A multidomain intervention against cognitive decline in an at-risk-population in Germany: Results from the cluster-randomized AgeWell.de trial.

INTRODUCTION: We investigated the effectiveness of a multidomain intervention to preserve cognitive function in older adults at risk for dementia in Germany in a cluster-randomized trial. METHODS: Individuals with a Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging, and Dementia (CAIDE) risk score ≥ 9 aged 60 to 77 years were recruited. After randomization of their general practitioner (GP), patients received a multidomain intervention (including optimization of nutrition and medication, and physical, social, and cognitive activity) or general health advice and GP treatment as usual over 24 months. Primary outcome was global cognitive performance (composite z score, based on domain-specific neuropsychological tests). RESULTS: Of 1030 participants at baseline, n = 819 completed the 24-month follow-up assessment. No differences regarding global cognitive performance (average marginal effect = 0.010, 95% confidence interval: -0.113, 0.133) were found between groups at follow-up. Perceived restrictions in intervention conduct by the COVID-19 pandemic did not impact intervention effectiveness. DISCUSSION: The intervention did not improve global cognitive performance. HIGHLIGHTS: Overall, no intervention effects on global cognitive performance were detected. The multidomain intervention improved health-related quality of life in the total sample. In women, the multidomain intervention reduced depressive symptoms. The intervention was completed during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Prevalence and patient-rated relevance of complexity factors in medication regimens of community-dwelling patients with polypharmacy.

PURPOSE: To describe the prevalence of complexity factors in the medication regimens of community-dwelling patients with more than five drugs and to evaluate the relevance of these factors for individual patients. METHODS: Data were derived from the HIOPP-6 trial, a controlled study conducted in 9 general practices which evaluated an electronic tool to detect and reduce complexity of drug treatment. The prevalence of complexity factors was based on the results of the automated analysis of 139 patients' medication data. The relevance assessment was based on the patients' rating of each factor in an interview (48 patients included for analysis). RESULTS: A median of 5 (range 0-21) complexity factors per medication regimen were detected and at least one factor was observed in 131 of 139 patients. Almost half of these patients found no complexity factor in their medication regimen relevant. CONCLUSION: In most medication regimens, complexity factors could be identified automatically, yet less than 15% of factors were indeed relevant for patients as judged by themselves. When assessing complexity of medication regimens, one should especially consider factors that are both particularly frequent and often challenging for patients, such as use of inhalers or tablet splitting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The HIOPP-6 trial was registered retrospectively on May 17, 2021, in the German Clinical Trials register under DRKS-ID DRKS00025257.

Task sharing in an interprofessional medication management program - a survey of general practitioners and community pharmacists.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacist-led medication review and medication management programs (MMP) are well-known strategies to improve medication safety and effectiveness. If performed interprofessionally, outcomes might even improve. However, little is known about task sharing in interprofessional MMP, in which general practitioners (GPs) and community pharmacists (CPs) collaboratively perform medication reviews and continuously follow-up on patients with designated medical and pharmaceutical tasks, respectively. In 2016, ARMIN (Arzneimittelinitiative Sachsen-Thüringen) an interprofessional MMP was launched in two German federal states, Saxony and Thuringia. The aim of this study was to understand how GPs and CPs share tasks in MMP when reviewing the patients' medication. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional postal survey among GPs and CPs who participated in the MMP. Participants were asked who completed which MMP tasks, e.g., checking drug-drug interactions, dosing, and side effects. In total, 15 MMP tasks were surveyed using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "I complete this task alone" to "GP/CP completes this task alone". The study was conducted between 11/2020 and 04/2021. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: In total, 114/165 (69.1%) GPs and 166/243 (68.3%) CPs returned a questionnaire. The majority of GPs and CPs reported (i) checking clinical parameters and medication overuse and underuse to be completed by GPs, (ii) checking storage conditions of drugs and initial compilation of the patient's medication including brown bag review being mostly performed by CPs, and (iii) checking side-effects, non-adherence, and continuous updating of the medication list were carried out jointly. The responses differed most for problems with self-medication and adding and removing over-the-counter medicines from the medication list. In addition, the responses revealed that some MMP tasks were not sufficiently performed by either GPs or CPs. CONCLUSIONS: Both GPs' and CPs' expertise are needed to perform MMP as comprehensively as possible. Future studies should explore how GPs and CPs can complement each other in MMP most efficiently.

