Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ultrason Imaging ; 43(5): 273-281, 2021 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34236008

RESUMO

To compare microvascular flow imaging (MVFI) to conventional Color-Doppler (CDI) and Power-Doppler (PDI) imaging in the detection of vascularity of Focal Breast Lesions (FBLs). A total of 180 solid FBLs (size: 3.5-45.2 mm) detected in 180 women (age: 21-87 years) were evaluated by means of CDI, PDI, and MVFI. Two blinded reviewers categorized lesion vascularity in absent or present, and vascularity pattern as (a) internal; (b) vessels in rim; (c) combined. The presence of a "penetrating vessel" was assessed separately. Differences in vascularization patterns (chi2 test) and intra- and inter-observer agreement (Fleiss method) were calculated. ROC analysis was performed to assess performance of each technique in differentiating benign from malignant lesions. About 103/180 (57.2%) FBLs were benign and 77/180 (42.8%) were malignant. A statistically significant (p < .001) increase in blood flow detection was observed for both readers with MVFI in comparison to either CDI or PDI. Benign FBLs showed mainly absence of vascularity (p = .02 and p = .01 for each reader, respectively), rim pattern (p < .001 for both readers) or combined pattern (p = .01 and p = .04). Malignant lesions showed a statistically significant higher prevalence of internal flow pattern (p < .001 for both readers). The prevalence of penetrating vessels was significantly higher with MVFI in comparison to either CDI or PDI (p < .001 for both readers) and in the malignant FBLs (p < .001). ROC analysis showed MVFI (AUC = 0.70, 95%CI = [0.64-0.77]) more accurate than CDI (AUC = 0.67, 95%CI = [0.60-0.74]) and PDI (AUC = 0.67, 95%CI = [0.60-0.74]) though not significantly (p = .5436). Sensitivity/Specificity values for MVFI, PDI, and CDI were 76.6%/64.1%, 59.7%/73.8% and 58.4%/74.8%, respectively. Inter-reader agreement with MVFI was always very good (k-score 0.85-0.96), whereas with CDI and PDI evaluation ranged from good to very good. No differences in intra-observer agreement were noted. MVFI showed a statistically significant increase in the detection of the vascularization of FBLs in comparison to Color and Power-Doppler.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Ultrassonografia Doppler , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Curva ROC , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Ultrassonografia Doppler em Cores , Adulto Jovem
2.
Rev Sci Instrum ; 84(3): 033503, 2013 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23556817

RESUMO

A semiconductor detector coupled with a neutron converter is a good candidate for neutron detection, especially for its compactness and reliability if compared with other devices, such as (3)He tubes, even though its intrinsic efficiency is rather lower. In this paper we show a neutron detector design consisting of a 3 cm × 3 cm silicon pad detector coupled with one or two external (6)LiF layers, enriched in (6)Li at 95%, placed in contact with the Si active surfaces. This prototype, first characterized and tested at INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Sud and then at JRC Ispra, was successfully shown to detect thermal neutrons with the expected efficiency and an outstanding gamma rejection capability.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA