Biological interaction, esthetics, handling, and loss rate of temporary luting cements - a clinical single-blind randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate three temporary luting cements in terms of their restoration loss rates, biological interactions, esthetic properties, and handling characteristics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 75 adults requiring fixed prosthodontics voluntarily participated in a single-blind, randomized controlled trial. After preparation, temporary restorations were luted with a randomly selected temporary luting cement (either Provicol QM Plus (PQP), Bifix Temp (BT), or Provicol QM Aesthetic (PQA)). Clinical examinations were performed one to two weeks after cementation. The following criteria were evaluated: tooth vitality, percussion, hypersensitivity, gingival bleeding, odor formation, esthetics, cement handling, removability, cleanability, and retention loss. Antagonistic teeth served as controls. Statistical analysis was performed using the paired t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson's chi-square and Fisher's exact test, where appropriate. RESULTS: The overall loss rate of temporary restorations was 16.0%, showing no cement-specific differences. Postoperative hypersensitivity occurred in 8% of cases regardless of cement type. Esthetic impairment was reported by 31% of the PQP-fixed restorations, compared with 4.0% and 4.2% of the BT and PQA-bonded restorations. Cement application was reported to be easy in 100% of cases, excess removal in 88-96%, depending on the cement used. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of luting material affects the esthetic appearance of a temporary restoration and should be considered, particularly in restorations in esthetically demanding areas. No significant differences between the cements were identified regarding biocompatibility, handling, and loss rate. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Translucent cements can help to reduce color interferences, resulting in a more appealing appearance of the temporary restoration.

DIGITAL DENTISTRY AND ITS IMPACT ON ORAL HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE.

Over the past 50 years, digitization has gradually taken root in dentistry, starting with computer tomography in the 1970s. The most disruptive events in digital dentistry were the introduction of digital workflow and computer-aided manufacturing, which made new procedures and materials available for dental use. While the conventional lab-based workflow requires light or chemical curing under inconsistent and suboptimal conditions, computer-aided manufacturing allows for industrial-grade material, ensuring consistently high material quality. In addition, many other innovative, less disruptive, but relevant approaches have been developed in digital dentistry. These will have or already impact prevention, diagnosis, and therapy, thus impacting patients' oral health and, consequently, their oral health-related quality of life. Both software and hardware approaches attempt to maintain, restore, or optimize a patient's perceived oral health. This article outlines innovations in dentistry and their potential impact on patients' oral health-related quality of life in prevention and therapy. Furthermore, possible future developments and their potential implications are characterized.

Long-term survival of monolithic tooth-supported lithium disilicate crowns fabricated using a chairside approach: 15-year results.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical performance of chairside fabricated tooth-supported posterior single crowns from lithium disilicate ceramic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four crowns (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) were inserted between 2006 and 2007 and again evaluated after 15 years. Survival and success rates were calculated according to Kaplan-Meier, and the quality of the crowns was evaluated by using modified United States Public Health (USPHS) criteria. RESULTS: Twenty-two crowns were available for recall; six patients were defined as dropouts. The mean observation period was 15.2 years (± 0.2). Six failures occurred (1 technical/5 biological) resulting in a survival rate of 80.1%. The success rate was 64.2%. The roughness of the crowns increased (p = 0.021) and the majority of adhesive gaps were discolored (p = 0.001) in comparison to baseline. The color, tooth, and crown integrity remained stable over the follow-up period (p ≥ 0.317). CONCLUSION: The fabrication of tooth-supported lithium disilicate crowns using a chairside approach yielded acceptable long-term survival and success rates. Due to discoloration, the long-term use of dual-cure self-adhesive resin cements might result in unpleasing esthetic results. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The performance of posterior lithium disilicate single crowns revealed excellent to good clinical quality and an acceptable number of events after 15 years of clinical service.

Prevalence of temporomandibular disorders and bruxism in seniors.

BACKGROUND: Information on the prevalence of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) or possible/probable bruxism in seniors is heterogeneous and sparse. OBJECTIVES: To elucidate the prevalence of TMD and possible/probable bruxism in German adults aged 60 years and older. METHODS: Participants of the Interdisciplinary Longitudinal Study of Adult Development and Aging (ILSE) born between 1950-1952 (C1) and 1930-1932 (C2) were examined in 2014-2016 (fourth wave). The participants were surveyed and clinically examined by one calibrated examiner. Two questions of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) were utilised to evaluate self-reported bruxism. The clinical examination included signs of probable bruxism and the RDC/TMD examination protocol. RESULTS: Data from 191 participants were available. No RDC/TMD diagnosis was made in 83.2%. Of the participants, 15.2% received a single diagnosis and 1.6% multiple diagnoses that included disc displacements (9.4%) and degenerative joint diseases (8.9%). A total of 24.7% reported bruxism that included self-reported awake bruxism in 11.9% and sleep bruxism in 16.2%. Wear was clinically identified in 27.2% of the participants. No sex-related differences were observed. Significant differences were detected for probable bruxism between C1 (14.1%) and C2 (54.3%). CONCLUSION: In the German population aged 60 years and older, the prevalence of TMD is 16.8%. TMD is characterised by temporomandibular joint disorders, including disc displacements and degenerative joint disorders. Bruxism was observed in a quarter of the old population.

Sex hormones associated with temporomandibular pain on palpation in male adolescents-Results of the epidemiologic LIFE child study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate whether the sex steroid precursor hormone dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEA-S), sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) and testosterone (TT) are associated with temporomandibular (TM) pain on palpation in male adolescents. METHODS: Out of the LIFE Child study dataset containing 1022 children and adolescents aged 10-18 years (496 males, 48.5%), we used a subsample of 273 male adolescents (mean age: 13.8 ± 2.3 years) in advanced pubertal development (PD) to analyse the association between hormones and TM pain. The Tanner scale was applied to describe the stage of PD. Pain on palpation of the temporalis and masseter muscles and the TM joints (palpation pain) was assessed using the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD). Serum levels of sex hormones (DHEA-S, SHBG and TT) were determined using standardised laboratory analyses. Free TT was estimated from the ratio between TT and SHBG (free androgen index[FAI]). We calculated the risk of perceived positive palpation pain for male participants as a function of hormone levels (DHEA-S, FAI) taking into account age and body mass index (BMI). RESULTS: Among more developed (Tanner stage 4-5) male adolescents, 22.7% (n = 62) reported palpation pain in the TM region. In these participants, FAI levels were approximately half that of individuals without such pain (p < .01). DHEA-S levels were about 30% lower in the pain group (p < .01). In multivariable regression analyses, the odds ratio (OR) for pain on palpation decreased to 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57-0.98) per 10 units of FAI level compared to those without pain, after controlling for the effects of age and adjusted BMI. We observed the same effect for this subgroup per unit of DHEA-S serum level (OR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.53-0.94). CONCLUSION: At subclinical lower levels of serum free TT and DHEA-S, male adolescents are more likely to report pain on standardised palpation of the masticatory muscles and/or TM joints. This finding supports the hypothesis that sex hormones may influence pain reporting.

Digital Workflow in Oral Splint Manufacturing.

AIM: The digital workflow used to manufacture an adjusted oral splint will be demonstrated in a patient case. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 25-year-old female patient presented for management of her bruxism. Therefore, an adjusted oral splint was manufactured. A computer-aided motion analysis of the patient was conducted (JMA Optic, Amann Girrbach) and full-arch scans of the maxilla and mandible, a biocopy of the maxilla with bite fork as well as buccal scans of the centric jaw relation (Primescan, Dentsply Sirona). The jaw relation was determined beforehand by ballistic closing on a chairside fabricated anterior jig. The digital construction of a Michigan splint took place in the laboratory. The design was nested and milled from a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)-containing blank (CLEARsplint Disc, Astron Dental Corporation). RESULT: The oral splint was inserted into the patient's mouth and checked to ensure a tensionfree fit. The static and dynamic contact relationship was checked. During the follow-up visit, the patient reported an improvement in tension in the masticatory muscles. CONCLUSION: The procedure described allows for an adjusted oral splint to be manufactured in a purely digital workflow.

HOW TO IDENTIFY SUBGROUPS IN LONGITUDINAL CLINICAL DATA: TREATMENT RESPONSE PATTERNS IN PATIENTS WITH A SHORTENED DENTAL ARCH.

