Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Diabetologia ; 55(12): 3155-62, 2012 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22965294

RESUMO

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this multicentre, randomised, controlled crossover study was to determine the efficacy of adding continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) to insulin pump therapy (CSII) in type 1 diabetes. METHODS: Children and adults (n = 153) on CSII with HbA(1c) 7.5-9.5% (58.5-80.3 mmol/mol) were randomised to (CGM) a Sensor On or Sensor Off arm for 6 months. After 4 months' washout, participants crossed over to the other arm for 6 months. Paediatric and adult participants were separately electronically randomised through the case report form according to a predefined randomisation sequence in eight secondary and tertiary centres. The primary outcome was the difference in HbA(1c) levels between arms after 6 months. RESULTS: Seventy-seven participants were randomised to the On/Off sequence and 76 to the Off/On sequence; all were included in the primary analysis. The mean difference in HbA(1c) was -0.43% (-4.74 mmol/mol) in favour of the Sensor On arm (8.04% [64.34 mmol/mol] vs 8.47% [69.08 mmol/mol]; 95% CI -0.32%, -0.55% [-3.50, -6.01 mmol/mol]; p < 0.001). Following cessation of glucose sensing, HbA(1c) reverted to baseline levels. Less time was spent with sensor glucose <3.9 mmol/l during the Sensor On arm than in the Sensor Off arm (19 vs 31 min/day; p = 0.009). The mean number of daily boluses increased in the Sensor On arm (6.8 ± 2.5 vs 5.8 ± 1.9, p < 0.0001), together with the frequency of use of the temporary basal rate (0.75 ± 1.11 vs 0.26 ± 0.47, p < 0.0001) and manual insulin suspend (0.91 ± 1.25 vs 0.70 ± 0.75, p < 0.018) functions. Four vs two events of severe hypoglycaemia occurred in the Sensor On and Sensor Off arm, respectively (p = 0.40). CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Continuous glucose monitoring was associated with decreased HbA(1c) levels and time spent in hypoglycaemia in individuals with type 1 diabetes using CSII. More frequent self-adjustments of insulin therapy may have contributed to these effects.


Assuntos
Glicemia/metabolismo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/sangue , Hiperglicemia/sangue , Hipoglicemiantes/administração & dosagem , Sistemas de Infusão de Insulina , Insulina/análogos & derivados , Monitorização Fisiológica/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Técnicas Biossensoriais , Automonitorização da Glicemia , Criança , Estudos Cross-Over , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Hiperglicemia/tratamento farmacológico , Insulina/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Acta Diabetol ; 51(5): 845-51, 2014 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25037251

RESUMO

To investigate the impact of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on health-related quality of life (HRQOL), treatment satisfaction (TS) medical resource use, and indirect costs in the SWITCH study. SWITCH was a multicentre, randomized, crossover study. Patients with type 1 diabetes (n = 153) using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) were randomized to a 12 month sensor-On/Off or sensor-Off/On sequence (6 months each treatment), with a 4-month washout between periods. HRQOL in children and TS in adults were measured using validated questionnaires. Medical resource utilization data were collected. In adults, TS was significantly higher in the sensor-On arm, and there were significant improvements in ratings for treatment convenience and flexibility. There were no clinically significant differences in children's HRQOL or parents' proxy ratings. The incidence of severe hypoglycaemia, unscheduled visits, or diabetes-related hospitalizations did not differ significantly between the two arms. Adult patients made fewer telephone consultations during the sensor-On arm; children's caregivers made similar numbers of telephone consultations during both arms, and calls were on average only 3 min longer during the sensor-On arm. Regarding indirect costs, children with >70 % sensor usage missed fewer school days, compared with the sensor-Off arm (P = 0.0046) but there was no significant difference in the adults days of work off. The addition of CGM to CSII resulted in better metabolic control without imposing an additional burden on the patient or increased medical resource use, and offered the potential for cost offsets.


Assuntos
Automonitorização da Glicemia/psicologia , Glicemia/análise , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamento farmacológico , Sistemas de Infusão de Insulina/psicologia , Satisfação do Paciente , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Automonitorização da Glicemia/economia , Criança , Estudos Cross-Over , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/economia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/psicologia , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/metabolismo , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/administração & dosagem , Insulina/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA