Examining the 4-D Model in Persons Enrolled in the Top DD Internet Intervention.

The 4-dimensional (4-D) model of trauma-related dissociation differentiates between dissociative experiences involving trauma-related altered states of consciousness and symptoms of distress that do not appear to involve alterations in normal waking consciousness across four phenomenological dimensions (i.e., our experience of time, thought, body, and emotions). The current study evaluated hypotheses associated with the 4-D model using analyses of variance and correlation analyses in individuals with a primary diagnosis of a trauma-related dissociative disorder who were participating in the TOP DD internet study involving a combination of in-person psychotherapy and an online psychoeducational program (n = 111). Intrusive memories of traumatic events were more frequently endorsed than flashbacks, but emotional numbing was more frequently endorsed than other forms of affect dysregulation. Negative thoughts and emotion dysregulation were more strongly intercorrelated than were voice hearing and emotional numbing. Distress symptoms were more strongly associated with PTSD symptoms and difficulties in emotion regulation, whereas experiences of depersonalization were more strongly associated with dissociative self-states. Greater reduction in distress symptoms was also seen in comparison with trauma-related altered states of consciousness over the course of the combined psychotherapy and internet-based psychoeducational intervention. Overall, results continue to suggest that measures of distress and dissociative experiences can be distinguished by measures of symptom frequency, co-occurrence, and convergence with other measures of distress vs. dissociation albeit that results varied across the four phenomenological dimensions that were surveyed.

Dissociative Identity Disorder: Diagnostic Accuracy and DSM-5 Criteria Change Implications.

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) revised the diagnostic criteria for dissociative identity disorder (DID) to more accurately reflect the symptom profile of DID patients. No study has examined how this change affects clinical diagnosis of DID. The present study examined clinician reports of patient symptoms in relation to DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 DID diagnostic criteria. Data were analyzed from 169 clinicians who participated in the Treatment of Patients with Dissociative Disorders Network Study with a patient they assigned a DID diagnosis. Clinicians evaluated their patients with respect to DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 DID diagnostic criteria. Researchers determined a clinician-assigned DID diagnosis as "accurate" when the patient's reported dissociative symptoms matched DSM-IV-TR and/or DSM-5 criteria for DID. Most of the clinicians (95.27%) accurately diagnosed DID. Of those accurately diagnosed, 83.85% of patients met DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 DID criteria, 9.94% only met DSM-IV-TR DID criteria, and 6.21% only met DSM-5 DID criteria. Further examination of responses suggested that possible idiomatic responses to the negative wording of the DSM-5 exclusionary criteria might have accounted for the DSM-IV-TR appearing to fit for a greater number of cases in this study. Changes in the DSM criteria for DID did not substantially change the frequency or accuracy of assigned DID diagnoses, but the removal of the requirement in DSM-5 that self-states regularly take control of an individual's behavior slightly increased the number of individuals meeting criteria for DID.

An Online Educational Program for Individuals With Dissociative Disorders and Their Clinicians: 1-Year and 2-Year Follow-Up.

Individuals with dissociative disorders (DDs) are underrecognized, underserved, and often severely psychiatrically ill, characterized by marked dissociative and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms with significant disability. Patients with DD have high rates of nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) and suicide attempts. Despite this, there is a dearth of training about DDs. We report the outcome of a web-based psychoeducational intervention for an international sample of 111 patients diagnosed with dissociative identity disorder (DID) or other complex DDs. The Treatment of Patients with Dissociative Disorders Network (TOP DD Network) program was designed to investigate whether, over the course of a web-based psychoeducational program, DD patients would exhibit improved functioning and decreased symptoms, including among patients typically excluded from treatment studies for safety reasons. Using video, written, and behavioral practice exercises, the TOP DD Network program provided therapists and patients with education about DDs as well as skills for improving emotion regulation, managing safety issues, and decreasing symptoms. Participation was associated with reductions in dissociation and PTSD symptoms, improved emotion regulation, and higher adaptive capacities, with overall sample |d|s = 0.44-0.90, as well as reduced NSSI. The improvements in NSSI among the most self-injurious patients were particularly striking. Although all patient groups showed significant improvements, individuals with higher levels of dissociation demonstrated greater and faster improvement compared to those lower in dissociation |d|s = 0.54-1.04 vs. |d|s  = 0.24-0.75, respectively. These findings support dissemination of DD treatment training and initiation of treatment studies with randomized controlled designs.

