Allergen challenge increases capsaicin-evoked cough responses in patients with allergic asthma.

BACKGROUND: Cough is a common and troublesome symptom in asthmatic patients, but little is known about the neuronal pathways that trigger cough. The mechanisms by which airway inflammation, airway hyperresponsiveness, and variable airflow obstruction cause cough are unclear. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the effects of allergen exposure on cough reflex sensitivity. METHODS: We performed a 9-visit, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-way crossover study comparing cough responses to inhaled capsaicin in patients with mild atopic asthma after allergen challenge compared with diluent control. Full-dose capsaicin challenge was performed at screening to determine the capsaicin dose inducing a half-maximal response, which was subsequently administered at 30 minutes and 24 hours after inhaled allergen/diluent challenge. Spontaneous coughing was measured for 24 hours after allergen/diluent. Methacholine challenge and sputum induction were performed before and after allergen/diluent challenge. RESULTS: Twelve steroid-naive subjects completed the study (6 female subjects; mean age, 34.8 years). Allergen inhalation caused both an early (mean ± SD, 38.2% ± 13.0%) and late (mean ± SD, 23.7% ± 13.2%) decrease in FEV1 and an increase in sputum eosinophil counts 24 hours later (after diluent: median, 1.9% [interquartile range, 0.8% to 5.8%]; after allergen: median, 14.9% [interquartile range, 8.9% to 37.3%]; P = .005). There was also an increase in capsaicin-evoked coughs after allergen exposure compared with diluent at both 30 minutes (geometric mean coughs, 21.9 [95% CI, 16.5-29.20] vs 12.1 [95% CI, 8.3-17.7]; P < .001) and 24 hours (geometric mean coughs, 16.1 [95% CI, 11.3-23.0] vs 9.8 [95% CI, 6.1-15.8]; P = .001). Allergen exposure was also associated with an increase in spontaneous coughs over 24 hours. CONCLUSION: Allergen-induced bronchoconstriction and airway eosinophilia result in increased cough reflex sensitivity to capsaicin associated with an increase in 24-hour spontaneous coughing.

IL-25 Receptor Expression on Airway Dendritic Cells after Allergen Challenge in Subjects with Asthma.

RATIONALE: IL-25 is an epithelial-derived cytokine, whose effects are mediated by the IL-25 receptor (IL-17RB), and that has been implicated in the pathogenesis of allergic disease and airway viral responses. Airway myeloid dendritic cells (mDCs) and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) are professional antigen-presenting cells. pDCs may play a protective role in asthma and are key players in the innate immune response through recognition of microbial products via Toll-like receptors (TLRs). The effects of inhaled allergens on the expression of IL-17RB by mDCs and pDCs, and the effects of IL-25 on pDCs, are unknown. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate allergen-induced changes in IL-17RB expression by mDCs and pDCs and to investigate the effects of IL-25 on pDCs. METHODS: Patients with mild atopic asthma (n = 13) were challenged with inhaled allergen. Blood and sputum DCs were enumerated and IL-17RB expression was determined by flow cytometry before and 7 and 24 hours after allergen challenge. The effects of IL-25 on pDCs in vitro were also assessed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Inhaled allergen significantly increased mDC and pDC numbers in sputum but not in blood. The percentage of IL-17RB(+) mDCs and pDCs was significantly increased in blood and sputum 24 hours after challenge. IL-25 up-regulated TLR9 expression by pDCs and orchestrated the responses to TLR9 ligation. CONCLUSIONS: IL-17RB is up-regulated on blood and sputum mDCs and pDCs after allergen inhalation. IL-25 modulates pDC function through an effect on TLR9 expression.

Methacholine Challenge: Comparison of Airway Responsiveness Produced by a Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer Versus a Jet Nebulizer.

BACKGROUND: The latest methacholine challenge testing (MCT) guidelines published by the European Respiratory Society recommend the characterization of nebulizers before their use in clinics and research. Such investigations are necessary for accurately determining the provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PD20) delivered by a given device. The standard English Wright (Wright) jet nebulizer recommended in the 1999 guidelines by the American Thoracic Society has become difficult to obtain and possesses some characteristics that complicate the calculation of dose delivery from this device (e.g. evaporation). Our objective was to determine if the Aerogen® Solo (Solo) vibrating mesh nebulizer provides similar methacholine challenge test results compared to the currently used Wright jet nebulizer. METHODS: Sixty mild-to-moderate asthmatics were studied across three research sites in a randomized crossover study. Both methacholine challenges were completed at least 24 hours apart within a 2-week period. Testing with the Wright device was performed as per the 2-minute tidal breathing protocol. The Solo study arm followed the same procedure except for a shorter inhalation time of 1 minute. The provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) and the methacholine PD20 were calculated following each methacholine challenge. RESULTS: The geometric mean methacholine PC20 values for the Solo and the Wright differed statistically (0.65 mg/mL vs. 2.58 mg/mL, respectively, p < 0.00001) and clinically. Between-nebulizer geometric mean methacholine PD20 results are comparable by clinical standards [81.7 µg (Solo) vs. 64.7 µg (Wright)], although the slight difference in dose was statistically significant (p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: The comparability of PD20 values between the Solo and the Wright validates the importance of reporting airway responsiveness to methacholine in terms of dose and not concentration, as stressed in the latest testing guidelines. This finding along with several benefits associated with the Solo make it a promising nebulizer for performing MCT.

Comparison of the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 between the AeroEclipse II breath-actuated nebulizer and the wright nebulizer in adult subjects with asthma.

RATIONALE: The American Thoracic Society guidelines for methacholine testing for the diagnosis of asthma recommends the 2-minute tidal breathing protocol with the Wright nebulizer, which produces more aerosol than required, generates a small particle size, and requires cleaning between tests. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate methacholine testing using a disposable, breath-actuated AeroEclipse II, which produces aerosol during inspiration and was developed for single-patient use. METHODS: Forty-six adult subjects with asthma (19 men), aged 27.3 (SD, 9.5) years, with FEV1 98.5 (SD, 18.1) % predicted participated in a randomized, crossover, observational study. Subjects were first screened using the Wright nebulizer, then assigned to 2 minutes of tidal breathing from the Wright or 20 seconds of tidal breathing from the AeroEclipse nebulizer on 2 separate days, in random order. Provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) values were calculated by linear interpolation of log dose-versus-response curves, log-transformed, and compared using paired Student t test and Pearson correlation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The 38 subjects demonstrating reproducible PC20 measurements of within 1.5 doubling concentrations were included in the comparison. The geometric mean methacholine PC20 measured with the AeroEclipse nebulizer was approximately 1 doubling concentration lower than the geometric mean methacholine PC20 of the Wright nebulizer (P < 0.05). The Pearson correlation coefficient between the two nebulizers was 0.86 (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The PC20 measurements using the two nebulizers were highly correlated; however, the PC20 determined with the AeroEclipse nebulizer was significantly lower than those determined using the Wright nebulizer. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01919424).