Frozen-thawed embryo transfer is an independent risk factor for third stage of labor complications.

PURPOSE: Third stage of labor complications are more prevalent following singleton vaginal deliveries of gestations conceived through in vitro fertilization (IVF) and fresh embryo transfer. This study aimed to evaluate these complications in pregnancies conceived through frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET), in which endometrial preparation differs from fresh cycles. METHODS: A cohort study of all singleton pregnancies conceived through IVF-FET who delivered vaginally at a tertiary medical center during 2007-2017. The study group consisted of 88 IVF-FET gestations (cases) that were matched to 176 spontaneous pregnancies based on age, gravidity, parity and gestational week at delivery (controls). The association between mode of conception and third stage of labor complication rate was examined. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, except for a lower prevalence of induction of labor in the control group (23.3% vs. 36.3%, p = 0.03). The rate of post-partum hemorrhage (PPH), manual lysis and revision of the uterine cavity were all higher in pregnancies conceived through IVF-FET versus spontaneously (13.6% vs. 5.7%, p = 0.018; 17% vs. 2.3%, p < 0.001; and 21.6% vs. 6.8%, p < 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis adjusting for age, previous cesarean section, induction of labor, neonatal weight and use of analgesia demonstrated that deliveries following IVF-FET were independently associated with an increased risk for third stage of labor complications (estimated OR = 3.45, p = 0.0002). CONCLUSION: IVF-FET is an independent risk factor for PPH, need for manual lysis and revision of the uterine cavity. Precautionary measures should be undertaken in the third stage in deliveries following IVF-FET, even if no other risk factors are present.

Poor Response to Gonadotropin Stimulation and Perinatal Outcomes in Fresh In Vitro Fertilization Embryo Transfer Cycles-A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Objective: The objective was to examine the association between poor ovarian response to gonadotropin stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF) and adverse perinatal outcomes in singleton gestations in young patients. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study including women aged 17-39 who underwent fresh embryo transfer and delivered a singleton neonate at a single center (pre-implantation genetic testing excluded) (2007-2022). Patients were classified as one of the following categories: poor responders-daily follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) ≥ 150 IU yielding ≤ 3 retrieved oocytes; normal responders-4-15 oocytes; and high responders with ≥16 oocytes. The primary outcome was a composite of pre-eclampsia (mild or severe), small-for-gestational-age, gestational diabetes mellitus, and preterm birth (<37 weeks). We compared maternal and neonatal outcomes between the three groups. Multivariable logistic regression was used to control for confounders. Results: Overall, 507 women met the inclusion criteria. Of them, there were 44 (8.68%) poor responders, 342 (67.46%) normal responders, and 121 (23.87%) high responders. Poor responders, compared to normal and high responders, were characterized by a higher maternal age (34.64 ± 4.01 vs. 31.4 ± 5.04 vs. 30.01 ± 4.93, p < 0.001, respectively) and total FSH dosage (3028.41 ± 1792.05 IU vs. 2375.11 ± 1394.05 IU vs. 1869.31 ± 1089.63 IU, p < 0.001). The perinatal outcomes examined, including cesarean delivery (CD) rate and the composite outcome, were comparable between groups. Using multivariable logistic regression and adjusting for ovarian response group, maternal age, nulliparity, and estradiol level and endometrial thickness before ovulation triggering, poor response was not associated with CD rate or the composite outcome, with maternal age associated with CD (p = 0.005), and nulliparity with the composite outcome (p = 0.007). Similar results were obtained when comparing poor responders to each other group separately or to all other responders. Conclusions: Poor ovarian response is not associated with increased adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes.

Is there a relationship between morphokinetic parameters and neonatal sex in fresh embryo transfers?

To investigate whether morphokinetic parameters differ between male and female embryos in IVF embryos resulting in live births, a retrospective cohort study was undertaken. Files of all live births resulting from a single embryo transfer (SET) cultured in time-lapse incubators between 2013 and 2019 in two tertiary care centres were reviewed. The study group consisted of 187 SETs resulted in 187 live births, of which 100 were females (53.5%) and 87 were males (46.5%). Embryo selection for transfer was based on the known implantation data (KID) score provided by the Embryoscope and morphological assessment by experienced embryologists. Neonatal sex was confirmed through live birth documentation. Morphokinetic parameters and day 3 and day 5 KID scores of male and female embryos were compared. Maternal baseline and treatment characteristics were similar between groups. Morphokinetic time-lapse parameters of male and female embryos including: pronuclei fading; cleavage timings (t2-t9); second and third cell cycle durations; synchrony of the second and third cleavages; late morphokinetic parameters and KID scores did not differ between groups. In conclusion, time-lapse morphokinetic parameters and embryo selection methods do not seem to differ between male and female embryos, and their utilization does not bias towards any neonatal sex.

Does the time interval from the end of sperm processing to intrauterine insemination (lab-to-uterus time) affect treatment outcome?

BACKGROUND: Intra-uterine insemination is an essential component in the treatment of infertility. Success rates are dependent on clinical factors of the female partner, sperm quality, and preparation technique. The effect of the time interval between the end of sperm preparation in the lab, and its injection into the uterine cavity (lab-to-uterus time) is yet to be determined. AIM: To investigate the association between the lab-to-uterus time and the pregnancy rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Partner and donor spermatozoa intra-uterine insemination cycles were included. Preparation for intra-uterine insemination of partners' fresh ejaculate or donor thawed spermatozoa was identical. The time interval from the completion of this stage to the actual intra-uterine injection was recorded. The lab-to-uterus intervals were divided into groups A (0-29 min), B (30-59 min), C (60-89 min), and D (90-180 min). Pregnancy was defined as two adequate consecutive doubling levels of hCG and the pregnancy rates were compared between the groups. RESULTS: A total of 267 female patients (138 partner spermatozoa, 129 donors) who had 470 intra-uterine insemination cycles (218 partner spermatozoa, 252 donors) were included. No significant differences in pregnancy rates per treatment cycle were found between the four lab-to-uterus interval groups: A (n = 96 cycles; 16.7%), B (n = 217; 19.4%), C (n = 121; 16.5%), and D (n = 36; 36.1%). No difference was found in the pregnancy rates between partner and donor spermatozoa. In the case of fresh partner spermatozoa, the pregnancy rates for groups were as follows: A (n = 40 cycles, 20%); B (n = 94; 14.9%), C (n = 70; 17.1%), and D (n = 14; 35.7%) (NS). In the case of thawed donor spermatozoa, the pregnancy rates (per cycle) for groups were as follows: A (n = 56; 14.3%), B (n = 123; 22.8%), C (n = 51; 15.7%), and D (n = 22; 36.4)% (NS). CONCLUSIONS: The intra-uterine insemination outcome was not affected by the lab-to-uterus time interval. Extended waiting up to 3 h for insemination did not have any detrimental effect on pregnancy rates, regardless if partner or donor spermatozoa was used.