BACKGROUND: When dental patients seek care, treatments are not always successful,that is patients' oral health problems are not always eliminated or substantially reduced. Identifying these patients (treatment non-responders) is essential for clinical decision-making. Group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) is rarely used in dentistry, but a promising statistical technique to identify non-responders in particular and clinical distinct patient groups in general in longitudinal data sets. AIM: Using group-based trajectory modeling, this study aimed to demonstrate how to identify oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) treatment response patterns by the example of patients with a shortened dental arch (SDA). METHODS: This paper is a secondary data analysis of a randomized controlled clinical trial. In this trial SDA patients received partial removable dental prostheses replacing missing teeth up to the first molars (N = 79) either or the dental arch ended with the second premolar that was present or replaced by a cantilever fixed dental prosthesis (N = 71). Up to ten follow-up examinations (1-2, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 96, 120, and 180 months post-treatment) continued for 15 years. The outcome OHRQoL was assessed with the 49-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP). Exploratory GBTM was performed to identify treatment response patterns. RESULTS: Two response patterns could be identified - "responders" and "non-responders." Responders' OHRQoL improved substantially and stayed primarily stable over the 15 years. Non-responders' OHRQoL did not improve considerably over time or worsened. While the SDA treatments were not related to the 2 response patterns, higher levels of functional, pain-related, psychological impairment in particular, and severely impaired OHRQoL in general predicted a non-responding OHRQoL pattern after treatment. Supplementary, a 3 pattern approach has been evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Clustering patients according to certain longitudinal characteristics after treatment is generally important, but specifically identifying treatment in non-responders is central. With the increasing availability of OHRQoL data in clinical research and regular patient care, GBTM has become a powerful tool to investigate which dental treatment works for which patients.

[Prevalence of temporomandibular disorders in seniors-Symptom-related analyses in younger and older seniors]. / Prävalenz kraniomandibulärer Dysfunktionen bei Senioren ­ symptombezogene Analysen bei jüngeren und älteren Senioren.

BACKGROUND: Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are common in the general population even in old age. Information on the prevalence of TMD in older people is sparse. OBJECTIVE: To present prevalence values for symptoms and signs of TMD in old people according to the research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (RDC/TMD). To compare prevalence values between the age groups of 60-74 years (younger seniors) and ≥ 75 years (older seniors). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Subjects of the interdisciplinary longitudinal study of adult development (ILSE), a representative sample of old people in Germany, were examined between 2014-2016. Subjects of the urban area of Leipzig were chosen to examine symptoms and signs of TMD. RESULTS: The most prevalent symptom was orofacial pain (13.0%) in the aged participants (n = 192). Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) sounds were the most prevalent sign with values up to 35.5%. Gender comparisons revealed higher prevalence values for the symptom headache/migraine as well as for the signs TMJ sounds (especially clicking sounds) and limited mouth opening in females. Regarding age groups, significant differences were only observed for self-reported headache/migraine. CONCLUSION: Orofacial pain was reported by 13.0% of the subjects and TMJ sounds were observed in every third participant. Similar prevalence values for TMD symptoms and signs in younger and older seniors were found.

Material selection for tooth-supported single crowns-a survey among dentists in Germany.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to survey dentists in Germany to identify their favored materials for the fabrication of tooth-supported single crowns (SCs) depending on the location of the abutment teeth and the preparation margin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The survey included questions regarding demographic characteristics of dentists/their dental practice and preferred restorative materials for the fabrication of SCs for abutment teeth 16, 11, 34, and 36 with either supra- or subgingival preparation margins. RESULTS: Between August 2019 and February 2020, 721 dentists participated in the survey; responses from 33 dentists were excluded from data analysis because the dentists did not work in Germany or provided less than one fixed dental prosthesis/month. Dentists favored ceramic materials independent of the location of the abutment tooth and preparation margin (56.6-92.2%). CAD/CAM resin composites or full metals were preferred by only a few participants. A significantly higher proportion of dentists recommended porcelain fused to metal for subgingival preparation margins than for supragingival margins (p < 0.001). Characteristics of dentists/dental practices influenced a single scenario (11 subgingival) that was dependent on the dentist's time since graduation. When asked to specify the ceramic materials, numerous participants wrote a free response (5.7-7.8%) or did not answer (0.7-4.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Dentists in Germany selected restorative materials for SCs depending on the clinical scenario. Since numerous dentists did not specify the ceramic materials, postgraduate information and education might help to extend expertise. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results of this survey provide insight into the favored materials of dentists for the fabrication of tooth-supported SCs.

Patients referred to a German TMD-specialized consultation hour-a retrospective on patients without a diagnosis according to RDC/TMD decision trees.

OBJECTIVES: The objective was to describe the physical and psychosocial features of patients attending a specialized consultation hour for temporomandibular disorders (TMD). This investigation focused on those patients who did not receive a diagnosis according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2004 to 2017, patients seeking care during a TMD-specialized consultation hour were consecutively recruited. Each patient completed a TMD-related questionnaire, psychosocial questionnaires (Graded Chronic Pain Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Beschwerden-Liste), and the Oral Health Impact Profile-49. The clinical examination was performed according to the RDC/TMD. RESULTS: The mean age of the 1020 patients was 43.3 years (75.3% female). According to the RDC/TMD decision trees, 351 patients were categorized without a TMD diagnosis (NoTMDdx). The most frequent reasons for seeking care were orofacial pain/TMJ pain or headaches revealing an OR of 1.89 (for TMDdx group). A relevant proportion of patients was categorized as positive for anxiety (NoTMDdx/TMDdx 30.8/41.2%; p = 0.072), depression (20.8/23.9%; p = 0.433), non-specific physical symptoms (31.4/44.1%; p < 0.001), or dysfunctional chronic pain (11.5/18.2%; p < 0.001). In both patient groups, the oral health-related quality of life was impaired (42.9/52.7 points; p < 0.001), and the frequency of therapy measures prior to the consultation hour was high. CONCLUSIONS: Patients seeking care from TMD specialists were usually referred with TMD-associated symptoms. Of those, a relevant proportion did not receive a diagnosis according to RDC/TMD decision trees. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Psychosocial screening and the avoidance of overtreatment are recommended for patients with TMD-related symptoms.

Functional oral health-related quality of life impact: A systematic review in populations with tooth loss.

Patients perceive the impact of oral disorder in four major areas, the dimensions of oral health-related quality life (OHRQoL) Oral Function, Orofacial Pain, Orofacial Appearance, and Psychosocial Impact. The functional aspect is essential given the need of chewing, biting, speech and swallowing. The objective of this study was to identify OHRQoL information for dental subjects with functional oral health problems. In a systematic review, distinct and clinically relevant groups of dental subject samples, in this study called "population groups," with such functional OHRQoL information based on the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) were identified (PROSPERO registration: CRD42017064033). The search strategy was "Oral Health Impact Profile" or OHIP. Searches were conducted in the PubMed interface of the Medline database, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL and PsyINFO on 8 June 2017 and updated on 14 January 2019. Published OHIP domain data of different versions were recalculated into OHIP-14`s Physical Disability domain score, characterising the subject's Oral Function impact. 3,653 potentially abstracts were screened. We identified 78 publications reporting dimensional information on 154 subject samples with 52 populations. A typical mean functional impact for partially dentate subjects was 1.6 units on a 0 to 8 unit metric, while for edentate subjects, the mean functional impact was 2.6 units. The functional impact score ranged from 0 to 7.9 units with 50% of the patient samples located between 0.8 and 2.6 units. For the first time, we provide normalised and therefore comparable metric information about the functional OHRQoL impact for a substantial number of functional oral conditions.

Interexaminer reliability of the German version of the DC/TMD.