Patients' perception on generating medication plans in an interprofessional medication management program: a mixed-methods study.

A medication plan (MP) provides an overview of a patient's entire medication. In the interprofessional medication management program ARMIN (ARzneiMittelINitiative Sachsen-Thueringen), MPs are jointly generated by general practitioners (GPs) and community pharmacists (CPs). We aimed to assess patients' initial acceptance of the service, how they use the printed MP, and whether they perceived a benefit from it. This was evaluated with mixed-methods: a cross sectional written (quantitative) survey followed by semi-structured (qualitative) interviews. The data were analysed separately and compared. Qualitative data were analysed by thematic analysis. For the survey, 103 patients (mean 73 years) were involved. Benefits indicated were: improved communication between GPs and CPs, safer handling of the medication, and increased knowledge on dosages and indications. Ninety-six percent of the patients used their MP, 51% regularly. Regular use was significantly associated with older age, higher number of drugs, and need for assistance with the medication. Ten patients were interviewed. Results from interviews agreed with the results from the survey but revealed some additional aspects (e.g., patients reported an increased feeling of safety). Health-care professionals should consider providing MPs for their patients. This interprofessional cooperation also meets patient's need for safety in health issues.

Short and mid-term impact of community pharmacy-based medication reviews on medication- and patient-related outcomes in Germany.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of a routine medication review service in German community pharmacies (ATHINA) on drug-related problems (DRPs) and patient-related outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2015 to 2017, ATHINA patients were invited by their pharmacists to participate in a prospective, observational trial, meaning that they needed to attend to a follow-up visit (T2) 3 - 6 months after the routine ATHINA baseline (T0) and concluding visit (T1) to assess implementation rates of the pharmacists' interventions. Moreover, they were asked to fill in 2 surveys on drug treatment-related quality of life and satisfaction with the amount of information received about medicines at T0, T1, and T2. RESULTS: Of 132 recruited patients, 115 completed T2. At T0, pharmacists documented a DRP or information need for 114 of 115 patients. About half of these issues were resolved leading to 43/115 patients without any DRP or information need at T1 and 50/115 patients without any DRP or information need at T2 (i.e., absolute reduction by 42.6%, p < 0.001). Also, the number of patients who felt that their daily life was not impaired at all or only very slightly by their drug treatment increased from 54.7% (58/106) at T0 to 67.6% (73/108, p = 0.011) at T2. While the overall satisfaction score with the amount of information on medicines increased from 10.2 ± 5.5 at T0 over 14.6 ± 3.8 (T1) to 15.4 ± 3.1 (T2, p < 0.001), this increase did not correlate with reduced information needs. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the intervention improves medication- and patient-related outcomes. However, causal relationships are still questionable.

The impact of a computerized physician order entry system implementation on 20 different criteria of medication documentation-a before-and-after study.

BACKGROUND: The medication process is complex and error-prone. To avoid medication errors, a medication order should fulfil certain criteria, such as good readability and comprehensiveness. In this context, a computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system can be helpful. This study aims to investigate the distinct effects on the quality of prescription documentation of a CPOE system implemented on general wards in a large tertiary care hospital. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis, the prescriptions of two groups of 160 patients each were evaluated, with data collected before and after the introduction of a CPOE system. According to nationally available recommendations on prescription documentation, it was assessed whether each prescription fulfilled the established 20 criteria for a safe, complete, and actionable prescription. The resulting fulfilment scores (prescription-Fscores) were compared between the pre-implementation and the post-implementation group and a multivariable analysis was performed to identify the effects of further covariates, i.e., the prescription category, the ward, and the number of concurrently prescribed drugs. Additionally, the fulfilment of the 20 criteria was assessed at an individual criterion-level (denoted criteria-Fscores). RESULTS: The overall mean prescription-Fscore increased from 57.4% ± 12.0% (n = 1850 prescriptions) before to 89.8% ± 7.2% (n = 1592 prescriptions) after the implementation (p < 0.001). At the level of individual criteria, criteria-Fscores significantly improved in most criteria (n = 14), with 6 criteria reaching a total score of 100% after CPOE implementation. Four criteria showed no statistically significant difference and in two criteria, criteria-Fscores deteriorated significantly. A multivariable analysis confirmed the large impact of the CPOE implementation on prescription-Fscores which was consistent when adjusting for the confounding potential of further covariates. CONCLUSIONS: While the quality of prescription documentation generally increases with implementation of a CPOE system, certain criteria are difficult to fulfil even with the help of a CPOE system. This highlights the need to accompany a CPOE implementation with a thorough evaluation that can provide important information on possible improvements of the software, training needs of prescribers, or the necessity of modifying the underlying clinical processes.

Individual factors increasing complexity of drug treatment-a narrative review.

PURPOSE: Complexity of drug treatment is known to be a risk factor for administration errors and nonadherence promoting higher healthcare costs, hospital admissions and increased mortality. Number of drugs and dose frequency are parameters often used to assess complexity related to the medication regimen. However, factors resulting from complex processes of care or arising from patient characteristics are only sporadically analyzed. Hence, the objective of this review is to give a comprehensive overview of relevant, patient-centered factors influencing complexity of drug treatment. METHODS: A purposeful literature search was performed in MEDLINE to identify potential complexity factors relating to the prescribed drug (i.e. dosage forms or other product characteristics), the specific medication regimen (i.e. dosage schemes or additional instructions), specific patient characteristics and process characteristics. Factors were included if they were associated to administration errors, nonadherence and related adverse drug events detected in community dwelling adult patients. RESULTS: Ninety-one influencing factors were identified: fourteen in "dosage forms", five in "product characteristics", twelve in "dosage schemes", nine in "additional instructions", thirty-one in "patient characteristics" and twenty in "process characteristics". CONCLUSIONS: Although the findings are limited by the non-systematic search process and the heterogeneous results, the search shows the influence of many factors on the complexity of drug treatment. However, to evaluate their relevance for individual patients, prospective studies are necessary.

Medication beliefs and use of medication lists - is there a connection? Results from a before-and-after study in Germany.

BACKGROUND: Despite increasing digitalisation the paper-based medication list remains one of the most important instruments for the documentation and exchange of medication-related information. However, even elderly patients with polypharmacy who are at high risk for medication errors and adverse drug events, frequently do not receive or use a complete and comprehensible medication list. Increasing the use of medication lists would be a great contribution to medication safety and facilitate the work of health care providers. METHODS: This study is related to the project MeinPlan (MyPlan) which comprised an information campaign on safe drug administration in the Rhine-Neckar region in South Germany. The campaign was evaluated in a before-and-after study based on a survey among two independent, representative samples of citizens over 65 years. In total, 5034 questionnaires were analysed. While the effects of the primary outcome (the percentage of citizens using a medication list) have been reported elsewhere, this analysis focusses on the effects of the campaign on citizens' medication beliefs and assesses whether medication beliefs are associated with the use of medication lists, the use of over-the-counter drugs and the use of the tools offered by the campaign. Medication beliefs were assessed with the German version of the General Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) which results in subscales for "General Overuse", "General Usefulness" and "General Harm". The use of medication lists and over-the-counter drugs was assessed with self-developed questionnaire items. RESULTS: No statistically significant change in citizens' medication beliefs before and after the campaign could be detected. Likewise, no association between medication beliefs and the use of medication lists, the use of over-the-counter drugs or the use of the tools offered by the campaign could be shown. CONCLUSIONS: A campaign focussing on the risks of drug administration did not change the medication beliefs of the targeted population. Moreover, citizens' general medication beliefs do not seem to be crucial for their decision to use a medication list or over-the-counter drugs. Strategies to improve the use of medication lists by patients should focus on other influential factors, such as individual benefits and barriers and socio-psychological factors.

Development of an algorithm to detect and reduce complexity of drug treatment and its technical realisation.

BACKGROUND: The increasing complexity of current drug therapies jeopardizes patient adherence. While individual needs to simplify a medication regimen vary from patient to patient, a straightforward approach to integrate the patients' perspective into decision making for complexity reduction is still lacking. We therefore aimed to develop an electronic, algorithm-based tool that analyses complexity of drug treatment and supports the assessment and consideration of patient preferences and needs regarding the reduction of complexity of drug treatment. METHODS: Complexity factors were selected based on literature and expert rating and specified for integration in the automated assessment. Subsequently, distinct key questions were phrased and allocated to each complexity factor to guide conversation with the patient and personalize the results of the automated assessment. Furthermore, each complexity factor was complemented with a potential optimisation measure to facilitate drug treatment (e.g. a patient leaflet). Complexity factors, key questions, and optimisation strategies were technically realized as tablet computer-based application, tested, and adapted iteratively until no further technical or content-related errors occurred. RESULTS: In total, 61 complexity factors referring to the dosage form, the dosage scheme, additional instructions, the patient, the product, and the process were considered relevant for inclusion in the tool; 38 of them allowed for automated detection. In total, 52 complexity factors were complemented with at least one key question for preference assessment and at least one optimisation measure. These measures included 29 recommendations for action for the health care provider (e.g. to suggest a dosage aid), 27 training videos, 44 patient leaflets, and 5 algorithms to select and suggest alternative drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Both the set-up of an algorithm and its technical realisation as computer-based app was successful. The electronic tool covers a wide range of different factors that potentially increase the complexity of drug treatment. For the majority of factors, simple key questions could be phrased to include the patients' perspective, and, even more important, for each complexity factor, specific measures to mitigate or reduce complexity could be defined.

Use of medication lists: A population-based approach to increase the prevalence of medication lists within a region in Germany. A pre-post study
.

OBJECTIVES: Patient-centered medication lists are a useful documentation method to support safe drug treatment, but they are still inconsistently used and are of varying quality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of an information campaign on the prevalence and use of medication lists. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We launched a population-based, low-threshold information campaign within a large region in Germany in order to sensitize the population to the use of medication lists. A survey was sent out at baseline and after 18 months to 5,340 citizens aged ≥ 65 years, covering ~ 4% of the region's population. RESULTS: The response rate was 49.4% (N = 2,640) at baseline and 45.4% (N = 2,427) at follow-up. Sociodemographic details of respondents were similar at both time-points as was the possession rate of a medication list among participants with regular medicine intake (51.6%, N = 1,181/2,288 vs. 51.4%, N = 1,082/2,107). Combining baseline and follow-up data, respondents indicated that their general practitioner was involved in issuing the list most often (N = 1,668/2,263, 73.7%), however, in 195 cases (8.6%), respondents indicated being solely responsible for the list. The majority (90.8%, N = 2,055/2,263) indicated having their list in use for longer than 1 year, but for only half of those, the list was updated within the last year. After the intervention, 6% of the respondents indicated being familiar with the campaign those being more likely to possess a list (69.7% N = 83/119 vs. 50.2% N = 999/1,988). CONCLUSION: The campaign did not change overall possession rate, but respondents who were familiar with the campaign were more likely to possess such a list.

[Potential Benchmarks for Successful Interdisciplinary Collaboration Projects in Germany: A Systematic Review]. / Potentielle Erfolgsindikatoren für die Durchführung von Projekten zur Arzt-Apotheker-Zusammenarbeit ­ eine systematische Übersicht.

