RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The impact of levosimendan treatment on clinical outcome in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support after cardiovascular surgery is unknown. We hypothesized that the beneficial effects of levosimendan might improve survival when adequate end-organ perfusion is ensured by concomitant ECMO therapy. We therefore studied the impact of levosimendan treatment on survival and failure of ECMO weaning in patients after cardiovascular surgery. METHODS: We enrolled a total of 240 patients undergoing veno-arterial ECMO therapy after cardiovascular surgery at a university-affiliated tertiary care centre into our observational single-centre registry. RESULTS: During a median follow-up period of 37 months (interquartile range 19-67 months), 65% of patients died. Seventy-five per cent of patients received levosimendan treatment within the first 24 h after initiation of ECMO therapy. Cox regression analysis showed an association between levosimendan treatment and successful ECMO weaning [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.41; 95% confience interval (CI) 0.22-0.80; P=0.008], 30 day mortality (adjusted HR 0.52; 95% CI 0.30-0.89; P=0.016), and long-term mortality (adjusted HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.42-0.98; P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest an association between levosimendan treatment and improved short- and long-term survival in patients undergoing ECMO support after cardiovascular surgery.
Assuntos
Antiarrítmicos/uso terapêutico , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardiovasculares , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Hidrazonas/uso terapêutico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Piridazinas/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sistema de Registros , Simendana , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most common type of supraventricular tachycardia. Slow pathway (SP) ablation is the treatment of choice with a high acute success rate and a negligible periprocedural risk. However, long-term outcome data are scarce. The aim of this study was to assess long-term outcome and arrhythmia free survival after SP ablation. In this study, 534 consecutive patients with AVNRT, who underwent SP ablation between 1994 and 1999 were included. During a mean follow-up of 15.5 years, 101 (18.9%) patients died unrelated to the procedure or any arrhythmia. Data were collected by completing a questionnaire and/or contacting patients. Clinical information was obtained from 329 patients (61.6%) who constitute the final study cohort. During the electrophysiological study, sustained 1:1 slow AV nodal pathway conduction was eliminated in all patients. Recurrence of AVNRT was documented in 9 patients (2.7%), among those 7 patients underwent a successful repeat ablation procedure. New-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) was documented in 39 patients (11.9%) during follow-up. Pre-existing arterial hypertension (odds ratio 2.61, 95% CI 1.14-5.97, p = 0.023), age (odds ratio 1.05, 95% CI 1.02-1.09, p = 0.003) and the postinterventional AH interval (odds ratio 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.04, p = 0.038) predicted the occurrence of AF. The present long-term observational study after successful SP ablation of AVNRT confirms its clinical value reflected by low recurrence and complication rates. The unexpectedly high incidence of new-onset AF (11.9%) may impact long-term follow-up and requires further clinical attention.
Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial/cirurgia , Nó Atrioventricular/cirurgia , Ablação por Cateter/métodos , Taquicardia por Reentrada no Nó Atrioventricular/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Fibrilação Atrial/fisiopatologia , Nó Atrioventricular/fisiopatologia , Criança , Eletrocardiografia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Frequência Cardíaca/fisiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e Questionários , Taquicardia por Reentrada no Nó Atrioventricular/fisiopatologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is rising evidence that cardioprotective functions of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) have significant impact on clinical outcomes. ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) represents a high-risk vascular condition. Whether higher HDL-cholesterol concentrations in women correspond to protective anti-oxidant properties in the setting of STEMI is unknown. METHODS: We prospectively assessed gender related differences in the anti-oxidant function of HDL, and the impact of HDL properties on mortality in 242 women and men with STEMI. Blood samples to determine HDL function and sex hormone levels were collected during primary percutaneous coronary intervention. RESULTS: Patients were stratified according to preserved anti-oxidant HDL function (HDL oxidant index (HOI) < 1) and pro-oxidant HDL (HOI≥1). Despite higher serum levels of HDL-cholesterol in postmenopausal women (48 mg/dl, IQR 42-54, versus 39 mg/dl, IQR33-47, p < 0.001 in men), the proportion of patients with pro-oxidant HDL was not different between women (35%) and men (46%, p = 0.132). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed higher cardiovascular mortality in both women (p = 0.021) and men (p = 0.045) with pro-oxidant HDL. We identified pro-oxidant HDL as strong and independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality with an adjusted HR of 8.33 (95% CI, 1.55-44.63; p = 0.013) in women and with an adjusted HR of 5.14 (95% CI, 1.61-16.42; p = 0.006) in men. Higher levels of free sex hormones (estradiol and testosterone) were associated with pro-oxidant HDL. HDL-cholesterol levels showed no association with mortality (HR in women 1.03, 95% CI 0.96-1.11, p = 0.45 and HR in men 0.99, 95% CI 0.94-1.05, p = 0.72). CONCLUSIONS: Total HDL-cholesterol serum levels were not associated with mortality in STEMI patients. Pro-oxidant HDL was a strong and independent predictor of mortality in women and men with STEMI. The present study provides a link between sex hormones, HDL function and clinical events in STEMI patients. In clinical practice and future clinical trials, anti-oxidant properties of HDL rather than total HDL serum levels should be used for risk stratification.