AIM: Verification of the interrater reliability of axis I diagnoses of the German version of the DC/TMD. The hypothesis was that the DC/TMD protocol yields comparable results, if examiner instructions are closely followed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A culturally equivalent German translation of the DC/TMD was developed. During a 1-day calibration workshop at the University of Heidelberg, three examiners were trained by the DC/TMD Training and Calibration Center. According to the calibration guidelines, 16 models (11 cases, five non-cases) were examined by four experienced TMD specialists. Reliability was calculated with reference to the reference standard examiner as percentage agreement and kappa coefficients for DC/TMD diagnoses and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for findings. RESULTS: Excellent reliability was achieved for the diagnoses myalgia, myofascial pain with referral, arthralgia, headache attributed to TMD, disc displacement (DD) with reduction, DD without reduction without limited opening (κ = 0.85…1.00). Degenerative joint disease was diagnosed with substantial agreement (κ = 0.64), DD with reduction with intermittent locking and DD without reduction with limited opening were not present in our sample. Overall percentage agreement was 94%-100% for all diagnoses. CONCLUSION: The German version of the DC/TMD shows very good reliability and can be recommended for the use in clinical and research settings.

Mapping Oral Disease Impact with a Common Metric (MOM)-Project summary and recommendations.

Oral Function, Orofacial Pain, Orofacial Appearance, and Psychosocial Impact-the dimensions of oral health-related quality of life-capture dental patients' oral health problems worldwide and regardless of whether the patient currently suffers from oral diseases or intends to prevent them in the future. Using scores for these dimensions, the project Mapping Oral Disease Impact with a Common Metric (MOM) aims to provide four-dimensional oral health impact information across oral diseases and settings. In this article, project authors summarize MOM's findings and provide recommendations about how to improve standardized oral health impact assessment. Project MOM's systematic reviews identified four-dimensional impact information for 189 adult and 22 pediatric patient populations that were contained in 170 publications. A typical functional, pain-related, aesthetical, and psychosocial impact (on a 0-8 impact metric based on two items with a response format 0 = never, 1 = hardly ever, 2 = occasionally, 3 = fairly often, 4 = very often) was about 2 to 3 units. Project MOM provides five recommendations to improve standardized oral health impact assessment for all oral diseases in all settings.

Material preferences for tooth-supported 3-unit fixed dental prostheses: A survey of German dentists.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Different material options are available for fixed dental prostheses (FDPs), but valid data on the favored materials of German dentists for 3-unit FDPs are lacking. It is unclear whether preferences depend on the individual characteristics of the dentists or their dental practices. PURPOSE: The purpose of this survey was to identify the preferred material selection of German dentists for the fabrication of tooth-supported 3-unit FDPs depending on the location of the abutment teeth and the individual characteristics of the dentist or the dental practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A survey was developed that included questions on the demographic characteristics (sex, area of expertise, age group, time since graduation, number of inhabitants, and the postal code of the dental practice or dental school) of the participating dentist and their preferred materials for the fabrication of tooth-supported 3-unit FDPs. Three clinical scenarios (anterior maxillary FDP, posterior maxillary FDP, posterior mandibular FDP) were presented. The dentists were allowed to select from predefined options or to give a free answer. For comparisons of characteristic associations, the number of inhabitants was chosen to represent the characteristics of the dental practice, and sex and time since graduation were selected to represent the characteristics of the dentist. Group comparisons were conducted with Chi-square tests (α=.05). RESULTS: A response of 721 dentists from all parts of Germany was received, and data from 688 dentists were included in the analyses. Ceramic was the most preferred material for the fabrication of 3-unit FDPs independent of the location of the abutment teeth with veneered zirconia as the favored option. Metal-ceramic was ranked second. The time since graduation ≤15 years was associated with a preference of ceramic over metal-ceramic for the anterior restoration (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Most participating dentists selected appropriate restorative materials depending on the individual clinical setting presented in the survey. For the anterior 3-unit FDP, time since graduation was associated with the preference for a restorative material. Some dentists selected lithium-X-silicate ceramics for situations beyond their recommended indication range.

Impact of cement type and abutment height on pull-off force of zirconia reinforced lithium silicate crowns on titanium implant stock abutments: an in vitro study.

BACKGROUND: Pull-off forces of cement-retained zirconia reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS) in implant-supported single crowns on stock titanium abutments with respect to abutment height and implant cement were evaluated and compared. METHODS: Pull-off force of ZLS crowns on stock titanium abutments was evaluated concerning dental cement and abutment height. A total sample size of 64 stock abutments with heights of 3 mm (n = 32) and 5 mm (n = 32) was used. The ZLS crowns were cemented with four different types of cement (one temporary, two semi-permanent, and one permanent). After cementation, water storage, and thermocycling each sample was subjected to a pull-off test using a universal testing machine. RESULTS: The temporary cement showed the least pull-off force regardless of abutment height (3/5 mm: means 6 N/23 N), followed by the semi-permanent methacrylate-infiltrated zinc oxide cement (28 N/55 N), the semi-permanent methacrylate-based cement (103 N/163 N), and the permanent resin composite cement (238 N/820 N). Results of all types of cement differed statistically significantly from each other (p ≤ .012). The type of implant cement has an impact on the pull-off force of ZLS crowns and titanium abutments. CONCLUSIONS: Permanent cements present higher retention than semi-permanent ones, and temporary cements present the lowest values. The abutment height had a subordinate impact.

Impact of the DC/TMD instructional video on the practical skills of undergraduate students-A single-blinded, randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Competencies in the clinical examination of patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) can be achieved by self-instruction. This study aimed to identify the impact of the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) instructional video on the practical examination skills of undergraduate students. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One week prior to completing an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) addressing the examination of patients with TMD, undergraduate students in their third year received either the DC/TMD manual (control group) or additionally watched the instructional video once (intervention group). After passing the OSCE, a feedback questionnaire was completed by the students. RESULT: Fifty undergraduates were recruited to take part in the OSCE prior to their first clinical course. The sum scores achieved in the stations were higher in the intervention group, but missed significance. Participants of the intervention group more often agreed that completing the OSCE stations was easy, which was significant for one station (P = .023). 95.8% of the participating students supported the implementation of the video in dental education. DISCUSSION: Due to the conception of the study, the video was only presented once to ensure that the control group had no access to the medium at all. However, it might be interesting to investigate whether repeated watching of the video enhances its effect. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical competencies in the examination of TMD patients can be achieved by self-instruction with the DC/TMD manual and instructional video. Watching the video for educational purposes was highly recommended by undergraduate students.

DENTAL PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES -- THE PROMISE OF DENTAL IMPLANTS.

In general dental practice, the use of implants is focused mostly on prosthodontic issues. That is, the replacement of missing teeth or the support of dental prostheses. However, there are other dental fields using implants such as orthodontics or maxillofacial prosthodontics. A classic way to measure success in implant dentistry is to look how long implants and the corresponding superstructure survive and are in function. Nevertheless, this alone is a very crude parameter. Therefore, biological and technical complications are taken in account additionally. Nonetheless, these objective measures do not well replicate the perception of the patient. That why, subjective measures, reflecting the perception of the patient are recommended to complement objective parameters. If these dental patient-reported outcome measures (dPROMs) are wisely chosen, they offer a wide variety of options. Besides comparing therapeutic effects by using the instruments' summary score only, dPROMs such as the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) provide the opportunity to additionally assess patients` perceptions in the 4 dimensions of oral health-related quality of life. These are functional limitations, pain, esthetic issues as well as psychosocial impairment. Even the 5-item short form of the OHIP captures these dimensions and provides an efficient way to assess patients' perception with low administrative burden. This in turn offers new insights into the patient perspective and therefore helps improving shared decision making.

IMPACT OF SHORTENED DENTAL ARCH ON ORAL HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE.

BACKGROUND: A shortened dental arch (SDA) is an established treatment concept for patients with missing molars. However, little is known regarding long-term course of oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in patients with SDA and the benefits from replacement of missing molars. OBJECTIVE: Purpose of this multi-center randomized clinical trial was to assess OHRQoL over a period of 15 years in patients with molar replacement by a removable partial denture (RPD) compared to patients with a restored SDA without molar replacement. METHODS: Patients at least 35 years of age with all molars missing in 1 jaw and at least the canine and one premolar present on each side were included. Patients received either a precision attachment-retained, RPD for replacement of missing molars (n = 79), or the dental arch ended with the second premolar (SDA) that had to be present or replaced by a cantilever fixed dental prosthesis (n = 71). Follow-up examinations continued for 15 years. OHRQoL was assessed with the 49-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP). OHIP summary and dimension scores were longitudinally modeled in the statistical analyses to assess course of OHRQoL over time applying an intention-to-treat approach. In addition, scores for the OHRQoL dimensions Oral Function, Orofacial Pain, Orofacial Appearance, and Psychosocial Impact were analyzed. RESULTS: After an initial improvement in OHRQoL indicated by a mean decrease of 20.0 OHIP points with an effect size of 0.61 in the entire study population, OHRQoL stayed relatively constant over the entire follow-up period. Assuming a constant time and treatment effects over the study period, OHRQoL did not differ statistically significant between the 2 treatments (0.4 OHIP points; 95%-CI: 7.1 - 6.2). OHRQoL after treatment did not change notably over 15 years and was statistically nonsignificant as well (P = .872). Similar findings were observed in all 4 OHRQoL dimensions. CONCLUSIONS: In patients, missing all molars in one jaw OHRQoL improved providing RPD or restoring SDA to a clinically relevant degree. Treatment-related improvement remained mostly stable over a period of at least 15 years. Therefore, patients can be informed that both treatment concepts are equivalent concerning long-term OHRQoL. Accordingly, patients' preferences regarding treatment options should be granted priority in treatment decision making with the SDA treatment option being the default.

Prevalence of anamnestic symptoms and clinical signs of temporomandibular disorders in adolescents-Results of the epidemiologic LIFE Child Study.

BACKGROUND: Prevalence values for symptoms and signs of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) in adolescents vary within the literature due to differences in set-ups of examination protocols. OBJECTIVES: The objective was to present prevalence values for symptoms and signs of TMD in German adolescents that were observed within a standardised examination. Prevalence values comparing gender or pubertal status should be investigated. METHODS: A cross-sectional sample of the LIFE Child Study aged 10 to 18 was examined. A questionnaire gathering anamnestic symptoms of TMD was completed, and an examination according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) was performed by trained dentists. Pubertal status according to Tanner stages was documented. Descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were performed. RESULTS: A total of 1.116 participants (mean age 12.9 years, 51.4% female) were consecutively recruited. Most prevalent anamnestic symptoms were headaches (55.7%) and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) sounds (17.6%). The major clinical sign was TMJ sounds (31.9%). Both the examination of muscles or TMJs showed that pain to palpation was statistically significantly higher than familiar pain (P < .001). Gender comparisons revealed higher prevalence values and an increase in TMD symptoms and signs during pubertal development in females. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of self-reported headaches, as well as anamnestic and clinical TMJ sounds, was high in German adolescents. Prevalence values for pain to palpation and familiar pain obtained relevant differences. Considering the DC/TMD, females are more affected by TMD signs and symptoms that increase during pubertal development, than male adolescents.

Field-testing a psychosocial assessment scoring form for TMD patients - summarizing axis II instruments.

BACKGROUND: The etiology of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) can be explained on the basis of a biopsychosocial model. However, psychosocial assessment is challenging in daily dental practice. The purpose of the current study was to field-test the practicability of a novel psychosocial assessment scoring form regarding the reliability of scoring procedures and the opinion of examiners. The working hypotheses were that the scoring results of inexperienced undergraduate students were similar to the results collected by a gold standard and that the scoring form was easy to use. METHODS: A psychosocial assessment scoring form was developed in accordance with guidelines of the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD), including results of the Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS), Patient Health Questionnaires (PHQ), and Generalized Anxiety Disorders (GAD). Inexperienced operators (undergraduate students) examined patients with TMD-associated complaints and rated the practicability of the scoring form. The scoring results were recalculated by two experienced operators and a consensus was defined as a gold standard. Reliability coefficients were determined comparing results of the gold standard and the inexperienced operators. RESULTS: Sixty-five examiners used the scoring form to obtain results for patients with TMD-associated complaints. Of the patients, 78.8% received a diagnosis according to DC/TMD decision trees. Two-thirds of the operators (62.9%) stated that the form was easy to complete, and 83.0% would use it in their dental practice. The reliability coefficients ranged between 0.81-1.00. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of the present study, the psychosocial assessment scoring form seems to be an easy-to-use and practicable tool. The vast majority of the inexperienced examiners recommended the application.