AIM OF THE STUDY: Collaboration between general practitioners and community pharmacists is essential to ensure safe and effective patient care. However, collaboration in primary care is not standardized and varies greatly. This review aims to highlight projects about professional collaboration in ambulatory care in Germany and identifies promising approaches and successful benchmarks that should be considered for future projects. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed based on the PRISMA guidelines to identify articles focusing on professional collaboration between general practitioners and pharmacists. RESULTS: A total of 542 articles were retrieved. Six potential premises for successful cooperation projects were identified: GP and CP knowing each other (I), involvement of both health care providers in the project planning (II), sharing of experience or concerns during regular joint meetings enabling continuing evaluation and adaption (III), ensuring (technical) feasibility (IV), particularly by providing incentives (V), and by integrating these projects into existing health care structures (VI). CONCLUSION: Only few studies have been published in scientific journals. There was no standardized assessment of how the participants perceived their collaboration and how it facilitates their daily work, even when the study aimed to evaluate GP-CP collaboration. Successful cooperation between GP and CP in daily routine care was often characterized by personal contact and longtime relationships. Therefore, collaborative teaching sessions at university might establish sympathy and mutual understanding right from the beginning. There is a strong need to establish standardized tools to evaluate collaboration in future projects and to enable comparability of different studies.

Developing a Shared Patient-Centered, Web-Based Medication Platform for Type 2 Diabetes Patients and Their Health Care Providers: Qualitative Study on User Requirements.

BACKGROUND: Information technology tools such as shared patient-centered, Web-based medication platforms hold promise to support safe medication use by strengthening patient participation, enhancing patients' knowledge, helping patients to improve self-management of their medications, and improving communication on medications among patients and health care professionals (HCPs). However, the uptake of such platforms remains a challenge also due to inadequate user involvement in the development process. Employing a user-centered design (UCD) approach is therefore critical to ensure that user' adoption is optimal. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify what patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and their HCPs regard necessary requirements in terms of functionalities and usability of a shared patient-centered, Web-based medication platform for patients with T2DM. METHODS: This qualitative study included focus groups with purposeful samples of patients with T2DM (n=25), general practitioners (n=13), and health care assistants (n=10) recruited from regional health care settings in southwestern Germany. In total, 8 semistructured focus groups were conducted. Sessions were audio- and video-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and subjected to a computer-aided qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: Appropriate security and access methods, supported data entry, printing, and sending information electronically, and tracking medication history were perceived as the essential functionalities. Although patients wanted automatic interaction checks and safety alerts, HCPs on the contrary were concerned that unspecific alerts confuse patients and lead to nonadherence. Furthermore, HCPs were opposed to patients' ability to withhold or restrict access to information in the platform. To optimize usability, there was consensus among participants to display information in a structured, chronological format, to provide information in lay language, to use visual aids and customize information content, and align the platform to users' workflow. CONCLUSIONS: By employing a UCD, this study provides insight into the desired functionalities and usability of patients and HCPs regarding a shared patient-centered, Web-based medication platform, thus increasing the likelihood to achieve a functional and useful system. Substantial and ongoing engagement by all intended user groups is necessary to reconcile differences in requirements of patients and HCPs, especially regarding medication safety alerts and access control. Moreover, effective training of patients and HCPs on medication self-management (support) and optimal use of the tool will be a prerequisite to unfold the platform's full potential.

[Benefits of a Medication List from a Citizen's Perspective -A Qualitative Survey]. / Nutzen eines Medikationsplans aus Sicht der Bürger ­ eine qualitative Befragung.

BACKGROUND: Since October 2016, German patients are entitled to get a medication list if using at least 3 drugs. The patient's individual attitude to a medication list is supposed to be relevant for its use und acceptance. STUDY AIM: Because there is little known about those attitudes, this study examined which potential benefits patients see in possessing a medication list, and why certain patients might not use it. METHOD: In a qualitative survey, 375 citizens of the Rhein-Neckar region were interviewed by using a semi-standardized guide. A content analysis of the interviews was done. RESULTS: Most citizens described medication lists as having private and economic benefits such as for health care or safe drug use. But often, they combine potential benefits with requirements such as age, number of prescribed drugs, or health status. Unsatisfied individual needs, excessive demands or an attitude of rejection are possible reasons for non-use. CONCLUSION: For successful implementation of the medication list, the individual attitude of patients should be assessed to be able to provide tailored information and assistance. The views of citizens about a medication list agree with the aims of the so-called German E-Health Act, but differ particularly with regard to named requirements and prioritisation.

[Fostering medication safety by and for patients]. / Verbesserung der Arzneimitteltherapiesicherheit mit und für den Patienten.

