Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation with anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a comparison of postoperative outcomes.

PURPOSE: To determine of the impact of ALIF with minimally invasive unilateral pedicle screw fixation (UPSF) versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation (BPSF) on perioperative outcomes, radiographic outcomes, and the rates of fusion, subsidence, and adjacent segment stenosis. METHODS: All adult patients who underwent one-level ALIF with UPSF or BPSF at an academic institution between 2015 and 2022 were retrospectively identified. Postoperative outcomes including length of hospital stay (LOS), wound complications, readmissions, and revisions were determined. The rates of fusion, screw loosening, adjacent segment stenosis, and subsidence were assessed on one-year postoperative CT. Lumbar alignment including lumbar lordosis, L4-S1 lordosis, regional lordosis, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, and sacral slope were assessed on standing x-rays at preoperative, immediate postoperative, and final postoperative follow-up. Univariate and multivariate analysis compared outcomes across posterior fixation groups. RESULTS: A total of 60 patients were included (27 UPSF, 33 BPSF). Patients with UPSF were significantly younger (p = 0.011). Operative time was significantly greater in the BPSF group in univariate (p < 0.001) and multivariate analysis (ß=104.1, p < 0.001). Intraoperative blood loss, LOS, lordosis, pelvic parameters, fusion rate, subsidence, screw loosening, adjacent segment stenosis, and revision rate did not differ significantly between fixation groups. Though sacral slope (p = 0.037) was significantly greater in the BPSF group, fixation type was not a significant predictor on regression. CONCLUSIONS: ALIF with UPSF relative to BPSF predicted decreased operative time but was not a significant predictor of postoperative outcomes. ALIF with UPSF can be considered to increase operative efficiency without compromising construct stability.

The effect of C2 screw type on perioperative outcomes and long-term stability after C2-T2 posterior cervical decompression and fusion.

PURPOSE: To determine if C2 pedicle versus pars screw type predicts change in fusion status, C2 screw loosening, cervical alignment, and patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) after C2-T2 posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PDCF). METHODS: All adult patients who underwent C2-T2 PCDF for myelopathy or myeloradiculopathy between 2013-2020 were retrospectively identified. Patients were dichotomized by C2 screw type into bilateral C2 pedicle and bilateral C2 pars screw groups. Preoperative and short- and long-term postoperative radiographic outcomes and PROMs were collected. Univariate and multivariate analysis compared patient factors, fusion status, radiographic measures, and PROMs across groups. RESULTS: A total of 159 patients met the inclusion/exclusion criteria (76 bilateral pedicle screws, 83 bilateral pars screws). Patients in the C2 pars relative to C2 pedicle screw group were on average more likely to have bone morphogenic protein (p = 0.001) and four-millimeter diameter rods utilized intraoperatively (p = 0.033). There were no significant differences in total construct and C2-3 fusion rate, C2 screw loosening, or complication and revision rates between C2 screw groups in univariate and regression analysis. Changes in C2 tilt, C2-3 segmental lordosis, C0-2 Cobb angle, proximal junctional kyphosis, atlanto-dens interval, C1 lamina-occiput distance, C2 sagittal vertical axis, C2-7 lordosis, and PROMs at all follow-up intervals did not vary significantly by C2 screw type. CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences in fusion status, hardware complications, and radiographic and clinical outcomes based on C2 screw type following C2-T2 PCDF. Accordingly, intraoperative usage criteria can be flexible based on patient vertebral artery positioning and surgeon comfort level.

Successful fusion versus pseudarthrosis after spinal instrumentation: a comprehensive imaging review.

PURPOSE: Following spinal instrumentation and fusion, differentiating between successful arthrodesis and pseudoarthrosis on imaging can be challenging. Interpretation of such examinations requires understanding both the expected evolution of postoperative findings and the subtle indicators of pseudoarthrosis across multiple imaging modalities. Due to this level of intricacy, many clinicians lack familiarity with the subject beyond the more rudimentary concepts. METHODS: This review provides an in-depth overview of the imaging of the post-operative spine, with particular emphasis on differentiating between pseudoarthrosis and arthrodesis. RESULTS: A comprehensive overview of imaging of the post-operative spine is given, including the most common imaging modalities utilized, the expected post-operative findings, imaging findings in pseudoarthrosis, and imaging definitions of fusion. CONCLUSION: Differentiating between pseudoarthrosis and arthrodesis in the postoperative spine is complex, and requires a robust understanding of various findings across many different modalities.