Spanish Abstracts by Asociación Chilena de Estrés Traumático (ACET) Un programa educativo online para personas con trastornos disociativos y sus médicos: Seguimiento de uno y dos años INTERVENCIÓN ONLINE PARA TRASTORNOS DISOCIATIVOS Las personas con trastornos disociativos (TDs) se encuentran sub-reconocidas, con pocos servicios y, a menudo, con enfermedades psiquiátricas graves, caracterizadas por marcados síntomas disociativos y de trastorno de estrés postraumático (TEPT) con discapacidad significativa. Los pacientes con TD tienen altas tasas de autolesión no suicida (ALNS) e intentos de suicidio. A pesar de esto, hay una escasez de entrenamiento sobre los TDs. Reportamos el resultado de una intervención psicoeducativa basado en la web para una muestra internacional de 111 pacientes diagnosticados con trastorno de identidad disociativa (TID) u otros TDs complejos. El programa de la Red de Tratamiento de Pacientes con Trastornos Disociativos (TOP DD Network, en su denominación en inglés) se diseñó para investigar si, en el transcurso de un programa psicoeducativo basado en la web, los pacientes con TD exhibirían un mejor funcionamiento y reducción de síntomas, incluso en los pacientes que generalmente han sido excluidos de los estudios de tratamiento por razones de seguridad. Mediante el uso de videos, ejercicios de escritura y prácticas conductuales, el programa TOP DD Network brindó a los terapeutas y los pacientes educación sobre los TDs y las habilidades para mejorar la regulación de las emociones, manejar los problemas de seguridad, y disminuir los síntomas. La participación se asoció con reducciones en los síntomas de disociación y de TEPT, mejor regulación de las emociones y mayores capacidades de adaptación, muestra total ds = .44-.90, así como reducción de ALNS. Las mejoras en ALNS entre los pacientes más auto-agresivos fueron particularmente sorprendentes. Aunque todos los grupos de pacientes mostraron mejoras significativas, los individuos con niveles más altos de disociación demostraron una mejoría mayor y más rápida en comparación con los más bajos en disociación |d|s = .54-1.04 vs. |d|s = .24-.75, respectivamente. Estos hallazgos apoyan la diseminación de la capacitación en el tratamiento del TD y el inicio de estudios de tratamiento con diseños controlados aleatorios.

The reasons dissociative disorder patients self-injure.

Background: Most individuals with dissociative disorders (DDs) report engaging in self-injury. Objective: The present study aimed to understand the reasons for self-injury among a clinical sample of 156 DD patients enrolled in the TOP DD Network study. Method: Participants answered questions about self-injury, including a prompt asking how often they are aware of the reasons they have urges to self-injure, as well as a prompt asking them to list three reasons they self-injure. Results: Six themes of reasons for self-injury, each with subthemes, were identified in the qualitative data: (1) Trauma-related Cues, (2) Emotion Dysregulation, (3) Stressors, (4) Psychiatric and Physical Health Symptoms, (5) Dissociative Experiences, and (6) Ineffective Coping Attempts. Participants reported that they were able to identify their reasons for self-injuring sometimes (60.26%) or almost always (28.85%), with only 3.20% unable to identify any reasons for their self-injury. Conclusion: Results suggest that the vast majority of DD patients (92.31%) reported being at least partially unaware of what leads them to have self-injury urges, and many individuals with DDs experience some reasons for self-injury that are different from those with other disorders. The treatment implications of these findings are discussed.

Antecedentes:La mayoría de los individuos con trastornos disociativos (DDs por sus siglas en inglés) informan realizarse autolesiones. Objetivo: El presente estudio tuvo como objetivo el comprender las razones de las autolesiones en una muestra clínica de 156 pacientes con DD enroladas en el estudio TOP DD Network.Método:Los participantes respondieron a preguntas sobre las autolesiones, incluyendo una pregunta sobre la frecuencia con la que son conscientes de las razones por las que se autolesionan, así como una pregunta que les pedía que enumeraran tres razones por las que se autolesionan.Resultados:En los datos cualitativos se identificaron seis temas de motivos de autolesión, cada uno con subtemas: (1) Claves relacionadas con el trauma, (2) Desregulación emocional, (3) Estresores, (4) Síntomas psiquiátricos y de salud física, (5) Experiencias disociativas y (6) Intentos de afrontamiento ineficaces. Los participantes informaron que pudieron identificar sus razones para autolesionarse a veces (60,26%) o casi siempre (28,85%), y solo el 3,20% no pudo identificar las razones de sus autolesiones.Conclusiones:Los resultados sugieren que la gran mayoría de los pacientes con DD (92.31%) informaron no ser, al menos parcialmente, conscientes de lo que los lleva a tener deseos de autolesionarse y muchos individuos con DDs experimentan algunas razones de autolesión que son distintas de las que padecen otros trastornos. Se discuten las implicaciones de estos hallazgos en el tratamiento.

An examination of the relations between emotion dysregulation, dissociation, and self-injury among dissociative disorder patients.

Background: Dissociative disorder (DD) patients report high rates of self-injury. Previous studies have found dissociation and self-injury to be related to emotional distress. To the best of our knowledge, however, the link between emotion dysregulation and self-injury has not yet been examined within a DD population. Objective: The present study investigated relations between emotion dysregulation, dissociation, and self-injury in DD patients, and explored patterns of emotion dysregulation difficulties among DD patients with and without recent histories of self-injury. Method: We utilized linear and logistic regressions and t-test statistical methods to examine data from 235 patient-clinician dyads enrolled in the TOP DD Network Study. Results: Analyses revealed emotion dysregulation was associated with heightened dissociative symptoms and greater endorsement of self-injury in the past six months. Further, patients with a history of self-injury in the past six months reported more severe emotion dysregulation and dissociation than those without recent self-injury. As a group, DD patients reported the greatest difficulty engaging in goal-directed activities when distressed, followed by lack of emotional awareness and nonacceptance of emotional experiences. DD patients demonstrated similar patterns of emotion dysregulation difficulties irrespective of recent self-injury status. Conclusions: Results support recommendations to strengthen emotion regulation skills as a means to decrease symptoms of dissociation and self-injury in DD patients.

Antecedentes: Los pacientes con trastorno disociativo (DD en sus siglas en inglés) reportan altas tasas de autolesiones. Estudios anteriores han encontrado que la disociación y las autolesiones están relacionadas con el sufrimiento emocional. Sin embargo, hasta donde sabemos, la relación entre la desregulación emocional y las autolesiones aún no se ha examinado en una población con DD.Objetivo: El presente estudio investigó las relaciones entre la desregulación emocional, la disociación y la autolesión en pacientes con DD, y exploró los patrones de las dificultades de desregulación emocional entre los pacientes con DD con y sin historias recientes de autolesión.Método: Se utilizaron regresiones lineales y logísticas y métodos estadísticos de prueba t para examinar los datos de 235 díadas paciente-médico inscritas en el Estudio TOP DD Network.Resultados: Los análisis revelaron que la desregulación emocional se asoció con un aumento de los síntomas disociativos y una mayor tendencia a la autolesión en los últimos seis meses. Además, los pacientes con un historial de autolesiones en los últimos seis meses informaron de una desregulación emocional y una disociación más graves que los que no se habían autolesionado recientemente. Como grupo, los pacientes con DD informaron de la mayor dificultad para participar en actividades dirigidas a objetivos cuando estaban angustiados, seguidos por la falta de conciencia emocional y la no aceptación de las experiencias emocionales. Los pacientes con DD demostraron patrones similares de dificultades de desregulación emocional, independientemente del estado de autolesión reciente.Conclusiones: Los resultados apoyan las recomendaciones de fortalecer las habilidades de regulación de las emociones como medio para disminuir los síntomas de disociación y autolesión en pacientes con DD.

The economic burden of dissociative disorders: A qualitative systematic review of empirical studies.

OBJECTIVE: Dissociative disorders (DDs) are associated with intensive, long-term treatment, suicidality, recurrent hospitalizations, and high rates of disability. However, little is known about the specifics of the economic burden associated with DDs. This worldwide, systematic review examines the results of studies in adults on direct and indirect costs associated with DDs. METHOD: We searched 6 databases and the reference lists of articles. We also approached researchers to identify unpublished studies. No language restrictions were imposed. RESULTS: A total of 1,002 records met the search criteria, of which 29 papers were selected for full-text inspection. Ultimately, of these, we reviewed four empirical studies. We provide a narrative discussion of study findings. Our findings suggest that DDs are costly to society, and that there is a reduction in service utilization and associated costs over time with diagnosing of and specialized treatment for DDs. However, the overall quality of the economic evaluations was low; several types of DDs, comorbid conditions, and costs were not included; and men were underrepresented. Due to the heterogeneity among studies, we could not perform a meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the heterogeneity and low quality of the identified economic evaluations, no firm conclusions about the economic burden of DDs alone can be drawn. Higher quality research, including a detailed description of the study design, population, and primary outcome measures used, utilizing appropriate clinical alternatives and including major comorbidities, is urgently needed to more rigorously assess the economic impact of DDs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).