The overall goal of all measures for medication safety is the optimization of drug treatment and the prevention of unnecessary risk that potentially endangers patients. Per definition, the goal of medication safety is a beneficial patient outcome. Particularly in primary care, the success of many medication safety strategies will depend on the active participation of patients, as in this healthcare sector the patient is responsible for many substeps of the medication process.From a healthcare systems perspective, a number of medication safety strategies have been developed that aim to support the patient in their active role in the medication process. These strategies intend to safeguard the processes of care including transfer of information, but also aim to prevent intentional and unintentional nonadherence. The prerequisites for successful implementation are targeted awareness-raising measures to sensitize all participants for potential risks in the medication process. Moreover, readily available medication safety strategies must be easily accessible and promoted both to patients and healthcare providers.

[Electronic decision support to promote medication safety]. / Elektronische Entscheidungsunterstützung zur Annäherung an eine sichere Arzneimitteltherapie.

Because of its inherent complexity, it is a considerable challenge to tailor drug treatment to a prevalent disease and its subgroups, which are increasingly defined by genomic variability (personalized medicine) and require consideration of context information such as co-morbidity, co-medication, patient preferences, and the specific characteristics of the healthcare sector. Thus, optimum treatment decisions might not be taken intuitively any longer, because decisions must be made both rapidly and increasingly based on analyses of complex relations of numerous variables that exceed the processing performance of a human brain. Hence, computer support is indispensable to ensure error-free high-performance medicine. A key step in computer-supported medication safety is to implement a computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system that compiles a patient's medication in a structured and coded format enabling the link to clinical decision support (CDS) systems. Implementing a CPOE is hence a strategic step for a hospital, which is crucial to exhaustingly and consistently prevent medication errors. Thereby, the best performance of a CPOE is achieved if it is deeply integrated into an electronic patient record thus enabling access to relevant patient information, which again has to be structured to allow processing. To efficiently support drug treatment, CDS systems must fulfill high-quality standards with regard to underlying data, integration, and user-interaction to ensure that they support but do not impede the provision of care.

[Simplifying complex drug therapies : Challenges and solutions]. / Komplexe Arzneimitteltherapien vereinfachen : Herausforderungen und Lösungsansätze.

The difficulties of managing a complex medication regimen are often underestimated in outpatient care. A large number of drugs (polypharmacy) and complicated dosage schemes or dosage forms may overstrain patients. Indeed, wrong drug administration can impair treatment success or cause adverse drug events.Patients are often unaware of the medication administration errors. Furthermore they do not voice administration problems, often because they are not aware of the potential to optimize their drug therapy. Medication regimen complexity can often be reduced by simple measures. However, feasible concepts for reducing medication regimen complexity in a structured way have been lacking in routine care so far.Electronic decision support facilitates systematic and efficient identification of factors that increase the complexity of a medication regimen. Furthermore, electronic decision aids may enable physicians and pharmacists to take appropriate measures in order to reduce medication regimen complexity. Personalizing the analysis and resulting measures to reduce medication regimen complexity might increase readiness of patients to implement changes in treatment and, thus, probably increase adherence. The first results of a prospective trial that is supported by the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) Innovationsfonds (HIOPP-6, Komplexitätsreduktion in der Polypharmazie unter Beachtung von Patientenpräferenzen) will be available in autumn 2018 and answer these questions.

Comparison of Nine Instruments to Calculate Anticholinergic Load in a Large Cohort of Older Outpatients: Association with Cognitive and Functional Decline, Falls, and Use of Laxatives.

OBJECTIVE: A patient's risk for anticholinergic adverse effects is frequently estimated by instruments evaluating the drugs included in his medication profile. It remains unknown, however, which characteristics should be included in such an assessment instrument aiming to reliably predict adverse anticholinergic outcomes. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: ESTHER cohort (Germany). PARTICIPANTS: Home-dwelling participants (N = 2,761) aged between 60 and 87 years. MEASUREMENTS: The association between anticholinergic load calculated with nine different instruments and four anticholinergic adverse outcomes was investigated in univariate and multivariate analyses. Therefore, linear models complemented with Kendall's tau rank correlation coefficients (ԏ) were applied for continuous outcomes and generalized linear models were used to derive odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for binary endpoints. RESULTS: Based on the respective identification criteria for anticholinergic drugs, the nine instruments identified between 245 (9%) and 866 (31%) anticholinergic drug users (mean age ± SD: 73 ± 6 years; Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] score: 28.3 ± 2.07; Barthel Index: 97.1 ± 7.5; 291 reporting falls; 29 taking laxatives [surrogate for constipation]). In the multivariate analysis, only two instruments indicated a significant association between anticholinergic load and all four outcomes. The instrument considering the prescribed dose showed the strongest association with MMSE scores (ԏ = -0.10), falls (OR: 2.30; 95% CI: 1.50-3.52), and the use of laxatives (OR: 3.11; 95% CI: 1.04-9.36). CONCLUSIONS: Instruments most reliably predicted anticholinergicadverse events if they were either based on the drugs' serum anticholinergic activity and the suggestions of clinician experts or considered the actual prescribed dose.

Risk factors of adverse health outcomes after hospital discharge modifiable by clinical pharmacist interventions: a review with a systematic approach.

The present review assessed the evidence on risk factors for the occurrence of adverse health outcomes after discharge (i.e. unplanned readmission or adverse drug event after discharge) that are potentially modifiable by clinical pharmacist interventions. The findings were compared with patient characteristics reported in guidelines that supposedly indicate a high risk of drug-related problems. First, guidelines and risk assessment tools were searched for patient characteristics indicating a high risk of drug-related problems. Second, a systematic PubMed search was conducted to identify risk factors significantly associated with adverse health outcomes after discharge that are potentially modifiable by a clinical pharmacist intervention. After the PubMed search, 37 studies were included, reporting 16 risk factors. Only seven of 34 patient characteristics mentioned in pertinent guidelines corresponded to one of these risk factors. Diabetes mellitus (n = 11), chronic obstructive lung disease (n = 9), obesity (n = 7), smoking (n = 5) and polypharmacy (n = 5) were the risk factors reported most frequently in the studies. Additionally, single studies also found associations of adverse health outcomes with different drug classes {e.g. warfarin [hazard ratio 1.50; odds ratio (OR) 3.52], furosemide [OR 2.25] or high beta-blocker starting doses [OR 3.10]}. Although several modifiable risk factors were found, many patient characteristics supposedly indicating a high risk of drug-related problems were not part of the assessed risk factors in the context of an increased risk of adverse health outcomes after discharge. Therefore, an obligatory set of modifiable patient characteristics should be created and implemented in future studies investigating the risk for adverse health outcomes after discharge.

Definition of variables required for comprehensive description of drug dosage and clinical pharmacokinetics.

PURPOSE: Electronic clinical decision support systems (CDSS) require drug information that can be processed by computers. The goal of this project was to determine and evaluate a compilation of variables that comprehensively capture the information contained in the summary of product characteristic (SmPC) and unequivocally describe the drug, its dosage options, and clinical pharmacokinetics. METHODS: An expert panel defined and structured a set of variables and drafted a guideline to extract and enter information on dosage and clinical pharmacokinetics from textual SmPCs as published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). The set of variables was iteratively revised and evaluated by data extraction and variable allocation of roughly 7% of all centrally approved drugs. RESULTS: The information contained in the SmPC was allocated to three information clusters consisting of 260 variables. The cluster "drug characterization" specifies the nature of the drug. The cluster "dosage" provides information on approved drug dosages and defines corresponding specific conditions. The cluster "clinical pharmacokinetics" includes pharmacokinetic parameters of relevance for dosing in clinical practice. A first evaluation demonstrated that, despite the complexity of the current free text SmPCs, dosage and pharmacokinetic information can be reliably extracted from the SmPCs and comprehensively described by a limited set of variables. CONCLUSION: By proposing a compilation of variables well describing drug dosage and clinical pharmacokinetics, the project represents a step forward towards the development of a comprehensive database system serving as information source for sophisticated CDSS.