Achieving Lumbar Fusion: An Evidence-Based Approach to Selecting Technique, Implants, and Biologics.

Many options currently exist for achieving lumbar fusion. A variety of techniques have been described. The challenge for spine surgeons is choosing which approach is ideal for the given circumstances, and to do this, a good understanding of the available evidence is necessary. The evidence regarding fusion approach, interbody cage utilization, bone grafting, biologics, and osteoporosis is reviewed.

Cervical Paraspinal Muscle Fatty Degeneration Is Not Associated with Muscle Cross-sectional Area: Qualitative Assessment Is Preferable for Cervical Sarcopenia.

BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia, defined as decreased skeletal mass, is an independent marker of frailty that is not accounted for by other risk-stratification methods. Recent studies have demonstrated a clear association between paraspinal sarcopenia and worse patient-reported outcomes and complications after spine surgery. Currently, sarcopenia is characterized according to either a quantitative assessment of the paraspinal cross-sectional area or a qualitative analysis of paraspinal fatty infiltration on MRI. No studies have investigated whether the cervical paraspinal cross-sectional area correlates with fatty infiltration of the cervical paraspinal muscles on advanced imaging. QUESTION/PURPOSE: Do patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with increasing paraspinal fatty degeneration on advanced imaging also demonstrate decreased cervical paraspinal cross-sectional area? METHODS: Between 2011 and 2017, 98 patients were prospectively enrolled in a database of patients undergoing one- to three-level ACDF for degenerative conditions at a single institution. To be eligible for this prospective study, patients were required to undergo an MRI before surgery, be older than 18 years, and have no previous history of cervical spine surgery. Two independent reviewers, both surgeons not involved in the patients' care and who were blinded to the clinical outcomes, retrospectively assessed the paraspinal cross-sectional area and Goutallier classification of the right-sided paraspinal muscle complex. We then compared the patients' Goutallier grades with their paraspinal cross-sectional area measurements. We identified 98 patients for inclusion. Using the Fuchs modification of the Goutallier classification, we classified the fatty degeneration of 41 patients as normal (Goutallier Grades 0 to 1), that of 47 patients as moderate (Grade 2), and that of 10 patients as severe (Grades 3 to 4). We used ANOVA to compare all means between groups. RESULTS: There was no difference in the mean paraspinal cross-sectional area of the obliquus capitus inferior (normal 295 ± 81 mm2; moderate 317 ± 104 mm2; severe 300 ± 79 mm2; p = 0.51), multifidus (normal 146 ± 59 mm2; moderate 170 ± 70 mm2; severe 192 ± 107 mm2; p = 0.11), or sternocleidomastoid (normal 483 ± 150 mm2; moderate 468 ± 149 mm2; severe 458 ± 183 mm2; p = 0.85) among patients with mild, moderate, and severe fatty infiltration based on Goutallier grading. There was a slightly greater longus colli cross-sectional area in the moderate and severe fatty infiltration groups (74 ± 22 mm2 and 66 ± 18 mm2, respectively) than in the normal group (63 ± 15 mm2; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Because our study demonstrates minimal association between paraspinal cross-sectional area and fatty infiltration of the cervical paraspinals, we recommend that physicians use the proven qualitative assessment of paraspinal fatty infiltration during preoperative evaluation of patients who are candidates for ACDF. Future studies investigating the relationship between cervical paraspinal cross-sectional area and patient-reported outcomes after ACDF are necessary to lend greater strength to this recommendation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.

Osteoporosis in spine surgery patients: what is the best way to diagnose osteoporosis in this population?

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to compare different recognized definitions of osteoporosis in patients with degenerative lumbar spine pathology undergoing elective spinal fusion surgery to determine which patient population should be considered for preoperative optimization. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients in whom lumbar spine surgery was planned at 2 academic medical centers was performed, and the rate of osteoporosis was compared based on different recognized definitions. Assessments were made based on dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), CT Hounsfield units (HU), trabecular bone score (TBS), and fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX). The rate of osteoporosis was compared based on different definitions: 1) the WHO definition (T-score ≤ -2.5) at total hip or spine; 2) CT HU of < 110; 3) National Bone Health Alliance (NBHA) guidelines; and 4) "expanded spine" criteria, which includes patients meeting NBHA criteria and/or HU < 110, and/or "degraded" TBS in the setting of an osteopenic T-score. Inclusion criteria were adult patients with a DXA scan of the total hip and/or spine performed within 1 year and a lumbar spine CT scan within 6 months of the physician visit. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-four patients were included. The mean age was 68.3 years, with 70.5% female, 96.7% Caucasian, and the mean BMI was 28.8. Fracture history was reported in 53.8% of patients. The proportion of patients identified with osteoporosis on DXA, HUs, NBHA guidelines, and the authors' proposed "expanded spine" criteria was 25.4%, 36.5%, 75%, and 81.9%, respectively. Of the patients not identified with osteoporosis on DXA, 31.3% had osteoporosis based on HU, 55.1% had osteoporosis with NBHA, and 70.4% had osteoporosis with expanded spine criteria (p < 0.05), with poor correlations among the different assessment tools. CONCLUSIONS: Limitations in the use of DXA T-scores alone to diagnose osteoporosis in patients with lumbar spondylosis has prompted interest in additional methods of evaluating bone health in the spine, such as CT HU, TBS, and FRAX, to inform guidelines that aim to reduce fracture risk. However, no current osteoporosis assessment was developed with a focus on improving outcomes in spinal surgery. Therefore, the authors propose an expanded spine definition for osteoporosis to identify a more comprehensive cohort of patients with potential poor bone health who could be considered for preoperative optimization, although further study is needed to validate these results in terms of clinical outcomes.

Regional improvements in lumbosacropelvic Hounsfield units following teriparatide treatment.

OBJECTIVE: Opportunistic Hounsfield unit (HU) determination from CT imaging has been increasingly used to estimate bone mineral density (BMD) in conjunction with assessments from dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The authors sought to compare the effect of teriparatide on HUs across different regions in the pelvis, sacrum, and lumbar spine, as a surrogate measure for the effects of teriparatide on lumbosacropelvic instrumentation. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective review of patients who had been treated with at least 6 months of teriparatide was performed. All patients had at least baseline DXA as well as pre- and post-teriparatide CT imaging. HUs were measured in the pedicle, lamina, and vertebral body of the lumbar spine, in the sciatic notch, and at the S1 and S2 levels at three different points (ilium, sacral body, and sacral ala). RESULTS: Forty patients with an average age of 67 years underwent a mean of 20 months of teriparatide therapy. Mean HUs of the lumbar lamina, pedicles, and vertebral body were significantly different from each other before teriparatide treatment: 343 ± 114, 219 ± 89.2, and 111 ± 48.1, respectively (p < 0.001). Mean HUs at the S1 level for the ilium, sacral ala, and sacral body were also significantly different from each other: 124 ± 90.1, -10.7 ± 61.9, and 99.1 ± 72.1, respectively (p < 0.001). The mean HUs at the S2 level for the ilium and sacral body were not significantly different from each other, although the mean HU at the sacral ala (-11.9 ± 52.6) was significantly lower than those at the ilium and sacral body (p = 0.003 and 0.006, respectively). HU improvement occurred in most regions following teriparatide treatment. In the lumbar spine, the mean lamina HU increased from 343 to 400 (p < 0.001), the mean pedicle HU increased from 219 to 242 (p = 0.04), and the mean vertebral body HU increased from 111 to 134 (p < 0.001). There were also significant increases in the S1 sacral body (99.1 to 130, p < 0.05), S1 ilium (124 vs 165, p = 0.01), S1 sacral ala (-10.7 vs 3.68, p = 0.04), and S2 sacral body (168 vs 189, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There was significant regional variation in lumbar and sacropelvic HUs, with most regions significantly increasing following teriparatide treatment. The sacropelvic area had lower HU values than the lumbar spine, more regional variation, and a higher degree of correlation with BMD as measured on DXA. While teriparatide treatment resulted in HUs > 110 in the majority of the lumbosacral spine, the HUs in the sacral ala remained suggestive of severe osteoporosis, which may limit the effectiveness of fixation in this region.

Thoracic disc herniation, avoidance, and management of the surgical complications.

Thoracic disc herniations are a relatively rare occurrence compared to disc herniations in the cervical or lumbar spine. Surgical management of these thoracic herniations can be technically difficult with a wide array of reported complications. In this study, we aim to describe the most common complications that can occur during or after surgical management of thoracic disc herniations. Furthermore, we describe tips and tricks for avoidance and, if necessary, management of surgical complications. Common complications addressed in this review include vertebral column instability, neurologic injury, cerebrospinal fluid leak/pleural fistula, thoracic viscera injury, wrong level surgery, incomplete disk resection, and intercostal neuralgia.

Current Quality Measurement Tools Are Insufficient to Assess Complications in Orthopedic Surgery.

PURPOSE: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (ACS-NSQIP) is a clinically-derived, validated tool to track outcomes in surgery. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicators (AHRQ-PSI) are a set of computer algorithms run on administrative data to identify adverse events. The purpose of this study is to compare complications following orthopedic surgery identified by ACS-NSQIP and AHRQ-PSI. METHODS: Patients between 2010 and 2012 who underwent orthopedic procedures (arthroplasty, spine, trauma, foot and ankle, hand, and upper extremity) at our tertiary-care, academic institution were identified (n = 3,374). Identification of inpatient adverse events by AHRQ-PSI in the cohort was compared with 30-day events identified by ACS-NSQIP. Adverse events common to both AHRQ-PSI and ACS-NSQIP were infection, sepsis, venous thromboembolism, bleeding, respiratory failure, wound disruption, and renal failure. Concordance between AHRQ-PSI and ACS-NSQIP for identifying adverse events was examined. RESULTS: A total of 729 adverse events (21.6%) were identified in the cohort using ACS-NSQIP methodology and 35 adverse events (1.0%) were found using AHRQ-PSI. Only 12 events were identified by both methodologies. The most common complication was bleeding in ACS-NSQIP (18.1%) and respiratory failure in AHRQ-PSI (0.53%). The overlap was highest for venous thromboembolic events. There was no overlap in adverse events for 5 of the 7 categories of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: A large discrepancy was observed between adverse events reported in ACS-NSQIP and AHRQ-PSI. A large percentage of clinically important adverse events identified in ACS-NSQIP were missed in AHRQ-PSI algorithms. The ability of AHRQ-PSI for detecting adverse events varied widely with ACS-NSQIP. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: AHRQ-PSI algorithms currently are insufficient to assess the quality of orthopedic surgery.

Femoral bow predicts postoperative malalignment in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Diaphyseal bowing may compromise axial alignment in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). 277 patients undergoing revision TKA were evaluated for coronal bowing and hip-knee-ankle (HKA) axis. The mean femoral bow was 1.52° ± 0.18° varus (-10.1° to +8.4°). The mean tibial bow was 1.25° ± 0.13° valgus (-5.9° to +10°). HKA axis averaged 3.08° ± 0.35° varus preoperatively compared to 0.86° ± 0.25° varus postoperatively. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability was high. Femoral bow greater than 4° significantly correlated with postoperative HKA axis malalignment (r = 0.402, P = 0.008). 39.7% of patients deviated 3° or greater from a neutral mechanical axis with a significant difference in femoral bow (0.94° ± 0.31°, P = 0.003). Diaphyseal bowing clearly has an important effect on postoperative limb alignment in revision TKA.

Osteoporosis Evaluation and Management in Spine Surgery.

Osteoporosis is a global health problem affecting over 200 million people worldwide and 54 million adults in the United States. Approximately half of all postmenopausal women will have an osteoporosis-related fracture during their lifetime. In the United States, the direct medical cost related to osteoporosis is expected to exceed $25 billion by 2025. Management of osteoporosis in vertebral fractures and elective spine surgery is of the utmost concern, given the high prevalence of osteoporosis in the general population and the increased risk of complication in this population. New pharmacologic treatment options such as anabolic medications and diagnostic tools including Hounsfield unit measurements on routine computed tomography scans are available to orthopaedic and spinal surgeons to help best manage this condition. This review serves as an update to diagnosis, management, and treatment of patients with osteoporosis undergoing spinal surgery.

Evidence and Controversies in Geriatric Odontoid Fracture Management.

Geriatric odontoid fractures are some of the most common spine injuries in our aging population, and their prevalence is only continuing to increase. Despite several investigational studies, treatment remains controversial and there is limited conclusive evidence regarding the management of odontoid fractures. These injuries typically occur in medically complex and frail geriatric patients with poor bone quality, making their treatment particularly challenging. In this article, we review the evidence for conservative management as well as surgical intervention and discuss various treatment strategies. Given the high morbidity and mortality associated with odontoid fractures in the elderly, thoughtful consideration and an emphasis on patient-centered goals of treatment are critical to maximize function in this vulnerable population.

Evidence-based Indications for Vertebral Body Tethering in Spine Deformity.

Posterior spinal fusion has long been established as an effective treatment for the surgical management of spine deformity. However, interest in nonfusion options continues to grow. Vertebral body tethering is a nonfusion alternative that allows for the preservation of growth and flexibility of the spine. The purpose of this investigation is to provide a practical and relevant review of the literature on the current evidence-based indications for vertebral body tethering. Early results and short-term outcomes show promise for the first generation of this technology. At this time, patients should expect less predictable deformity correction and higher revision rates. Long-term studies are necessary to establish the durability of early results. In addition, further studies should aim to refine preoperative evaluation and patient selection as well as defining the benefits of motion preservation and its long-term effects on spine health to ensure optimal patient outcomes.

Bone morphogenetic protein in subaxial cervical arthrodesis: a meta-analysis of 5828 patients.

OBJECTIVE: Use of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-an osteoinductive agent commonly used in lumbar arthrodesis-is off-label for cervical arthrodesis. This study aimed to identify the effect of BMP use on clinical and radiological outcomes in instrumented cervical arthrodesis. METHODS: A comprehensive systematic review of the literature was performed to identify studies directly comparing outcomes between cervical arthrodeses with and without using BMP. Outcomes were analyzed separately for cases of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and posterior cervical fusion (PCF). RESULTS: A total of 20 studies with 5828 patients (1948 with BMP and 3880 without BMP) were included. In the ACDF cases, BMP use was associated with higher fusion rates (98.9% vs 93.6%, risk difference [RD] 8%; risk ratio [RR] 1.12, p = 0.02), lower reoperation rates (2.2% vs 3.1%, RD 3%; RR 0.48, p = 0.04), and higher risk of dysphagia (24.7% vs 8.1%, RD 11%; RR 1.93, p = 0.02). No significant differences in the Neck Disability Index, neck pain, or arm pain scores were associated with the use of BMP. On subgroup meta-analysis of ACDF cases, older age (≥ 50 years) and higher BMP dose (≥ 0.9 mg/level) were associated with significantly higher fusion rates and relatively lower risk for dysphagia, whereas arthrodesis of fewer segments (< 2 levels) showed significantly higher dysphagia rates without a significant increase in fusion rates. In the PCF cases, the use of BMP was not associated with significant differences in fusion (p = 0.38) or reoperation (p = 0.61) rates but was associated with significantly higher blood loss during surgery (mean difference 146.7 ml, p ≤ 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Use of BMP in ACDF offers higher rates of augmented fusion and lower rates of all-cause reoperation but with an increased risk of dysphagia. The benefit of fusion outweighs the risk of dysphagia with a higher BMP dose in older patients being operated on for < 2 levels. The use of BMP in PCF seems to have a less important effect on clinical and radiological outcomes.

A Standardized Curriculum Improves Trainee Rod Bending Proficiency in Spinal Deformity Surgery. Results of a Prospective Randomized Controlled Educational Study.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical simulation is increasingly being accepted as a training platform to promote skill development and a safe surgical technique. Preliminary investigations in spine surgery show that simulation paired with educational intervention can markedly improve trainee performance. This study used a newly developed thoracolumbar fusion rod bending model to assess the effect of a novel educational curriculum and simulator training on surgical trainee rod bending speed and proficiency. METHODS: Junior (PGY1 to 2) and senior (PGY3-fellow) surgical trainees at a single academic institution were prospectively enrolled in a rod bending simulation using a T7-pelvis spinal fusion model. Participants completed two simulations, with 1 month between first and second attempts. Fifty percent of surgeons in each training level were randomized to receive an educational curriculum (rod bending technique videos and unlimited simulator practice) between simulation attempts. Rod bending simulation proficiency was determined by the percentage of participants who completed the task (conclusion at 20 minutes), time to task completion or conclusion, and number of incomplete set screws at task conclusion. Participants completed a preparticipation and postparticipation survey. Univariate analysis compared rod bending proficiency and survey results between education and control cohorts. RESULTS: Forty trainees (20 junior and 20 senior) were enrolled, with 20 participants randomized to the education and control cohorts. No notable differences were observed in the first simulation rod bending proficiency or preparticipation survey results between the education and control cohorts. In the second simulation, the education versus the control cohort demonstrated a significantly higher completion rate ( P = 0.01), shorter task time ( P = 0.009), fewer incomplete screws ( P = 0.003), and greater experience level ( P = 0.008) and comfort level ( P = 0.002) on postparticipation survey. DISCUSSION: Trainees who participated in a novel educational curriculum and simulator training relative to the control cohort improved markedly in rod bending proficiency and comfort level. Rod bending simulation could be incorporated in existing residency and fellowship surgical skills curricula. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Significant Reduction in Bone Density as Measured by Hounsfield Units in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis or Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis.

Background: Multisegmental pathologic autofusion occurs in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH). It may lead to reduced vertebral bone density due to stress shielding. Methods: This study aimed to determine the effects of autofusion on bone density by measuring Hounsfield units (HU) in the mobile and immobile spinal segments of patients with AS and DISH treated at a tertiary care center. The mean HU was calculated for five distinct regions-cranial adjacent mobile segment, cranial fused segment, mid-construct fused segment, caudal fused segment, and caudal adjacent mobile segment. Means for each region were compared using paired-sample t-tests. Multivariable regression was used to determine independent predictors of mid-fused segment HUs. Results: One hundred patients were included (mean age 76 ± 11 years, 74% male). The mean HU for the mid-construct fused segment (100, 95% CI [86, 113]) was significantly lower than both cranial and caudal fused segments (174 and 108, respectively; both p < 0.001), and cranial and caudal adjacent mobile segments (195 and 115, respectively; both p < 0.001). Multivariable regression showed the mid-construct HUs were predicted by history of smoking (-30 HU, p = 0.009). Conclusions: HUs were significantly reduced in the middle of long-segment autofusion, which was consistent with stress shielding. Such shielding may contribute to the diminution of vertebral bone integrity in AS/DISH patients and potentially increased fracture risk.

Reduced Bone Density Based on Hounsfield Units After Long-Segment Spinal Fusion with Harrington Rods.

BACKGROUND: Long-segment instrumentation, such as Harrington rods, offloads vertebrae within the construct, which may result in significant stress shielding of the fused segments. The present study aimed to determine the effects of spinal fusion on bone density by measuring Hounsfield units (HUs) throughout the spine in patients with a history of Harrington rod fusion. METHODS: Patients with a history of Harrington rod fusion treated at a single academic institution were identified. Mean HUs were calculated at 5 spinal segments for each patient: cranial adjacent mobile segment, cranial fused segment, midconstruct fused segment, caudal fused segment, and caudal adjacent mobile segment. Mean HUs for each level were compared using a paired-sample t test, with statistical significance defined by P < 0.05. Hierarchic multiple regression, including age, gender, body mass index, and time since original fusion, was used to determine predictors of midfused segment HUs. RESULTS: One hundred patients were included (mean age, 55 ± 12 years; 62% female). Mean HUs for the midconstruct fused segment (110; 95% confidence interval [CI], 100-121) were significantly lower than both the cranial and caudal fused segments (150 and 118, respectively; both P < 0.05), as well as both the cranial and caudal adjacent mobile segments (210 and 130, respectively; both P < 0.001). Multivariable regression showed midconstruct HUs were predicted only by patient age (-2.6 HU/year; 95% CI, -3.4 to -1.9; P < 0.001) and time since original surgery (-1.4 HU/year; 95% CI, -2.6 to -0.2; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: HUs were significantly decreased in the middle of previous long-segment fusion constructs, suggesting that multilevel fusion constructs lead to vertebral bone density loss within the construct, potentially from stress shielding.

Bone Quality as Measured by Hounsfield Units More Accurately Predicts Proximal Junctional Kyphosis than Vertebral Bone Quality Following Long-Segment Thoracolumbar Fusion.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the prognostic power of Hounsfield units (HU) and Vertebral Bone Quality (VBQ) score for predicting proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) following long-segment thoracolumbar fusion to the upper thoracic spine (T1-T6). METHODS: Vertebral bone quality around the upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV) was measured using HU on preoperative CT and VBQ on preoperative MRI. Spinopelvic parameters were also categorized according to the Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab classification. Univariable analysis to identify predictors of the occurrence of PJK and survival analyses with Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression were performed to identify predictors of time to PJK (defined as ≥10° change in Cobb angle of UIV+2 and UIV). Sensitivity analyses showed thresholds of HU < 164 and VBQ > 2.7 to be most predictive for PJK. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients (mean age 66.0 ± 7.0 years; 27.6% male) were identified, of whom 15 suffered PJK. Significant predictors of PJK were high postoperative pelvic tilt (P = 0.038), high postoperative T1-pelvic angle (P = 0.041), and high postoperative PI-LL mismatch (P = 0.028). On survival analyses, bone quality, as assessed by the average HU of the UIV and UIV+1 was the only significant predictor of time to PJK (odds ratio [OR] 3.053; 95% CI 1.032-9.032; P = 0.044). VBQ measured using the UIV, UIV+1, UIV+2, and UIV-1 vertebrae approached, but did not reach significance (OR 2.913; 95% CI 0.797-10.646; P = 0.106). CONCLUSIONS: In larger cohorts, VBQ may prove to be a significant predictor of PJK following long-segment thoracolumbar fusion. However, Hounsfield units on CT have greater predictive power, suggesting preoperative workup for long-segment thoracolumbar fusion benefits from computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging alone to identify those at increased risk of PJK.

Contemporary Practice Patterns in the Treatment of Cervical Stenosis and Central Cord Syndrome: A Survey of the Cervical Spine Research Society.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate for areas of consensus and divergence of opinion within the spine community regarding the management of cervical spondylotic conditions and acute traumatic central cord syndrome (ATCCS) and the influence of the patient's age, disease severity, and myelomalacia. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is ongoing disagreement regarding the indications for, and urgency of, operative intervention in patients with mild degenerative myelopathy, moderate to severe radiculopathy, isolated axial symptomatology with evidence of spinal cord compression, and ATCCS without myelomalacia. METHODS: A survey request was sent to 330 attendees of the Cervical Spine Research Society (CSRS) 2021 Annual Meeting to assess practice patterns regarding the treatment of cervical stenosis, myelopathy, radiculopathy, and ATCCS in 16 unique clinical vignettes with associated MRIs. Operative versus nonoperative treatment consensus was defined by a management option selected by >80% of survey participants. RESULTS: Overall, 116 meeting attendees completed the survey. Consensus supported nonoperative management for elderly patients with axial neck pain and adults with axial neck pain without myelomalacia. Operative management was indicated for adult patients with mild myelopathy and myelomalacia, adult patients with severe radiculopathy, elderly patients with severe radiculopathy and myelomalacia, and elderly ATCCS patients with pre-existing myelopathic symptoms. Treatment discrepancy in favor of nonoperative management was found for adult patients with isolated axial symptomatology and myelomalacia. Treatment discrepancy favored operative management for elderly patients with mild myelopathy, adult patients with mild myelopathy without myelomalacia, elderly patients with severe radiculopathy without myelomalacia, and elderly ATCCS patients without preceding symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is uncertainty regarding the treatment of mild myelopathy, operative intervention was favored for nonelderly patients with evidence of myelomalacia or radiculopathy and for elderly patients with ATCCS, especially if pre-injury myelopathic symptoms were present. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.