients. Surgical techniques seem to influence the development of AU, but this is still a matter of discussion. This study aims to compare the incidence of AU in circular-stapled (CS) versus linear-stapled (LS) gastrojejunostomy. METHODS: Single-centre retrospective analysis of 241 (m 77 /f 164) consecutive patients (126 CS, 115 LS) with primary or revisional GBP including Roux-Y-Gastric Bypass (RYGB) and One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) between 01/2014 and 01/2018. Follow-up with oesophagogastroduodenoscopy was only performed in symptomatic patients. Age, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, smoking and medication were analyzed in both groups. The data are reported as total numbers (%) and mean ± standard deviation. RESULTS: AU occurred significantly more often in the CS group than in the LS group (p = 0.0034). Moreover, refractory AU and the need for revisional surgery were higher in the CS group. Smoking correlates significantly with the development of AU, whereas other risk factors had no impact on its incidence. CONCLUSION: Linear-stapled gastrojejunostomy with a long and narrow pouch should be the preferable procedure for reducing AU development risk. Smoking cessation minimizes the risk for AU and is a necessary part of the treatment.


Assuntos
Derivação Gástrica , Laparoscopia , Obesidade Mórbida , Derivação Gástrica/efeitos adversos , Derivação Gástrica/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Úlcera/etiologia , Úlcera/cirurgia
3.
Obes Surg ; 29(2): 626-631, 2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30402803

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Approximately 14% of Austria's 8.5 million inhabitants have a body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m2. The laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) was introduced in Austria in 1994, where about 10.300 patients have received it so far. One of our LAGB patients developed an adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus 13 years after implantation. OBJECTIVES: In order to calculate whether after LAGB patients are at higher risk for carcinoma of the esophagus, we performed a nationwide survey. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to all surgical departments in Austria, primarily in order to detect cases with esophageal carcinoma after LAGB, but also to evaluate the policy in Austria concerning preoperative work-up, operation, and follow-up in LAGB patients. RESULTS: Since 1994, 37 of the 119 surgical departments in Austria have performed a total of about 10.300 LAGB implantations. Six patients have been identified with esophageal cancer following LAGB. The WHO statistical report on esophageal cancer shows an incidence of 2.8/100.000 per year in Austria, about 1/3 of which cases are adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus. CONCLUSION: Following LAGB, the incidence of esophageal cancer might be up to fivefold higher than the aged standardized overall population of Austria.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas/epidemiologia , Gastroplastia/estatística & dados numéricos , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiologia , Áustria/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA