TOX expression in cutaneous T-cell lymphomas: an adjunctive diagnostic marker that is not tumour specific and not restricted to the CD4(+) CD8(-) phenotype.

BACKGROUND: TOX (thymocyte selection-associated high-mobility group box) was shown to be aberrantly expressed in mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS) and is suggested to have additional diagnostic value. However, data on expression in other types of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) are scarce and it is unknown whether TOX is expressed only by MF with a CD4(+)  CD8(-) phenotype. OBJECTIVES: To investigate TOX expression in various types of CTCL with different T-cell phenotypes. METHODS: Immunohistochemical expression of TOX was evaluated on 153 skin biopsies of 132 patients with CTCL and 60 patients with benign inflammatory dermatoses (BIDs). RESULTS: TOX was expressed by > 50% of the neoplastic T cells in 49 of 59 patients (83%) with MF and in 19 of 22 patients (86%) with SS. The TOX(+) cases of MF included 34 of 35 cases (97%) with a CD4(+)  CD8(-) phenotype, but also five of eight cases (63%) with a CD4(-)  CD8(+) phenotype and 10 of 16 cases (63%) with a CD4(-)  CD8(-) phenotype. TOX expression in other types of CTCL was common but showed variable intensity. Although only one of 60 patients (2%) with a BID expressed TOX in > 50% of the skin-infiltrating T cells, some caution is warranted, as the majority of BIDs had TOX(+) T cells varying between 11% and 50%. CONCLUSIONS: TOX expression is not tumour specific, is not restricted to CTCL with a CD4(+)  CD8(-) phenotype, and, on its own, is insufficient for diagnosis of CTCL. However, it may have an adjunctive diagnostic role in conjunction with other clinical and histological data.

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and immune-related adverse events in advanced melanoma.

Background: The predictive value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in immune-related adverse event (irAE) development remains unknown, although an association between tumor immunogenicity and irAEs has been suggested. We investigated the association between TIL abundance in pretreatment primary and metastasis specimens and the subsequent development of severe irAEs. Patients and methods: We retrospectively identified patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma who received first-line anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) with or without anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (anti-CTLA-4) from 10 hospitals in the Netherlands. TILs were scored on representative hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stains of the primary melanoma and pretreatment melanoma metastasis as 'absent', 'nonbrisk', or 'brisk'. A univariable logistic regression analysis was carried out to assess the association between the TIL scores and the development of severe irAEs. Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard models were used to estimate the cumulative incidence of severe irAEs. Results: Of the 1346 eligible patients, 536 patients had primary melanoma specimens available, and 613 patients had metastasis specimens available. Severe irAEs occurred in 15% of anti-PD-1-treated patients and 49% of anti-PD-1 + anti-CTLA-4-treated patients. The presence of TILs was not associated with the occurrence of grade ≥3 irAEs in primary melanoma specimens (P = 0.70) nor pretreatment metastasis specimens (P = 0.91). In the univariable analysis, patients with brisk TILs did not have a higher chance of developing severe irAEs compared with patients with absent TILs, for both primary specimen (odds ratio 1.15, 95% confidence interval 0.60-2.18) and metastasis specimen (odds ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.37-1.59). There was also no significant difference in the lifetime risk or timing of the development of severe irAEs in patients with TILs present compared with patients with TILs absent. Conclusion: There was no association between the TIL scores on H&E-stained slides from the primary melanoma or pretreatment metastasis and the development of grade 3 or higher irAEs. Additionally, no correlation was found between the presence of TILs and the timing of irAEs.

Mind your head: two cases of mucosal metastasis of BRAF-mutated melanoma of the scalp.

Mucosal melanomas are rare and only a small portion bear BRAF mutations while cutaneous melanomas have a much higher prevalence and often harbor BRAF mutations. We present two cases in which, after a malignant melanocytic mucosal lesion with a BRAF mutation was found, the primary cutaneous source was identified and clonality confirmed between the lesions. In both cases, primary lesions occurred on the scalp, an often-overlooked site. Both lesions showed signs of regression implying that in due time these lesions could have been fully regressed and might never have been detected. In that case, the metastatic mucosal lesion would erroneously be identified as a BRAF-mutated mucosal melanoma. These cases give warrant; a careful dermatological inspection should be instigated when confronted with a BRAF-mutated mucosal melanoma. We hypothesize that some BRAF-mutated mucosal melanomas might actually represent metastases of regressed cutaneous melanomas.

[Granulomatous secondary syphilis; an uncommon presentation of a polymorphic disease]. / Granulomateuze secundaire syfilis: een zeldzame uiting van een polymorf ziektebeeld.

BACKGROUND: Due to a great diversity of clinical presentations secondary syphilis can mimic various skin diseases, which means that the diagnosis of this sexually transmitted condition can be missed. Occurrence of a granulomatous inflammatory reaction in secondary syphilis is rare and may be confused with other granulomatous dermatoses. CASE DESCRIPTION: We present a 37-year-old homosexual male with a granulomatous dermatitis due to secondary syphilis. The differential diagnosis based on clinical and histopathological findings was lengthy and the initial syphilitic serology results were negative, resulting in delayed diagnosis. After revision of the histopathology and repeated serological testing secondary syphilis could be diagnosed. CONCLUSION: Not only the clinical, but also the histopathological presentation of secondary syphilis is variable. To prevent transmission, treatment delay and complications, we recommend repeating syphilitic serology following negative results if there is clinical or histopathological suspicion of this disease, especially in patients displaying high-risk behaviour. Syphilis should be also excluded in granulomatous dermatoses with plasma cells.