Pregnancies during and after trastuzumab and/or lapatinib in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive early breast cancer: Analysis from the NeoALTTO (BIG 1-06) and ALTTO (BIG 2-06) trials.

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist on the safety of using anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) targeted agents during pregnancy. To date, only retrospective studies have assessed the prognosis of patients with a pregnancy after prior early breast cancer, with no data in HER2-positive patients. METHODS: The Neoadjuvant Lapatinib and/or Trastuzumab Treatment Optimization (NeoALTTO) trial and the Adjuvant Lapatinib and/or Trastuzumab Treatment Optimization (ALTTO) trial were randomized phase 3 trials for patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer. In both trials, pregnancy information was prospectively collected. Pregnancy outcomes were compared between patients unintentionally exposed to trastuzumab and/or lapatinib during gestation (the exposed group) and those who became pregnant after trastuzumab and/or lapatinib completion (the unexposed group). In the ALTTO trial, disease-free survival (DFS) was compared between pregnant patients and those aged 40 years or younger without a subsequent pregnancy via an extended Cox model with time-varying covariates to account for a guarantee-time bias. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients (12 in the exposed group and 80 in the unexposed group) had a pregnancy: 7 in the NeoALTTO trial and 85 in the ALTTO trial. Seven patients (58.3%) in the exposed group and 10 patients (12.5%) in the unexposed group opted for an induced abortion; in the unexposed group, 10 patients (12.5%) had a spontaneous abortion. No pregnancy/delivery complications were reported for the remaining cases, who successfully completed their pregnancy, with the exception of 1 fetus with trisomy 21 (Down syndrome). No significant difference in DFS (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-2.42) was observed between young patients with a pregnancy (n = 85) and young patients without a pregnancy (n = 1307). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer, having a pregnancy after treatment completion appears to be safe without compromising fetal outcome or maternal prognosis.

Effect of the angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril/valsartan on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a single dose of furosemide.

AIMS: Sacubitril/valsartan is indicated for the treatment of heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Furosemide, a loop diuretic commonly used for the treatment of HFrEF, may be coadministered with sacubitril/valsartan in clinical practice. The effect of sacubitril/valsartan on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of furosemide was evaluated in this open label, two-period, single-sequence study in healthy subjects. METHODS: All subjects (n = 28) received 40 mg oral single-dose furosemide during period 1, followed by a washout of 2 days. In period 2, sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg (97/103 mg) was administered twice daily for 5 days and a single dose of 40 mg furosemide was coadministered on day 6. Serial plasma and urine samples were collected to determine the pharmacokinetics of furosemide and sacubitril/valsartan and the pharmacodynamics of furosemide. The point estimates and the associated 90% confidence intervals for pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated. RESULTS: Coadministration of furosemide with sacubitril/valsartan decreased the maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax ) [estimated geometric mean ratio (90% confidence interval): 0.50 (0.44, 0.56)], area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to infinity [0.72 (0.67, 0.77)] and 24-h urinary excretion of furosemide [0.74 (0.69, 0.79)]. When coadministered with sacubitril/valsartan, 0-4-h, 4-8-h and 0-24-h diuresis in response to furosemide was reduced by ~7%, 21% and 0.2%, respectively, while natriuresis was reduced by ~ 28.5%, 7% and 15%, respectively. Post hoc analysis of the pivotal phase III Prospective comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and morbidity in Heart Failure trial (PARADIGM-HF) indicated that the median furosemide dose was similar at baseline and at the end of the study in the sacubitril/valsartan group. CONCLUSIONS: Sacubitril/valsartan reduced plasma Cmax and AUC and 24-h urinary excretion of furosemide, while not significantly affecting its pharmacodynamic effects in healthy subjects.

Pharmacodynamic interaction between intravenous nitroglycerin and oral sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) in healthy subjects.

PURPOSE: Sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) and nitroglycerin share the second messenger cGMP and lower blood pressure. Given the potential for co-administration of both drugs in patients with heart failure, this study was designed to investigate the potential for a pharmacodynamic drug interaction affecting blood pressure. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, crossover study, 40 healthy subjects received sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg bid (97/103 mg bid) or placebo for 5 days. Two hours after the morning dose of sacubitril/valsartan or placebo on day 5, subjects received intravenous nitroglycerin infusion at increasing doses up to 40 µg/min or placebo. Serial measurements of blood pressure (BP), heart rate, biomarkers and sacubitril/valsartan pharmacokinetics were conducted. RESULTS: Administration of nitroglycerin alone led to a dose- and time-dependent decrease in supine systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) which was similar when nitroglycerin was co-administered with sacubitril/valsartan. At the highest dose of nitroglycerin, the mean (95% CI) decrease from baseline of SBP/DBP was 19.54 (- 21.99, - 17.09)/12.38 (- 13.85, - 10.92) mmHg for nitroglycerin alone compared to 22.63 (- 25.06, - 20.21)/12.94 (- 14.38, - 11.49) mmHg when co-administered with sacubitril/valsartan. Co-administration of sacubitril/valsartan and nitroglycerin did not result in further plasma cGMP increase compared to sacubitril/valsartan alone. The co-administration of nitroglycerin and sacubitril/valsartan was safe and well tolerated and did not impact the pharmacokinetics of sacubitril/valsartan. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this study demonstrate no pharmacodynamic drug interaction between nitroglycerin and sacubitril/valsartan in healthy subjects, suggesting that no change of dose selection and escalation recommendations or clinical monitoring during nitroglycerin administration is required.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Bimagrumab (BYM338).

BACKGROUND: Bimagrumab is a human monoclonal antibody binding to the activin type II receptor with therapeutic potential in conditions of muscle wasting and obesity. This phase I study evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and safety of various dose regimens of bimagrumab and routes of administration in healthy older adults. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm, multiple-dose study in older adult men and women (aged ≥ 70 years, body mass index [BMI] 18-34 kg/m2) with stable health and diet. The study comprised seven treatment groups (Cohorts 1-7). Participants received bimagrumab or placebo treatment every 4 weeks for three doses (Cohorts 1 [700 mg] and 2 [210 mg] intravenous infusion; Cohorts 3 [1500 mg] and 4 [525 mg] subcutaneous infusion), or every week for 12 doses (Cohorts 5 [300 mg], 6 [150 mg], and 7 [52.5 mg] subcutaneous bolus injection) and were followed up until week 20. Blood samples were collected for bimagrumab PK analysis. PD were assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry to quantify the change from baseline in lean body mass (LBM) and fat body mass (FBM) compared with placebo. Safety was assessed throughout the study. RESULTS: Eighty-four of 91 (92.3%) randomized participants (mean age 74.5 years; BMI 28.0 kg/m2) completed the study. Demographic characteristics were generally balanced across the groups. A target-mediated drug disposition profile was observed following both intravenous and subcutaneous administration. The absolute subcutaneous bioavailability was estimated at approximately 40%. LBM increased by 4-6% (1.5-2 kg) from baseline throughout the treatment period for intravenous and subcutaneous regimens, except for the 52.5 mg subcutaneous dose, which did not differ from placebo. Concurrently, there was a decrease in FBM (approximately 2-3 kg) for all intravenous and subcutaneous regimens. Bimagrumab was generally safe and well tolerated; adverse events were mostly mild to moderate in severity. CONCLUSIONS: Dose levels of bimagrumab administered weekly subcutaneously resulted in PK profiles and PD effects comparable with monthly intravenous dosing, which supports the feasibility of the subcutaneous route of administration for bimagrumab for future clinical development.